User talk:Lfstevens/2021 Archive

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much mahalo! Lfstevens (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lfstevens apologies for reaching out here. I'm a researcher studying & starting to contribute to WikiMed. I'm particularly interested in the work on the [Burden of Disease Study]. noticed you've contributed to the section "Results" - can I email you a few questions on that or post them here?

Thanks for considering! --Whiskiz (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flattered that you ask. I have 0 medical expertise. I copyedit and add reliably sourced facts that interest me. 19:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, would you like to join us for turtle? LittleJerry (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Busy until June. TFA. Lfstevens (talk) 02:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Early vehicles pwr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article has quite a few errors in citations, most seem to be originating from your edits back in 2013. The article uses the following short cites, but there is no corresponding source is listed in the bibliography:

• Fetterman 2005, pp. 98-107 and Fetterman 2005, pp. 107-121. --> a typo in year? (err in orig. fixed)
• Fetterman 2001, p. 113. --> a typo in year? (err in orig. Is it 2001a or 2001b? not fixed.)
• Wandersman et al. 2000 (didn't see a 2000. there was a 2004/2005 mismatch. fixed.)
• Imm, Chinman & Wandersman 2006 (err in orig. no fix.)
• Fisher et al. 2006. (ditto)
• Sabo 2001. (ditto)
• Miller & Campbell 2006. (fixed)
• Smith 2007 (Fixed)

Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 02:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing. I'll fix as best I can. Lfstevens (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts in copy editing Scuba skills, they have helped improve the article. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC) - Thanks for noticing! Lfstevens (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to DeepSpeed has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit mangles the references in the lead section of the article. I suspect whatever tool you were using doesn't always work properly. I've cleaned this up, but not checked your other contribs. 81.187.27.126 (talk) 21:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the trouble and thanks for noticing. In future, if I break something, LMK and I'll happily fix it. No need to trouble yourself.

Hey Lfstevens, it seems we're both working on List of fictional presidents of the United States (K–M). Seeing as you started copyediting before I did, could I just take credit for §L and let you do the rest? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you like. Happy to retire and let you have it.

Understood; I'll finish it up. If you could remove the {{cleanup tense}} template on other articles before starting so that it's removed from the backlog I think we can avoid future mixups. Feel free to claim credit for §K. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, I finish them in one pass, but this was a long one. Lfstevens (talk) 22:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the July 2021 GOCE copy editing drive page you have 11 articles listed in your detailed entry but have claimed 33 on the leaderboard. In the past you have done quite a bit of off-the-books copy editing. What is the situation here? What should the score be? Dhtwiki (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I must have been really tired when I did that update. My number is of course 11. I also did several hundred shorties, but I don't count them. Lfstevens (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I was wondering if you could help me remove the template message on Small modular reactors. I am new to Wikipedia and want to improve the page on SMRs. I was wondering if you could help me figure out what needs to be done in a specific section of the lead article and how the template message can be removed.

I'll take a look. Lfstevens (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wondering - what's the point of all the non-breaking spaces? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used a utility to clean up references. It put them in. I don't know why and it makes no sense. Sorry.

Hmm. Never seen ReFill do that. Oh well. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info.

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tahreek Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah ( TLY ) party. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 13#Tahreek Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah ( TLY ) party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 03:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI there are discretionary sanctions on the Uyghur genocide so I would resist reverting if I were you. I would also go back and take a look at your edits, its pretty sloppy work... You appear to have search-replaced detainees with internees including in a quote among other things. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should also stop referring to edits like the above and [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] as copy edits (ce) in edit summaries as these edits go way far beyond copy edits. Those are serious and major edits to those articles. In some cases they’re basically cleanup level re-writes. You can’t call that ce anymore. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I have actually never done an actual revert in >10 years.

You did an “actual revert” yesterday [8] (or today depending on where you live). Congratulations. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By "revert", I mean "clicked the revert button". Didn't do that.

Thats not what we here on wikipedia mean by

WP:REVERT. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the talk) 01:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply ] Bad edits... Lfstevens... We just talked about this... To me this[9] looks like a sloppy error ridden edit with the misleading edit summary “CE” For example you changed "In October 2020, more countries at the UN joined the condemnation of China over human rights abuses in Xinjiang with German Ambassador WP:CIR, if you cant make good edits you shouldn’t be editing... Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply ] I'm completely missing what you're complaining about. The UN never condemned anything, they aren’t joining the UN’s condemnation they’re joining a condemnation made at the UN. You completely missing this is why I linked WP:CIR. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply ] Can you please be more specific about your objections? I made many changes and can't even tell which one(s) you're objecting to. Alternatively, instead of reverting a bunch of innocuous improvements because you object to one you find objectionable, either fix the issue or let me know about and I will do so. I'm not fighting you. I'm trying to turn a steaming pile into something that ordinary folks might find informative. I've only just begun.... Lfstevens (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] I have been more specific in our discussion on your talk page, please respond there. If you’re suggesting that you’ve only just begun disrupting wikipedia I would caution you, that will likely lead to a block or a ban. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] Have a great life. I'm done trying to collaborate with you. Lfstevens (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thats a shame, just FYI my door is always open to collaboration and I think you could be a great editor if you slowed down and focused less on quantity and more on quality. If you introduce errors along with innocuous improvements the page is poorer for your attention. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Continued use of misleading edit summaries Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at SoftBank Group, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] Please stop with the threats. Lfstevens (talk) 00:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Request for a more through copy edit Hi, thanks a lot for your copyedit in SpaceX Starship! Since I am pretty new to wikipedia, I don't really have a lot of skill at copyediting, so your future help on the article is greatly appriciated! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] My pleasure! Lfstevens (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thanks a lot! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Photovoltaic power station I have started an individual good article reassessment of Photovoltaic power station which was rated "good" in 2013 and I think it needs modernizing. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] COVID-19 pandemic Hi, I wanted to thank you for your c/e of the article, I realize its a long article, should any updates be needed I would respond immediately, thank you again--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] More to do. Thanks for noticing. Lfstevens (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thank you ...for the comments on the COVID-19 pandemic article (I'm going thru each comment), your c/e was outstanding, all who worked on this article, are in your debt,--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 03:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for noticing. Lfstevens (talk) 05:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] I've started on your recommendations[10], BTW will the article get one of these [11]?....thank you as always, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] I usually don't, but you can add if you want. Lfstevens (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] thank you, Merry Christmas!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 02:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] GOCE c/e request Hi Lfstevens, I noticed you've accepted the GOCE c/e request for this article and have done some work on it but you haven't updated its status. I also see that article has been extensively edited in the last day or so. If that editing is causing problems, maybe the request should be declined. Please let us know your intentions about the request. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] All done. Thanks for the reminder. Lfstevens (talk) 00:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Geothermal energy Geothermal energy has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thoughts on SpaceX Starship now? Hi, I remember you as a copyeditor for the article when it is nominated for GAN, and I think you would love to copyedit the article now. It is expanded, tightened, and written in summary style, and probably much easier to copyedit than the last time. Thanks a lot in advance! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] I would like to. In the middle of another project right now. I'll try to get to it. Lfstevens (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Thanks a lot! Don't feel rushed, you have plenty of time. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Finished. LMK if more is needed or if any errors need to be corrected. Merry XMAS. Lfstevens (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Same to you. Thanks a lot for your work on the article! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lfstevens/2021_Archive&oldid=1194255578"