User talk:144.136.88.8

talk · contribs ) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, cpe-144-136-88-8.pfcz2.cht.bigpond.net.au (144.136.88.8), is registered to Telstra Internet and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, I'm Fdssdf. I noticed that you recently removed some content from South Adelaide Football Club without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fdssdf (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Northern Territory Football Club. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flickerd (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Winterysteppe (talk) 03:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload unencyclopedic images, you may be blocked from editing. Winterysteppe (talk) 03:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Norwood Football Club with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at West Adelaide Football Club with this edit. Jim1138 (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I see that after reverting my carefully constructed list of West Perth players who'd gone onto to play in the V/AFL, with a laundry list of anyone who's played for WP either before, during or after playing in the AFL, you are doing the same to other clubs. Why? What benefit does it give the reader that a category intersection tool can't give? Most are completely non-notable links. And please consider registering and getting a user account. It's actually more anonymous than using your IP address. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 14:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with The-Pope here. These lists of players you are adding are indiscriminate and doubling up the purpose of categories, especially in VFL cases where your lists have been mostly full of AFL-listed reserves players. Please seek a consensus with the

WT:AFL project to get a consensus on these lists before continuing. Aspirex (talk) 07:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Please cease your addition of laundry lists of players in state league clubs without gaining consensus, or at least engaging in discussion on the subject. Otherwise I'll have no choice but to report you for disruptive editing. Aspirex (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do this [1] and then revert it. (Obviously accidental edits happen, but don't do it intentionally, okay?) There's a preview option if you want to see what something will look like before committing it. NE Ent 12:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Road signs in India, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Road signs in India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DatGuy. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 11:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RTRFM. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RTRFM, you may be blocked from editing. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 11:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jack Lynch (West Adelaide footballer)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marvellous Spider-Man 05:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have tagged a number of football clubs as being like advertisements. I disagree with the tags: to my eye, these articles are more or less encyclopedic in style and content. But I'll hear your reasons, so can you please explain to me the rationale behind these tags in each of these articles. Thus far I can see the tags on Port Melbourne, Northern Blues, Werribee, Williamstown, Swan Districts and Box Hill. Aspirex (talk) 08:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Marianna251. I noticed that in this edit to Alby Green, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 10:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lambiam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Road signs in Sweden have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  --Lambiam 21:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Road signs in Thailand, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for it was used to evade a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to List of Talkin' 'Bout Your Generation episodes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Road signs in Azerbaijan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 01:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Road_signs_in_South_Africa, you may be blocked from editing. I see for the past few years you have repeatedly committed the same vandalism. User:I_dream_of_horses I see you had the same issue a few weeks back, please assist. Waddie96 (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Waddie96 (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing as a disruptive editor using this address has returned. History indicates only the one disruptive user on this IP address - may need an indefinite block in future.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SilkTork (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.