User:RalfHaire/sandbox

There were originally 57 scholarships.[13]^[8]During the ensuing 100 years, the trustees have added about another 40 scholarships at one time or another, though not all have continued. Some of these extended the scheme to Commonwealth countries not mentioned in the will.^[30] A more detailed allocation by region by year can be found at Rhodes Scholarship Allocations. Very brief summaries of some of the terms and conditions can be found on the trust's website.^[31][32] Complete details can be obtained from the nominating countries.^[33]

As of 2017^[update] scholars are selected from over 20 Rhodes constituencies (64 different countries) worldwide.^[34] In 2015 the Rhodes Scholarship extended into new territories, first with the announcement of a number of scholarships for China,^[35] later with the announcement of one to two scholarships per year for the United Arab Emirates.^[36] The organisation administering the scholarships named its first scholars from China in 2017.^[37]The move into China is the biggest expansion since women became eligible in the 1970s.^[38][2]

History

Throughout his lifetime Rhodes accumulated a large fortune. Like many Britain’s at the time he was an ardent colonialist and imperialist, and believed that forging a greater understanding between the English-speaking nations, particularly Britain and the United States of America would be advantageous. By the end of 1908 a total of 189 men had received the scholarship.^[39] At the time the size and scope of the scholarship was unprecedented; however Rhodes' entry restrictions threatened to undermine the future of the trust. In 1907 Madam Thayer had set up a scheme along the same lines as the Rhodes scholarship to bring women from the United States of America to study at Oxford, Cambridge or London. Although still limited to applicants from America and the British colonies the scheme was greeted with enthusiasm, particularly for its reciprocal agreement with American Universities; it did however highlight some fundamental flaws in Rhodes’ own scheme.

from 1916 to 1976 the Rhodes Scholarship was subject to three parliamentary acts.

The Rhodes Estate Act 1916.

Due to rising tensions between Britain and Germany in the run up to World War 1 the scholarship for German Students was withdrawn.^[40]

The Rhodes Trust Act 1929.

Extended the powers available to trustees.

The Sex discrimination act and the Rhodes Trust (Modification) Order 1976.

As a result of the 1975 Sex discrimination act the scholarship was opened up to women.

20th century

In 1925, the

For at least its first 75 years, Rhodes Scholars usually studied for a second Bachelor of Arts degree. While that remains an option, more recent scholars usually study for an advanced degree.^{[citation needed]}

In 2015, Rhodes Scholar R. W. Johnson published a critical account of the decline of the Rhodes Trust under its warden, John Rowett, and commended the recovery under wardens Donald Markwell and Charles R. Conn.^[10]

Cecil Rhodes wished current scholars and Rhodes alumni (in the words of his will) to have "opportunities of meeting and discussing their experiences and prospects". This has been reflected, for example, in the initiation by the first warden (Sir Francis Wylie), of an annual warden's Christmas letter (now supplemented by Rhodes e-news and other communications); the creation of alumni associations in several countries, most prominently the Association of American Rhodes Scholars (which publishes The American Oxonian, founded in 1914, and oversees the Eastman Professorship); and the holding of reunions for Rhodes Scholars of all countries.

21st century

In 2013, during the 110th Rhodes Anniversary celebrations,

In 2015, Rhodes Scholar R. W. Johnson published a critical account of the decline of the Rhodes Trust under its warden, John Rowett, and commended the recovery under wardens Donald Markwell and Charles R. Conn.^[10]

In recent years the Rhodes Trust have shifted from a focus on the individual to an emphasis on what the academic community can achieve through a fellowship of fellowships. In 2016 the Trust began a partnership with The Atlantic Philanthropies, creating the Atlantic Institute. The institute is based at Rhodes house and acts as a knowledge sharing hub for the Atlantic Fellows programs, providing grants for scholars, researchers and those working to tackle today’s global challenges. The £75 million worth of funding has enabled the institute to provide fellows and alumni with additional support, networking opportunities and annual innovation prizes.

In 2017, to address some of the issues surrounding interdisciplinary collaboration in the scientific community, the trust partnered with Eric and Wendy Schmidt to create the Schmidt Science Fellows. The scheme aims to encourage and nurture the kind of interdisciplinary projects that lead to the successful sequencing of the human genome, as well as helping scientists in the early stages of their career develop the leadership skills required to conduct interdisciplinary research.

Controversies

Exclusion of women

The Rhodes Scholarship was originally, as per the language and terms used in Rhodes's will, open only to men. After his death, the will was under the control of the Board of Trustees of the Rhodes Trust. In 1916, however, the trustees introduced a bill into the House of Commons that, catering to popular British sentiment during the War, "revoked and annulled" the German scholarships.^[41] Since then, legal control over the will has resided with Parliament. And absent an act of Parliament, women could not be eligible to apply for the scholarship.

In 1970, the Trustees established the Rhodes Visiting Fellowships. Unlike the regular scholarship, a Visiting Fellow was expected to have a doctorate or comparable degree, and to use the two-year funded study to engage in independent research. Only 33 Visiting Fellowships were awarded.^[42]

In 1975, Parliament passed the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 that banned discrimination based on sex, including in education. The Trustees then applied to the Secretary of State for Education to admit women into the scholarship, and in 1976 the request was granted.^[43] In 1977, women were finally admitted to the full scholarship. To a large degree, this change was the result of the advances of the feminist movement as well as the importance of Title IX legislation in the United States that made illegal sex discrimination in colleges that received federal financial assistance.

Before Parliament passed the 1975 Act, some universities protested against the exclusion of women by nominating female candidates, who were later disqualified at the state level of the American competition.^[44] In 1977, the first year women were eligible, 24 women (out of 72 total scholars) were selected worldwide, with 13 women and 19 men selected from the United States.^[45] Since then, the average female share of the scholarship in the United States had been around 35 percent.^[45]

In his 2008 book Legacy: Cecil Rhodes, the Rhodes Trust and Rhodes Scholarship (Yale University Press), biographer and historian Philip Ziegler writes that "The advent of women does not seem notably to have affected the balance of Scholars among the various professions, though it has reduced the incidence of worldly success." The idea has persisted that women Rhodes Scholars are less successful overall than their male peers, but research from The Rhodes Project, under the leadership of Dr. Ann Olivarius, shows this to be false. Women have achieved significant success at Oxford and beyond.^[46]

In South Africa, the will of Cecil Rhodes expressly allocated scholarships to four all-male private schools. In 1992, one of the four schools partnered with an all-girls school in order to allow female applicants. In 2012, the three remaining schools followed suit to allow women to apply.^[47] Today, 4 of the 9 scholarships allocated to South Africa are open only to students and alumni of these schools and partner schools.^[47]

Exclusion of black Africans

Beginning in 1970, scholars began protesting against the fact that all Rhodes Scholars from southern Africa were white, with 120 Oxford dons and 80 of the 145 Rhodes Scholars in residence at the time signing a petition calling for non-white scholars to be elected in 1971.^[48]: 238 The case of South Africa was especially difficult to resolve, because in his will establishing the scholarships, unlike for other constituencies, Rhodes specifically allocated four scholarships to alumni of four white-only private secondary schools. According to Schaeper and Schaeper, the issue became "explosive" in the 1970s and 1980s as scholars argued that the scholarship be changed while the trustees argued they were powerless to change the will.^{[48]: 236–237} Despite such protests, only in 1991 with the rise of the African National Congress did black South Africans begin to win the scholarships.^[48]: 240

Criticism of Rhodes as colonialist

Public criticism of the scholarship has also focused on Cecil Rhodes's white supremacist views. For example, in 1966, regional committees in interviews asked a white American candidate to assure them he would not publicly belittle the scholarship after he referred to its founding on "blood money".^[48]: 238 In 2015, a South African Rhodes Scholar, Ntokozo Qwabe, began a campaign to address Rhodes' controversial historical and political legacy, with a focus on "dismantling the open glorification of colonial genocide in educational and other public spaces – which makes it easy for British people to believe that these genocides were 'not that bad' – and props up the continuing structural legacies of British colonialism, neocolonialism, and ongoing imperialism".^[49] Among other things, the campaign called for the removal of a statue of Rhodes from Oriel College and changes to Oxford's curriculum.^[50] While the college agreed to review the placement of the statue, the Chancellor of the university, Lord Patten, warned against "pandering to contemporary views".^[51]

A group of Rhodes Scholars also created the group Redress Rhodes whose mission was to "attain a more critical, honest, and inclusive reflection of the legacy of Cecil John Rhodes" and to "make reparative justice a more central theme for Rhodes Scholars." Their demands include, among other things, shifting the Rhodes Scholarships awarded exclusively to previously all-white South African Schools (rather than the at-large national pool), dedicating a "space at Rhodes House for the critical engagement with Cecil Rhodes' legacy, as well as imperial history", and ending a ceremonial toast Rhodes Scholars make to the founder.^[52] While the group does not have a position on the removal of the statue, its co-founder has called for the scholarship to be renamed as it is "the ultimate form of veneration and colonial apologism; it's a large part of why many continue to understand Rhodes as a benevolent founder and benefactor."^[53]

Public criticism has also focused on the alleged hypocrisy of applying for and accepting the Rhodes Scholarship while criticizing it, with University of Cambridge academic Mary Beard, writing in The Times Literary Supplement, arguing that Scholars "[could not] have your cake and eat it here: I mean you can't whitewash Rhodes out of history, but go on using his cash."^[49][54] Reacting to this criticism, Qwabe replied that "all that [Rhodes] looted must absolutely be returned immediately. I'm no beneficiary of Rhodes. I'm a beneficiary of the resources and labour of my people which Rhodes pillaged and slaved."^[53][55] A group of 198 Rhodes Scholars of various years later signed a statement supporting Qwabe and arguing that there was "no hypocrisy in being a recipient of a Rhodes scholarship and being publicly critical of Cecil Rhodes and his legacy – a legacy that continues to alienate, silence, exclude and dehumanise in unacceptable ways. There is no clause that binds us to find 'the good' in Rhodes' character, nor to sanitise the imperialist, colonial agenda he propagated."^[53]

Criticism over recipients not entering public service

The tendency of a growing number of Rhodes Scholars to enter business or private law, as opposed to public service for which the scholarship was intended, has been a source of frequent criticism and "occasional embarrassment".

According to Schaeper and Schaper, "From 1904 to the present, the programme's critics have had two main themes: first, that too many scholars were content with comfortable, safe jobs in academe, in law, and in business; second, that too few had careers in government or other fields where public service was the number-one goal."[59] Andrew Sullivan wrote in 1988 that "of the 1,900 or so living American scholars ... about 250 fill middle-rank administrative and professorial positions in middle-rank state colleges and universities ... [while] another 260...have ended up as lawyers."^[60]

Quality of post-graduate education at Oxford

In 2007, an op-ed by two American Rhodes Scholars caused an "international row over Oxford's status as a top university"^[61] when they criticized the university's post-graduate education as "outdated" and "frustrating" in comparison to their education in the United States, specifically pointing to the perceived low quality of instruction and an insufficient scholarship stipend for living expenses. They also criticized the Rhodes application process itself, arguing that potential applicants should not apply unless they are "ready to study and live in Oxford."^[62]

The original op-ed spurred responses on both sides of the Atlantic.^[63][64][65] Other students criticised the authors for their tone of "ingratitude and entitlement," while The Sunday Times noted that it fueled the "long rivalry between Harvard, Cambridge and Oxford" and existing concerns about the quality of British graduate education. In response, the Rhodes Trust released two statements, one to the Sunday Times saying that "the criticisms ... are unrepresentative of the vast majority of Americans" studying at Oxford,^[66] and another as a reply to the original op-ed arguing that "false expectations," particularly for those uncertain about their degree choice, and going to Oxford for the "wrong reasons," could contribute to dissatisfaction.^[67]

Criticism of political bias

In 2017 a group of Rhodes Scholars called Rhodes Scholars for Intellectual Diversity accused the Rhodes Scholarships of political bias. In particular they criticized that the scholar selection process favors those with left-leaning views. ^[68] The Rhodes Trust denied the allegations. Warden Charles R. Conn called the allegations "perplexing and simply wrong".^[69] The Rhodes Trust banned the spokes person of Rhodes Scholars for Intellectual Diversity from an internal Rhodes Scholar forum. ^[70] Rhodes Scholars for Intellectual Diversity highlighted the discrepancy in numbers between Democrat and Republican Rhodes Scholars in elected office. This was mirrored by reports that around half of the 2017 US class of Rhodes Scholars elect are social justice activists. ^[71]

Controversies over Rhodes Must Fall activists

Joshua Nott, a former publicist for Rhodes Must Fall, was accused of hypocrisy, including by Rhodes Must Fall, over subsequently applying for and accepting a Rhodes Scholarship. The Rhodes Trust was criticized for not awarding the scholarship to someone more deserving. ^[78][79][80]

Notable scholars and career trajectories

Surveying the history of the Rhodes Scholarship, Schaeper and Schaeper conclude that while "few of them have 'changed the world' ... most of them have been a credit to their professions ... and communities", finding that "the great majority of Rhodes Scholars have had solid, respectable careers."^[81] Eight former Rhodes scholars subsequently became heads of government or heads of state, including Wasim Sajjad (Pakistan), Bill Clinton (United States), Dom Mintoff (Malta), John Turner (Canada), Norman Manley (Jamaica) and three Australian prime ministers: Bob Hawke, Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull.

From 1951–1997, 32% of American Rhodes Scholars pursued careers in education and academia, 20% in law, 15% in business and 10% in medicine and science.^[82] Although Cecil Rhodes imagined that scholars would "pursue a full-time career in government ... the number of scholars in local, state and federal government has remained at a steady 7 percent" over the past century. Of the 200 or so scholars who have spent their careers in government, "most of them have had solid, but undistinguished careers," while "perhaps forty or more can be said to have had a significant, national impact in their particular areas."^[83]

At least three scholars have served prison terms since the 1980s (one of them being Mel Reynolds, for statutory rape & Mahmood Farooqui, for rape of a research scholar ^[84]) and around three dozen have committed suicide in the history of the programme.^[85]

Comparison to other post-graduate scholarships

As the first large-scale programme of international scholarships,^[86] the Rhodes Scholarship inspired the creation of other awards, including:

• The international Fulbright Program to teach study/research or teach English in over 150 countries (1946)
• The Marshall Scholarship for Americans to study at any university in the United Kingdom (1953)
• The Churchill Scholarship for Americans to study at Churchill College at the University of Cambridge (1959)
• The Kennedy Scholarship for British nationals to study at Harvard University or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1964)
• The Harkness Fellowship for citizens of nine countries to conduct research related to health policy in the United States (1997)
• The Mitchell Scholarship for Americans to study at any university in Ireland (2000)
• The international Gates Cambridge Scholarship to study at the University of Cambridge (2000)
• The John Monash Scholarship for Australians to study at any university worldwide (2004)
• The international Yenching Scholarship for study at Peking University (2015)
• The international Schwarzman Scholarship for study at Tsinghua University (2016)
• The international Knight-Hennessy Scholars to study at Stanford University (2018)

In structure and selection criteria, the scholarship is most similar to the Gates Cambridge Scholarship, Marshall Scholarship and UK Fulbright Program. Like the Rhodes, the Marshall is a two-stage geographic scholarship organised through districts in selecting countries. Like the Gates Cambridge, the Rhodes is tenable at only one university. In structure, the Marshall Scholarship is more flexible than the Rhodes Scholarship, in that Marshall Scholars can study at any British university and can also attend a different university each year during a scholar's tenure. In addition, a limited number of one-year Marshall scholarships are available. The Marshall Scholarship also places a greater emphasis on academic achievement and potential, requiring a minimum grade point average of 3.7. For example, winners of the Marshall Scholarship from Harvard University have had average GPAs of 3.92, while winners of the Rhodes Scholarship from Harvard have had an average GPA of 3.8.^[87]

See also

• List of Rhodes Scholars
• Chevening Scholarship
• Clarendon Scholarship
• Harry S. Truman Scholarship
• Udall Scholarship
• Thouron Award

References