Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)

Treaty of Rapallo (1920) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 25, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Balkan / European / Italian / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force Italian military history task force (c. 500–present) World War I task force Croatia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Slovenia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Slovenia to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks you can do (watch): Requests: Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl) Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308 Expand: Education in Slovenia Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band) Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles Take/Add requested photographs Yugoslavia High‑importance Treaty of Rapallo (1920) is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 6–14 October 2023.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Regarding the last edit of anonymous user I'd like to ask: what territory gained by the "Treaty of Rapallo" lies in Slovenia? --Romanm 21:26, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Dear user, you have to realise that when you massively modify an article that has been there for a while you should first go trough the talk page or inevitably your edits will be reverted because you are deleting portion of text that were agreed with large consensus in the past. --Silvio1973 (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have only replaced the number which was previously been rounded to 1.5 million, with more precise (less rounded) number - 1.3 million. I gave the source, too. It clearly shows that 1.5 was not the precise number. --DancingPhilosopher ^{my talk} 15:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the version before your edits. Clearly if your edits are reverted you need to go trough the talk page or you will be reverted automatically. This article is about the Treaty of Rapallo, not about Italianization. This last subject is treated in the relevant article. You have already tried to push your POV's without any success in the article Italianization, now you want to do elsewhere. This attitude is becoming disruptive and if your aim is to continue "contributing" to the project in such a way you will be reported. --Silvio1973 (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article now says that after this treaty, Soca was given to Yugoslavia. In other articles (

Before WW1 the last Italian (dark green) village was San Giorgio di Nogaro while Cervignano del Friuli was under Austrian empire (light green) 5.90.133.183 (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. It is clearly a mislabeled place on the map because, in reality, Cervignano is South-southeast of Palmanova, while this place on the map is indicated at a place southwest of Palmanova - quite possibly at the place where San Giorgio di Nogaro is located. Since that particular label adds nothing to understanding of the map, I'll see if it is possible to modify the map by merely removing the erroneous label from the map entirely. Thanks for pointing this out.--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ThaesOfereode (talk · contribs) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dobar dan! This is a good looking article and it looks like most things are in order, but we should fix a few things before I put the rubber stamp on it. THIS ARTICLE HAS PASSED ITS

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The articles regarding Dalmatia were largely ignored. There Italy received the city of Zadar and several islands. – What "there" refers to is unclear. Did Italy receive the city of Zadar in the Dalmatian articles? You sometimes capitalize "eastern Adriatic"; don't. Corpus Separatum separatum – This can be spelled either all lowercase or with "corpus" capitalized, but not both capitalized; cf. MOS:DASH ).
	1b. it complies with the list incorporation .	Get rid of both instances of Furthermore (as per MOS:OFCOURSE ) and this passes with flying colors. I'd consider putting the name of the treaty in Serbo-Croatian and Italian, but that's not mandatory.
2. source spot-check :
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .	Spot check: WP:AGF. Rudolph 2008 looks good. Mentions the "Adriatic question" (Croatian: jadransko pitanje), sense of "across ethnic lines" confirmed by "usklađivanje talijanskih granica mora provesti prema jasno prepoznatljivim crtama nacionalnosti" so that works for me. Kernek 1982 confirms Wilson threatened wrt the Treaty of Versailles. Pavlović 2008 is a real book, but I cannot access the pages cited so AGF pass. Knox 2007, ibid. Carteny 2015 confirms that the Treaty and death of Nicholas I lead to the end of Italian support. Graovac 2004 supports claims of Dalmatian population/demographic changes, cf. O tome najbolje govori činjenica da su ostali veći dalmatinski gradovi do 1931. godine bilježili porast broja stanovnika, posebice Split, dok je Zadar demografski nazadovao, as does high soldier-to-civilian population claims, cf. Značajnu komponentu stanovništva grada činili su vojnici koji su obuhvaćali čak 25% stanovništva. Hehn 2005 confirms the number of Italians and South Slavs affected by the territorial changes.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Residents of Fiume cheering the arrival of Gabriele D'Annunzio and his Legionari in September 1919, when Fiume had 22,488 (62% of the population) Italians in a total population of 35,839 inhabitants – It doesn't look like this was added by you, but it either needs to be sourced or completely removed. Claim that these people were cheering the arrival of D'Annunzio is found in the image origins.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Looks good.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Looks good. Spot check shows clear differentiation between source and prose.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yep.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Adds good background without going excessively into detail about the War. Same with aftermath.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Balances Italian and Yugoslav claims nicely.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Stable. Most of the last two dozen edits were copy-edits.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Looks pretty good. "Territories promised to Italy, by the Entente [...]" is a little iffy, but it passed another GA so I think it's probably fine. Next map seems to have been created by an academic with a WP page, so that's cool. Last map is good. Photos all are clearly marked as public domain.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .	Not only relevant, but interesting and helpful to understanding the topic at hand. I would consider putting "Prime ministers Giolitti and Vesnić [...]" at the top.
	7. Overall assessment.	Just fix the few errors that I pointed out and I think this thing is ready to roll. Congrats on writing a great article!

Thank you very much for reviewing the article. I intend to address your concerns within two days (maybe three). CheersTomobe03 (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ThaesOfereode Could you please look at the changes to the article. Thanks!Tomobe03 (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomobe03: Sve u redu. Looks like everything I marked was fixed and I see no reason now not to promote to GA status. This was a wonderful read; I learned a lot. Congratulations on an excellent article! Hope to see you back at GA soon. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]