User talk:206.213.63.206

Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This IP address, 206.213.63.206, is registered to Banner Health and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mike Zimmer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mike Zimmer was changed by 206.213.63.206 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968941 on 2016-01-11T03:30:46+00:00 .

Thank you.

Hello, I'm Joshualouie711. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cars 3 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Joshualouie711 (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is there any end to the lies of Doug Weller? His first lie was racially motivated, as the director of the NM Museum of Space History is Native American, so that he doesn't qualify as an "academic." Then he went on to lie that something is "crazy" when eBay evidently disagrees by allowing the posting from somebody who has no negative feedback selling esoterica. Nobody this biased should be allowed to be an editor on wikipedia. The most recent lie is to claim that merely linking to a book at amazon, such as New Mexico Space Trail (Images of America) as a means of substantiating a claim, or an item on eBay, doesn't substantiate the related claims, due to such sites being commercial. In that case, then all links should be removed from wikipedia, if they target commercial sites or anything currently on the market. Nobody taking such a position should be allowed to wreak havoc on wikipedia, as such a person is only interested in promoting a biased, narrow-minded point of view, no doubt one that is racially motivated as proven by his digital equivalent to book burning so as to bury contradictory information at commercial sites.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Bauval. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Are you User:Billandcori? I never said anyone wasn't an academic. What's crazy is the ad, selling a " talisman used in thwarting Hillary's 1st run". What's bad is using Wikipedia to advertise the watch. Where did I delete something linked to Amazon? And yes, we don't use ads as sources except for the ad or perhaps the product. Calling someone who blocks racists on sight a racist is just ignorance. Doug Weller talk 19:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All proving my point about there being no end to lies: "Calling someone who blocks racists a racist is just ignorance" is a two-fold lie: doing so isn't ignorance, yet it never happened except in Weller's mind, as it's just well-founded suspicion based on available evidence. Thus, there was no false accusation against Weller. 2ndly, it's hypocritical to call something "crazy" in contradiction of available evidence, such as user feedback or the very existence of posting. Thus, Weller was the 1st to violate the terms of usage, yet wikipedia always circles the wagons against the victims of such hypocrisy, which is what really deters users. Then he adds to the hypocrisy by denying others his right to subjective opinions, by calling their opinions "tirades." But let me clarify that this isn't a personal attack of Weller: instead it's a collective one against all hypocrites at wikipedia, with Weller just being a useful symbol thereof. As for not using ads as sources "except for the ad or perhaps the product" is a half-lie, as the link was to an real-life TALISMAN, i.e. a tangible example of the title of the book being discussed, with copious discussion of its use as such by MASONS, for purposes as discussed in the book. This should actually be considered veiled flattery of Weller for being smart enough to know that this precisely was the case, rather than just engaging in a knee-jerk reaction to defend a half-lie. And it does take intelligence to engage in actions which so faithfully adhere to one's personal bias, which is why I didn't belabor the relevance of the link. As for not deleting something linked to amazon, Weller deleted the source cited for a NM site, which had a link to amazon that made explicit reference to the NM site being approved the the director of a state-of-NM museum, who at least has official capacity to include the site (even if he only got his position and/or included the site on account of being Native). To delete inclusion of a site for not being approved by academic Aryans (they're mostly White) is to treat Native non-academics as inferiors. So in this case, wikipedia shouldn't defer to academics as objective judges as to what's really true.

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Per the above tirade directed at User:Dougweller. Heiro 19:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. . Per the above additional tirade against Weller (and for the record, I called your posts above tirades, not Weller). Heiro 20:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are required to sign your posts, just add ~~~~ (4 tildes) after your post and the software fills in your sig. Heiro 21:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller talk 20:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug. I am not really sure how to respond but my account is "billandcori" and I am very confused about the stuff above about racism. I added information about the town of Westford.

I should add that I do not know what the thing about Mike Zimmer or Cars3 is. I did not have an account in 2016 either.

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nia Long have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to PlayStation 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 11:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Princess Helen of Waldeck and Pyrmont, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]