User talk:Aszu23

Hello, Aszu23,

Thank you for creating Bahra 1.

All content of the article must be sourced by reliable sources. There is some unreferenced information on the lead.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including

Hello, Aszu23. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Bahra 1.
Message added 00:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Do this now please - if you initiate a DYK nom it isn't really acceptable to only edit fortnightly. Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected and added new sources, sorry for the delay, nominated before pandemic in my country. I will also complete the hook in a moment Aszu23 (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bahra 1, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bahra 1 in Kuwait is the oldest permanent settlement south of Mesopotamia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bahra 1. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bahra 1), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have speedy deleted the article as a copyright infringement. You must not copy from online sources without marking the copied text as a quotation, and properly attributing it. Even if properly marked, excessive quotations are not acceptable. Wikipedia is very serious about this principle. In academic circles it also counts as plagiarism, as you no doubt know. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the appropriate response, although I did not copy, I made footnotes, and in the second source I cited (Sudan and Nubia 22, 155-166) the information resource was similar and in a similar order, of course you are right that there are too many similarities, I'm very sorry about this mistake, I made the second version as a draft, can I have a request to check if it's ok now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aszu23/Monastery_in_Ghazali Aszu23 (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Monastery in Ghazali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

talk) 17:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you! Aszu23 (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have doubts whether the Polish expedition only approach is best. You may want to ask others at

Just wanted to say thank you for improving this further. Fascinating topics! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For writing and translating articles on archeological sites. Eostrix  (🦉hoot hoot🦉) 09:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Palmyreńskie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]