User talk:Godot13/Archive 1

nominate

) 16:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

Goof faith edit? [2] Guilty as charged. But seriously, thanks for the warning on the keysort. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you could use {{
  hs}}. If I'm not mistaken, AWB avoids templates (and thus you won't have to keep reverting) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Ooops, my bad ;-) didn't realize the typo until it was too late. The visible part has all the proper punctuation/accents, it's just the hidden key sort gets thrown off. Thanks for having a look. --Godot13 (talk) 14:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day from Oz; the computer I'm using at the moment can't cope with the size of the list and it's impossible for me to edit it, otherwise I'd make the change myself: the United States Air Force didn't exist until 1947, so the Port Moresby crash aircraft was from the United States Army Air Forces. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Heizer

Be sure to place a when supporting the hook. Thanks. Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Done, thanks for the reminder. --Godot13 (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

The article

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

A new list appears to be a jargon filled duplication of other lists already on wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Responses to proposed deletion of this list because it is alleged that it is "a jargon filled duplication of other lists already on wikipedia".
• This list is far more comprehensive in scope and quantity than most other aviation accident and incident lists.
• New information, not contained in any other list, has been added.
• This list has higher sorting functionality than any other I have seen.
• This list has exhaustive references to both internet databases and national aviation authority original accident and incident reports.
• Frankly, I think this deletion notice is absurd.--Godot13 (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William 17:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself

with WP:Canvassing. I say this because I see your posts here[3], here[4], and here[5] at User Talk pages....William 20:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for keeping such a watchful eye on me. The first post was to one of the directors of FLC seeking his advice on how to handle the situation and if he could offer any suggestions (e.g., would this effect the outcome of the FLC, etc). The second and third posts were to two users who have been actively reviewing my list in FLC and have made comments that (without solicitation) would directly refute the AfD claims.

• In addition, other than simply summing up where relevant comments have been made, the extent of my commentary was "Is there anything in addition to my response that I should do?" While I understand that canvassing is not appropriate, I'm not entirely sure that watching where I make posts is any more appropriate. May I suggest assuming just a little good faith?--Godot13 (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the

WP:NPA and in your case canvassing....William 00:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

• I have been nothing but civil despite the coordinated attack of aviation editors. So your placement of this comment is inappropriate. Now you are threatening me with ANI for making personal attacks and/or canvassing? Or for seeking advice on how to handle a situation I am not familiar with? Tell me, is there a barnstar for driving people away from the Aviation Project?-Godot13 (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• You accused me of
  WP:Wikihounding 'While I understand that canvassing is not appropriate, I'm not entirely sure that watching where I make posts is any more appropriate'. Looking at the edit histories of other editors who work in projects you're interested in isn't wikihounding....William 01:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• • • First, I didn't even know there was a term "Wikihounding" and second, when you are alerting me to my posts (in a suggestively accusatory manner) at the same time I've just finished sending them, it's just a bit creepy. Honestly, when I set out to create this list, I wanted to make something better than anything else that was out there. Within my target scope, I think I succeeded. Too bad the senior editors of the aviation project are bent on its destruction. If that's not the case, this whole process (something akin to cross between trial by ordeal/fire and hazing) is a bit sadistic.--Godot13 (talk) 02:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• FYI I just took Rambling Man to ANI[6]. He is an administrator....William 02:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Your post came in as I was writing mine:FYI I just took Rambling Man to ANI[7]. He is an administrator. Please tell me how your comment can be construed as anything but a threat?--Godot13 (talk) 02:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, it's clearly designed to make you feel threatened. The accusations levelled at me at ANI came to nothing mind you, other than to waste a lot of valuable community time, so don't worry too much, it just became another example of "the lady doth protest too much, methinks" and more recent edits have further demonstrated the level of ownership some editors attempt to exercise over the "aviation project" lists. Funny that "boomerang" had been mentioned in later edits! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • To
    WP:DEADLINE. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Godot13, in reply to your message, yes, getting involved with aviation articles will doubtless lead you to the cabal that believe they own all aviation articles across Wikipedia, which is a real shame. We had a good start, and even MilbourneOne's comments were being addressed on the talkpage, yet the trigger-happy owners of such articles have deemed this one ready for deletion already. I'm sorry about that, although it's somewhat outside my edit zone. I've had a number of very bad experiences with some editors at the aviation "project", and I suppose I'll just add this to the list. However, the one thing I've distilled out of it which I agree with (and I noted at the FLC) was the fatality %. I'd axe it. In other news, I've yet to do a proper review, so there may be other issues I could find, but the whole AFD thing is a sorry tale of presumed project ownership gone bad. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• (from above) LOL! “A paranoid editor who should beware the boomerang”. I always find the defense mechanism of projection to be so very revealing. I embrace the boomerang (aka Karma) because it will eventually find all of us.--Godot13 (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation!

I wrote it in the {{

List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities is a good useful article, and must have been a lot of work. In my opinion it looks like it was time well spent. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your kind words.--Godot13 (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Palestine-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock-Detail 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 20:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks for your patience with all of this Godot13 I am sure I have raised everything now (just made some points about the columns) at the FL review. It may be hard to believe but I dont think we are that far of finding a resolution for the few things remaining. I am a bit wary of featured anything as in most cases it is a bit of an insular activity that is then used to beat up the rest of us in other articles, "It must be right it is a feature foo" has been used in the past when clearly it has not been the best examples. So if I dont mention things then it gets enshrined in the "good example". That said most of the guys in the aircraft project will pile in and help improve articles on request, a good example is User:Kyteto and his article of the month where he sets himself a target to improve an article then asks for help from others in the project, we then all use a various sources and skills to improve the article. Thanks again for your patience. MilborneOne (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I understand your concerns now. I am trying (FLC and talkpage suggestions) to make as many people happy as possible with edits. Not everyone will always be happy with changes, including me. During the FLC process I have made changes and alterations that I didn't really want to, but the reasoning made sense so it is done. Also, thank you for participating in the FLC review, it has strengthened the list. I saw that you made some comments there, so I'll respond to them there. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 18:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Man... I did not touch your work (I would not dare be this stupid) because here you are king and it's really none of my business how you treat your precious corner of the world, but if you allow me to say something in my defence... the info on the Location column is preventing the table to expand and accommodate the information contained in other parts of the table and make it graphically readable (placing the info to the center makes reading more pleasant as well). The more info we apply to the table, the worse it is (that special collection.net link reads access denied, so there was nothing I could do running the reflink). For instance: "Blue Grass Airport is a public airport located in Fayette County, Kentucky, United States, 4 miles west of the central business district of the city of Lexington." So, there's no need to add anything else than Blue Grass Airport, which is what matters after all. I don't know if other names such as Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst will fit in a minor space, but you could try to shorten long names, avoiding redirects of course. I also took a look on your sandbox 4 (awesome man, simply awesome! Neat and concise!) and noted that the reverse of those bills are placed under the obverse, there being no need for a Portrait column once that info could go to the notes section. Yes, how about trying to place the reverse to the right and narrow the notes column in order to make a ref group number fit? You could like this expand the notes section down by giving yourself more room to write as much info there as you see fit. Krenakarore ^TK 14:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's serious now... I'm having problems as for how to fill in a cell with color in a wikitable. I've tried many things, but to no avail. For instance, the first title in the GE column should have only one square instead of three. Op. 7 has seven subtitles. The GE column should have only one square, but it has seven ! Placing a rowspan solves the problem as for the number of squares, but not when I use a temp:cell. It's in my sandbox. Can you find me a solution ? Krenakarore ^TK 14:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on the citations/references. I've never really used color (at least not on purpose) so I'm not sure I can help, but I'll take a more detailed look later today...--Godot13 (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it, I'm the one who's learning from you. Thank you once again ! Krenakarore ^TK 17:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps keeping the numbers a little more vague (i.e. there have been at least 512 ... rather than "precisely" 512), involving at least xx thousand deaths... etc? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Done-Godot13 (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milbornes talkpage is on my watchlist, so I saw the conversation about tabulating the page. I have a couple of comments on the format which I hope you will see as constructive and not sniping from the sidelines. While a table allows for sorting, it can be constrictive in that it forces you to fit an individual's activities into set boxes when a summary note is more flexible and more accurate. The check box approach also leads to abbreviated column titles which then need explaining. Date of birth is useful but date of death is not compared to the date they were active in aviation since some gave up early. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not seen as sniping at all, I appreciate the feedback. I did find it quite challenging (difficult) to summarize some individual's accomplishments in a smaller space, and I recognize that is the difference between a summary text-style list versus a tabular style list. It seems to me (someone with no real background or expertise in aviation history) that a tabular format list allows for better organization and presentation (e.g., alphabetical order for names and nationality, chronological order for dates, grouping by aviation accomplishments, etc). I guess it comes down to details versus organization. I understand leaving it in it's present format, but it will require almost as much work to bring it up to speed through revision as it would to reformat it into a table. I find it educational and am willing to work on it in either format based on the results of a discussion. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 20:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the minor errors in your table format, it is "June" not Jun, "World War I" not WWI (most historians do not use the abbreviation, although that is often acceptable, in Britspeak, it is still "First World War" and "Second World War"); giving a "bare" URL such as http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Hez%C3%A2rfen should be replaced by a configured reference source: "News at Princeton". Princeton University. (the bare URL is a "broken" tag anyway), dates are written out (in international style as DMY) rather than ISO-style dating (" 2011-03-03": should be 3 March 2011 or March 3, 2011), page numbers are abbreviated as "p." or "pp." (pages) followed by a space; all notations in bibliographic form should be ended in a "sentence" style by a period (full stop); use of a "Harvard comma" in list format is usually deprecated; mixing two reference styles is confusing- there are both American Psychological Association (APA) and Modern Language Association (MLA) styles in use (APA is most often used in the Sciences and MLA in everything else including the Humanities and Social Sciences) and finally, "plane/s" is deprecated as a colloquialism, as well as "aeroplane" as archaic and "airplanes" as a derivation of plane (although there is still quite a bit of controversy over the terminology). Note: I have re-written the "Canada" section into a list form; still my preference instead of a table (as per my already stated reasons). FWiW Bzuk (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think my error was showing an example that is in progress (not finished/polished). It is supposed to show a basic idea of how the list could look, if it were to be finished. I think I made that somewhat clear on the talk page. (Also, in table construction, using DD MMM YYYY format is perfectly acceptable).--Godot13 (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Godot13. You have new messages at TheLongTone's talk page.
Message added 20:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheLongTone (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Godot13, I have just resolved some wording (near paraphrasing) issues with the Charles R. Chickering (artist) nomination and was hoping you could take another peek at it if you have the time, as things seem to be moving kinda slow over there. -- Gwillhickers 23:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you're comments, I've responded to them. Regards. --TIAYN (talk) 12:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand what you mean by "Sort by rank not done".. Since the doubles ranking were sorted according to the highest number in the team... Is the current version better? --TIAYN (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning to respond to the Mikhail Youzhny career statistics FL review?--TIAYN (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As Harrias already mentioned in the FLC review, we are all volunteers here. If someone doesn't take action as soon as you make a request, be patient.-Godot13 (talk) 06:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to be aggressive and rude, it was just a bad wording choice .... However, I'm going to be fairly rud now, in reply to you're "The new sorting/table style for the doubles matches is actually somewhat confusing", how does that help me? .... What do I need to improve? I'm still not getting it. --TIAYN (talk) 13:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I called you rude, just a bit impatient. Your reply, which you caution as being rude is actually not rude at all, but a fair question. I responded on the FLC review page. Let me know if you have any questions.-Godot13 (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is where I get lost, the former version did sort after rank (the highest ranking of the individual member of the doubles team)... So for instance, if the team has one player ranked 40, and another one ranked 7, the team is ranked 7.. Are you saying you want one, uniform ranking? If so, they do not exist. --TIAYN (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I see what the problem is: using the original double table, if you actually use the sort feature for the rank column, see what happens - the top player of the doubles pair is sorted by rank, but it is not perfectly chronological. The 7th pair and the 9th pair are not in order. This was my original concern. You could simply remove the sort function from the rank column (versus a fairly labor-intensive use of hidden-keys) and keep the original design because it is visually better. Does this make sense?-Godot13 (talk) 19:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just want you to support the article :p .. no, but seriously, I have to be really stupid because I don't see it... Anyhow, I've readded the old table, and removed sortability from the Rank column. It should be fine now, right? --TIAYN (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I think I've actually fixed the problem, better now (the old one is still there)--TIAYN (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --TIAYN (talk) 07:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Israel-2013-Tel Aviv 01-Reading Power Station.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 02:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Israel-2013-Jaffa 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 07:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Czech-2013-Prague-Astronomical clock face.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 19:59, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Godot13,

I noticed that you've been uploading many great images taken in Israel. FYI, the

Please let me know if I can help you in contributing your photos uploaded between September 15 and October 15 to WLM.

Thanks, —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 14:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ynhockey- Thanks for the message. I have had some difficulty figuring out which are the appropriate monument tags for some images and if you feel like adding the relevant tag for inclusion in WLM I would be very appreciative. Also, I have a recent FP on commons of the mount of olives (aerial overview) and I don't know if that falls into any specific category, as well as some images from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Many thanks in advance-Godot13 (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually most of the holy sites in Jerusalem aren't on the lists because we do not include archaeological sites, so I was wondering if you had any photos of other historical sites uploaded recently. Both photos recently promoted to FP on EnWiki that you took (Reading Power Station and Old Jaffa) are in the lists so they would be eligible if uploaded on September 15 – October 15, but alas. Do you have any similar photos uploaded last month, or maybe others that you can upload until the competition ends? Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 11:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PHENOMENAL WORK, you should be proud, its a tough subject, and the listing is spot on, IMOCoal town guy (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very much appreciated, thank you!-Godot13 (talk) 20:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have attempted to address your issues there. Thanks, Matty.007 17:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matty.007- I will re-review this weekend.-Godot13 (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$5-SC-1899-Fr.271.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Susan B. Anthony & Alice Stone Blackwell signed NAWSA check.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of

thank you, I will look into that. The list has not been fully promoted yet. Is there a glitch, or if is there more I need to do please let me know. Thanks.-Godot13 (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's just waiting for the bot to do its job properly on the final close: don't worry, it is now a featured list (although I'm never happy until the gold star gets in there either!) I'll see what the issue is with the bot. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I agree with you: seeing the star there does allow for a sigh of relief ;-) -Godot13 (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering if you meant this weekend or the previous weekend in this. Thanks, Matty.007 19:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matty- Sorry it has slipped through the cracks. I'm trying to prep for a shot to be competitive in the Steeplechase 2013, and am traveling but will get to the re-review in the next few days (I hope by Sunday). Sorry for the delay.-Godot13 (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I just wanted to check that you were still able to review it. Thanks, Matty.007 17:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godot, are you still planning on reviewing this? Thanks, Matty.007 19:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godot, I honestly don't mind if you don't want to, but I would simply like a reply. Thanks, Matty.007 18:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (1st Issue)-$0.05-Fr.1231.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (1st Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1240.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (1st Issue)-$0.25-Fr.1280.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (1st Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1312.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (2nd Issue)-$0.05-Fr.1232.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (2nd Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1246.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (2nd Issue)-$0.25-Fr.1284.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (2nd Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1322.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.03-Fr.1226.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.05-Fr.1238.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1254.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.25-Fr.1294.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1328.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1339.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (3rd Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1355.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1259.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.15-Fr.1269.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.25-Fr.1303.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1374.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1376.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (4th Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1379.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (5th Issue)-$0.10-Fr.1265.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (5th Issue)-$0.25-Fr.1308.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-Fractional (5th Issue)-$0.50-Fr.1381.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[PS: Could you check the descriptions? Almost all of them says the author is different, than what is on the nomination page.]

Traveling home today, will make sure everything is correct by tomorrow/-Godot13 (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Israel-2013-Ein Avdat 02.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 08:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

[8] Congratulations on all the great work you've done this year! I hope everything is well with you :) Jujutacular (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Thanks!-Godot13 (talk) 03:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, congratulations! Matty.007 18:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$1-FRBN-1918-Fr.713.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$2-FRBN-1918-Fr.749.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$5-FRBN-1918-Fr.790.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$10-FRBN-1915-Fr.817.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$20-FRBN-1915-Fr.828.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$50-FRBN-1918-Fr.831.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$100-FRBN-1915-PROOF (no Fr.).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$5-FRBN-1929-Fr.1850-B.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$10-FRBN-1929-Fr.1860-B.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$20-FRBN-1929-Fr.1870-D.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$50-FRBN-1929-Fr.1880-B.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$100-FRBN-1929-Fr.1890-D.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Lichtbringer ("Bringer of Light") by Bernhard Hoetger (1936).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

You have voted on the delisting of US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863. Some new information has been presented. Would you consider reviewing your vote?

The deletion request was started because it was assumed that

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 11:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$100-GC-1882-Fr.1207.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$100-GC-1934-Fr.2406.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$1000-GC-1882-Fr.1218g.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$1000-GC-1934-Fr.2409.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:US-$10000-GC-1934-Fr.2412.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 15:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Godot, got a question. Any chance the Smithsonian would be willing to donate a high resolution image of the

I make no guarantees, but I do know exactly who to ask. I will be there the week after next. Any world currency that tickles your fancy for WP?-Godot13 (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. I rather like the old 1950s/60s rupiah... the current series is a bit too bright. I haven't been exposed to enough world currency to make a firmer selection, though. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what they have. Good thing though, Indonesian currency is in the public domain...-Godot13 (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Indeed, it's quite lucky (for us). The 1968 series, if I remember correctly, has Sudirman on all denominations. Quite an interesting character, that one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Good Humor!
		Hello Godot13.Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers.--Pratyya (Hello!) 06:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Godot, when you've got time, would you mind taking another look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of currencies in Europe/archive1 please? I would quite like some action on the page, so that I can have more of a chance. Thanks, Matty.007 20:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. Cheers. —