User talk:Herreshoffian

Hello @

UAVs in the Iranian military. Surprisingly few Iranian UAVs have their own wiki page, and Category:Unmanned military aircraft of Iran appears to intersect with Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles of Iran. Can I count on your help? Herreshoffian (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure, if you have questions or anything just drop me a note or ping me with {{ping|Ahunt}}. - Ahunt (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at

Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects

. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Fotros UAV
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at

Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects

. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamaseh UAV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv123 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at

Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects

. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talash UAV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv123 (talk) 01:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv123 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at

Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects

. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarir UAV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv123 (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv123 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at

Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects

. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karrar UAV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv123 (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —usernamekiran (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Usernamekiran:, thanks for the warm welcome and offer of help. :) The Wikipedia Adventure sounds interesting. Have a nice day! Herreshoffian (talk) 21:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bibi (singer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:25, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siemens, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:32, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@General Ization: Please indicate the change with the diff code so that I may learn. Otherwise, your instructions are almost worthless. Herreshoffian (talk) 01:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by "the diff code". If you are suggesting you were unclear which edit of yours I was objecting to, it was the only one I reverted, at which time you would have immediately received a notification with a link to the reversion. My instruction to you was to follow our policies and include citations of reliable sources with your edits. General Ization ^Talk 02:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

Siemens AG page, by all means take full responsibility for that reversion. Herreshoffian (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

If you copy content from another Wikipedia page, you must also copy the cited sources that support that content. You should not presume that others will do that for you,

because it is your responsibility. General Ization ^Talk 02:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

KraussMaffei

added a link pointing to Allach

Main Ground Combat System

added a link pointing to Armata

Prelude to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

added a link pointing to Varyag

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please note that disambiguation pages like Saint George (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Disambiguation pages are supposed to lead readers to existing content - there is no point in sending them to a page that doesn't mention the title they're looking for. Leschnei (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the link for Georgii Pobedonosets. I have edited the entry per

MOS:DAB - one blue link per entry and no references (the references should go in the article). Leschnei (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An article you recently created,

Hi @

Slovenian army? I'm not sure how this deletion enhances wiki. Surely there is a little leeway for lists like these, or do you propose to weed out most of these contributions on the basis of a procrustean rule? Herreshoffian (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, it just needs to be clear where you have got your information from, with sourc(s) listed. If you add the sources, preferably with inlnie citations, it will be fine for the mainspace. I can't agree that showing where the information comes from in a new encyclopadia article isn't important. Hopefully it can be easily fixed. Thanks for your work on it, Boleyn (talk) 14:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: ok you might as well vaporize pretty much every page in this category. Herreshoffian (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hi @

Spanish army? I'm not sure how this deletion enhances wiki. Surely there is a little leeway for lists like these, or do you propose to weed out most of these contributions on the basis of a procrustean rule? Herreshoffian (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Defence Support Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archie Hughes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hi Herreshoffian, the article requires additional reliable, secondary sources providing significant coverage to the subject, currently, I don't see any source meeting the criteria and thus contributing to

ping me. Justiyaya 04:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb into Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: yes, I did attempt it, see here. Herreshoffian (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide attribution at the destination article, not the source article. — Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

Category:Military equipment of Slovakia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mozart Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neutrality Act.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Industry of Belarus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MAZ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Sorokin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi . You added the short form ref "Saint & June 1988" to Crosbie E. Saint, but haven't added the required cite that completes the reference. Could you add the cite detail what work this refers to, or let me know what the work is and I'll add it for you. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @ActivelyDisinterested: It's the June 1988 article in selected pubs. I don't know how to get sfn to work right. Herreshoffian (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the cite here, and corrected the {{sfn}} template to link correctly. The templates only work with full cites, they won't link with text. They can be tricky to get setup correctly, if you have any questions just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:09, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ActivelyDisinterested: great work! :) I added the second author too finally. Would you mind helping with the rest? The July and October 1988 need the same second author, and it would be nice to see the others under control. Are you particularly interested in US military, or just don't like to see sfn errors generally? Herreshoffian (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've created similar cites for the other articles. I mostly deal with Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, a year and 20k+ edits and I've nearly cleared 'D'. But I also deal with any other referencing issue, and article conversions upon request. I'm currently standardising the refs at Christianization, which I expect to keep me busy for awhile. If you have any referencing problems drop me a note on my talk page. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eejit43 was:

No changes have been made since I draftified this- the article has very little information and the only main content is a timeline. Needs to be fully reworked in order to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conflict Zone (TV programme) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ante Gotovina into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

This edit was a copy&paste that didn't bring in the ref tags, except for one that seemed to reference a blog post. This was also below the standard of B class, which Independence of Croatia is classified at. Likewise, this added overly detailed information that isn't really relevant there. Please be more careful in the future. --Joy (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Joy: I'm curious about your use of language. What about this edit where I say "reword copy para from Ante Gotovina" (with wiki link!) made you say "It appears that you copied or moved text"? Frankly, I'm stunned. Is English not your first language? It is very difficult to read past this text because it is such a blatant misrepresentation of the facts. Please be more careful in future. Herreshoffian (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's part of the automated template, sorry about not adjusting the generic part. No need to be condescending, though. --Joy (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed that you wrote The material I found airbrushed history to the point of burying it. The copy paste material supplied by wiki is incontrovertible and needs no reference beyond what is on the linked pages therefore I have removed the impugned reference as unfit for a B class article and supplied a BBC timeline instead.

I'm afraid this is the wrong way to approach editing on Wikipedia. There is nothing buried by not extending the aftermath section of the article about independence of Croatia into rehashing the entirety of the linked article about the

you made a bold edit, it was reverted, it's your turn to use the fine talk page there instead. --Joy (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Joy: I'm happy to engage on the talk page of the article in question. I wonder if you are too near the topic for objectivity. Your contention that "Likewise, saying that something needs no reference is not appropriate, esp. on a B-class article." makes no sense. For example, take the B-class article Venn diagram. Why would we need to substantiate with footnotes any of the information in the first two paragraphs? For example we take for granted that John Venn was born in 1834 and died in 1923 and we can look at his page if we need to find reference for his biographical data. It appears as though you wish to overturn accepted practice on all of wikipedia in order to serve your own ends and this poses some difficulty. Herreshoffian (talk) 22:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliant Techsystems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FTC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

These in particular aren't ok [1] [2] - please keep your comments and edit summaries

civil. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Don't feed the trolls, they said, so I won't. Herreshoffian (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irkutsk Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Emergency Situations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please remember to

@Freoh: thanks for your comment. Initially, I assumed good faith. Then through experience, I formed a judgment. I beg to differ on your categorization of sophistry, which is quite civil. It was acceptable to Parliament last time I checked. Herreshoffian (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dormskirk: it is pointless to criticize people when you fail to bring examples to your argument. At times it may even be considered to be hostile. To my knowledge, my edits have all been supported by references. While you gather your evidence, I stand to be corrected. Herreshoffian (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please see this edit. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find an actual

You need to provide a written source that states what you want to say. You cannot simply look at two pictures and decide what you think they mean. That is

synthesis and is not permitted on Wikipedia. If this information is as obvious as you think, you should have no problem finding a book that states as much. If you continue to edit-war, you'll be blocked from editing. Parsecboy (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Parsecboy: you must be an enlisted man. Idle threats that make no sense bore everyone. Unlike you, I read the caption. Herreshoffian (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you. Did you read the part where I said you can't cite image captions? Parsecboy (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[3] Hello. Could I please inquire into the reasons behind your moving and subsequent blanking of this page? If you would like to have it deleted see

Hi @Silikonz: I created the page today before I realized that it was a better home for Vostochny Port (company) (VPC). Then I tried to move VPC to JSCVP only to find that the "move page" button prevented me. At that point I just gave up. Now I see I ought to have just copy+pasted from one to the other. Does that help? Herreshoffian (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the move button prevented you you should have followed the instructions on the form, which were to post to

WP:RMT

. Blanking is not the same thing as deletion.

Copy-pasting moves are strongly discouraged because they require a

moving procedure

before you perform further actions in this regard. Moving pages to (TBD) to 'queue' deletion is not remotely helpful.

I have now reverted the move and tagged the (TBD) page under

WP:CSD#R3. Silikonz💬 22:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Silikonz💬 22:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Germany–Ukraine relations

added a link pointing to Generalgouvernement

Saudi Arabia–United States relations

added a link pointing to Iranian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Germany–Ukraine relations has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also on Minsk agreements. Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa:, sorry "Bruxellois" was my work. I remember it vividly. Why did you delete my work under the "Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia." label when it was no such thing? Herreshoffian (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it matched content from The New Statesman. You can view the overlap using Earwig's tool. — Diannaa (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Osechkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello @Onel5969: thanks for this note. I am somewhat disappointed that, while you write here on this talk page that the article "should have at least three, to be safe", nowhere on the {{notability|date=April 2023}} makes mention of number of references. That's why I limited myself to two good references. I can understand the need to maintain quality and quantity, and likely will comply soon. It would be nice to have the number three mentioned in the notability tag text so as to remove the need for this here dialogue if you think your requirement will pass consensus muster. Herreshoffian (talk) 13:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The issue was that neither of those two sources was truly in-depth about the organization. The first was just a brief mention of the organization in relation to an LNG trade deal, as was the second. In addition, the second is what is known as churnalism, and is just information regurgitated from a press release by the organization. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Onel5969: now that I have re-submitted the article would you be so kind as to approve it for mainspace release. Herreshoffian (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Herreshoffian. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Fu Cong, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Herreshoffian. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Herreshoffian|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. I'm surprised you feel that way. What would make you say that, @Amigao:, maybe the fact that previously I asked that question of you? Herreshoffian (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dmytro Kuleba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: It's good that you noticed this copyright infringement. Can we discover who was the culprit? See where I lifted it from Kalibr (missile family) here, and was not my work. I'm dismayed that User:Hadal acted so hastily in deleting Novator 91R. In addition to the impugned material, which was copy-pasted directly as above, there were many references that were found by me, and at least four images that were again found by me. I would like access to my work, none of which was in violation. Can anything be done to fix this matter? Herreshoffian (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So there's several issues here:

• It seems the text was copied vertabim from elsewhere. I don't know who did it, but by creating another aticle you are essentially propagating that problem. (It's possible the text was originally on Wikipedia and copied by the external source, but this is not immediately evident.)
• If you copied the text from the existing article at Kalibr (missile family), even if it was not a copyright violation, you technically infringed on the Wikipedia:GFDL. You should have credited the original authors from the Kalibr article in your edit summary. In other words, you should have determined who contribued this text to begin with. Otherwise you've essentially done a copy/paste move (bad).
• Regardless of the above, it is not evident that the article you created would have stood on its own-- in other words, even if it were not a copyright violation it could have been deleted under
  CSD:A10
  .

I suggest you recreate your article, writing in your own words, as a

draft

first. Despite what you said on my talk page, I did not see any references in the deleted article. The following images were in the article, but these were not created by you:

File:91RTE2 maquette maks2009.jpg

File:91RE1 submarine launched anti-submarine missile from Kalibr-PLE-Club-S system 01.jpg

File:91RE1 submarine launched anti-submarine missile from Kalibr-PLE-Club-S system 02.jpg

Otherwise, there does not appear to be anything else to retrieve? --Hadal (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I will point out that you have already been warned several times about Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia, and that you appear to do this often. I caution you that continuing to violate copyright, and editing in a disruptive manner will result in a block from editing. --Hadal (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Hadal:. Thanks for your reply. I am unable to see the text in question and hence am unable to debate you on the merits of the case. If you will kindly copy over to my draftspace the article in question (without the offending text) I will attempt to remedy the situation both for this article and in future.

I thought I had added a number of references in the lede. Maybe I'm thinking of a different article. Is it really that difficult to restore the article without the copyright violation and then to notify me and give the community a week to fix the remaining issues?

As to your addendum, I am sorry if I don't understand the policy. I would need to see my edit notes on Novator 91R to be able to retrace my steps and fix the problem. I doubt very much that I "appear to do this often". Can you substantiate your claim please? As with the previous instance if I can't see my error, I am unlikely to be able to fix my error. Your caution seems to be worded unfriendly and I find it distasteful. Herreshoffian (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recreated the article, sans copyvio content, here: User:Herreshoffian/Novator 91R. I regenerated the reflist -- the original history didn't show the refs, so I apologize for that discrepancy. That said, as you can see there is very little left to the article. There would need to be substantial improvement/expansion for this article to avoid deletion per CSD:A10.

Re: my caution to you: I'm sorry you feel that way. You have been warned several times by other users, including for "excessive copying" (by Joy on Jan 31 2023), as evinced by your own talk page here. You were warned several times prior to and after Jan 2023. Copyright and attribution are important aspects of the Wikipedia project that we take very seriously. It would be helpful to make sure you are fully aware of these editing policies when contributing in future. Disregarding other users' warnings is considered disruptive editing. I believe you have been given ample warning, so please take great care going forward. --Hadal (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shinzo Abe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TPP and Western Pacific.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page National Microbiology Laboratory, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Korea–United States relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Declaration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1152607766: what did you mean with "the removal claim is spurious"? If you were referring to my edits, they did not remove anything, they added {{Better source needed}} tags. Sources are typically preferred in text form, so if there is any such adequate replacement, the video should be replaced with that. I tagged it with {{Full citation needed}} requesting the quote and timestamp (trans-quote with a translation of the quote to English should be preferably inserted too). Cheers. –Vipz (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Admiral Nakhimov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yevgeny Primakov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be reverting any major part of a Good Article (GA) without discussing it first. If you'd looked properly, you'd have seen there is no dispute about the content Billsmith60 (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you thought it was a good idea to reinstate outing and harassment of another editor? I've indefinitely blocked someone else who appears to have encouraged that campaign of abuse, and your reinstatement of the IP's abuse is profoundly troubling. This block is indefinite in the literal sense. Any appeal must address your conduct. The only acceptable action would be to report the attempts to out another editor, or if you have good and substantial reason for suspicion, to privately provide evidence directly to the Arbitration Committee, not to put it back. Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Herreshoffian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am puzzled. In fact, I'm agog. I have not harassed anyone nor have I "outed" anyone. It appears that Acroterion refer to -->the IP's<-- posting of words on my page. Is it or is it not my talk page? My page is so far off the main stream. It's a backwater. Why the fuss? It's literally incomprehensible to me. "The only acceptable action" presumes I've been across this bridge before, which I haven't. I just edit. Just let me be. Herreshoffian (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is not "your talk page" in that you own and control it completely. It is "yours" in that Wikipedia permits you to have an area for communication with you. You do not have the latitude to restore and endorse outing to this page. This page isn't as far off the mainstream as you think. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read

WP:OUTING. You may not use WIkipedia to play guessing games about people in real life like that. Another editor correctly redacted the wholly inappropriate speculation from your talkpage, and you not only put it back, you complained about it and agreed with the IP's harassment and outing. Acroterion (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NTV (Russia), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vladimir Solovyov, Red Arrow and Sunday Night.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict Zone (TV programme), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 21:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shanghai Petroleum and Natural Gas Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLI 05:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Herreshoffian. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]