User talk:Hunterd/archive

Welcome!

Hello, Hunterd/archive, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

[[Image:McCrann Terry.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Terry McCrann]] is what I used here.

[[Image:McCrann Terry.jpg|thumb|200px|Terry McCrann]] would also work.

By changing the px number you can make it bigger or smaller but 200 or 250 is probably a good size. I notice that the page you have the picture on has been tagged as not having it's copyright status listed. You need to get that fixed. Where did the picture come from? As to the deleting of the article, well that does happen fast sometimes. What you need to do is to try and set the whole article up beforehand on your own computer. Make sure that you have the categegory(s) and if necessary the stub tags on the article. Also make sure it's Wikified. That is put as much as is possible (and sensible) within the [[, check out

OK if you click on the picture or go to [[:Image:McCrann Terry.jpg:Terry McCrann] you will see that there is a tag about the copyright status of the picture. You need to get it fixed up. I'm not sure what you need to do so I think you will have to try and find an editor that has some idea of copyright info. CambridgeBayWeather 12:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I deleted Terry McCrann for violating the copyright of the article from which it was clipped. I didn't see any indication it was used with permission. Even if it had been, it would still need a major overhaul, as that is not an encyclopedia article but a promotional blurb. If you want to write something in a more serious and encyclopedic form it almost certainly would not be deleted. -R. fiend 14:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you need to avoid copyright violations. This is easily avoided by putting things in your own words, and not doing a cut/paste. It's also important that you keep the article neutral and factual. Avoid superlatives, glowing praise, and anything that really sounds like it was written by the man himself. Also try to keep an encyclopedic tone. ""Will interest rates be cut? Will the dollar fall? Which companies are headed for troubled times?" For more than 20 years Terry has provided critical analysis on these issues and a wide range of events and personalities that have shaped the nation" is not really encyclopedic. Certainly some of that information can be incorporated into the article, but not that way. Finally, it's always best to have more than one source. This is far from always done, but it helps greatly. Good luck. -R. fiend 14:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. I see the prob. cool, thanks. I'll hopefully get it right next time, although this won't be for a while (with end-year exams, etc. I'm a tad busy now).ZPMMaker 07:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can just put a speedy tag on it, and someone will be along and delete it. You have to be an admin to delete it yourself. If it keeps getting created enough times that user will probably end up blocked. You could also ask them to stop!

• What other articles has he created?
  Rx StrangeLove 00:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The new one is Transcience of time. You listed Psychology as an interest and this is an article that the other editors aren't sure is a real psychology term or maybe misnamed. Maybe you can figure it out (the article has been moved to talk:Transcience of time. Otherwise just pass it along.

I put this here because I'm not sure everybody checks there desk as often as I do. Speaking of desks, yours doesn't have the template for the little box that tells the maximum number of open tasks you want. If you want you can tell me the number and I'll set it up for you (I'd just copy it off my desk instead of having to look for the usage details). RJFJR 01:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I added the template for desk size and interests to your desk. You probably want to edit yoru interestes to be clearer. Tables of content appear when there are enough headings for it to need a table of contents, unless it is suppressed. I edited Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Loung Ung so the heading would be on that page and added a bullet in front of a comment. And I moved the taskforce notice from article to the talk page for Loung Ung. RJFJR 13:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just added your name to the list at Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Are you active? RJFJR 16:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I read the comment you put at talk:Transcience of time. Looks good to me. Thank you for taking the time to work on this article (especially since it was mainly to prove it wasn't about anything). RJFJR 17:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I put it up for AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcience of time. RJFJR 14:36, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The procedure to nominate an article for deletion is at

In a few special circumstances an article can be speedied and deleted much quicker than going through AFD. The circumstances and conditions (and the procedure) are at

Hope that helps, RJFJR 14:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from

Hi. Just wondering why you deleted the OneCone International article? ZPMMaker 03:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide me with a link or some context, please? Regards,  (aeropagitica)  07:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a link to the AfD : Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OneCone_International. The article was deleted because the consensus was delete - the ten delete opinions expressed outweighed keep or comment opinions. If you had a personal stake in this article, it wasn't a personal decision. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  10:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Please try and keep a cool head, despite comments people may make against you.

My apologies, I should not have removed the entire message, that was my procedural error. Nevertheless, "hey, dickhead!" isn't the nicest way to address someone on their talk page. I was not aware that you had a personal relationship, and that this was playful banter. I will restore the message ASAP, and if you have any further questions, see my talk page. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 05:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hunter, nice to meet you. A

• OK, will do. I will also copy this convo onto my talk page. Ta. David P. A. Hunter 02:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

• • Copied by David P. A. Hunter.

Hi, I've moved your peronal boxes template to

Hey, Dave, thanks for the Barnstar! Now, I just need some help on the article Richard III (1955 film) Watch the damn film! Have a little patience! .... 02:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• lol David P. A. Hunter 22:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, jesus, you should see my brothers user page: User:Magicpoo

Behold the Man! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 06:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Such a use of images is not fair use. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 08:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out: Good Article Status!

Check out my userpage. It's the fun-kayest thing you've ever seen! And It's completely plagerised! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 00:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yours is nothing compared to the might of mine! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Pygmalion effect to your desk because you have expressed an interest in psychology. Please take a look at the article or let me know and I will reassign it. Thank you.RJFJR 02:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Davey, your sig no longer links to you. It's useless! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should check your mail. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 03:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Matter of time, though, you know. I mean, I'm shocked it lasted this long. Well, I've got the source for it stored away somewhere, so when the time comes, it'll be back.

Anyway, I'm working on a spoken version of Richard III (1955 film). It's pretty good, up for FA again. You might wanna take a look, and vote for, or against it, if you wish. Did you get that PDF file I sent you? ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 04:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see that you're not hanging yourself. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 04:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, not David, battling his way to the phonebook to look up hitmen. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 04:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there is a list of stub types. It can be found

I noticed that you have filed a TfD request for a template you created yourself. If you create an article, redirect, template, or userpage by mistake, and noone else has edited it, you can ask to have it speedily deleted under Wikipedia policy by placing {{

Are you sure that old sig conformed with the Geneva Convention? ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 09:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! (although, I think the naming convention would be a lowercase 's' in ship...) Amalas =^_^= 13:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it for you. For reference in the future, there should be a link up near the "history" tab of the article. I think you have to be a registered member for 4 days or something like that before you get the access to move pages. Amalas =^_^= 17:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hunterd/f06-07,

Thank you for applying for

]

| Moderators will approve a user based upon sufficient evidence that he or she intends to use the tool in a constructive manner. While in no way a strict rule, new users with fewer than 250 mainspace edits, users who have recently been involved in edit wars, and users with a history of vandalism will generally not be accepted.

Hope that explains things, thanks for querying me :) —

l _{/ 14:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)}[reply

]

My history with Atlantis has been both good and bad. Unfortuately the reason that I offered the bounty is that I don't have enough Wikitime to bring the main article or the locations article to FA status. You are free to contribute to the article and I would definitely consider your contributions to the article if it is brought to FA status. Thanks! --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 14:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting Mottos in bold! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, your'e div-ing me out here man! All, like, centred... ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I have. What did you think I was talking about. I was trying to put something on that page, and then lo and behold, there's an edit conflict, all because you have to put up all these mottos in bold. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard III is a featured article! JUZZAH! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 06:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should. It's the rockingest Shakespeare film ever. You just need patience. Oh, and those amazon.com bastards are yet to deliver, so it's yet another day of waiting. In fact, it's a whole weekend. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the userbox issue has been a pretty hot potato, and the acceptability of such userboxes has been very hotly debated. I realize that you of course don't really subscribe to whipping people at work, but I feel the joke is a more than a bit insensitive. We don't need to go all that far back in history to find this kind of physical abuse in several countries during the industrial revolution, and I would certainly not be surprised if this brutal practice takes place today.

I want you to compare your box to the climax of the "userbox wars". Someone created a pedophilia userbox ("This user identifies as a pedophile"), and in the aftermath which was promptly deleted. Another user decided to make a parody userbox ("OMG! This user has been attracted to underage females"), which also upset a lot of people. In the end, the fighting which took place over the userbox resulted in two users being temporarily banned and two admins winding up desysopped (three further admins had their adminship restored). The userboxes were of course meant as a joke, but it was a joke in bad taste, and a joke which offended people.

In general, there has been a consensus that userboxes which jokingly promote violence (e.g. "This user thinks pacifists make good target practice") are

In the case of the Scourge box, I originally did not delete it myself, because T1 is itself rather controversial and quite a lot of grief has arisen from admins deleting userboxes unilaterally. I therefore tagged the userbox for speedy deletion so that another admin could review it, and the speedy delete was confirmed. When you recreated the userbox, I deleted it again, having it confirmed that the box was indeed a T1 candidate. However, since most people don't bother to read userpages, I (reluctantly) decided to allow you to keep the raw code on your userpage. Also, the edit summary you used when recreating the box was... not particularily helpful, calling people "dickheads" does have a tendency to lead to a lot of hard feelings and distress. There are people behind each username, volunteers who donate time and effort to write an encyclopedia, so it's a good thing to be nice to them.

To summarize, I feel that the box you created was made as a good faith joke, but that it was insensitive, and you cannot always expect everyone to get the joke. Userboxes can sometimes be fun, but sometimes it's best to have the fun within your own userspace, and not let it spill over to the "official" namespaces such as Template.

Sorry for a long-winded response, if you have further questions feel free to ask.

Best wishes, Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Icebird.jpg and Image:221 ul-Icebird pack ice.jpg, uploaded by you, are both labelled GFDL. The copyright of the first one is owned by Rigby Heinemann, according to the image page, and the second one by the Australian government. I wonder, where did you find these images? Have Heinemann and the Australian government released these images under GFDL? If so, where did you find this information? We'll need this info, or the images will have to be deleted. // Habj 12:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should have helped you checking stuff here... and I planned to, but never got around to it. Sorry! It seems they were found to be copyvio and deleted. // Habj 09:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When posting a message on my talk page, kindly create a new heading for it. And that's not my motto. And I know, because I put it there. Toodle-oo. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 06:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• No. Laurence Olivier is a gargantuan task, and it's my primary concern for now. No Amazon delivery, yet another day of waiting. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you want something done on Wikipedia, I suppose you have to do it yourself. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 08:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed fair use images from your userpage and your freinds, please do not readd them as fair use can not be used outside the main namespace.

Also, your userpage may require a cleanup as it is extremley messy (or badly formed in FF) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 16:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OneCone logo.jpg listed for deletion

OR = Orphan, they are fair use images and thus cant be used outside main space i removed them from your user space, thus making them orphans and orphaned fair use images are not allowed here. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 08:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you created all the images you want to release as free then yes you can use them outside main space ;-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 09:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No package yet.

...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 22:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I found you through the Cleanup Taskforce, and I was wondering if you'd like to pitch in on an article Mayerling. I was going to add it to your desk, but I see you've got your hands full at the moment, so I came over here instead. Thanks! Kerowyn 09:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• I am more than happy to do so; I shall begin immediately. Hopefully you get this message; I have posted here as your signature does not link to your talk page. I will add the article to my desk, also. Your one true god is
  Talk to me! 08:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thanks for your help, and also the FYI re: my signature. I can't get it to do anything fancy for some reason. C'est la vie. --Kerowyn 08:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*The split is done, as we discussed. Let us expand both articles and clean them up. Oh, and I hope you don't mind. but I stole a few of your userbox templates. :-) Your one true god is

Talk to me! 12:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• Quite alright. I've stolen much code in order to create my userpage. =) Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 01:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are an idiot. And no package. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're refunding our postage money, and saying that it will probably come in the next few days. I'm giving them till next Wednesday. If not then, they must give us an express delivery! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 04:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop masturbating on my talk page. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As it says. On Monday, your order of

1. Henry V - Laurence Olivier
2. Hamlet - Laurence Olivier
3. Richard III - Laurence Olivier
4. Zulu - Cy Endfield

will be delivered to you for a total of $24.99 AUD. We apologise for the delay. Please bring your money to the campus on Monday, and the aformentioned DVDs will be yours.

Thank you for shopping with OneCone.

...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Firefly article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Your one true god is

Talk to me! 05:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the request. I am fine with it. Check with Childzy though. Also there are quite a few mottos on nominations that need transcribing. If you could help with that please do. Geo. 19:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

As Childzy will be out of town, I will deputize you as a Temp. Overseer until he gets back. At that time I will write a review and we will determine permanent status. Geo. 21:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I meant to make sure that the mottos from the old page were rearranged in the new style. Feel free to approve or reject any mottos in the Recently closed section or older than seven days without labels. To put a motto on the lists, copy it from the nomination, to allow the whole nomination to be archived. Please leave a Moved note so I dont redo it. Thanks for the help Geo. 20:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The Biography WikiProject Newsletter Issue I, no. 2 - August 2006
Project news The project was reenergized one week ago today and went from over 100 articles tagged to over 1300! Great work everyone! People are joining us almost every day now. These project banners help with this! A new parameter was added to our project banner living=yes, which will add the WP:BLP disclaimer to the top. Two new departments have been added: Vandalism . Check them out and join if it interests you... Another new department has been added, Biography Portal upkeep ! The featured article on this FA portal has not been updated since May 23. We certainly have enough FA and GA articles to keep this rotated more often. Please join this effort to highlight all of our hard work!	Current proposals and discussions A draft of how our task force pages will look has been created. Comments and feedback welcome! If no one else objects, then I will make the other ones for the task forces that got votes. Need people to be bold and pitch in and help with any peer reviews that get added. These are articles that fellow members have asked us to give feedback on.... We already have three requests, and only 2 have been reviewed (and by only one person). Also, a more informal task is assessing the class of an article that fellow members have requested. Task force nominations still open, please vote! Nominate an article for Collaboration of the Fortnight Non-Americans and non-Western world members desperately needed on the discussion about fine tuning the "Top" definition before voting though.
We couldn't do it without you!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

WOW! That crazy Box set actually had some good stuff in it, didn't it?!

For your edification, the one's I've seen:

• The Ten Commandments, fantastic, and I own it.
• To Catch a Thief, an OK Hitchcock thriller
• Marathon Man, a Laurence Olivier Oscar Nomination! Yay!
• Roman Holiday, fantastic Romantic comedy from my favourite director, and actress! And I own it
• Ben-Hur, own it. Good stuff.

You've got some films there that I've been dying to see!

• A Place in the Sun
• Sabrina (Audrey Hepburn goodness)
• Chinatown (though I despise the director)
• Love Story
• Die Hard with a Vengance

Ooh, the tables have turned! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 22:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're not allowed to have that. Also, check out YMDB it's awesome! I'm Raoul Hernandez on there, search for me!

Ooh! Goody. I just looooooooooooooooooooooooooooove Audrey Hepburn. Seriously. I think I have serious problems in that department. I'm scaring myself. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 09:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just wanted to request that you shorten and change your signature line. It's currently taking up 4.5 lines in the edit window, which is quite bulky. It also contains external links, which are very strongly discouraged. Please see relevant guidelines at

Everything looks fine. Thanks Geo. 23:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Feel free to add t the schedule. Geo. 00:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I owe you a comment since long... but this page makes me confused. Is this an archive, or am I supposed to write messages to you here? // Habj 00:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It also prevents the "User contributions" and "E-mail this user" links from showing up. Could I suggest that you put the normal talk page in its regular spot and use the 'move' function to archive your talk pages (which I presumme is the purpose behind the redirect to here)? Thanks. --Quiddity·(talk)

Happy now?!?!?!?! Your one true god is

Talk to me! _{I forbade it! Join Stargate Wars!} ^Chaos Hail OneCone International! 06:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

.usermessage { display: none }

in your monobook.css. // Habj 09:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi! I stumbled across the article by accident, while doing some stub sorting, so I took the opportunity to fix other things that could be fixed... {{bio-stub}} is reserved for people only; films should be tagged with {{film-stub}} or any of the derived stub templates. In fact, I now see that such a template really exists: {{bio-film-stub}} - and I just edited the article accordingly... GregorB 12:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to update the schedule. Geo. 19:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Bugger. I'm sorry that it has been viewed that way, but I was just trying to add relevant details there. Equal Measures is a first season episode of Transformers: Beast Wars. I created it as part of an agrrementbetween myself and another user. Articles like

Heh. No argument from me.SMegatron 10:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I had an abundance of time during that week, which I wasn't expecting, which was why I listed it with the taskforce. Like I said on the Taskforce page, now it just needs some better verification. --Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 09:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for Chekov's first name? This info would be greatly apreciated. American Patriot 1776 21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my current place is #11, with a score that brings you off limits! It's comment is that I am in serious trouble. Well, get along! I tried to plan to go for a wikibreak but, not enough time...

PS My score on the Wikipediholic Test was 3420 over...•Sean•gorter• 09:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow this link and find the template which fits - User:Sean gorter/USBX. Happy? •Sean•gorter• 09:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any way, it's {{user Wikipediholic| your score}}. •Sean•gorter• 09:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's {{User:Sean gorter/user Wikipediholic-proud}}, which means I created it. •Sean•gorter• 09:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunterd, I changed the userbox style. Anyway, I don't think Wikipedia would accept my userbox. I tried fitting in one of them, but it got deleted.

(Talk) 01:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Speaking of Wikipediholic test score, how come you posted your score twice on the top 20 table? AstroHurricane001 19:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ktip images

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Image:Crystal Clear Ktip.png has been replaced by Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png and you will probably want to update your pages/templates. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Image:Crystal Clear Ktip.png has been replaced by Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png and you will probably want to update your pages/templates. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode IV

Hey, yeah I actually had submitted it for FA status. But their demands are too large at the moment for me to handle while dealing with my real life at the moment. So I withdrew the nomination. Their two large demands were that the article needs a through copyedit, more references, and perhaps more information. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could copyedit the article, as I usually have three great guys to do so. One is on a wikibreak, and one just won't message me back. Would you mind if I messaged you again towards the time that I'm going to nominate the article again for FA status, just to see if you can do another run-through (if I've added more info)? The Filmaker 13:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually, before you do that. As a side favor, could you run over to this article
  Pilot (House episode) and copyedit it for me real quick. As you'll see it's very short and I'm working on it to be an FA as well (as we don't have any episode featured articles). Let me know if you have any ideas for more info I can give. The Filmaker 18:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Hey, not to be a pest, but I'd really appreciate it if you'd run over that article on the House Pilot and spend the five-ten minutes to copyedit before you work on the Episode IV article as I'm done with the Pilot article right. Plus, the Pilot article won't take too long. :) The Filmaker 03:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • No offense taken. But which article are you talking about, the Pilot, or the Episode IV article? If you're talking about the Pilot, than I can see this because I'm trying to find as much information as possible. I've spent hours trying to find the original ratings for the episode when it premiered but I keep finding the ratings for the Season Three premiere. Go figure. The Filmaker 14:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Actually IMDb is not paticularly reliable. I only use it occasionally for references. Still, no it does not carry ratings for the paticular episodes of television shows. The Filmaker 22:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • So what were you talking about with Pilot when you said you found quite a bit of information to be "omitted". I can't allow alot of the show's general information into the article as the article is specifically about the episode and not the show. This what I've been able to scrap up. Or was there something else you were thinking of when you mentioned this? The Filmaker 02:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biography Newsletter September 2006

The Biography WikiProject Newsletter Volume I, no. 3 - September 2006
Project News AWB specifically for our project. You can download it to help with tagging talk pages. Support for other WikiProjects will be added gradually. This month we have welcomed WikiProject British Royalty . They have joined WikiProject Biography as a child project. The Core biographies workgroup have finished formulating the top 200 articles. Please help get these to FA quality! If you are tagging talk pages with our template, {{ WPBiography }}, please make sure you are up to date with recent changes. We have some new parameters, and the importance parameter has been deprecated (it should no longer be used). Instead, we now have a priority parameter which replaces importance and affects the workgroup articles lists only. Importance and priority is currently not displayed on our worklists because of the above change and due to the bot author being on wikibreak. We hope this feature will return soon.	Current proposals and discussions Seeking contributions for the Academic and artistic biographies essay Seeking contributions for the Notability (royalty) essay Vote on proposed work groups From the Editors Message from the editors goes here. If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography. You'll get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 4 – October 2006). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Contributors to this Issue Plange (Editor) Kingboyk (Editor)
Complete Announcements/To Do List Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively. Write an article Expand an article about: a person an actor an animator an artist a bishop a businessperson a diplomat an educator an engineer a lawyer a military person a musician a photographer a saint a politician a scientist a sportsperson a writer Improve an article by: adding references adding categories Review an article Romano Volta • Suzanne Carrell • Mullá Husayn • John Gilchrist (linguist) • Thomas Brattle • Answer requests for comments Work on the Portal Portal:Biography Assess an article Assessment requests Unassessed articles
We couldn't do it without you!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Have fun

with that. Oh, and my Brother actually pissed off on Founder's Day. So...yeah. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup taskforce

I added

Bud Bagsak Massacre to your desk. Please look at it and eitehr accept, decline or let me know and I'll reassign it. Thank you. RJFJR 15:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks

I have cleared up the autoblock incident I just havent archived it Geo. 19:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Dates on my userpage

Please help me get the dates working correctly in the date/time area on my userpage, directly beneath my photograph at the top of the page. I have altered the date templates with the corrections for each type of calendar. Thanks. Goiter McWilliostein, P. I. ^{You can't control me!} _{I'm a P. I.!} Save Stargate SG-1! 10:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed!

talk · contribs · count

)

I'm sorry, that one with the DAY+21 and MONTH+4 isn't going to work. At least, I don't know how to fix it.

Bryant 11:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

It's getting near that time again... Thanks! I love MOTD! --

Delphinidae 19:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I have so too made it to first base, and indeed third base with this delightful woman. Hot damn! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 06:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Users_who_have_actually_gotten_to_first_base%2C_but_some_jerk_created_an_userbox_and_placed_it_on_his_talk_page%2C_and_now_the_category_is_stuck%2C_despite_the_removal_of_the_userbox

Apparently, Angie didn't take the hint the first time.... --

Umm, sorry, that's

WP:OMG. Zocky | picture popups 16:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Please remove the link from your signature.

Naconkantari 22:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• Vincent Canby called the film "the movie that's going to entertain a lot of contemporary folk who have a soft spot for the virtually ritualized manners of comic-book adventure."^[1]

• Hey dude, are you working on the article? I only ask because you said you only had yesterday and the day before to work on it and since you simply uploaded my quote, it implied that you didn't have anything to change in the article (which, yes, I find to be highly unlikely). I'm just a little worried as I'm having a bit of trouble getting people to copyedit for me. So if you could just drop me a message and sooth my worries, I'd appreciate it. :) The Filmaker 02:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello once again, dude. Could you let me know how far you are from completion. I ask because another editor is willing to work on it now, but he's aware that you are working on it. If you're not too far, I can go ahead and let him start. If you're going to be done within the next day or two, I'll have him back off till then. Let me know, and thanks. :) The Filmaker 03:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • If that's the case, I'll let you know that I've got a few ancy people who want me to submit the article for FAC. So here's what I'm thinking, Deckiller is really interested in copyediting it. So I'm going to have him copyedit and then I'll submit it for FAC. While it's up for FAC, and when you are able to copyedit at the end of the week. You can copyedit it as well, based off the version that Deckiller has come up with. For your sake, I'll give you a day to send a message and disagree. But I hope you understand, I've been trying to get a copyedit done for close to a month now. And I've been waiting on yours for two weeks. I fully understand that you have your exams to worry about, which you should over this. But because of your exams, I'm going to have Deckiller copyedit and than you can copyedit over his while it's up for FAC. How does that sound? :) The Filmaker 13:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When using

My response to you query.
--ric_man 08:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed!
--ric_man 14:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the ussefulness of

Hunterd/archive has been listed as a please do .

and the other templates? They serve no purpose and do no give any significant insight into your "assessment/review". Please do not add them to talk pages. It would be more constructive if you left a review on the article's talk page. Joelito (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. PStrait 02:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, thanks for adopting me. How old are you btw? No offense, but your picture makes you look like you are in highschool. Nevertheless, you seem to know how to use the wikipedia format especially well, and I am struggling. A few questions came to mind:

First, how do I archive my talk page when it becomes time to do so?

Second, what software should i get to make editing easier?

Third, how do I upload pictures?

Fourth, how can I make a counter work to see how many edits I have? I have tried a few, but they failed (and now I dont even remember what they were called).

I have more questions but I don't want to burden you right now and perhaps I can figure some of it out on my own. Thanks for your help. PStrait 04:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I put a "nonsense articles" tag on their talk page, then the user must have created an article that appeared to be nonsensical. It's not showing up in that user's contribution history because it's been deleted. There's no easy way (that I know of) to determine what that deleted article was. I wasn't the only one who left a warning for Magicpoo on that date; note [1] this warning message (erroneously left on the user page instead of the user talk page). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hunherd, I'm just here to tell you that you have two scores posted on the wp:holic test. I don't think it's fair for users outside of the top 20 that someone has two scores there. Please do #21 a favor and remove one the older of your 2 scores. Thank you. |

Talk 17:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

You have a number of open projects on your desk. How are they progressing? Do you need assistance with any of them? RJFJR 20:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's the Sith credo...they're one mean biker gang. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you just feel the need to expel money or something? Oh, and are you OK for next Wednesday? ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 23:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have work on Tuesday. The Phantom Menace will begin at 8:00 AM sharp on Wednesday 15 2006 AD. Bring money; pizzas will be ordered, and bring food if you feel the need. No we can not leave - the longest break will be about half an hour between Revenge of the Sith and A New Hope. If we can fit in something between then, we will do so. Estimated time of conclusion is circa 9:30 PM. Stop buying crap films. The marathon will work - there will be no compromise for others. Johnny knows the risks, I've more than fairly warned him. And I trust Chris. And sorry about your VOD marathon; I suppose I was just in a Futurama mood, and UKTV had recently had a VOD marathon of it's own. Maybe some other time. Questions will be allowed during this marathon, but only in moderation, and only to do with the on-screen content. I'm not inviting Gonzo because he didn't ask - all of those who are coming asked. And I'm not inviting the rest of out clicuequequeke, because I don't have the space. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 05:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Must...buy...crap! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 22:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I did - told him it was on Wednesday. He's not sure if he can make it...I'm going to ring Pingu soon, as well. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 03:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'm not inviting anyone. You all invited yourselves! I was going to do this thing alone! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 20:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • No, no, no, you all invited yourselves. I was talking to you about it, and you said something about being there, and then I asked if you were coming too and you said, in your typical manner "Ye-es!" ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 01:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The message has been restored! Apologies for any inconviniences. It seemed like vandalism at the time, but upon looking at your userpage, I noticed that it just couldn't be the case. =) That's a pretty high score.... –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 07:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are for discussing the articles. Your changes showed teh beginnings of a pattern that would compromise the discussion pages. If you want to change your sig dynamically great, (go into preferences select raw and paste this in "''[[User:Hunterd|Duke of]] [[User talk:Hunterd|{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}]]''," ).
(E.G. "Duke of Hunterd,"

But it is

The best way to learn is to jump right in, but if you want to co-mediate with someone else I'm sure anyone currently mediating a case would be willing. In particular Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-18 Singapore Changi Airport has already asked for a second mediator. --Ideogram 19:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for offering to help! Firstly, I don't know, maybe it's just me, but that sig using {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}} gets awfully long when dealing with subpages (as you can see at the mediation page), I don't suppose you could change it (perhaps if you want to keep it, just for the duration of the case? It'll be weird to see "The Duke of Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-18 Singapore Changi Airport" all the time heh). First thing is we'll have to notify the participants involved. Personally I like to ask them to give their views on the discussion section at the same time. – Chacor 02:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I'm waiting for responses from all the parties. This way we can get a better idea of what the dispute exactly is. – Chacor 05:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I've been fairly busy in real life recently, so haven't had much time to work on the case. I'll have a look, cheers. – Chacor 12:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

...User:Hunterd/archive/CE. 210.50.112.55 02:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Today is the birthday of Hunterd. Feel free to wish this user a happy birthday.

I've given the project a second refreshing, cleaned out all the pages and organised new mottos well into February 2007 - are you participating in this as an overseer any more, or would you like to be removed from the list? Oh, and happy birthday! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 18:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday, Hunterd! Wishing you a very happy birthday and an awesome upcoming year! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake! Best regards from the Birthday Committee and myself! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 00:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Happy Birthday Hunterd! · AndonicO ^Talk

I wish you a Happy Birthday! I hope you have a magnificent day! You are a year older now, enjoy it! · AndonicO Talk

.

Maybe later. I need your phone number again....so I can put it in my new Video iPod! ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 00:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cordially invite you and every person on Wikipedia to participate in my user game. To read more about this click on the question mark in my name.


--

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays Hunterd! |

Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

May you and your family have a Merry Christmas, as well as any other Holiday you may celebrate. I hope that warmth, good cheer, and love surround you during these special days. May God bless you during the Holidays. | Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply ]

File:Julekort.jpg

.