User talk:Binamra Deb

Hello,Binamra Deb I am a representative from Agartala Press Club.Today one of our crime reporters Sudip Dutta Bhowmik was brutally murdered by the Commandant of TSR Second Battalion Tapan Debbarma.So,we have decided to make an article about him on wikipedia.As you are an experienced editor and member of Wikiproject Tripura we are requesting you to make a biography on him.You will be payed a fee of 3000 for the Biography.So if you agree please reply on my talk page. Agartala Press Club. Vampirewoods (talk) 04:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A YouTuber with 225 subscribers doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article about them. See Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Binamra Deb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Binamra Deb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one here will believe you when you say that this was your brother. This is such a common excuse that we even have a page about it. (See Wikipedia:My little brother did it). If going forward, you limit yourself to one account and stop using Wikipedia to promote yourself, you'll be fine. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but no. I have no particular reason to trust you, and I will not compromise the investigation simply because you're worried about it making you look bad. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the link. Binamra Deb (talk) 05:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Firangi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapil Sharma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kees08 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Umakanta Academy English Medium instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Umakanta Academy appears to be the same place. I recommend taking the information you have in this article and placing it there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kees08 (Talk) 07:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Umakanta Academy instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Reviewer,Why are you telling the same reason that the two schools are same.They are not same.Please check it again. Thankyou Binamra Deb (talk) 08:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Umakanta Academy. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Given the size of this article, it would be much better to improve the Umakanta Academy article, which is also just a stub. Having one stub instead of two is preferred.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why I am Blocked

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binamra Deb/Archive.I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Respected Administrator,Please tell me why my account is blocked suddenly without any notification. Binamra Deb (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note, though, that your account is NOT currently blocked, not directly. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you do so. --Yamla (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Umakanta Academy. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@1997kB 05:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of reviewing your draft. However, I need at least one independent source that covers the topic in detail. Do you have any national-level source? Or according to WP:NSCHOOL, at least one regional source is required for this. Besides, many of your sources are not accessible. Look into the matter as soon as you can, so that I can reach a decision. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the sources they are accessible.And the first two sources are national level please see them again.Talk to me if you face in problem.Thanks. Binamra Deb (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No in-depth coverage found for the school. Please see WP:NSCHOOL to understand what goes on Wiki. Provide at least one (regional is fine too) source that covers the school in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 07:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Was told to provide a 'source that covers the school in detail' but the newly added reference is about a book fair!!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umakanta Academy English Medium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lal Sarkar (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 06:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kees08 (Talk) 06:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and

(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

• Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
• Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bijan Dhar. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 05:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the references.one thing is that the subject is only covered as Secretary of CPI (M) in Tripura everywhere and central committee member in cpim website.Thanks! Binamra Deb (talk) 11:06, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Binamra Deb (talk) 09:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Any further BLP vios and I will block you. If you can not understand that or why your edits violate our policy then stop editing voluntarily. —SpacemanSpiff 10:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Binamra Deb (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 15:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for accepting it. Binamra Deb (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article body also does not say anything to support the film's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lal Sarkar (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chenzw  Talk  02:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More elaboration and information needed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Jishnu Deb Burman
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 04:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

Mainspace has an article about the same person.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bijan Dhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

• Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
• List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
• Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
• For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest

Looking forward your participation, all the best.

Binamra Deb, You don't have to do this for sure but I think you will understand what I am trying to say here. I just saw your own Draft:Binamra Deb. You and I both know that your personal profile is not eligible to be on Wikipedia (as of now). While I know you are getting used to it and you are quite dedicated towards your contributions for Tripura-related stuff, I would suggest you nominate your own draft for deletion. It is just sitting there and it will be sitting there for who knows how many days/months/years. Hope you get it. I really wish you reach somewhere in life and do something notable and worthy of inclusion in encyclopedia. Please place db-self template on the top of your draft to delete it. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 04:30, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Dial911 you told right.please tell me how to delete the draft because it is of no use to me and I don't care about it.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb (talk) 04:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted it for deletion. Binamra Deb (talk) 04:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are a sport. Dial911 (talk) 05:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Binamra Deb, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

Spiff erred over here.I've retagged.Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou...! Binamra Deb (talk) 14:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to recreate that article. You've been told it's inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But Why its inappropriate..?Please tell. I will submit the draft and if will be published only after undergoing review.So why not.?

Binamra Deb (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's previously been deleted. You can see the discussion at

WP:V. --Yamla (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Biplab Kumar Deb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SFI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you'd attempted to add page protection to an article. Normal editors can't do that - only administrators. A bot has automatically removed the tag from the article. If you feel that a page needs to be protected you need to go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and read the instructions there. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Agartala flyover has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NOTNEWS

, no lasting notability established by the references (which are merely standard news items).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agartala flyover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agartala flyover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Binamra Deb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mamita Debbarma for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Earthh (talk) 21:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapan Debbarma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapan Debbarma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't block I want to edit wikipedia and add more information.Please give me a last chance Administrator please. Binamra Deb (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please don't block I want to edit wikipedia and add more information.Please give me a last chance Administrator please.

Decline reason:

This appears to be a recurring problem. This last instance was pretty troubling; you pretended to be another person and actually had a conversation with yourself while vote-stacking a formal deletion discussion. "I want to edit" is not a sufficient explanation for this deliberately deceptive action. Kuru (talk) 12:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21983 was submitted on Jul 05, 2018 11:14:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:14, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please give me a final chance..please please.I promise to be honest always or please set the time limit of the block.I promise administrator that I will never repeat this on wikipedia. Binamra Deb (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You last socked literally yesterday, no way we're unblocking you right now. Here's a

standard offer: wait 6 months without editing Wikipedia, promise to avoid breaking our rules, don't create any extraordinary reasons to not unblock you. Max Semenik (talk) 20:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment - Its a pity, but not unexpected...Binarma, You are at a very young stage of Wikipedia editing and life in general...6 months is not a very long time... And there are many editors who were indefinitely blocked but came back successfully and doing great here.. But you will have to show some understanding of how Wikipedia works and what is good and what is bad here.. Some sincerity and maturity on your part is needed for you to be an active editor here once again... for your reference I am showing you one example how this guy successfully got unblocked after six months because he didn't do anything silly (like block evasion or creating another account) and after 6 months he convinced the Administrators that he understood the problem and won't repeat the offence again... please see his case and read his last unblock request and act accordingly... All the best..--Adamstraw99 (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstraw99 can I put unblock request again after 3 or 4 months. Binamra Deb (talk) 05:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstraw99 Binamra Deb (talk) 05:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Suppose you can but i would suggest wait it out for 6 months as it will improve the chances of community trusting you that you have required patience to edit constructively thereafter... Also, did you go to this page and read all unblock requests by him -->> [[1]].... I think he was denied unblock when requested before 6 months... read the discussion on that page and make a wise decision... Good Luck :-) --Adamstraw99 (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstraw99 6 months is near to an end.Yesterday I visited my investigation page and found out that another user was considered as my sockpuppet.please check it I don't know that account. Binamra Deb (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not creating any other accounts and not indulging in sockpuppetry, You need not worry, your 6 months are still away ... I would suggest waiting it out for 3 more months.. take care...--Adamstraw99 (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstraw I can wait but the administrator had blocked that user citing Sockpuppet of Binamra Deb.Please see this.Thanks. Binamra Deb (talk) 13:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User"Adamstraw99 Binamra Deb (talk) 13:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstraw99 Binamra Deb (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy, its a checkuser block... Did you read my first comment above posted in July and followed my advice truly? And can you honestly confirm/deny or confess that "Nipe Cold" is not you ??? --Adamstraw99 (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstraw99 I followed your suggestion and didn't created any account in last 5 months nor tried to edit anything.I honestly Confirm that Nipecold is not me.please help me.Thanks Binamra Deb (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dude, A checkuser block is a serious issue..moreover Bbb23 is a check-user Admin and regarded and respected in the community as a pro check-user Admin... So, the best thing right now to do for you is stay away from Wikipedia for another 2-3 months and thereafter put your case in front of the unblock-reviewing Admin, still i think Bbb23 will be the ultimate decision-maker in your case... good luck...Adamstraw99 (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Check user Admin User:Bbb23 I found on my investigation page that another account Nipecold has been blocked as mine sock puppet but I don't know this user.Please check it,I don't want to get false charges on me.With Regards. Binamra Deb (talk) 17:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hey, Ping any user just like this {{ping|Username}} otherwise they can't get notification... i will do it here for you @Bbb23: --Adamstraw99 (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Binamra Deb (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@Max Semenik: Respected Admin,As you told me to wait for 6 months not editing wikipedia I followed it.But two days back when I visited my investigation page I found that another Account Nipecold was blocked as an sockpuppet of mine.I literally don't know Nipecold.What can I do if any account edits my page,I am not responsible for the act.I request you please see the matter.With Regards. Binamra Deb (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxSemenik: Binamra Deb (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Max Semenik: Binamra Deb (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adanstraw99: Will you please leave a note on talk page of Admin Max Semenik,I am not able to ping him.Please help me.With Regards. Binamra Deb (talk) 07:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstraw99: Binamra Deb (talk) 07:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can only ping him for you, This matter will be addressed at the admin level...I'm afraid that I won't be able to help you beyond this point... good luck

hi @MaxSem:, can you please have a look at this case? --Adamstraw99 (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I looked, and since I've already declined Binamra Deb's request I'd rather not review this time. However, in any case, there's nothing to review right now as there's no request to unblock. Let me remind everyone that standard offer is not an automatic entitlement to an unblock, so a (good) request is still needed. Also, I'm pretty bad with date math but I don't think that November is 6 months from July. Max Semenik (talk) 02:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are right 6 month will be completed on December 5.But I just want to point out that another account have been blocked as my sock which I have no connection with.I only request to bring this matter before Admins Curb Safe Charmer and Bbb23.Please help me.With Regards.@MaxSem: Binamra Deb (talk) 06:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from July 5, 2018, is January 5, 2019.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

unusual and suspicious. It is up to the experts in sockpuppet investigations to decide whether my suspicion was right or not. I don't get involved in that, and I am not an administrator, just a normal editor, so I cannot help you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

What can I do if an editor edits pages which I have edited.One thing which I noticed is that Nipecold was trying to make article on N.C Debbarma which I have already created.And Admin Bbb23 has closed the case citing me again as a sockmaster in this case.I have been not editing wikipedia for more then 5 months.please bring the case before Admin Bbb23 please.With regards.@Curb Safe Charmer: Binamra Deb (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did a mistake I counted from june.But Bbb23 I want you to look into the case of Nipecold which you blocked as mine sock puppet.I don't have any connection with that account.With Regards.@Bbb23: Binamra Deb (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

6 months have passed not editing wikipedia.Can I get a last chance.I followed the instruction of Admin MaxSem.I request the Admin Bbb23 to unblock me.With regards @MaxSem: and @Bbb23:. Binamra Deb (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't believe this to be true, we believe you last violated

WP:SOCK in October, 2018. You've protested against that finding, but it's hard to believe your word given your previous abuses. Even if it was true, you can't just wait six months and then demand unblocking. You need to address your previous bad behaviour. --Yamla (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@Yamla: I don't have any connection with NipeCold.That account tried to create article that I have already created and also changed licensing in my pictures.He edited some articles that I also edited this is not my fault.After advice of @MaxSem: I stood away from wikipedia for 6 months and last month I suddenly found this Sock case of NipeCold. Binamra Deb (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxSem: I apologise for my previous behaviour.I accept that I told Tripura GK about the article of Swapan Debbarma but he voted at his wish.His account was not so much active and edited articles that I edited. Binamra Deb (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a last chance and keep an eye on me.If you found me indulge in any anti-policy activity then you may block my account forever.Thankyou.@Yamla: @MaxSem:

Binamra Deb (talk) 13:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: @MaxSem: @Yamla: Today I saw a unblock request on the talk page of NipeCold which was requested on 9th December.Please contact him and and find out the truth.I request you admins. Binamra Deb (talk) 11:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Nipe Cold. That user has not made an unblock request. And no, I'm not going to contact that user, who's an established sockpuppet of yours. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: @Bbb23: I am repeating again that I don't know NipeCold in any way.Please reinvestigate the matter.If you don't contact NipeCold that how the matter will get fixed. Binamra Deb (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: @MaxSem: @Bbb23: Just think that Why I would submit an article by another account Which I akready created. Binamra Deb (talk) 15:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: @MaxSem: @Bbb23: I think that the block is not necessary now and that I have understood the policies of wikipedia.I honestly promise that I would edit wikipedia honestly.And if I get unblocked then I would try to prove myself that I don't know NipeCold.I think this account is from my state Tripura;India so it is getting confused.Thankyou. Binamra Deb (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Binamra, do not ping me again.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not ping me again, either. I've reviewed your block and have nothing more to say here. --Yamla (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Admin,I apologise for my past behaviour.After 6 months of time as given to me by Admin @MaxSem: I came to get a last chance.I promise to work here honestly if you give me a last chance.I have no connection with the account NipeCold which is bring thought as my Sockpuppet.Hoping a last chance with a spirit of true forgiveness.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb (talk) 14:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

The most recent case at the SPI was in November. Assuming user would be eligible for the WP:standard offer 6 months form then the earliest would be in May. Counting from today, sometime in July. Please do not edit under this or any other username till July. That includes unblock requests. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Dlohcierekim: Respected Administrator I understand what you are telling but I previously claimed that I don't know NipeCold and asked to reinvestigate the matter again.After the advice of Admin @MaxSem: I didn't used any other account to edit wikipedia.As soon as I saw the case of NipeCold in my Investigation page I requested the Admins to look at the matter again but nothing was done.Please check the case honourable Admin I request you.I recently visited the talkpage of NipeCold and found an Unbock topic,Where he has given a statement also,I think NipeCold does not know how to put an Unblock request. Sorry for late reply Internet was banned in our area for four days.With Regards and Hope of Judgement. Binamra Deb (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One thing which is possible is that NipeCold belongs to my State Tripura,India as it was given in his userpage. Binamra Deb (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

mangle duplicate -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected Reviewing Admin,As per the offer of @MaxSem:,I abstained from wikipedia for 6 months.I apologise for my past behaviour.Previously my unblock request was rejected on the case of NipeCold but I am tired of saying that I don't know him.Please review the case.

Decline reason:

mangled duplicate. please see my decline aobve -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My unblock request. Binamra Deb (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nioe Cold: I don't know you but my account is blocked because of you.If you want to appeal to get unblock then use {{Unblock}} like this. Binamra Deb (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NipeCold: Binamra Deb (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nioe Cold: use {{Unblock}} to appeal. Binamra Deb (talk) 20:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nipe Cold: Binamra Deb (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected Binamra Deb (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nipe Cold: Use {{Unblock}} to appeal.For You I am blocked. Binamra Deb (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

You are not blocked only because of Nipe Cold. Yamla (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Reviewing Administrator, I have requested to review the case of NipeCold please.I don't have any relation with that account.Please.I have earlier requested to review it but no one believed it.For that account I have been blocked. Binamra Deb (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected Admin, Another 6 months have passed.Please remove my block now.I am suffering from a block that I have no connection with. Binamra Deb (talk) 05:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binamra Deb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Come on. You know better than this. You have to convince us you won't repeat your previous behaviour. This includes

WP:BLP. Procedural decline, no grounds to lift the block at this time. Your next unblock request will almost certainly be your last, so please make sure it covers this stuff in the unblock request itself. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Respected Admin, I have been not editing Wikipedia since a year and I just want a last chance.Please unblock me. Binamra Deb (talk) 05:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste, Binamra Deb. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Binamra Deb. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]