Timeline of ceratosaur research

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Ceratosaurus nasicornis

This timeline of ceratosaur research is a chronological listing of events in the

Lydekker and Marsh's hated rival Edward Drinker Cope argued that the taxon was invalid.[3]

The idea of the Ceratosauria would regain some support more than thirty years later when Gilmore argued in its favor in

joints between bones in the skull whose interpretation has been controversial. Paleontologist Robert T. Bakker has interpreted this condition as an adaptation to swallow prey larger than it would otherwise be able to fit through its jaws.[4]

Since the

noasaurid Masiakasaurus knopfleri, named after the lead guitarist from Dire Straits.[6]

19th century

Ceratosaurus nasicornis skeleton restoration by O.C. Marsh from 1896, depicted in an erroneous upright position

1880s

1884

1888

1890s

1892

  • Cope rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1896

20th century

1900s

1901

Genyodectes serus
  • Genyodectes serus.[7]

1910s

1919

  • Othenio Abel rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1920s

Skeletal restoration of known elements of Elaphrosaurs

1920

1921

Sarcosaurus woodi

1925

  • Janensch described the new species
    Labrosaurus stechowi.[7]

1930s

1931

  • Orthogoniosaurus matleyi.[7]

1932

  • Von Huene described the new genus and species
    Sarcosaurus andrewsi.[7] Huene recognized the Ceratosauria and/or Ceratosauridae as valid.[3]

1933

  • Von Huene and Matley described the new genus and species
    O. mobilis.[7]
  • Alfred Sherwood Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1950s

1955

Neotype
specimen of M. crenatissimus (MNHN.MAJ 1), the right dentary of a subadult individual, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris.

1956

  • Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]
  • Von Huene recognized the Ceratosauria and/or Ceratosauridae as valid.[3]

1960s

1964

  • Colbert rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1966

  • Romer rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1970s

1970

  • Rodney Steel rejected the validity of the Ceratosauria and Ceratosauridae.[3]

1979

pachycephalosaur
skull dome

1980s

1980

1985

Carnotaurus sastrei

1986

1989

  • Rowe formally defined the Ceratosauria as theropods more closely related to Ceratosaurus nasicornis than birds, based on Gauthier's 1986 usage of the term.[3]

1990s

Tarascosaurus salluvicus
Velocisaurus unicus

1990

  • Rowe and Gauthier published a node-based definition of Ceratosauria.[3]

1991


1994

  • Thomas Holtz named the Coelophysoidea, then thought to be ceratosaurs. He defined them as all theropods more closely related to Coelophysis than to Ceratosaurus. Holtz defined the Neoceratosauria as all theropods closer to Ceratosaurus than to Coelophysis. He also defined the ceratosaur subclade Abelisauroidea as all theropods closer to Carnotaurus sastrei than to Ceratosaurus nasicornis.[3]

1995

  • Genusaurus sisteronis.[9]

1996

  • Bonaparte described the new genus and species
    Ligabueino andesi.[7]
  • Sankar Chatterjee and Dhiraj Kumar Rudra observed that abelisaur teeth had lower crowns than other carnivorous dinosaurs either within or outside of Ceratosauria.[4]

1998

Restoration of Majungasaurus based on the complete specimen described in 1998.


21st century

2000s

Masiakosaurus knopfleri

2000

  • Madsen and Welles described the new species
    C. magnicornis.[9]

2001

  • Sampson,
    Masiakasaurus knopfleri.[9] They noted that at least six individuals were preserved together. This makes Masiakasaurus the first neoceratosaur to be preserved in association with others of its species.[10]

2002

Aucasaurus garridoi

2003

  • Wilson and others described the new genus and species
    Rajasaurus narmadensis.[12]

2004

2006

  • Malkani described the new genus and species
    Vitakridrinda sulaimani.[citation needed
    ]
Limusaurus inextricabilis

2007

  • Allain and others described the new genus and species
    Berberosaurus liassicus.[15]

2008

2009

  • Xu and others described the new genus and species
    Limusaurus inextricabilis.[18]

2010s

Artistic restoration of Eoabelisaurus

2010

2012

  • Pol and Rauhut described the new genus and species
    Eoabelisaurus mefi.[21]

2013

Artistic restoration of Arcovenator

2014

2016

  • Filippi and others described the new genus and species
    Viavenator exxoni.[26]

2017

2018

2019

2020s

2020

  • Cerronia and others described the new genus and species
    Tralkasaurus cuyi.[32]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Introduction", page 47. Also cf. "Systematics and Evolution", page 64.
  2. ^ a b Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", pages 48–49.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Systematics and Evolution", page 64.
  4. ^ a b c d e Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Paleobiology", page 69.
  5. ^ Holtz (1999"South American Discoveries: Keys to Dinosaur Evolution", pages 48–49.
  6. ^ Sampson (2009); For description and naming, see "Dramatis Dinosaurae", pages 36–37. For family membership, see "Drifting Continents and Globe-Trotting Dinosaurs" page 59.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 50.
  8. ^ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 48.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Table 3.1: Ceratosauria", page 49.
  10. ^ Tykoski and Rowe (2004); "Paleobiology", page 70.
  11. ^ Kellner and Campos (2002); "Abstract", page 163.
  12. ^ Wilson et al. (2003); "Abstract", page 1.
  13. ^ Calvo, Rubilar-Rogers and Moreno (2004); "Abstract", page 555.
  14. ^ Sereno, Wilson, and Conrad (2004); "Abstract", page 1325.
  15. ^ Allain et al. (2007); "Abstract", page 610.
  16. ^ Sereno and Brusatte (2008); "Abstract", page 15.
  17. ^ Canale et al. (2008); "Abstract", page 409.
  18. ^ Xu et al. (2009); "Abstract", page 940.
  19. ^ Ezcurra, Agnolin, and Novas (2010); "Abstract", page 1.
  20. ^ Novas et al. (2010); "Abstract", page 45.
  21. ^ Pol and Rauhut (2012); "Abstract", page 3170.
  22. ^ Farke and Sertich (2013); "Abstract", page 1.
  23. ^ Tortosa et al. (2013); "Abstract", page 63.
  24. ^ Sánchez-Hernández and Benton (2014); "Abstract", page 581.
  25. ^ Dalman (2014); "Abstract", page 181.
  26. ^ Fillippi et al. (2016); in passim.
  27. .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .

References

External links