User talk:De Administrando Imperio/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

1 July 2006 Sadr City bombing

Hi TheFeargod, I changed the fatalities on this page from 66 to 62. Most of the news reports I found said 62. I've also had difficulty finding lengthy, and descriptive stories about this bombing. Also, thank you for telling me I was leaving out categories in my articles.User:Bob371, 17 February 2007

NATO bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

Hi TheFEARgod, As I get the impression that there is an edit war unfolding, I took the liberty to jump in. I have edited the infobox to quote directly from the NATO press statement. Please note that the

Casus Belli implies that "a government [needs] to demonstrate that it was going to war only as a last resort", therefore the non-acceptance of the Rambouillet terms is the casus belli, that what ultimately led to the war unfolding. Regards, Asteriontalk 18:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Somalia

I did not "rush" into making it, I have been actively following the progression of the conflict since the battle of Mogadishu and have been surprised that Wikipedia has not covered the event. The article should not be merged into the civil war article any more than the US war in Afghanistan should or the Soviet war in afghanistan should. These are seperate wars or conflicts within a state of civil war, you might call them phases. Just like Afghanistan, this is a seperate phase in the conflict going on in Somalia. So many people are comparing it to Afghanistan to justify a merge, but this is a false justification as the comparison works in favor of keeping the article. The only "rushing" that occured was 8 minutes after the article was first created, and during my efforts to assemble information, it was put up for deletion without any discussion, halting any improvements and making me now have to discuss its deletion rather than add content. People are too eager to jump on others, and seeing the way discussion is going there is really no reason for me to continue to state my case and explain why it deserves its own article. A quick search for the conflict shows most news sources calling it either the Somali or Somalian war, hence the name choice, though obviously it could be moved if someone has a better idea. ~Rangeley (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Arab-Israeli conflict 2006

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. TewfikTalk 16:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Of course. While I obviously don't agree that it should exist, as the creator, you are at minimum deserving of the ability to present your rationale. After all, we are all here for the same goal - to improve the encyclopaedia. Cheers, TewfikTalk 16:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism in Kazakhstan

On

Counter-terrorism in Kazakhstan? The section on "Cooperation with the United States" could possibly also be split. KazakhPol 05:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for the feedback and the template example. KazakhPol 18:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chad

I'm a member to WikiProject Chad, and was interested to know if you would like to partecipate to the WikiProject: I've noted your work on the many conflicts involving Chad, and you seem to have an interest for the country and the region. Also, if you have something to ask concerning Chad, don't be afraid to ask me: I doubt there is anybody regularly in wikipedia that has read more on the country than me. Ciao, Aldux 23:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The

November 2006 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Хвала

Thanks for the barnstar, it has been very frustrating recently detailing with certain users, along with some editors who I really respected deciding to quit Wikipedia, I was considering doing the same. You've convinced me to stick around a bit longer though ;) // Laughing Man 00:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xvala for what

Are you from croatia or where, pricas hrvatski? How much? But stop vandalizing other pages. I suggest you learn how to reply and resolve the problem, since you can not, what is this, you only add who signed it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.2.62 (talk)

Fair use Images

You might want to double check [1], policy number 9 —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by 86.12.249.63 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC).[reply
]

Please do not remove the copyvio tag, It is there so an administrator can determine wether or not you are required to comply with the official Wikipedia policy, shown below,
Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion. This is because it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image only if no free alternative exists and only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum. Exceptions can be made on a case-by-case basis if there is a broad consensus that doing so is necessary to the goal of creating a free encyclopedia (like the templates used as part of the Main Page).
accessed from
Wikipedia:Fair_use#Fair_use_policy
, section policy, bullet point 9
I will leave the image on your talk page until the matter has been adjudicated on 86.12.249.63 21:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The anonymous user is correct. You should not use a fair use image in an user box, as per the policy quoted above. I have removed it. Sandstein 21:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

African military history task force

Hi Feargod

I read your edits on battle of malakal today and wondered whether you would be interested in joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/African military history task force. Greatings Wandalstouring 11:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan-Chadian war

Hi Feargod, I wanted to thank you for your efforts regarding Chadian history, and in particular for

Libyan-Chadian War; I hope too expand it soon, but first I'm waiting for Nolutshungu's history of the Chadian civil war, Limits of anarchy, to arrive from the USA. In the meanwhile, I noted you reverted my last edit; could you explain me your objections? Thanks, and ciao--Aldux 13:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

That was dumb, thanks for correcting.--Aldux 14:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've started expanding the article - any opinions or criticisms regarding the first sections?--Aldux 14:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they do need work, but honestly I've got to right a decent article on the first Chadian Civil War, and work on the biographies of Chad's heads of State. But you could consider asking help or advice from editors like BanyanTree (our chief editor regarding Darfur), or Ezeu or El C. Cheers,--Aldux 21:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

So much better this way. It takes up less room. KazakhPol 19:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks

Thank you for writing up the Red Terror (Ethiopia) article. --Strothra 14:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006 Hamas-Fatah clashes

Please cite your sources. KazakhPol 22:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the wikipedia's doing weird things with the redirs. We each seem to have to repeat the same edit twice for it to stick. -- Kendrick7talk 21:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are messing up naming conventions again. The article should be XXX (December 2006). -- Kendrick7talk 21:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry, nvm -- that last move wasn't even you. OK, I'm not touching this for a while. Too many cooks! -- Kendrick7talk 21:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

Just to let you know, it's not necessary to put dates into the titles of event articles unless needed for disambiguation; otherwise, they're just extra clutter. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 14:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey!

Hey it wasnt me just a co-worker on my account. Never the less theres no need to call me an "Idiot" Leapster 17:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake

We seem to have created two separate articles on the same event, at the very same minute. You made

2006 Hengchun earthquake. The early news reports I read indicated it was in the Luzon Strait. Perhaps indicating it was in the South China Sea is more accurate? I added links to the Luzon Strait version at the bottom of Earthquake#21st_Century and Tsunami#2006_-_Philippines_tsunami. I'll gladly respect whichever title you think is best. If you'd like to change those links and redirect the Luzon Strait earthquake article, please feel free, or let me know and I'll be happy to do it. There is some additional information in the Luzon Strait version, so, of course, feel free to merge it into the South China Sea version if you feel it's beneficial. I'll refrain from editing either until I hear back from you, to keep any further edit conflicts at a minimum. Be well. Justen 13:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

License tagging for Image:Taiwan december 26.gif

Thanks for uploading

image description page
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The

December 2006 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject

As a member of WikiProject Serbia, you should be aware that the project as well as Portal:Serbia is being considered for deletion. If you have the time, please comment on what you feel should be done with the project and the portal. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xinjiang raid (January 2007)

I want to put up

for deletion. Convince my why this is notable enough for its own article. KazakhPol 01:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

You might want to take a look at this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srbosjek

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The

January 2007 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Iraq and WoT

As a part of the Terrorism and Counter Terrorism project, I invite you to participate in discussion on the topic of the relationship between the

War on Terrorism campaign at this location. ~Rangeley (talk) 02:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

2006–present Lebanese revolt

Please move the article to

WP:MOSDASH#Dash guidelines for Wikipedia editors en-dash and em-dash cannot be used in article names. Thanks. (I guess there's a zillion other articles effected in the Military History Project). --213.155.224.232 17:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:MILHIST
Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Somalia ICU forces.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

our fair use policy
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


What's happening???=

What talk should I see? Have you considered discussing such changes with somebody? Alaexis 15:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I first thought you've deleted article contents. Sorry. I agree with the edit. Please update the related pages accordingly. Alaexis 15:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ramallah 2002.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

our fair use policy
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adds to the Iraq war campaignbox

I have added an article about the Karbala insurgent raid and the suicide attack on the military base in Mosul in 2004 to he battles and bombings campaignboxes of the Iraq war. As for the battles there are no mroe to be added just wait for new ones. But for the bombings I also added yesterday the attack on the UN headquarters have you any propositions for any more major suicide attack to be added. Maybe the car-bombing in the summer of 2003 in Najaf I don't remember that much but I think almost a 100 people were killed. Send me a reply. ThanksTop Gun

I think that we should leave the bombings campaignbox of the Iraq war seperate from the terrorism box and create a seperate independent campaignbox for the terrorism in Iraq Top Gun

OK I agree with you for the terrorism box but think that a box with major bombings listed in it should also be there separate from the terrorism box, something like major Kamikeze attacks of the Pacific theater of World war two.Top Gun

Nisam mislio posebne kutije za posebne vrste napada,mislio sam jedna kutijica da obuhvati terorizam u Iraku,ali da u glavnoj kampanjskoj kutijica rata da bude kao sto je i sada borbe i operacije sa leve, a veci bombaski napadi na desnoj jer oni mu dodju isto kao deo rata a ne samo deo terorizma.Top Gun

Re: Terrorbox

Well, the appearance part is trivial to do; the question is whether the change will stick. I'll leave that part up to you! ;-) Kirill Lokshin 13:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dodao sam clanke u terrorbox o napadima u Musayibu, Irbilu, Nasiriji i Karbali, proveri ih i javi mi sta mislis. PozdravTop Gun

Cu da vidim da poradim narednih dana na novim clancima koje si dodao u vezi Crvenog krsta,granatiranja Kufe i Jordanske ambasade pa da vidimo kako ce da ispadne. CaoTop Gun

Avivim incident

I have added a "{{

Avivim incident, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 15:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Pre Christian Armenia

Before converting to Christianity Armenians were pegan. Armenians had many gods. Similar to Greeks and Romans. see http://www.tacentral.com/mythology.asp?story_no=2 Vartanm 10:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petition (kopija maila koji sam danas dobio)

Potpisite peticiju protiv nezavisnosti Kosova i prosledite sajt drugima da ovi proslede trecima itd. Pozdrav!

Hi Friends,

I have just read and signed the petition: "No Independence For Kosovo"

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/905791187


Please feel free to write your representatives in addition to signing the petition. We show solidarity for Serbia and Also We Let Our Representative Know that We Support Serbia Territorial Integrity, with Letters and with Petition.

Note: I cannot change the petition text. So I will write the errata here: Josip Broz Tito was president of Yugoslavia, not of Serbia. Please forgive me the error. Also feel free to write me at [email protected], about any irregular signatures you see on the site. I am able to have those removed.

Thanks!

ThePetitionSite.com provides tools and empowers individuals to make a difference and effect positive change through online activism. Get connected with the causes you care about, take action to make the world a better place, and start your own petition at http://www.ThePetitionSite.com!

ThePetitionSite.com is powered by Care2.com, the largest online network for people who Care2 make a difference. With over 5 million members, we make it easy for you to live a healthy, sustainable lifestyle and protect the environment, human rights, education, women's rights, animal welfare, and much more... all in one place! Join our community at http://www.Care2.com Andrija 22:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)



Molba

Cao imam jednu molbu,ako bi mogao nesto da mi ucinis, jos pre vise meseci sam uradio clanak za Wikipediju pod nazivom Battle of Husaybah, jedna od poznatijih bitaka Irackog rata. Ali sada su rekli da sam previse materijala,istih recenica,iskoristio iz novinarskog izvora koji sam koristio kao referencu pa su obrisali taj clanak i blokirali su me da ga ponovo uradim. A clanak je jos uvek zaveden pod battles and operations u boksu Irackog rata. Pa ako bi umesto mene hteo da napises clanak bio bih zahvalan. Ako pristanes poslacu ti materijal referncu da iskoristis za pravljenje clanka i kako je ranije izgledao moj clanak pa ti napravi izmene. Sacekacu tvoj odgovor. Hvala. Top Gun 15:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Izvini sto ti nisam pre ovo poslao tek sam sad video da si mi poslao poruku.Link je Battle of Husaybah. Uvod i Aftermath su OK ali imali su problema sa The Battle delom clanka. Ovako je izgledao clanak pre kad sam ga ja uradio. Jos jednom hvala.

Battle of Husaybah
Part of the Post-invasion Iraq
DateApril 17, 2004
Location
Husaybah, Iraq
Result U.S. victory
Belligerents
United States United States Iraqi insurgents
Strength
150 300
Casualties and losses
5 killed, 25 wounded 150 killed, 20 captured

The Battle of Husybah was fought in the spring of

United States Marines and insurgents were looking to relieve pressure on the city by atempting an offensive of there own. Ten days before the highway connecting Al Anbar to Baghdad was cut and the insurgents attacked the capital of the province, Ramadi. The attack was repulsed by the Marines and the battle resulted in heavy casualties on both sides. Now the insurgents were ready for another attack, on the city of Husaybah
on the Syrian border.

The Battle

An estimated 300 Iraqis from Fallujah and Ramadi launched an assault against the Americans in Husaybah around eight in the morning, first detonating a roadside bombing and then hitting with 24 mortars. When Marines responded to the bombing, they were met with small-arms and machine-gun fire as they neared a former Ba'ath Party headquarters. They immediately called for a quick reaction force to help them. The force that was coming in to help was mortared and hit by machine-gun fire as they made their way into the city. The quick reaction force platoon dismounted their vehicles and countinued down the streets on foot. The fighting lasted the whole day and it was block by block. The quick reaction force started taking fire from two-story buildings. The platoon continued to push north along a street known to the Marines as "East End Street." All along the street insurgents where occupying houses and where constantly laying down fire at the Marines. The Marines continued north, all the way collecting insurgents and weapons in the back of the hummers. They got to one house that the insurgents were using as a stronghold. The Marines used a school as a rally point to take the house. All the time while trying to take out the insurgents in the house, the Marines were taking fire from every other direction. Heavy machine gun and RPG fire was coming from the insurgents inside the house and the Marines were starting to take on casualties. In addition to the small-arms fire, three rockets were fired at the house. But even that did not take out the insurgents. The platoon decided to smoke the insurgents out of the house. All nine insurgents from inside the house were eventually killed. The house would later be called by the Marines as "The Crack House". The unit continued to push through the hostile town, all the while collecting weapons and detainees as well as wounded Marines. They would meet the rest of the battalion on Market Street. Fighting continued late into the night as Marine Cobra helicopter gunships strafed enemy positions near a downtown soccer stadium and Marine helicopters continued to take wounded to their main base at Camp Al-Qaim. All of the Marines were killed in the first hour of the fighting, four of them when they went to clear out "The Crack House" where Iraqi fighters were hiding. The battalion commander, Colonel Matthew Lopez, said he believed the Marines had crushed the insurgents' attack. I don't think they expected us to retaliate as hard as we did.[1]

Aftermath

Five Marines were killed along with 150 insurgents in the fierce battle that lasted 14 hours. Another 9 Marines were wounded and 20 insurgents captured.[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Marines Recount Fierce Battle".
  2. ^ "Five Marines killed in battle near Syria".

Category:Battles and operations of the 2003 Iraq conflict

Rock music Wikiproject invitation

Hello WikiProject Metal member.
WikiProject Metal music is important in expanding encyclopedic coverage of the metal. It brings attention to the lesser-known bands, and significantly improves the quality of the famous ones. Five Featured articles and two formers is proof of that.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently resurrected

WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music
articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and embrace the links between metal and rock music in general.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 05:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Russi cecenia1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 03:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image:Palestinian militants Gaza.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 03:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image:Iraq shooting down.gif

Image:Iraq shooting down.gif needs an actual source, you are not the photographer/video operator, and it needs to be sourced as to who created it. Also, it therefore cannot be licensed under PD-Self and should be changed to fairusein Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 08:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armenians

Armenians were Pagans before they adopted Christianity, if this answers your question, please see this also

Religion in ancient Armenia Artaxiad 15:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Attack on FOB Marez

Cuj hteo sam da razgovaram sa tobom uvezi napada na vojnu bazu Marez i spajanja ona dva clanka koje si predlozio Bombings and terrorist attacks of the Iraq war i Suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003. Cuj vratio sam napad na Marez jer ta stranica nije samo za terrorist attacks of the Iraq war nego i za Bombings ovo specificno spada u Bombings of the Iraq war, takodje ima jos nekih na toj stranici koji nisu teroristicki napadi nego cisto vojne stvari, kao na primer granatiranje Kufe koji je bio artiljerijski napad od strane nepoznatih lica, mozda cak Amerikanaca, takodje medju teroristickim napadima su i napadi na policijske stanice koji bi mogao reci su legitimne vojne mete kao Marez. To je sto se tice toga treba Marez ostati a sada sto se spajanja predlazem sledece da uradimo da ne spojimo nego napravimo link od Bombings and terrorist attacks of the Iraq war do Suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003 kao sto u kutijici sa frontovskim bitkama ima link do manjih operacija (list of coalition operations). Cuj ova stranica Bombings and terrorist attacks of the Iraq war treba da ostane stranica na kojoj su oni najveci napadi kao centralna kutijica za najvece napade, a da napravimo link pomocu koga ljudi mogu da odu na stranicu Suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003 gde mogu da vide spisak i onih manjih. Treba da razdvojimo manje od vecih. Kao sto smo rekli na toj stranici This is a list of major terrorist attacks of the Iraq War. Javi mi tvoje misljenje, ali ja licno mislim da je ovako najbolje. Ja licno doradjujem Suicide bombings in Iraq since 2003 ali to je samo da bi List of insurgents killed in Iraq bio tacan. Javi mi sta ti mislis.Top Gun 17:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slazem se sa tobom sada bolje izgleda, ali trebali bi smo u tom slucaju da izbacimo iz kutijice bombaskih napada 2004-2007 kidnappings jer ionako sada imamo vec jedan link sa glavne strane teroristickih napada do liste otmica ne treba nam i taj. Jos jedna stvar trebali bi malo da ga smanjimo sa dodavanjem teroristickih napada u campaignbox trebalo bi da se ogranicimo na napade sa vise od 60 mrtvih i kao sto si ti uradio da podebljani budu oni sa vise od 80 i dodajemo one koji su cak iako ima manje od 60 mrtvih spektakularni na televiziji kao Marez,Nasirija,Kanal Hotel ili koalicione barake u Karbali.Top Gun 19:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Strage di nassiriya.jpg

Thanks for uploading

fair use
but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Campaignbox Jemaah Islamiyah

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --— Indon (reply) — 12:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

There are actually rules against running to a notice board and requesting votes for an afd. I think this needs to go to an administrator for advice.[2] Merbabu 13:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2004 Jakarta embassy bombing

Please note that you appear to have reached the limit for

Suro 14:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Alert
Sri Lanka civil war

During the last few days very aggresive pro government edits have removed all negative information about the government such as the suspected involvement of military in the murder of NGO associtesunknown as the

Muttur massacre and its bombing of a former orphange that resulted in the death of at least 51 students Chencholai bombing. I have tagged the article as disputed. Please take a look at it. Thanks RaveenS 19:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Military history/Coordinators

Hello TheFEARgod. Thanks for your support at the Military history elections. With your aid I was able to commision this ship to help plunder the coast of Military history. Na, just kidding. If you ever require any astance all you have to do is ask and you will see my ship on the horizon. Kyriakos 08:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Kutijice

Dao sam moj glas za ocuvanje sa malim zakasnjenjem ali izgleda da je sve dobro proslo lik je povukao svoju nominaciju za brisanje.Top Gun 16:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Campaignbox al-Qaeda attacks

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --— Indon (reply) — 15:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The

February 2007 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 17:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Chadian-Libyan conflict

Hi Feargod, thanks for your template it's really nice, I should have thought about it myself. But I have to disagree regarding your last edit to

Opération Manta, in the edit summary you said a warbox should be built; but the problem is Operation Manta was never thought by the French as a war mission, but as a deterrence mission, and both the French and the Libyans avoided attacking each other, let alone break economic and diplomatic relations. Do you know if there's a sort of "operation box"? Ciao,--Aldux 20:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Nice, thanks, I'll see to add the French strength (3,500 for Manta and 2,200 for Epervier). I wanted to put it in "strength3", but the box has some problem showing the numbers.--Aldux 22:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism in Kazakhstan

Hi, You may remember a while back I split

counter-terrorism in Kazakhstan based on your noting that T in K was getting lengthy. I think you may be interested in weighing in on the AFD currently underway (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrorism in Kazakhstan). KazakhPol 09:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

March 2007 Denmark Riots

Hi, is was wondering if you had a specific reason for supporting this merge [3]. --Hojimachongtalk 01:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Novi napad samoubica u Iraku sa vise od 90 mrtvih

Saljem ti referencu [4] sa podacima o dvostrukom samoubilackom napadu u Hili danas kazu da su 93 osobe poginule,za sada.Top Gun 22:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dodao sam novu kampanju u odeljak borbe i operacije Iraka proveri, Diyala province campaign, i reci mi sta mislis.Pozdrav.Top Gun 06:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somalia

I agree. I'll get to them over the next few days. --Petercorless 08:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


RE: Ethiopian Casualties

I will if I do, but I wouldn't hold my breath. The Ethiopian government is notorious for not giving out casualty figures. —

Ethiopia 14:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

2001 El Salvador earthquakes

I noticed that red link, and am very happy to see that it has turned blue. Thank you! Feeeshboy 22:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tal Afar

Desila su se dva napada kamionima bombama u Tal Afaru ubijajuci 66 ljudi. Mislim da je broj mrtvih dovoljno velik da bi mogli da stvorimo clanak u listi velikih bombaskih napada u Iraku. Sta ti mislis? User:87.116.171.227 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ja citam [5] 45 mrtvih. Nekako me ne privlaci. Ti svakako mozes, ako hoces. --
Ч) 10:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

IfD discusions

Hi. You are receiving this message because you participated in the IfD discusion for either

here. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Operation Epervier

Hi feargod. I see you've moved the article to "Operation Sparrowhawk". The problem is this name is very rarely used even in English to refer to the operation, and instead "Operation Epervier" is by far preferred in the sources I've consulted. When you have objections regarding the name of a Chad-related article, could you first leave me a message, so we can discuss about eventual disagreements? Ciao,--Aldux 22:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bombaski napadi

Izgleda da se ipak broj mrtvih u onom napadu u Tal Afaru popeo sa 45 na 85. Evo ga sad jos jedan [[6]] u Bagdadu ,broj mrtvih 82 to je cak i vise od 80 pa bi trebalo da bude podebljan u kutijici. Desio se istovremeno sa trostrukim napadom u Khalisu gde je 53 poginulo. Uzgred preduhitrio si me, pre mene si doradio onaj clanak o ulicnim borbama sa Etiopljanima u Mogadisuu taman sam bio ja hteo da ga namaknem. Dobro si ga ipak odradio.Top Gun 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Da li da ostavimo ili izbacimo odmazdu nad civilima u Tal Afaru nakon napada, posto fakticki to nije bombaski napad a ta sekcija pokriva bombaske napade.Top Gun 15:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The

March 2007 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Bitka za Mogadisu

Dodam sam reference koje potvrdjuju smrti 22 ljudi 21.marta kada su borbe pocele, ti i Yom stalno zaboravljate da ukljucite njih u broj mrtvih. BBC i Somalinet referencu sam dodao mozes da proveris, one kazu da je 1 Etiopski i 9 TFG vojnika poginulo time ostaje 12 mogucih civila to dodaj na potvrdjenih 381 u novim borbama i to je 393. Uzput 1 Etiopski mrtav od 21.marta plus potvrdjenih 36 u novim borbama to je 37.Top Gun 17:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rekao bih da se bitka za Mogadisu barem za sada zavrsila pa cu promeniti u clanku da vise ne prati aktuelni dogadjaj i da je rezultat bitke bio takticki pat pozicija i strategijski gerilska pobeda.Top Gun 17:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Napad na Iracki parlament

Dodaj sam u clanku odeljku Napad na Iracki parlament u odeljku reakcija nakon napada da su 16.aprila clanovi kabineta koji pripadaju Sadrovoj paravojsci dali otkaz zbog sve vece nesigurnosti u Bagdadu i dbijanja da se postavi datum odlaska Amerikanaca iz Iraka.Top Gun 00:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hidden redirects to advance arguments

I wish you wouldn't do that; it could been seen as a blatant attempt to confuse a closing admin. -- Kendrick7talk 20:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you write "
WP:OR on your part. It would be better to make your agrument in full, that "a" could just as easily redirect to "b". -- Kendrick7talk 22:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Requesting feedback at 2006 Lebanon War talk

Hi, I noticed that you're one of the fairly active editors on the 2006 Lebanon War article. If you have a chance, please take part in the requested move discussion going on there. The move is in regards to whether we should use uppercase "War" or lowercase "war" in the article title. Whether you agree or disagree with my position, your feedback and vote would be appreciated. Cheers. — George Saliba [talk] 18:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that you are pretty busy, but I'd appreciate if you could make the new image for 2006 Lebanon War that was discussed on talk. Perhaps the composite could include a Hezbollah launcher and Israeli artillery piece, and some mixture of damage. Of course you can bring all that to talk if you have any questions :-). Thanks for your help, TewfikTalk 03:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

disaster management

Hi,

I wanted the template there to cover the chopper shootdown (we have no other mention of it). I'm very busy on-wiki right now, but could you possibly start a short sub-stub on the shootdown for the purposes of the disasters project? Please? Thanks, Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ; only e couple of hours ago, an article I've been working on about an eleven-fatality shootdown during the 2007 Battle of Mogadishu was passed as a good article. No-one ever requested a merge or even questioned the notability of the incident since its creation a month ago, including a high-visibility period when it was on DYK. Therefore, I believe an article on the chopper shootdown should be fine. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kutijica sa bombaskim napadima

Jeli, da li se slazes s tim sto je User:Sijo Ripa promenio da podebljano u kutijici budu napadi sa vise od 100 mrtvih, a ne 80. Uzgred dodao sam clanak o napadima u Bagdadu 29.marta ove godine.Top Gun

Claims of police brutality in Tallinn

Hi! I removed your section on that because it falls out of scope for statue. I beleive there is a need for new article called

unsigned comment was added by Borism (talk • contribs) 17:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

Karbala

Dodao sam moje komentare da se slazem sa tobom da nema potrebe spajati ona dva clanka o dva razlicita napada u Karbali, ajde OK mogu barem da se slozim sa njim da stavimo u kutijicu i onaj napad u Karbali sa 42 mrtvih od 14.aprila, mada moje licno misljenje je da taj napad nije imao neki veliki politicki ili vojni znacaj pa ga ni ne treba stavljati, ali neka. Ali strogo se protivim misljenju onog korisnika da treba da budu razdvojeni clanci.(Top Gun

Portal:Istorija

Malo sam preuredio portal:istorija da se clanci menjaju na nedeljnom nivou (posto nije bio osvezavan skoro godinu dana). Ne znam da li cu zbog obaveza biti u stanju da pratim tempo menjanja clanaka, pa se i ti malo aktiviraj. 'Ajd', citamo se. --BokicaK 07:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The

April 2007 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Hrvatska srbi.jpg

Hello, TheFEARgod. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

User talk:TheFEARgod/Archive 1. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image:Immortal.png

Hello, TheFEARgod. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

User:TheFEARgod. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fascism in Estonia

Thanks for contributing to Fascism in Estonia. You however need to edit your contribution as it borrows too heavily on the source. Also note that the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn brought a whole wave of new editors from Estonia. They all seem to have only one agenda, rejecting what they call Soviet occupation denialism. They may see your edits as an example of this denialism. -- Petri Krohn 17:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nothing, so far you have not contributed anything of relevance to the article. --3 Löwi 12:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"From the mid-1930s, when the Omakaitse adherents gained power" is exactly the kind of sentence which indicates that neither its author, nor whoever takes it seriously, possesses even trivial knowledge about Estonian history. It simply does not make sense, as Omakaitse was created only in 1941. Konstantin Päts and other people close to him who gained power in the mid-1930s never even had a chance to become "Omakaitse adherents", as by 1941 the Soviets had either executed or deported them from Estonia. I have been following your recent Estonia-related edits, TheFEARGod, and without fear of any God can tell you that most of them do not qualify for much more than insults to intelligence. Your admitted hate of fascism is okay, but please do not edit articles about things that you have no clue about. Regards,--Klamber 20:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Immortal.png

Hello TheFEARgod, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 12:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello! i see you are editing the lebanon conflict article, thanks a lot! how can we put it on the front page of wiki to raise awarness? Can you PLEASE help me regarding citing, im not sure how put in the numbers and the like, there are two sources. Rgds, Doge120 15:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help, theres quite a lot of backround material on Fatah al-islam we can include, lets see where this goes! Rgds.Doge120 16:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanon

Hello! You think we can protect the page on the Lebanon conflict, theres an abnormal amount of vandalism going on.Doge120 11:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks[reply]

Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Set Nominations/Wars of Africa

Hi TheFEARgod. Could you please have a look at the link and see if you can help? Some articles are needing more references in order to get released. You can leave your comments at the page as well. Thanks in advance. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 17:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Beslan child running.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hariri Tribunal

Hi TheFEARgod. That's a very complicated question, and the answer likely depends on who you ask. :) I may not be the best person to ask, as I don't live in Lebanon, but here it goes.

I believe there could be a few reasons that some Lebanese oppose the tribunal. First, if they were complicit in the assassination, they would oppose it for obvious reasons. For instance, different groups inside Lebanese have been suspected of having a hand in the assassination, including Hezbollah and the current president,

ongoing anti-government protests, the goal of which is to get Hezbollah veto power in the cabinet. If the government continues to function without Hezbollah's say, it greatly diminishes the power of their protests. As such, they may just oppose the tribunal as a way to show that the current government is powerless without them, until they get veto power in the Lebanese cabinet. There's also the whole complexity with Fatah al-Islam
going on now too, which also has some ties to apparently bombings in Lebanon.

Basically, it comes down to two things: nobody trusts their political enemies, and both sides are in a struggle for power. That's my take on the situation at least, but again, I'm no expert, and it's highly complex. ;) Cheers. — George [talk] 19:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that so many groups benefit from a divided or chaotic Lebanon, or, likewise, a subservient Lebanon. Syria could have assassinated Hariri to shut up the opponents to Syrian occupation of Lebanon, or to shut up those who opposed Syrian influence in politics (such as the Syrian-backed extension of the term of President Emile Lahoud). Israel or the United States would could have assassinated him to frame Hezbollah or Syria, two groups it's not too friendly with (though I suspect this move would be too risky for either, but who knows). Hezbollah could have assassinated him at the behest of Syria, or simply to defend their status as a armed militia. Fatah al-Islam or another group, Palestinian or otherwise, could have assassinated him to destabilize the country – either in the hopes of gaining political power in the aftermath, or forming a Palestinian state within Lebanon (similar to as was attempted in the civil war), or to frame Hezbollah. After all, Fatah al-Islam are religious enemies of Hezbollah, and want to be at the "forefront" of fighting Israel in their place. Or someone we haven't even thought about yet. There are a ton of possible suspects, so the case will likely come down to evidence. We'll see. ;) — George [talk] 21:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Turkish-Kurdish conflict#Move war

Hi, I was wondering what you'd think of my compromise proposal? --

chi?
12:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The

May 2007 issue
of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

2006 Lebanon War Mediation

Hi, Shamir1 has opened a medation request for renaming the 2006 Lebanon War article to 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War. As someone who was involved in previous discussions on the topic, I thought you may want to join in. Cheers. — George [talk] 23:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note

While in my writing I may continue to use Israel-Hezbollah, as opposed to the additional "i", I just want you to know that does not reflect my personal opinion of whether to include it or not. While both have the exact same meaning, I acknowledge your concern that one may be more correct. I have not yet looked into the matter in great detail and do not plan on it until the bigger issue is at least somewhat settled. Just wanted to make sure there were no misunderstandings. Thanks for putting your thought into the discussion. --Shamir1 23:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Lebanon conflict

Cao, revizovao sam deo clanka koji govori o konfliktu jer upravu si bio je postajao predugacak. Mislim da je sada okej, takodje posto sada govore da su uhapsili u Beka dolini 13 clanova Al Kaide dodao sam ih u boks pod casualties kao Bomber cells: 13 captured i takodje u brojcanosti sam stavio unknown number of al-Qaeda bombers.--Top Gun

Grdelica train bombing

Hi. Thank you for creating this article. Can you please make sure it conforms to

WP:NPOV? Thanks, --John 18:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

See what you think of the changes I made. I can help you develop the article; it's an interesting bit of history. --John 20:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your edits

I have noticed your edits to a few different articles, including today. you seem like a pretty good guy. just wanted to say thanks for all your diligent efforts. good to know you're out there. feel free to write any time. see you. --Sm8900 14:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) --
Ч) 14:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Virginia Tech massacre

Hey ... when I hit the rollback button, it was before you fixed the photo ... I had assumed (incorrectly) that the image had been deleted and thought I was just removing a deleted image. That photo is actually a news media photo - the license is incorrect and I have tagged it for a speedy on Commons. --BigDT 15:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gaza (2007)

Proveri Timeline of the Palestinian Civil war u njemu sam uneo pojedinacno svaku zrtvu svakog incidenta u zadnja cetiri dana na osnovu Yahoo-vih vesti. Takodje danas AP news javlja da je ukupno poginulo 108 ljudi od subote. Tako sam izvrsio podelu. Jos uvek je malo haoticno ali valjda ce srediti te brojke. Danas na primer su javili da je 14 poginulo u borbi za zgradu uprave, 7 kasnije pogubljeno ispred zgrade, 18 mrtvih nadjeno posle borbe u zgradi, 1 kasnije pogubljen i vucen kroz grad i jos 3 javljeno da je poginulo a ne zna se ko su i kako su poginuli. A povrh svega toga javljaju da je danas samo 29 poginulo, a do juce je bilo 65 a sveukupno kazu 108. Sad vidi i sam pod kakvim uslovima radim. Trudim se da sto tacniji budu brojevi, ali nije lako. Npr javili da je 5 ljudi poginulo u eksploziji juce u Kan Junisu, nisu rekli ko su, pa su jutros rekli da su bili Fatovci pa veceras kazu da nije poginulo 5 nego 13, ali nije potvrdjeno.--Top Gun

Nema problema

Hvala na upozorenju imacu u vidu Snake BGDtalk 14:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Videcu sta jos mogu da uradim.

Zrtve teroristickih napada

Pa, samo u u ovim koje smo vec naveli u glavnom clanku ima 2.797 mrtvih.Top Gun

Categories and templates

I am relatively new to wikipedia and still learning the form and function but I do not understand why you removed some of the templates and categories from pages.--

Kumioko 11:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Libanski konflikt

Dodao sam u clanak danasnji napad na U.N.-ove vojnike zato sto izgleda da je povezano sa onim sto se dogadja u kampu jer su zarobljeni militanti pricali da se sprema napad na mirovnjake, Al-Kaida je pretila da ce ih napasti i Fata je pretila da ce napasti mete van severa zemlje.--Top Gun

Stavio bih na mapi kao teroristicki napad jer su ga vlada i UNIFIL tako okarakterisali plus sada govore da je izgleda to bio samoubilacki napad.--Top Gun

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:De_Administrando_Imperio/Archive_2&oldid=1094781635"