User talk:Aybeg

Hey. I reverted your edit to Ottoman Empire because it is in conflict with Flags of the Ottoman Empire. Your edit seems suspicious due to your young editing age, so I've reverted it. If you could source your change that'd be great. Thanks. ~NottNott ( ✉ -☺) 16:27, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your heads-up at my talk page regarding Kadir Mısıroğlu.

I've called in a Turkish-speaking admin to help me with this, and we'll sort it out.

I'm posting here just in case you interpreted my reply on my own talk page as a warning to you. As I have now said there, it is not anything of the sort. I am very hopeful we will discuss things and sort them out.

Let me know of any way I can help. Andrewa (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to be getting on top of this. I'm busy with many things so if it gets out of hand again, please let me know on my talk page. TIA Andrewa (talk) 19:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ullierlich. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted some of this editor's edits. I think they're going to need more watching, given this sneaky removal of any mention of the Armenian Genocide. Pinkbeast (talk) 06:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ullierlich. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ottoman Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hizb ut-Tahrir. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vif12vf: The materials I added are mentioned in the article. - Aybeg (talk) 13:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean you can add all of this without explaining your edit or adding sources to the infobox! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. El_C 11:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Hi. "Flagdeco" code is used in all other flags in this article. Can you replace "flagicon" to "flagdeco"? The Turkish National Movement and the Ottoman regime were separate. Thank you. - Aybeg (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Sorry about that. El_C 11:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Season's greetings

I am looking for proactive copy edit support/input help any of the following (So far neglected subjects) articles. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.

• Islamic advice literature
• Draft:Aurats (word)

Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Islam

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source for your claim? The version I used (the link bellow) is backed by two sources claiming it was used during the 1820s.--Catlemur (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Ottoman_Empire_(eight_pointed_star).svg

Provide a source for your edits, undo them all or I will report you for disruptive editing which you have been banned for before.--Catlemur (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Catlemur: I made all my changes for historical accuracy. The five-pointed-star flag was used after 1844. Read the information in Flags of the Ottoman Empire: "The five pointed star did not appear until the 1840s." (Marshall, Tim (2017-07-04). A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-5011-6833-8.) The star and crescent flag was never used in the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, and most of the 18th century. "...the flag was defined as red by decree in 1793 and an eight-pointed star was added." (Publishing, D. K. (2009-01-06). Complete Flags of the World. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-7566-5486-3. Marshall, Tim (2017-07-04). A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-5011-6833-8.) Also about the Ottoman red flag: "According to Rıza Nur, sultan Selim I (1512-20) had a white personal flag, while the Ottoman Army flag was red (kızıl bayrak). During Süleyman I's reign (1520-66) the janissaries had a white flag while the timariot cavalry had a red flag. It was used as the Ottoman civic and merchant flag from 1793 to 1923." (Jane Hathaway (1 February 2012) A Tale of Two Factions: Myth, Memory, and Identity in Ottoman Egypt and Yemen, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-8610-8) - Aybeg (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of people who have been considered deities without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GirthSummit _(blether) 07:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kadir Mısıroğlu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EN-Jungwon 10:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EN-Jungwon: If Mısıroğlu is called a "historian", it is like calling David Irving a "historian". Both of these people have written works with the perspectives given by their extremist ideologies, but neither of them are historians. Mısıroğlu has been a mockery in the Turkish media for his unscientific, superstitious statements at his conferences. He is not taken seriously in academia. As written in the article, "his works came under criticism by historian İlber Ortaylı for lacking scientific approach, knowledge and distorting the facts." In modern times, the professionals who have graduated from the history department of a college can be called historians. Otherwise, we should call every authors, journalists, or amateur researchers who have written books on history a "historian": Murat Bardakçı, Ergün Poyraz, Niyazi Berkes, Erdoğan Aydın, Murat Belge, İlhan Arsel, Necip Fazıl Kısakürek, Nihal Atsız, Celâl Şengör, etc... The reason for the insistence of the user who changes with the IP address 176.55.95.51 and different IP addresses is ideological. Due to he is an Islamist, he tries to give him prestige portraying him as a "historian". For ideological reasons, Islamists impose this guy on people. He is not described as a historian on the Turkish Wikipedia. See this talk page. - Aybeg (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 176.54.25.181 (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of people claimed to be Jesus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. In May 2019 you added a hoax image with this diff. You added the same image to the Turkish Wikipedia and Arabic Wikipedia in June 2020 and the Greek Wikipedia, Catalan Wikipedia, Azerbaijani Wikipedia and German Wikipedia in July 2020. Jr8825 • Talk 06:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Request to visit discussion topic

First round of discussion about 'Difference between Muslim .... and Islamic .... ?' in relation to Wikipedia article titles has been initiated at some article talk pages, including @ Talk:List of former Muslims#Difference between Muslim .... and Islamic .... ?

You are being informed of the discussion, since its seems you have edited related topic previously.

Please do join in discussions, Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 02:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI for edit warring

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 786wave (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

January 2022

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you recently removed content from Irreligion in Turkey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GenoV84 (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GenoV84: Hi, "deism" and "deist" are not proper nouns. Aybeg (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cited sources and references included in the bibliography of the article Deism use the terms "Deism" and "Deist" with the uppercase D. GenoV84 (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Paul the Apostle into List of conspiracy theories. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Irreligion in Turkey, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

esenlikler

bir ricam var sizden. vikisöz'deki PKK maddesini bence vikipedi'deki maddesinde göstermeliyiz "ilgili sözleri vikisöz'de bulabilirsiniz" diye şablon oluyor. kısacası, lütfen ""{{vikisöz}}"" bunu sayfanın en altına ekleyebilir misiniz?

bu sayede vikisöz'deki maddemize akış olacağını umuyorum. kolay gelsin..............

bu arada neden size yazıyorum? çünkü en son siz düzenleme yapmışsınız tr vikipedi'deki maddede.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKK - {{vikisöz}} ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 14:28, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

lütfen yapın. esenlikler :/..... ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 16:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba @Modern primat: Kusura bakma, talebinle henüz şimdi ilgilenmeye başlayabiliyorum. Bakayım. - Aybeg (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ekledim. - Aybeg (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Agop Dilaçar ile ilgili yalanlar

Hocam merhaba, Agop Dilaçar hiç bir zaman Türk Dil Kurumu kurucusu, başkanı ve genel sekreteri olmadığı halde bu yalanlar sürekli İngilizce sayfalarda dillendiriliyor. Dönemine ait Türk Dili Tetkit Cemiyeti bültenlerinden ve Türk Dil Kurultay zabıtlarından kaynak göstermeme rağmen saçma sapan gazete köşe yazıları ya da kapanmış gitmiş blog yazılarını kaynak gösterip bu yalanı yazmaya devam ediyorlar. 1928 Dil Heyeti listesinde olmamasına rağmen Türk alfabesini icat eden diye yazıyorlar. O dönem Bulgaristan'da yaşayan ve Türk vatandaşı olmayan biri Ankara'daki alfabe komisyonlarına nasıl dahil olabilir? Agop Dilaçar'ın Türk Dili dergisinde bizzat kendi yazdığı alfabe makalesinde bile bırak alfabeyi icat etmeyi, alfabe komisyonlarına katkıda bulundum ya da yardımcı oldum gibi hiç bir söylemi yok. Kendisinin TDK'daki tek görevi vardı, o da batı dilleri başuzmanlığı idi. 88.243.159.186 (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@88.243.159.186: Merhaba. Kendinize bir kullanıcı hesabı açarak katkı sunmaya devam etmeniz daha iyi olabilir. IP ile katkı yapanlara vandal gözüyle bakıyor bazıları. Dilaçar konusuna dikkat etmenize sevindim. Ben henüz yeni fark ettim. Aybeg (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hocam, hesap açtım da. Şu İngilizce sayfadaki Türk alfabe mevzusu için yardım edebilir misin? Yine uydurma kaynaklarala Türk alfabesini Agop Martayan icat etti yalanını devam ettirmeye çalışıyorlar. Canuur (talk) 21:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Beshogur: Merhaba. Bu konuyla ilgili sizin desteğinizi/yardımınızı rica ederim. Turkish alphabet ve Atatürk's reforms maddelerinde Dilaçar üzerinden ciddi bir dezenformasyon çalışması yürütülüyor. Ben siliyorum ama geri getiriyorlar. Aybeg (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

-- Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 11:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tahrir Square

Did you mean to delete the 2nd part of this edit? Your edit summary for the full reversion only addressed half of the previous edit. Swliv (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Swliv: There is no a square called "Tahrir" in Istanbul or anywere in Turkey. Aybeg (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.You also deleted another unrelated phrase with your reversion. Thanks .Swliv (talk) 00:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced contents

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced/unreliable source content to the Turkish War of Independence article. 37.155.39.97 (talk) 11:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An old edit on Ottoman Caliphate

Hey there Aybeg I was taking a look at the references on Ottoman Caliphate and noticed one that was lacking in information. Here is a link to your edit which added it. If you could try and add more info on the source you used (Barthold) that would be awesome, cheers! - CapnJackDaniels (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Büyük Doğu edits

If you want to add Islamism then find a source. So your edits will be reverted per Wikipedia:What SYNTH is not, Egeymi (talk) 07:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Kadir Mısırlıoğlu & monarchism

Thanks for referring to a conference in which he said he was a monarchist. Can please you also indicate where in the video timeline he says so in order to make it easier for everyone to hear it directly from himself as well? Veritas.vos.Liberabit.58 (talk) 11:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it soon. Aybeg (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it thanks to a transcription software, without having to listen to a 2-hour conference. Veritas.vos.Liberabit.58 (talk) 10:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently an ongoing discussion on the Talk page and no consensus had been established yet. Reply there. GenoV84 (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]