User talk:Abdullah raji

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

September 2022

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Terra (blockchain), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

umm ok, but what are the guidlines i am breaking? Abdullah raji (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't add any source. Addtionally I don't think we normally add info like that. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
oh umm ok? i was kind of exited tho i am new to editing, sorry Abdullah raji (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've left you a welcome message below with some helpful links. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Abdullah raji! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VERI PERI moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uhai (talk · contribs) 04:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

i understand i kind od didnt even fully notice it was published Abdullah raji (talk) 05:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VERI PERI (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Abdullah raji! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
what "reliable 3rd party sources" are there any help? Abdullah raji (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VERI PERI (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires
notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Animals Named after their Feet or legs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

WP:LISTN. VickKiang (talk) 01:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

thanks Abdullah raji (talk) 12:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings depicting the Annunciation

I have reverted your undiscussed and very bad move of a featured article. Please don't do any more like this. See Category:Paintings depicting the Annunciation for one reason why your move was so hopeless. Johnbod (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Popes in alphabetical order (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
Instead please work on
WP:BOLD
and make that change yourself This list will not proceed as it stands, though the concept is a good one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Dear Abdullah,

just because a link is red, doesn't mean it should be removed. Redlinks are sometimes used to suggest to other editors that they might want to create the linked page (provided it is notable enough to merit an article). Because of this, redlinks shouldn't be indiscriminately removed (though they do sometimes require removal).

For more information, you might want to read

WP:RED
.

Happy editing! — Jumbo T (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people which has been designated a

contentious topic
. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware
}} template.

Doug Weller talk 17:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Honeycomb moray (disambiguation)
has been accepted

Honeycomb moray (disambiguation)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Meroperix
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Meroperix. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meroperix has been accepted

Meroperix, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eskoharpes has been accepted

Eskoharpes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that was quick! Abdullah raji (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Triassosculda
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Triassosculda. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Triassosculda has been accepted

Triassosculda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Globoharpes has been accepted

Globoharpes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 15:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

talk) 13:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Links to draft articles

Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monticuliferidae (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
more sources and detail would help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Abdullah raji -- I've deleted this at your request but, despite Theroadislong's decline, I think extinct taxons are generally considered notable. You might like to see whether WP:WikiProject Palaeontology can provide you help or advice. Let me know if you would like the draft refunded to keep working on it. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 10:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I might try again in the future Abdullah raji (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinucleioidea has been accepted

Trinucleioidea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Kathwaia
(November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathwaia has been accepted

Kathwaia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acropyge (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
These are just links into databases. The databases contain the proper academic citations, but these citations need to be copies into the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:Did you know nominations/Triassosculda

Abdullah raji, I was wondering why you attempted to delete this page via the speedy deletion process. I recognize that it was your nomination, but you made the request two days after it had been approved, which is unusual.

The deletion was not done, since you weren't the only person to edit the page. Can you let me know your objections to allowing the nomination proceed at DYK? It sounds like the article was improved during the review process, but if you know of problems with it that should prevent it from being run, that information would be appreciated. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it wasn't going through, so anyways, its on the main page? Abdullah raji (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't on the main page yet, but it could be later this month. Now that I know you didn't have any objections to it ending up there, I'll make sure it's available for promotion there. It may take some time to get there. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Library

As you have over 500 edits, you should be able to access the Wikipedia Library [1], and thus able read most research papers, even closed access ones. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly can i use this, it is quite alien and foreign to me. Abdullah raji (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agnostotes has been accepted

Agnostotes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tapashanites has been accepted

Tapashanites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

QuantumRealm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 06:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Titus Olowokere (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Triassosculda

On 4 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Triassosculda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that until April 2023, when the genus Triassosculda was discovered, the mantis shrimp fossil record contained a gap of more than a hundred million years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Triassosculda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Triassosculda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, yesssss, I was soooo exited, yes! Abdullah raji (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lioharpes
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Lioharpes. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lioharpes has been accepted

Lioharpes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Proetoidea
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Proetoidea. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proetoidea has been accepted

Proetoidea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hattopsis has been accepted

Hattopsis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Triassosculda

The article Triassosculda you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Triassosculda for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paraphillipsia has been accepted

Paraphillipsia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 15:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cummingellinae has been accepted

Cummingellinae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 08:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your AFD nom for Oursai

Hi, I have updated both the article itself Special:Diff/1210418489 and the AFD page Special:Diff/1210418938 to match the instructions for listing an article for AFD. Mentioning here for any future nominations you do. Happy editing and let me know if you have any questions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beretella has been accepted

Beretella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was extremely quick! Abdullah raji (talk) 13:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atrypida has been accepted

Atrypida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 16:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abdullah_raji&oldid=1222897786"