Underdog
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
An underdog is a person or group in a competition, usually in sports and creative works, who is largely expected to lose.[1] The party, team, or individual expected to win is called the favorite or top dog. In the case where an underdog wins, the outcome is an upset. An "underdog bet" is a bet on the underdog or outsider for which the odds are generally higher.
The first recorded uses of the term occurred in the second half of the 19th century;[2][3] its first meaning was "the beaten dog in a fight".[4]
In
In a story, the Fool is often an underdog if they are the main character. Their apparent ineptitude leads to people underestimating their true abilities, and they are able to win either through luck or hidden wisdom against a more powerful, "establishment" villain. An example in film is The Tramp portrayed by Charlie Chaplin.[6]
Social norms
People often root for underdogs for various psychological and cultural reasons; for example, witnessing and experiencing underdog challenges can lead us to empathise with the effort required to overcome such obstacles, fostering a connection with others who confront similar hardships.[7] This shared understanding may, in turn, contribute to breaking social norms by challenging prevailing expectations and disrupting established power dynamics. Social norms often dictate that success is reserved for those in privileged or dominant positions; however, the underdog narrative challenges this norm by portraying individuals or groups who are perceived as disadvantaged, less powerful, or less likely to succeed.[8] One could argue that individuals or groups perceived as underdogs may face a different set of expectations and allowances within a social context. The underdog is often seen as disadvantaged or less likely to conform to established norms. In this context, society might be more lenient or accept norm violations from underdogs, as their perceived struggles or challenges may evoke empathy or understanding.
Social justice
We also rally round the underdog to satisfy our need for social justice. Supporting the underdog gives us a sense of agency and empowerment as we align ourselves with those fighting against the odds. It reinforces the belief that individuals can overcome adversity and effect positive change, promoting a sense of hope and optimism for social justice efforts. Humans naturally support social justice, as seen in a study publicised by the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.[9] This study examined how individuals and groups manage shared resources. The results revealed differences in resource allocation and outcomes based on group size. These findings shed light on our innate preference to fairness and equality, as how individuals and groups allocate and utilise these resources reflects principles of fairness and equality.
Underdog and schadenfreude
Austrian psychologist Fritz Heider argues that the concept of schadenfreude plays an essential role in the sympathy gained by the underdog particularly when the dominant party is perceived as undeserving of their success. This phenomenon has received attention from social scientists who argue that resentment towards high-status individuals can fuel Schadenfreude when they experience a downfall.[10] Heider suggests there is tendency to root against the "top dog," or those perceived as riding high, indicating a pleasure from watching them fail, thus we support the underdog. The interconnection between rooting for the underdog and Schadenfreude is illustrated in a study by Stephen Ceci and Edward Kain (1982) in the context of political elections.[11] Their findings suggest that exposure to polls depicting a candidate as having a dominant position did not evoke positive feelings towards the underdog but instead created a negative reaction towards the dominant candidate. This negative reaction could be indicative of a form of schadenfreude, where individuals derive satisfaction from seeing the dominant figure falter. When participants were shown the leading contender in the polls, they tended to move away from supporting them, possibly due to a subconscious pleasure in witnessing their potential downfall. However, when presented with information indicating a shift in the polls towards the underdog, participants shifted their support back to the leading contender. This shift in support suggests that the pleasure derived from the underdog's potential victory may not necessarily stem from genuine support for the underdog but rather from the satisfaction of seeing the leading candidate lose their position of power. This highlights how opposition reactivity, possibly driven by schadenfreude towards the leading candidate, influences shifts in support towards the underdog during electoral contests.
Both underdog support and Schadenfreude are influenced by perceptions of deserving and fairness within competitive contexts.[12] The interplay between these two phenomena sheds light on the complex motivations underlying individuals' reactions to competitive situations, where notions of justice, fairness, and deserving play crucial roles in shaping emotional responses.[13]
Limitations of the underdog
Studies supporting the underdog effect often face challenges in accurately assessing its implications. Despite efforts to create realistic scenarios, limitations persist in capturing the emotional nuances and social dynamics present in real-life situations where underdog support is observed. For instance, Stephen Ceci and Edwards Kain's (1982)
Moreover, reliance on
Furthermore, there are challenges in distinguishing underdog support from schadenfreude, underscoring the intricate relationship between these
Additionally, underdog narratives can sometimes reinforce
Cinderella
In sports, the terms Cinderella, "Cinderella story", and Cinderella team are used to refer to situations in which competitors achieve far greater success than would reasonably have been best expected.[15][16] Cinderella stories tend to gain much media and fan attention as they move closer to the tournament final game.[17]
The term comes from the well-known European folk tale of Cinderella, which embodies a myth-element of unjust oppression and triumphant reward, when the title character's life of poverty is suddenly changed to one of remarkable fortune. In a sporting context the term has been used at least since 1939, but came into widespread usage in 1950, when the Disney movie was released that year, and in reference to City College of New York, the unexpected winners of the NCAA Men's Basketball championship also that year.[18] The term was used by Bill Murray in the 1980 movie Caddyshack where he pretends as the announcer to his own golf fantasy: "Cinderella story. Outta nowhere. A former greenskeeper, now, about to become the Masters champion."[19] Referring somewhat inaccurately to the plot details of the classic Cinderella story, the media will debate whether the given "Cinderella" team or player will "turn into a pumpkin", i.e. fail to win the prize and then return to its former obscurity.[20] In the fairy tale, it was the carriage that turned into a pumpkin at midnight, not Cinderella herself. Another popular term is "strike midnight", when a Cinderella team does finally get beaten.[21]
Prior to the widespread use of Cinderella in this way, the more common term for unexpected and dramatic success was Miracle, as in the "Miracle Braves" of 1914, the "Miracle on Grass" in 1950, the "Miracle of Coogan's Bluff" in 1951, the "Miracle Mets" of 1969, and the "Miracle on Ice" in 1980.[citation needed]
Cinderella teams are also referred to as a surprise package or surprise packet, and their success would be termed a fairy-tale run. A related concept is the giant-killer, which refers to a lesser competitor who defeats a favorite, reflecting the story of
See also
References
- ^ Keinan, Anat; Avery, Jill; Paharia, Neeru (November 2010). "Capitalizing on the Underdog Effect". Harvard Business Review (November 2010). Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
"Everyone loves a scrappy underdog", as the article observes. - ^ "Definition of UNDERDOG". www.merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 2016-05-29. Retrieved 2016-06-04.
- ^ The Shorter Oxford Dictionary, Third Edition, 1983. First use 1887.
- ^ The Shorter Oxford Dictionary, Third Edition, 1983.
- ^ ISBN 978-1479840816.
- ISBN 1615930000.
- ISSN 0021-9029.
- ISBN 978-1-4008-7329-6.
- ISSN 1939-1315.
- LCCN 58010801.
- ^ doi:10.1086/268715.
- ISSN 1556-5068.
- ^ PMID 18000097.
- ISSN 0022-2380.
- ^ Merron, Jeff. "ESPN.com: Page 2 : Who are the greatest Cinderella stories?". ESPN.com. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
- ^ Kim, Suzie (26 March 2004). "Cinderella stories: Battling from the bottom up". The Gazette. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
- ^ Bonsor, Kevin (17 March 2003). "How March Madness Works". HowStuffWorks.com. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
- ISBN 9780345513922.
- ^ "Soundclip of Bill Murray in Caddyshack". MovieSoundsCentral. Retrieved 2007-02-26.
- Christian Science Monitor. 22 March 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ "Clock Strikes Midnight for Cinderella Team George Mason - WRIC Richmond News and Weather -". Archived from the original on 2013-12-12. Retrieved 2013-03-24. "Clock Strikes Midnight For Cinderella Team George Mason"
- ^ Oleg Koshelev. The Thunder to the Dominant": the main sensations of the Russian Cup in football (Гроза авторитетов: главные сенсации Кубка России по футболу). TASS.
- ^ Thunder to the Dominant (Гроза авторитетов). HSF.narod.ru
Works cited
- Vogel, Greg; Vieira, Peter (2002). "IFMAR Electric Worlds: On-Road Upset! Tamiya Takes Touring Worlds". Radio Control Car Action. Wilton, Connecticut: Air Age Media: 138. Retrieved 5 June 2020.
- Spinner, Colin (September 2008). "Interview with a Legend". Radio Controlled Car Racer.
- Haswell, Mike (August 2002). "On-Road Worlds 2002". Radio Controlled Car International. Retrieved 5 June 2020.
- Gonzalez, George M (November 1998). "Battle of Britain: IFMAR Electric On-Road World Champs & ISTC World Cups". Radio Control Car Action. Wilton, Connecticut: Air Age Media. Retrieved 5 June 2020.
- Haswell, Mike; McDonagh, Jamie; Emery, Peter (1998). "Welcome to OnTrack '98 with RCCi". Radio Controlled Car International (OnTrack Supplement). Retrieved 5 June 2020.
- Buono, Derek (January 2001). "2000 IFMAR Electric On-Road Worlds". Radio Control Car Action. Wilton, Connecticut: Air Age Media. Retrieved 5 June 2020.
External links
- "Top dog". The Phrase Finder. Retrieved 2013-09-19.