User talk:Abdurhman Ahmad

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to

, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to

]

February 2020

Please stop adding flag icons to article main space that do not meet the guideline at

]

Hello, I'm Gene93k. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pornhub have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. • Gene93k (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superstar (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstar (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Amkgp 💬 15:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

John B123 (talk) 17:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

September 2021

]

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad,

We don't categorize people based on their past or current relationships. Please do not recreate this category or create any more categories like this one. If you have questions, please visit

the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Melitopol, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People who died on their birthdays has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Doc Strange. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Scott Hall, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been informed of this already, a long time ago. Re your edits at

]

12

13 192.145.172.36 (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scientology. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 12:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abdurhman Ahmad: What Cambial is referring to is the BRD cycle described in WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle which is based on the consensus policy. In other words, instead of just making the edit again and again, Wikipedia editors are expected to discuss or debate disputed matters of content on an article's talk page in order to come to a consensus. There is a discussion going on right now at Talk:Scientology#Info templates. Grorp (talk) 00:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of twins, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

Ways to improve Dexter (character)

Hello, Abdurhman Ahmad,

Thank you for creating Dexter (character).

and note that:

Please introduce more

RS

to the article, and make sure that they are adequately cited

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dxneo}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

dxneo (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

By the way, why did you start both Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence and Draft:Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence within a few minutes of each other? —Tamfang (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]