User talk:Frankyboy5

Hello Frankyboy5! sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  14:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

You may want to read

]

NPOV in general

I'll reiterate the above recommendation, specifically as regards your recent edits to

]

Nessie

I am going to echo the two comments above. Adding unreferenced controversial facts will only mean other people have to take them right back out again. That's what the article discussion pages are for. --

]

Ditto :)

Hi Frankyboy5 - I agree with the above. You can see what I had to say about the criticism section for the Nintendo DS Browser on its talk page.

Keep contributing!

Regarding the comment you made here, I was wondering if I could ask you to shorten it? The length 'O' messes with the formatting a bit.--

]

Thanks!--

Crossmr 07:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

This edit you made to New Super Mario Bros. was removed by User:ReyBrujo. Wikipedia is not a video game guide so information like this is likely to be removed, however you may like to add the information to WikiKnowledge which does allow video game guides. Gerard Foley 15:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a read of the link above and do not insert youtube links to content that: 1) is bad style 2) has no relavence here 3) is libelous 4) is a copyright violation 5) is on YouTube!--

]

FYI: After your recent remarks on the LZ 129 Hindenburg article, I added some remarks to the talk page and main page for Image:Zeppelin Picture.jpg. I also posted some remarks about the issue on the Talk page (User talk:Smith2006) for the person who uploaded it. -Wookipedian 19:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use

]

Peafowl ssp

The trouble is that the sources do not appear to carry any weight of authority, and, as we know, information and misinformation are widely copied on the web. The fact that you can give more than one site is largely irrelevant. The fact is that genuinely authoratitive sources such as ITIS and Pheasants of the World treat the species as monotypic, and unless you can find a reference with some weigh to it, this remains as speculation and doesn't really belong in the main article. jimfbleak 05:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(cut'n'pasted from nessie: this is so off topic. By all means let's argue about Christians and witches, but not on the Loch Ness Monster discussion page. A lot of this stuff is about your reactions rather than the LNM article's merits.)

(...from Loch Ness Monster talkpage: It is not a joke, a witch did something to the loch, the webcam, and even claims to protect Nessie. In the TV show, he does that in the beginning of GUST's search. the webcam site is full of "funny" (I call it evil) jokes. I'm never going to that site again. Here's an article about this thing [1]. GUST, or any organization that looks for monsters, should never do this again.

I'm warning christians: Do NOT go to the loch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• Very funny. I doubt that serious Christians give any thought to Loch Ness, so the notion that a witch has something to do with the alleged monster is not likely to stir much interest either.
  Wahkeenah 02:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• 1.the locals around Loch Ness are staunchly Christian. Are you suggesting they move away?
• 2. Are you saying witches are evil? Try reading about witchcraft and Wicca, then decide.
• 3. The witch concerned is Kevin Carlyon, who apparently needs a stretch limo instead of a broomstick [2], and calls himself "High priest of the Scottish Witches" despite living on the south coast of England [3] so he's probably not so much evil as slightly ridiculous. he often traipses up to the loch for these events, and nothing seems to change either way. Have no fear of him.
  Totnesmartin 11:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I'm never ever gonna look at those articles and sites. They're evil, no matter what he claims. The jokes on the webcam site are evil. Gary Campbell is evil. Mikko Takala is evil. GUST is evil (not LOL!). I think that banning all of the sites and the TV show is the right thing to do. I'm being very serious. Frankyboy5 00:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankyboy, you seem to be trapped by superstition. clicking on a link is not evil. You won't go to hell or get turned into a newt. Promise.

Totnesmartin 11:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

additional: you can't go calling people evil, unless you can prove it. It's libellous and they can sue you. Do you have the money for that?

Totnesmartin 12:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually, I'm a Christian myself, and I refuse to click on the links. I now have a reason not to click on the links. But even if the people on the site are not evil, then the jokes and the links are still!. Frankyboy5 23:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I offered the chance to leave blind prejudice behind you, but you turned it down. I am not a Christian yet I read about it, because seeing both sides of an argument helps me develop an informed opinion. The links are there, anytime you want to look and learn.

Totnesmartin 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

In Christianity, all magic is considered evil, even stuff about fairy godmothers, who are considered "nice". Frankyboy5 04:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok let's stop arguing cos we'll never convince each other, and I really want to avoid arguing about whether someone's religion is right or not (those kind of arguments just end up causing bad feeling); I apologise if I offended you.

Totnesmartin 23:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Steve Irwin

I removed it because it was editorialising.

]

Wii

Because there is nothing controversial about the system itself. The BS lawsuits (which I am 100% sure will get dismissed) are mentioned below. ~~

Austin Stevens

I see you have a long history of trying to criticism and controversey different things, where there is no controversey. People are tired of you editorials. We are trying to have a proper encyclopedia, not some blog. I just found this page and it is a little humorous how you are going around adding stuff in articles that is poorly referenced by references that have little weight. Still, thank you for refraining to edit the Austin Stevens article. The information about the show index is great so tanks for that. Max Zorin

20061110 07-44-53albinopeacocks.JPG-Are they really albino?

I believe that the "albino" peacocks in your photo [4] are not albinos but genetic

mutations [5].Frankyboy5 00:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I see now. Thank you. I corrected the photo description. r3 14:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source you added is simply a user webpage, there is no indication of the user's references for the information, it's not a credible source. Anyone can make up a webpage and post anything, this has to be tied to a source, research. KP Botany 19:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a more reputable website, it's from the UPA [6]. Frankyboy5 20:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, more reputable, except that the author does not speak as if she knows what she is talking about: "Most birds and animals do have a naturally occurring gene that eliminates coloring. It is usually recessive as in the white peafowl. Many have declared whites to be albino, but this is not the case." That is what albinism is, an elimination of coloring, hypopigmentation, or lack of melanin. Then she says it is usually recessive, then that white peafowl are not albinos. She gives no reasons for this, and in fact, her discussion leads one to believe she is talking about albinism. Cats for example, can be white due to albinism, the lack of pigmentation, or they can be white due to white masking the other coloration. So, which is it? This article discusses the mechanism of albinism, but then states it is not albinism. KP Botany 21:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many ducks in farms are white, but they are not albinos. Frankyboy5 21:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you were to ask an expert on this subject they would say "No, White Peafowl are not albino." Frankyboy5 21:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then give me that expert's name, the one you quote. This is part of an article on a scientific subject, it includes precise information--what it is that causes the whiteness, and references. KP Botany 21:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anybody who is reaslly an expert in person. But if you were to meet up with a breeder, I expect them to answer your question like that. Frankyboy5 21:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really about that. It has to be something already written down, researched by a professional, and available in the literature. You can't just ask folks, especially if they're like the woman whose web page you gave me, who appears not to understand the terms. You have to find a written, verifiable resource. I know a white peacock breeder. I had a friend in Oklahoma who raised white peacocks. I can't just ask him and report his answer--it has to come from research. KP Botany 22:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot edit anything all because somebody with the same IP as me has been vandalising everything, even though I signed in! Frankyboy5 17:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like you've been autoblocked. Use the {{unblock|REASON TO UNBLOCK}} tag and you will get adminstrator help. I'll just shoot over to

Yuser31415 18:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay, someone will turn up soon.

Yuser31415 18:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Helpme

Hi there, anything I can do to help? Bjelleklang - talk 18:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been autoblocked! Frankyboy5 18:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please post the content of the block message you get here to help us find the autoblock. Without that information its impossible to help. :/ Syrthiss 19:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have already been unblocked! Frankyboy5 19:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, happy editing! Syrthiss 19:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask again if you need any help!

Yuser31415 19:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Congo Peafowl

Any reference(s) about this "hissing viper-like female" ? --Stavenn 01:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank ! I am unable to find any result other than wikipedia or its mirrors for Pavo javanensis. If this is a well established species it should be listed on at least one of the world bird species lists or the red-data book/birdlife site, unless this is a new species in which case the description publication should be easy to trace. In the absence of such citation, it is more likely to be a subspecies. Of course biological species as a concept itself is soft, making it all the more important that the statement be accompanied by a citation of source. cheers. Shyamal 05:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am convinced that the arguments on splitting are on the edge of the subspecies-species debate and should not be introduced into the article unless supported by suitable citations from ornithology journals. So I have taken out references to new species. Hope you are okay with it. thanks. Shyamal 06:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my user page. It has tons of info on this, but it can't be added because it's not that reliable. I can confirm that Kermit Blackwood (made-up name because he was adopted) has many photos of poultry on many sites. The photo gallery has some info, so does the MSN group. Many ornithologist are unaware of the several species notion, and assume Delacour was right. Delacour was not a true scientist, says kermit. Taken from my user page:

"Jean Théodore Delacour automatically assumed that any green-colored peafowl would be included in one species. He then labelled any strange-looking Green Peafowl that does not look like any one of the the typical subspecies as mere "individual variations". One of the birds that was different was an Annamite Dragon.

I find that to be very wrong and misleading. It is very bad science to simply automatically assume that any green-colored peafowl should be included as one species.

I believe that we should not always classify birds as one species just by appearance. For example, while the

Common Teal

are obviously closely related and are sometimes treated as being conspecific, they are more closely related to the Speckled Teal than to each other."

You can keep the article the same way if you want. Frankyboy5 07:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you can ask Kermit in this forum [7] Frankyboy5 07:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank, no it is not about how me or any editor wants it to be. Please feel free to add new information, but just cite the journal article using the <ref> tags. cheers Shyamal 08:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are not journals, which is a problem. The citations are a photo gallery and an MSN group (se my user page for links). Frankyboy5 19:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand. It is important to keep only reliable information by citing only sources that have been reviewed by peers. Information from discussion forums or private web pages are not reliable sources. A new species cannot have been overlooked so easily. And the Indian Peafowl are well studied and if someone is suggesting new species, i would suspect such sources. Shyamal 05:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Until K finishes the first book (about Peafowl) out of a big encyclopedia about galliformes, I guess I'm stuck to the gallery. Kermit (the guy who posts in the gallery) is much more reliable than you think though as K. B. Woods who described the strange Green Peafowl of Yunnan on the Red Data Book is him is him. Frankyboy5 05:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

((unblock-auto|64.59.144.21))

I've contacted the blocking administrator; please see WP:RFCU for information regarding checkuser. In the meantime, please bear with us, and thanks for your patience. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is strange. My IP was something else (24.81.240.231) a month ago when I posted on Wikimedia Commons. Why did it change? Frankyboy5 06:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't say. Dmcdevit has converted the block to anon-only, at least for the time being -- you should be able to edit, provided the situation remains stable. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference picture [8] is a female Lesser Bird of Paradise,

]

That's what I thought, but there still isn't any images of the Lesser Melamepitta on the web. Frankyboy5 17:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can find Lesser Melampitta images (male and female) on "BIRDS of NEW GUINEA and the BISMARCK ARCHIPELAGO - A PHOTOGRAPHIC GUIDE" by Brian J. Coates.

ISBN 0 9590257 4 X on page 215. I can't post it on Wikipedia for copyright reason. --Stavenn 06:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Your comments on Steve Irwins talk page.

Shut up you insensitive little brat, how is it funny that a fatherless child is mouring the loss? 1B6 15:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure, whatever you say, except, why then was there your siginature next to the comment? 1B6 10:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• 1B6 Has since been blocked. Gherkin30 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I only edited the section for grammar - do you have any concerns about the Kermit edits? jimfbleak 06:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of it. If it happens again, just use a {{

]

Helpme

How do I sign up for

Wikiprojects

? Do I just put my name on the list or what?

Yep. That's all there is to it. :)

Nessie

Understandable. I've removed the comment as it was my mistake. Thanks! --PureRED - Kyle Floyd 23:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the article; perhaps I read too much into the intro. Please clean up all unsourced allgations (either properly source or delete them) and try and re-write the article in a more encyclopedic and less "fan-site"y tone. Thanks. -- Avi 02:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frank, Luke has three brothers, and three sisters. His mother thus has seven children (don't forget to count Luke!), not eight. That is what her own website says today. Or do you have information to the contrary? Iph 14:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)iph[reply]

You say "Luke actually has four brothers. The oldest, Matthew, is busy, I think he is in the Navy or something, that's why he is not mentioned." Questions for you:

• (1)This Guardian page from July 30, 2003 says "Jacqui is a single parent of seven (Matthew, 19, Rachel, 17, Sarah, 16, Luke, 14, Anna, 13, Joe, 10, and Ben)" and Ben was then 6. So Matthew is now 23 but he is mentioned. (And Ben is now 10.) So, logically, if there really are eight children now, it would seem that in fact Jacqui Jackson now has another male baby younger than Ben, who is not mentioned on her website, contrary to your claim that it is the eldest (Matthew) who isn't mentioned.
• (2) how do you know there are eight children? Wiki needs references for information. If you knew the family well, how would you get the point about a baby being the unlisted one wrong? But if you don't know them personally, how can anyone be sure your assertion there are eight children is correct?

Iph 15:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)iph[reply]

Yes, I decided to come back with a new user ID and a much smaller watch list, to lessen the likelihood of driving myself crazy. I'm going to try to be more civil this time around. Also, I was getting tired of my old ID anyway. :) Baseball Bugs 04:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to this article. In the section on reintroductions I was wondering if we could modify what you've added as it is rather a lot about the ins and outs of the Green Peafowl and its taxonomy rather than the pitfalls and difficulties of reintroduction in general. The examples used in the article are supposed to be just that, examples, but this section reads as if it is more about the peafowl than conservation. This level of detail is fanstastic for the article on the species but rather too much for a more general article like this one. Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just checked the

article. I'd have to admit that, working professionally with taxonomy, many of the sources in that article are highly suspect (not at least the frequent use of "in litt", which is essentially impossible to check for accuracy). However, as you evidently have been heavily involved in the article, I presume you would be able to help with more accurate citings than:

"K. B. Woods (Kermit Blackwood) in literature, from 2000-present"

I would be very interested in an actual citing of any specific paper authored by above dealing with any of the taxonomical issues of the Green Peafowl. A search failed to give any results (at least none of the major papers that typically deal with avian taxonomy appear to have any publications on this subject by the above author). Indeed, any citings for an article containing any hard data supporting the various suggested subspecies/species would be greatly appreciated (as I understand German, I have read Wolfgang Mennig's article, but it is entirely devoid of hard scientific data). Thanks.

]

• Never mind the above. I hadn't seen the earlier postings on a comparable subject, where it is clear that references, as the ones requested above, are lacking.
  Rabo3 04:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Green Peafowl (continued)

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I've added a response

]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 64.59.144.21 lifted or expired. Sorry for the trouble! Request handled by: – Luna Santin (talk) 02:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Short-tailed Paradigalla

Could you please provide references for your addition to this article (and any others). It will only help to improve WP's reliability, unreliability is it's major criticism. Any questions, please ask me. thanks! --Merbabu 06:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frankyboy, thank you for correcting the facts about national symbol and national bird mix up in

]

The

]

WikiProject Birds April 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 00:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProjet Birds May 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 00:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Michael Jackson

Thanx for spotting there error, cheers. Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 23:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considering joining the MJ wikiproject? Realist² ('Come Speak To Me') 23:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Jackson

If you are interested in setting up a Janet Jackson wikiproject please go to the Janet Jackson talk page and sign on. Cheers. --Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 23:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 13:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Michael Jackson Wikiproject

Wikipedia:WikiProject Michael Jackson/Barnstar Workshop - Take a look. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 00:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008 Birds Project Newsletter Link

The

talk) 16:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hindenburg

"article needs heavy revision and more extensive information regarding the flights of the ship, not design and construction."

Thanks for your weighing in and helping with the post-split clean up! For whatever it's worth, I strongly disagree with your comment above; I'd like to see more technical detail (we're missing many important specifications - I was surprised yesterday how hard it was to obtain these from any

reliable

source) and less intimate detail of Hindenburg's flights.

I'm not saying this to start an argument; quite the opposite - your comment made me reflect that perhaps we have the balance about right! :) Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was your comment above that prompted my thinking on the reorganisation. In most technical aspects, the two airships were identical, and there's no reason to repeat the bulk of this material across two articles. Their careers were, of course, widely different.

But absolutely, if you can contribute an article on LZ 130 of similar scope to what we have on the Hindenburg, please go right ahead! Such an article should focus on the career of the ship.

This division of content is quite consistent with how both

WikiProject Ships organise material. It looks to me like these particular airships are of special interest to you - that's great! But please also consider how these articles fit into Wikipedia in a broader sense. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Just a query - I note that you've now recreated the LZ 130 article from an old copy of the page. But are you actually intending to do any work on it? As it stands, there's nothing there that couldn't be (and in fact, is) covered in the article on the class. Unless you've got actual plans to substantially expand it, I'd lean strongly towards redirecting it to the class until you (or anybody else) actually has something more to say about this particular ship. --Rlandmann (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I was just wondering what your intentions were. Good luck! :) --Rlandmann (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re dogs: true, maybe; encyclopedic, no. Accident reports don't, as a rule, mention every dog & cat, or other pet. Neither should we. As noted, when CNN starts doing it, I'll leave it in. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 23:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MJ project

Please comment here. — Realist² 17:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

1993 child sexual abuse accusations against Michael Jackson. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Realist² 17:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Birds October newsletter

The

talk) 00:20, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Birds November newsletter

The April 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by

talk) 07:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC) [reply

]

WikiProject Birds February newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 21:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds March newsletter

The

talk) 21:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Birds April newsletter

The April 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 15:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds May newsletter

The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 06:07, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June newsletter

The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson projects

Please comment

WP:JANET. — R² 14:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by –

^talk 02:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

A HUGE, SHOCKING DISCOVERY!

BREAKING NEWS!

OTHER USERS, STAND ON ALERT!

THIS USER IS A SOCKPUPPET OF 1B6! BAN HIM QUICKLY! HERE IS THE LINK TO HIS OLD USER PAGE, ON WHICH IT CLEARLY SAYS IT! (current user page says that he is banned with no evidence, so I gave you the old). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:1B6&oldid=117058446

Nice "revenge", bucko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.178.234 (talk) 15:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birds of Paradise hybrids

Hi Frankyboy5 - I note that you placed a disputed neutrality tag on the

hybrids section of the BoP page. Could you please explain why you think the section is biased? The best place to do that would be on the article's talk page. Cheers. Maias (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD nomination of Secret Maryo Chronicles

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy 10th

File:Verre de whisky.jpg

Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia!

WikiLove

by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

What goes around, comes around. Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{

User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 14:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC) [reply

]

about the changes you did on Michael (album)

the way you love me is a demo which was appeared on The Ultimate Collection 2004 as a demo not a full song this is the list of demos appeared on The Ultimate Collection 2004

Scared Of The Moon (Demo) Cheater (Demo) Beautiful Girl (Demo) Sunset Driver (Demo) Shake a Body (Early Demo) P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) (Demo) We Are the World (Demo) Dangerous (Early Version) Fall Again (Demo) The Way You Love Me (Demo)

so don't change it again . Ahmed El Gohary (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

about the changes you did on Michael (album) 2

my friend his a demo not a full track listen to me be carefully the intro isn't a demo it's the an Acapella of michale jackson and his beat box ok Theron "Neff-U" Feemster make this intro of michael's Acapella like he is talking in phone and there's a differ between a remix and re-arrange the remix is to completely change the music and makes a change of the Acapella too while the re-arrange is to make a change in the same arrangement of the song by adding or removing of Musical instrument the music which michale jackson arrange it in the song remains the same so it's re-arrange not a remix

i hope you understand the difference between the remix and the re-arrange . Ahmed El Gohary (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

about the changes you did on Michael (album) 3

In “(I Like) The Way You Love Me,” the vocals are unquestionably by Jackson, who released a different version — “The Way You Love Me,” now described by Sony as a demo — as bait for collectors in the 2004 boxed set “The Ultimate Collection.” That version incorporated the beat-box rhythm, a brisk double time, as part of its beat, and accompanied him with electric-keyboard chords. electric-keyboard is not a piano i'm a electric-keyboard player it's also titled as "Electronic keyboard" but it fact they have the same voice and about for all time the song wasn't remix that's the original mix of the song it's only remastered as it was on a Vinyl record

that's all . Ahmed El Gohary (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Cascio tracks are fake

hi Cascio tracks are fake that's not michael jackson voice it's fake Michael Jackson's nephew said that "I remember when Teddy and I were at Encore listening to Keep Your Head Up. We both knew it wasn't my Uncle."

"Out of the 10 songs listed, only 7 of them are Michael Jackson."

"I've always admired the talent of Teddy Riley, but after hearing him lie on Oprah I am terribly disappointed."

and the real true fans who know michal jackson before his death know that's tracks are fake it's not michael jackson the real vocalist on the Cascio tracks is Jason Malachi and michael album is the worst album of michael jackson by the way sony music (epic) released this album as a studio album but the fact it's compilation of outtakes and feature a two new records which are hollywood tonight and best of joy michael jackson have a huge number of new records but sony don't have any one of them,this new records is with his sister la toya jackson so they fake songs

sony can do any thing for money . Ahmed El Gohary (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

August 2011

Please do not add or change content without

reliable sources, as you did to Bronx Zoo. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Breaking News Hong Kong Promo-CD

Please refer the discussion page of

Breaking News (song), and check the picture of its Hong Kong promo. Parabola1999 (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mitchell Waite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

List of unreleased Michael Jackson material

for featured list removal

I have nominated

featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Rubiscous (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Science lovers wanted!

Science lovers wanted!
	Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Sarah (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. When you recently edited Downhere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somebody to Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

HTC J Butterfly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nexus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HTC One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Hindenburg (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• newsreel transitions into the film in colour, with the ''Hindenburg'' is shown outside its hangar (a matte painting, not actual footage, and along with the opening credits the airship flies by

Thanks,

talk) 04:41, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Green Peafowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irrawaddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo usage

Hi, I'm working on an educational videogame with which I'm trying to build a bridge between animal awareness and Pokemon fans among others. It started out as something small but it's getting bigger and more professional. I saw one of your pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Siamese_Dragon.JPG

And I would like your permission to use it under that license with the following attribution: theSwifty, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Frankyboy5

Also, because I want to make sure there's no misunderstanding, you are the original photographer correct? It sometimes happens that another person simply takes a picture from somebody else and uploads it to wikipedia with a license to distribute. That is why I'm asking.

There is more information on the game here, including a short video that tells a little bit about the background: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/238178285/animalalbum

I also have a demo version of the game available so you can see for yourself in what way the pictures are presented: http://dromedarydreams.com/index/demo/0-8

Please let me know if I have your permission, if the picture is yours and if you want a different attribution.

With kind regards, Sjors Jansen ([email protected]) Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 13:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the leaked version of blue gangsta isn't a remix

hi it's nice to talk to you it's the final version of the song which michael completed it said by Dr.Freeze him self afte rit's leak michael recorded multiple versions of all his tracks as demos untile he comes with the final version so the leaked version is the final version not a remix . and sony don't have it during the release of their fake tracks Inspired by SMOOTH CRIMINAL, Dancers from Michael Jackson THE IMMORTAL World Tour celebrate the release of XSCAPE with this original music video choreographed to BLUE GANGSTA they say original so stop

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MJ & Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S.E.S.. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LZ 129 Hindenburg

Your current edit works; I don't disagree that there are references to the proposal, the reason I had reverted you is that the previous edit stated that mixed cells were part of the design. They never moved beyond the proposal stage, which your current edit does cover.

talk) 18:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Frankyboy5. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hindenburg edits

Could you please proof-read the edits you made? You have grammar problems on both Hindenburg disaster and LZ 129 Hindenburg. Specifically:

Despite this, the skin alone to burn too slowly to account for the rapid spread of the fire, as it would have taken four times the speed for the ship to burn.

and

While at Rio, the crwOn the return flight from South America, the automatic valve for gas cell 3 stuck open.

I also don't see any sources for the significant additions you made. Can you cite them please? Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 02:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the typo. The first source is within the Mythbusters documentary itself. The source for the second line is in Harold G. Dick's book "Golden Age of the Great Passenger Airships" which is in the bibliography. Frankyboy5 (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, don't tell me :-). Put the reference in the paragraph where you added all the details about that first flight. Tarl N. (discuss) 05:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Frankyboy5. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Frankyboy5. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Austin Stevens: Snakemaster

The article Austin Stevens: Snakemaster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]