User talk:Kautuk1

• Error in infobox.
• I have replaced rear with rare. Xx236 (talk) 10:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nashik without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 15:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kautuk1. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Raut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Raut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kautuk1, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Suhas Palshikar have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kautuk1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shubhangi Gokhale for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is rewritten now... Kautuk1 (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kautuk1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sandesh Kulkarni should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandesh Kulkarni .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bradv 20:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shubhangi Gokhale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable media.Fly-by-actress.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBG^converse 08:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Kautuk1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kautuk1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. ∯WBG^converse 16:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Winged Blades of Godric I really wonder how you came to conclusion that I get paid for the edits or I have a financial stake. I am editor for last many years and I have contributed to varied topics. I am working on Wikipedia as a hobby and I get pleasure while working on it.Kindly check my edits for last many years and you can easily understand this. If you still have any issues, pls. let me know.

Sorry to inform you but I am really upset with the above messege. It would have been better if you would have validated first and then informed. Kautuk1 (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kautuk1. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not added featured icons to unreviewed articles as you did in Sulochana Latkar filmography. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Sulochana Latkar filmography. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for my error in thinking that the paragraph concerned had been copied from a copyright source. The other site must have copied the Sulochana Latkar Wikipedia article. I have returned the filmography to its previous state. When you copy text from another Wikipedia article you should mention it in your edit summary. So, no copyright infringement, but you must not add "featured content" tags to articles as you did here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth, Thanks for your understanding... Kautuk1 (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jammu and Kashmir. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is not accapetbale sourcing. We require a good deal more than promotional listings and crowd-sourced material to demonstrate that an actor is

Hello, Kautuk1. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vitthalrao Gadgil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dattatreya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Gangapur, Basar, Karanja, Amrapur and Balekundri

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kaivalya Kumar Gurav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Accesscrawl (talk) 16:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Datta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Subhas Chandra Bose, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Walrus Ji (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Walrus Ji (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BIMSTEC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 108 Names of Ganesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be entirely copy pasted from one unreliable source and not sure an article is warranted for the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwarkanath Sanzgiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwarkanath Sanzgiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]