User talk:69.117.93.145

Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, ool-45755d91.dyn.optonline.net (69.117.93.145), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Optimum Online . It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Introduction to Wikipedia

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 05:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few other notes: Several of the sources you cited were court records and gossip sites. These sources are not acceptable for contentious claims about

edit warring. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 05:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 06:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page was used to flush out concerns. It took awhile for me to get actual concerns out of the user but I addressed his concerns and made appropriate edits. Vandalism and deleting mass amounts of content you don't like is also not allowed on Wikipedia. I was not engaged in a edit war as I was providing valuable information that was being deleted incorrectly. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you're discussing your edits on the talk page, but that should be your first step before reverting. The

blocked from editing. To be blunt, you will most likely be blocked for edit warring and personal attacks if you don't promptly self-revert this edit and retract your accusations of vandalism. I'm about to go to bed, but I'd happy to answer any questions you might have and I should be able to get back to you no later than tomorrow evening. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 07:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You are so missing the point. Vandalism is not ok. Anyone is free to edit but to completely remove almost the entirety of the article is vandalism. It is not an attack but rather a fact. Nobody wants to revert anything on my end however my had was forced at the gross vandalism. Blockquotes were used on my end and when it was pointed out to me that this resource, blockquote, is not acceptable, I made appropriate original summaries of said books and made updates. The sources I cited are extremely reliable and your claiming they are not is an indication of your ignorance in the matter. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I incorrectly assumed that the summaries that you wrote were quotes because their tone was

non-neutral and therefore inappropriate for an encyclopedic article, but they were not copyright violations and I should have checked more closely. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 22:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:69.117.93.145 reported by User:Callitropsis (Result: ). Thank you. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 07:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a personal or professional connection to

As I write this, you have made 23 edits to

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your

Not wasting anybody's time. I am constructively editing the article and have been assailed for doing so. If anything I am the one whose time is being wasted by biased deletions of my verified factual writing. I am researching. My additions are made based on factual findings. Your attempt to censor my ability to reply to these actors is interesting. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will note I made no comment about your article contributions, the sources you use, or the article topic itself. DMacks (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How bout you use your energy for good? Enhance the article perhaps! 69.117.93.145 (talk) 20:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no knowlege of the topic. I am an uninvolved admin, seeking to keep the discussion on track. DMacks (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. It's difficult people keep deleting verified sources I have provided because it harms the ability for an informed decision to be made. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are

not here to write an encyclopedia so I recommend you find a different website for your advertising. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I wondered what was up with 69.117. PROMO had not crossed my mind. Oaktree b (talk) 20:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kathleen's bike (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]