User talk:Harrygouvas

• Hello ans welcome to Wikipedia! I think your ideas about three different articles would be an asset to add to the encyclopedia. Please forgive any typos as i broke my thumb and tore ligaments in my hand yesterday and find myself typing with only one hand. Do you make house calls? (Just joking.) in my opionion, it would be an improvement to add a brief introduction of the different kinds of amputation to the Amputation#Reasons_for_amputation section in the Amputation article. then you could create separate articles that go more in depth. You could link to the new articles from the Amputation article. I don't know if I;m making any sense, but in essence, i think you should go ahead and create three articles (as you suggest), linked from the Amputation article. I think that it would be advantageous for you to let other editors on the Amputation talk page know your thoughts. Let me know if you need help with anything. Cind.amuse 21:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HARRY GOUVAS: I agree with You Sir 100%. I will need help in uploading Photos in the artice (My cases medical Photos). Please send me informations HOW i can do it, step by step. It is different in Greek Wikipedia than in English Wikipedia. ThanksHarrygouvas (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Few comments on formating:

1. Headings should be those found here
   WP:MEDMOS
2. For the headings of sections the first words has caps but does not after that
3. We use generic names for medication and as such they are not capatalized

Cheers

OK James. Thanks a lot. Harrygouvas (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW if you need help uploading images let me know.

talk · contribs · email) 20:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

And looking at this section [3]. Wikipedia automatically adds the refs at the end as long as you use <ref>ref here</ref>. I agree it is all a bit complicated but once you get used to it no too bad.

talk · contribs · email) 20:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! I just wanted to say thank you for your frequent contributions to the medical articles across the English Wikipedia. It's always great to see editors who are experts in the subject they are editing. You might also be interested in participating in WP:WikiProject Medicine. As an aside, I visited Athens last year and want to say that your country is absolutely beautiful. Have a good day! DubiousIrony ^yell 21:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I couldn't agree more! Cind.amuse 22:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's excellent having you here. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DEAR FRIENDS, i feel proud to have you arround me. As Bill Gates said "I need more IQ near me". It will be my pleasure to guide you one day in my city

]

Barnstar

		The Medicine Barnstar
		For you excellent article on Sodium hyaluronate

JoJan (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Sir for your Barnstar! Please, Could you help me to Upload my photos from Wikipedia Commons to the Article? I failed Harrygouvas (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Greece[reply]

You failed because the file in the en.wikipedia and the file in the Commons both had the same name File:Sodium Hyaluronate.JPG. To avoid this I moved the file in the en.wikipedia to a new name File:Sodium Hyaluronate 001.JPG and deleted the old name (I can do this because I'm an admin). Then I introduced the file from the Commons into the infobox in this manner: | image= Sodium Hyaluronate.JPG. And that's it. If you need more help like this, you can contact me at my talk page.

Another good advise. When uploading images to the Commons, I always use the Creative Commons license with attribution. (In the upload wizard choose "Choose another license" and choose the second one). Why ? Because, anybody using your photos will have to give credit to you. This way, my name has been credited at least 44,000 times on the internet (and who knows how many times my photos have been used without giving credit). My photos have been used in several books about art, in scientific journals and even in the Encyclopaedia Brittannica online etc., each time with credit. So it can happen with your photos. Once uploaded, these photos begin a life of their own and start to pop up everywhere. JoJan (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more time, Thanks a lot Sir!!!Harrygouvas (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Greek inventor of Frappe Cofee, Dimitris Vakondios, 1957.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC) ANSWER: I declare that this photo (year 1957) of ever memorable Dimitrios Vakondios, in practice, is for many years ago PUBLIC DOMAIN in Greece, published everywhere without any sign of photographer or copyright. The Photographer is unknown. Probably this photo has taken by a public photographer of reportage (reporter) in the Thessaloniki 1957 International Exhibition, when the invention of Nestle Frappe cofee invented by him. So, there is NOT any danger about the law of copyright. Best Regards. Dr. Harry Gouvas. Harrygouvas (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, would it be possible to move your image to WP:Commons? Some on the Dutch Wikipedia would like to use it here. I will do the transfer if you agree, greetz, -B kimmel (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• ANSWER: Of course, i agree to transfer the photo to Wikipedia Commons. Please do it. Harrygouvas (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Somehow I overlooked the file... it's already there... My bad.. thanx, -B kimmel (talk) 18:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Playing Nitendo in the Church, Oil paint by Agim Sulaj.jpg, which you've attributed to Agim Sulaj. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eurozone problems, Oil paint of Agim Sulaj.jpg, which you've attributed to Agim Sulaj. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Agim Sulaj, Emigrant house, Oil paint, Photo Harry Gouvas.jpg, which you've attributed to Agim Sulaj. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANSWER: I have the permission of my friend Agim Sulaj to publish his art works in photos. Also i informed him to send a mail to give the permission to Wikipedia for public Domain. I will do it again today. His mail is [email protected] Harrygouvas (talk) 04:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A free translation of the poem Preveza of Kostas Karyotakis.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• ANSWER: Thank you for your notice. The poet Kostas Karyotakis perdormed a suicide in MY City Preveza (Greece) on year 1928. A few days before his death he composed the poem "PREVEZA". There is NOT copyright about this poem, it has been as a Rock song in 1976, and also has published free, as public domain in thousands articles, magazins, newspapers and also Greek Wikipedia. As you see, they have past more than 70 years from the death of the poet, so there is not any problem to publish it, in English Wikipedia. Best Regards, Dr.Harry Gouvas, Preveza Greece, [email protected] Harrygouvas (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *1. "''Protect nature''" (A Bonzai tree is protected on the ground by 5 plastic hands: H. Gouvas, 2013

Thanks,

Thanks my friend. I corrected. Harrygouvas (talk) 07:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

Thank you for your help The image Copyright is... Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 license.Harrygouvas (talk) 10:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right! There are Many Arta cities. I mean Arta, Greece the city i have been born!!! Thanks again. Harrygouvas (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Caress of the Sun.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANSWER: The conjectural ART construction "CARESS OF THE SUN" is made by me on 2013. Also the photograph of the exhibit is made by me. Copyright is Free. IS IT ALL CLEAR NOW? Dr. Harry Gouvas, Director of the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. Harrygouvas (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paint "Face in the Clouds".jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Painter of this paint "FACE IN THE CLOUDS" was Dimitris Genias or Yenias, who died on 2011. However, our foundation, when buys paints, asks allways and takes document from the painter, about 2 things: (a) That the paint is Original and not copy (b) That the painter gives us the copyright of the paint, that means we have the lisence to publish everywhere the photo of any paint of our Collection. Best regards Dr. Harry Gouvas, Director Harrygouvas (talk) 06:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,I suggest you confirm that with the address in the previous notifcation.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harrygouvas, I see you are having many problems with images you upload and then they are deleted. I am sorry to see your effort wasted, but there are some requirements that cannot be overlooked, especially when dealing with images of works of art. Answering about such concerns in your talk page, does not solve the problem at all. It is absolutely necessary that such statements are communicated per email with [email protected] so they can approve the claims. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me in my talk page or to email me. Hoverfish Talk 18:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see, you have already communicated to OTRS about File:Paint "Face in the Clouds".jpg. I was looking at File:Caress of the Sun.jpg, which still misses an {{OTRS pending}} template. As it is, this photo can still be deleted in 3-4 days, which would be a pity. Hoverfish Talk 18:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Our Museum, has bought on 1994 the paint "GREEK SYMPOSIUM" and also the copyright, from the painter Josef Kyromytis. So, there is not problem.Harrygouvas (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but we have no proof that you purchased the copyright when you bought the artwork. It would be highly unusual for this to happen, so if you could please have the painter, Josef Kyromytis, send an email to us using the instructions at

WP:CONSENT? Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, so this legal step is necessary. -- Diannaa (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

There is a mistake in the tittle. It is THE BED OF THE SEA, NOT the ded of the sea. Our Museum, has bought on 1994 the paint "THE BED OF THE SEA" and also the copyright, from the painter K.Papantoniou. So, there is not problem.Harrygouvas (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of the painting does not transfer the copyright, which is still held by the artist that created the painting. And according to commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Greece, there is no freedom of panorama in Greece. Therefore we cannot display the image on Wikipedia. Sorry, -- Diannaa (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

The Open Air Art Exhibit CARESS OF THE SUN, has been made by Dr. Harry Gouvas , the Director of the Museum, with the help of Albanian construction worker Omeri Agim. It is Plastic (polyester) + Cement + Color. So there is NOT any problem about copyright. Photograph is made by Dr. Harry Gouvas also. Thanks Harrygouvas (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Both the statue and the photograph are subject to copyright. According to commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Greece, there is no freedom of panorama in Greece. Therefore we cannot display the image on Wikipedia. Sorry, -- Diannaa (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, I CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOU. ME, Dr. Harry Gouvas (username harrygouvas), director of the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus has made the statue and the photograph, myself. I release my copyright to PUBLIC DOMAIN. Share Attribution share Alike 3.0. Where is the problem? Please explain in my mail [email protected]. Harrygouvas (talk) 04:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Original Uniform of Euzone Warrior and his Wife, Year 1900.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your misgivings. The 2 Uniforms of 1912 belong to Collections of the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. This Museum is private and belongs to Dr. Harry Gouvas. The photographs also made by Dr. Harry Gouvas. So, there is NoT any problem about copyright. Harrygouvas (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution of File:Ingrown Toenail, Onychocryptosis, Wedge Resection 02.JPG, However given the nature of the image (which is of a medical or anatomical nature) it would be appreciated if you could indicate in more detail on the file description page how the image was obtained. Whilst it is understood that no signed consent is needed for un-controversial image,if patient consent was obtained this as well as an indication of your relationship with the patient or responsible physician/practitioner, should be mentioned in the file description. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

This is a photograph of Dr. Harry Gouvas (Orhtopaedic Surgeon), of a Big Digit operation for Ingrown toenail. The operation technic performed by Dr. Harry Gouvas in 1992, and the name is LATERAL ONYCHOPLASTY, that means LATERAL NAIL BED PLASTIC OPERATION, in English WEDGE RESECTION. Always in Medical Photos, we have the permission of the patient. Especially, in cases where NO FACE OF THE PATIENT is SHOWN, the

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Joanovitch Paul (1859–1957) The Sword Dance, Private Collection.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Mail dear friend. Really, the time from death of painter (1957 to 2013) is just 56 years, not 70 as needed. However, when a paint belongs to private Collection, Collectors WANT to have publicity about the photo of the paint, because the price of the paint INCREASES. So there was never legal problem in history, about photos of paints in private collection, because of this reason. The problem exists IF the pain will be print in post cards or posters. That is my oppinion as a collector and like as a Museum Director. If you have other oppinion, i have no problem to erase this photo. My best regards from Preveza, Greece and from Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. Dr.Harry Gouvas, MD, PhD Harrygouvas (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flight in the Aegean.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC) ANSWER: I have explained it an other time. When we buy a paint, we also buy the Copyright of the art project. So PAINT + COPYRIGHT, belongs to the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. Thenk you "Peripitus' for your note.I hope to see you one day in our Museum. Best regards from Greece. Harrygouvas (talk) 10:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Fritz de Quervain.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

Dear Sfan 00 If you type Fritz de Quervain into Google "Pictures" , you will have a lot of photos of Dr. Quervain Propably i took this picture from there last years. I think there is not any Copyright problem. Dr. Fritz de Quervain is an internationally famous doctor, born in 19th century and i believe his photos are public domain. Best regards from Greece Dr. Harry Gouvas Harrygouvas (talk) 06:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is ready! I have to download 4 photos, later. Thanks for help I Invite you to Monolithi!!! Harrygouvas (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

ANSWER: This photograph of 1935(?) is unknown photographer. It has been published in Calendaries, in newspapers, in magazins of City Preveza and belongs today to archives of the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. So there is not any problem about Copyright. I am Dr. Harry Gouvas. Director of the Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus. Liability is mine. Best regards.Harrygouvas (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

ANSWER: I just contucted Mr. Anthony Adolph and he promissed to me, that will write his oppinion to TALK page of the article. Best Regards Dr. Harry Gouvas, Greece Harrygouvas (talk) 19:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Needling Therapy for Patellar Tendonitis.JPG, which you've attributed to Dr. Daniel Kulund: "The Injured Athlete", USA, 1988. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Donkeys in Monolithi Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harrygouvas. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chalk19 (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museum of Arts and Sciences of Epirus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ——Chalk19 (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ABOUT THE MUSEUM OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF EPIRUS (MOASE): The Foundation MOASE established in year 2010 as Museum of Arts and Sciences Harry Gouvas. It is the same. The building erected on 2012-2013. Opened to the public on 02-09-2013. Until today we had 2500 Visitors. TWO administratos of Greek Wikipedia FROM ATHENS and PATRA have Visited the Museum and took pictures. The Licence of the Greek Ministy of Culture is available by number ΥΠΠΟ/ΔΙΠΕ/Α/3110/66 date 22-01-2001. So, i can't explain why the entry MOASE has been deleted. Dr Harry Gouvas, Director Mail= [email protected] Harrygouvas (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Donkeys in Monolithi Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ——Chalk19 (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harrygouvas. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Single Rock in Monolithi Bay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the