Talk:Tom Bradley (mayor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

--68.192.222.87 21:22, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)tom bradley68.192.222.87 21:22, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)--Tom Bradley site


Tom Bradley WAS NOT the first African-American mayor of a major American city -- Carl Stokes of Cleveland was. He was elected in 1967, five years before Bradley became mayor of L.A.

Plans for Expansion?

For a guy that was mayor of a major city for 20 years, this article is pretty spartan. Lantoka 07:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone loved Tom Bradley; he smiled, kissed babies, was charming, went to dinner parties with the most important people in town, had enormous charisma, and offended no one. He avoided controversy and never pushed for issues that would offend anyone. That's the reason you don't see a section with a long list of his accomplishments.

HI —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.143.222 (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on

Talk:Omar Ahmad (American politician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Military Service?

I was wondering why his time in the LAPD is categorized under military service? The police aren't the military. It should be listed instead under either "Law enforcement career" or "civil service" or something like that, but he wasn't in the military, he was a police officer.

Media appearances

Many people are champions of acceptance and integration, but few are invited to make a cameo appearance in a feature-installment of a TV series where integration was a central theme. Mr. Bradley had a cameo in Alien Nation: Dark Horizon. Few politicians are so widely (or wildly) popular as to have their name given positive inclusion in the script of a contemporary sit-com, but Mr. Bradley was adored by the character Roger Thomas in What's Happening (in contrast to former Presidents Ford and Carter who were not so adored in that series). Granted, not every detail of a person's life can be included in the few bytes afforded to a wiki article, but these media appearances are relevant because they demonstrate the significance of his cultural impact, perhaps more effectively than dry names, dates, and the broad strokes commonly presented in encyclopedic entries. Should they be included? 104.153.219.203 (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

Tom Bradley (American politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley's middle name

I wonder what does the J stand for ? Let me know if you find more information. (725edwards 5:53, February 13, 2019 (CST).

Why was his party affiliation deleted from lede?

There are countless California mayors whose party affiliation is listed in the lede despite technically being a nonpartisan office. And the wording I added did not imply that he was elected to a partisan office, it just listed his party affiliation. You’re welcome to take the time to delete party affiliation from hundreds of other ledes if you think other users would allow that, but I don’t see any reason to specifically exclude it from this specific article. I’m willing to listen to your thoughts if you think there is a good reason though. —169.234.216.238 (talk) 02:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been put back in connection with the governor's race, which was a partisan one. Best wishes. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you, this seems like a reasonable way of handling it. 169.234.216.238 (talk) 02:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Tom Bradley (mayor). Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– Tom Bradley is the most notable historical individual with the name per Wikipedia:Article titles. Every other Los Angeles Mayor is deemed noteworthy enough to not have the (American politician) parenthesis afterwards. Bradley is LA's longest-serving and most significant Mayor, overseeing its transformation from a conservative white city to a liberal Latino-plurality one. We can drop the (American politician) here. Plumber (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: In consideration of the alternative proposed name – robertsky (talk) 05:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • move to Tom Bradley (mayor) is good. There are three American politicians with the name; the other two are disambiguated by middle intials – so (American politician) is incomplete disambiguation. The other two were US representatives; no indication they were ever mayors. – wbm1058 (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Errors regarding football at UCLA

The article twice indicates Bradley played football at UCLA. This is incorrect. The “Black Bruins” book cited never makes that claim, and Bradley himself confirms that he intended to play football when he enrolled but then changed his mind. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-oct-02-sp-28609-story.html Jsmathematics (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]