User talk:Bengali editor

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 16:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islam and Arabic language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and Arabic language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Charyapada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:84Mahasiddhas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamization of Bengali language, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamization of Bengali language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ziaur Rahman Azmi has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Students of Ziaur Rahman Azmi has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Book of Monotheism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AH and Verses.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bengali editor! Your additions to

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ved Prakash Upaddhay.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kalki Avatar and Muhammad book cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 10:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can not understand why I have been blocked, someone should talk to me before blocking me. Can you explain me what is the reason behind blocking me? Bengali editor (talk) 22:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been identified as a

sockpuppet of the blocked user Lazy-restless. You may not edit the encyclopedia while you have been blocked under any account. If you wish to appeal this block you may do so on the user talk page of your original account. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't even know who the lazy restless is. What is the relation between him and me? 202.134.10.134 (talk) 23:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the sock puppet investigation here. The evidence is overwhelming. If you ever wish to be unblocked my first piece of advice is to avoid socking, wait at least 6 months and request an unblock per

WP:SO. You will need to explain in detail what you want to work on, and also that you understand why you were blocked. Socking, especially recently, will count against any unblock request. Denying the obvious will also kill any chance you have of being unblocked. You are also not allowed to edit using an IP address. Any further discussion of this should occur on the talk page user Lazy-restless. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]