User talk:JamCor

— Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 09:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mana Dubai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 16:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

]

Ok thanks JamCor (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Giovanni Simonetti, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See
  section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
  their content.
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See
  section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
  their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

An article you recently created,

]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

March 2021

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

Juozas Baikštys

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

Jonas Wagner

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Merely appearing at the 2021 European Athletics Indoor Championships will not in of itself confer notability, unlikely to satisfy WP:SPORTCRIT, not opposed to draftification to give the creator more time to work on this but it can't stay in mainspace as is.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

Vempala

A tag has been placed on

section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

An article you recently created,

]

An article you recently created,

]

Article created now - if you are interested. Matilda Maniac (talk) 08:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! A lot of your new articles on athletes, such as Dániel Jankovics, are getting deleted because you have not added sufficient information or citations. Note that articles on living people will be automatically deleted if relevant citations proving the detail are not included. Furthermore, your articles are lacking a basic structure, such as reference sections, categories, or detail beyond one sentence.

When starting a stub article, you'll need to add sufficient detail and structure to avoid the article being deleted. Ghulam Abbas (hurdler) is an example of this, as it has relevant structure with sections and categories, includes the key points of subject notability, and provides multiple references for that material. It can take time to learn how these things are organised, so I'd suggest looking at existing articles on similar topics and copying their layout, or working on existing articles only until you are comfortable with Wikipedia's style. While it is tempting to work on new articles, creating new things does require a certain skillset beforehand. Good luck with your editing! SFB 15:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is it possible to connect this page with Turkish version? İsmail Kendir (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think so JamCor (talk) 07:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not tag articles like

]

Hello, JamCor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to submit and / or resubmit articles / drafts which do not pass the

. Here are some links which may help you to get started properly:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Guide to adding citations

Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ashwellthorpe and Fundenhall, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user | talk] 07:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SK2242 (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you are adding URLs below the References heading in articles. That is not the proper way to cite a source. Please follow the guidance at User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners. It explains where the reference should be placed and how to format it. Even if all you do is put the URL between <ref> and </ref> tags, the most important part is to put it immediately following the text that the ref supports. Thanks, and happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. It might also be useful to see if we can find some rather better local sources for village name meanings rather than Ekwall who is dubious at times. For example, Suckling tells us that Ashby in Suffolk was also known as Haskeby. How does that fit with Ekwall taking a modern place name from a map and telling us what the name must mean? Blue Square Thing (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Boughton, Northamptonshire

added a link pointing to Bucks

Bugbrooke

added a link pointing to Bucks

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Boughton, Northamptonshire

added a link pointing to Bucks

Hardingstone

added a link pointing to Thorn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your enthusiasm for editing is welcome. However, you are doing it quite badly, and in doing so you are, in some cases, generating additional work for other editors who have to correct your edits. Just as one example.... at

]

Like this. It's easy - please do this yourself in future, rather than forcing others to correct your mistakes. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will, Thank You JamCor (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Stanford-on-Avon

added a link pointing to River Avon

Strixton

added a link pointing to Wollaston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. eviolite (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, were you using the draft as a holding pen for that content as you rewrote it/ worked off of it? The content was copyrighted and we're unfortunately not allowed to keep content around in that way. If you want to work off the text like that please do so in an offsite document (such as Google docs or word) Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 18:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JamCor. Re this edit, it's not clear how the comment can be considered vandalism. It is aimed at discussing the content of the article. While the user has not provided any sources to support their claim (though its already sourced in the article), it should not be the sole reason to remove the comment. Please go through

]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monken Hadley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heather.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor,

Thank you for creating St Andrew's Church, Orwell.

and note that:

Thank you for this article. Using a wikipedia article as a source or reliable reference is not admitted. Please replace this particular reference with another about St Andrews Church, Orwell, Cambridgeshire. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 05:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Moneytrees and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Text you find online is almost always copyrighted, and cannot be copied here; it's against the

]

Has thanked me

	Has thanked me
	Thnx Weenowastaken (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome! DammieJodger (talk) 16:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may find this book useful as a reference: https://archive.org/details/placenamesofmidd00goverich/page/68/mode/2up?q=perivale Sciencefish (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will use it along with my other reference JamCor (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor,

Thank you for creating St Mary's Church, Ashwell, Rutland.

and note that:

Can you mention somewhere in the articlke, maybe the lede that it is a listed building. Thank you for creating

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 17:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

do edits liike this. They are a COMPLETE NUISANCE when you are still working on an article. Unfortunately I spotted them too later to revert without even more hassle. So please JUST DON'T! Johnbod (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,249		Santos FC (talk)	Add sources
25		Alexander Elphinstone, 19th Lord Elphinstone (talk)	Add sources
14		Hottentots Holland High School (talk)	Add sources
7		Baron Wraxall (talk)	Add sources
18		Oliver Eden, 8th Baron Henley (talk)	Add sources
235		Raja CA (talk)	Add sources
1,198		United Torah Judaism (talk)	Cleanup
64		Health in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
348		History of books (talk)	Cleanup
409		Omer Bar-Lev (talk)	Expand
1,961		Bolivia national football team (talk)	Expand
4,092		Japan national football team (talk)	Expand
6,890		Likud (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
74		Book scanning (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6,467		2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
102		Miss Peru (talk)	Merge
227		Himitsu Sentai Gorenger (talk)	Merge
42		Cosmopolitan Soccer League (talk)	Merge
3		Michael Oliver (cardiologist) (talk)	Wikify
12		Willy De Clercq (talk)	Wikify
6		Hugh O'Neill, 3rd Baron Rathcavan (talk)	Wikify
4		Jayant Kumar Banthia (talk)	Orphan
2		Isa bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa (talk)	Orphan
2		Khallfa bin Duaij Al Khalifa (talk)	Orphan
13		Adryelson (talk)	Stub
50		Manila Grey (talk)	Stub
9		Harry Schüssler (talk)	Stub
108		Simon Fraser, 16th Lord Lovat (talk)	Stub
13		Édson dos Santos (talk)	Stub
196		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The article Aberdeenshire (historic) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aberdeenshire (historic) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. They need to be below 40 characters, so I've pruned the one you did for Pole Vault (communications system). Secretlondon (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The article 2018 FIFA World Cup you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2018 FIFA World Cup for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HawkAussie -- HawkAussie (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your changes to the Good Article Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. I'm sure they were done in good faith. However, I'm going to ask you to revert them. The reduction in length of the short description could make sense for most articles, but botanical articles typically have longer than normal short descriptions. The citation template changes where you added the volume are out of place because that field would be for the volume of the journal. The volume referenced in the title of both of those articles is for the "phases" of the articles themselves. The volume number is actually a part of the title, as written. Please revert. Thanks. —Eewilson (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just noted your edits to KBIF and KIRV to add short descriptions. They actually already had them as part of {{Infobox radio station}}. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 15:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see now. That issue is one I need resolved because I'm not quite sure how to fix the location generation for that. The "type in location" module has some weird parsing I can't figure out. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Hi there! Looking at the article you nominated, I noticed it has a cleanup tag, which can cause the nomination to fail, and that KJP1 has given editors some useful pointers for improving the article. Any chance of you sorting the issues out? Ping me if you need help here. Also, I notice (to my horror) that you have yet to create the article for St. Mary's, South Luffenham, the village my mum lived in for 40 years. Tut, tut! Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, yes, I'm slowly making my way through Rutland, I'll get there eventually:) JamCor (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JamCor

I have noticed that you are making multiple requests every day to Citation bot, in each case to the same page: User:JamCor.

A far as I can see, that page change very little: just one or two additions per day.

That means that Citation bot is parseing the same pages multiple times per day. That isn't a problem in theory, but in practice Citation bot has limited capacity: about 3 pages per minutes on modest-sized articles, falling to less than one per minute or big articles with hundreds of refs.

The sums are simple. With 197 articles currently linked from User:JamCor, then 3 pages per minute is 180 pages per hour ... so with 197 pages, that is over an hour of bot time for each time you run this list through it; probably more, because your list contains some very large articles: 32 of the articles on your list are over 100,000 bytes of wikicode; England has 521 ref tags to check, and United Kingdom has 694.

So probably over 90 minutes of bot time to process the lot.

If you do that three times a day, then we are looking at 4.5 hours of the bot's time every day being on this one small list.

I and a bunch of other editors are using the bot trawl through big selected lists of article, trying to work systematically through articles. Other editors use the bot to clean up individual pages. All of these tasks are significantly slowed by having the bot spend 20% of its time repeatedly trawling the same articles.

So I wanted to ask you a favour. Please would you kindly consider a big reduction in the frequency with you ask the bot the scan your list? Once per week would more than enough to keep on top of changes to the articles, and once a month would be better.

Thanks in advance --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS I should have said explicitly that I assume you were unaware of these issues with using the bot. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry I wasn't, I'm taking a short wikibreak so I won't be using the bot this week. Happy editing :) JamCor (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I take it that means you will be more restrained in bot use?

Hope you have a nice wikibreak. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back from your wikbreak, jamCor.

I had hoped that on your return you might have excised some restraint in your use of Citation bot, but sadly that seems not to be the case. The latest set of edits by Citation bot shows that you have just started yet another run of the bot processing pages linked from User:JamCor. The first edit[1] was at 17:03 UTC today.

Yesterday, you fed the bot all of the pages linked from User:JamCor: see these bot edits, where the first edit[2] was the 9th page processed, at 18:22 UTC yesterday.

When I initially wrote to you about this, above, I assumed that you were unaware of how much of bot's limited resources you were using. You assured me[3] that was indeed the case.

Yet now that you do know, you are still at it: clogging up the bot with repeated re-runs of the same set of pages. So what's going on?

Note that Citation bot has made only 1,894,524 edits since it began work in October 2008. Wikipedia currently has about 6.3 million articles, so even if every edit the bot had made was to a page it had not edited before, more than 2/3 of all articles have never been edited by the bot. The bot has no shortage of work; it is currently jammed up with so many big jobs that it won't even start on my latest list of articles specifically selected to have problems which the bot can fix (bare URL refs). So why are you continuing to feed the bot with articles which have ben processed dozens of times in your previous requests? Why not exercise a bit of self-restraint by running the bot on your list only once a month, and allow other pages to get their first pass on the bot? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earl Shilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edmund Plantagenet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The article

]

The article Denis Eden you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Denis Eden for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dugan Murphy -- Dugan Murphy (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamCor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated

]