User talk:Mangokeylime

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 23:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Legal intoxicant may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

I undid your edit. We would need a source or sources to make such an interpretation in the article. --John (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Legal Status of Coca}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zapatismo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Anti-German sentiment page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your excellent navigation templates: Youth rights sidebar and Black Power sidebar. Thank you! Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HEY! ALRIGHT! Thanks...

September 2015

Hello, I'm JustBerry. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Cornel West, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Does not seem to be a mention of Black Power (movement) in the article. Could you provide a reference? JustBerry (talk) 00:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding any further Black Power sidebars, please discuss your reasons for placing multiple sidebars on different articles. @Huon: for additional comments. --JustBerry (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure why I, specifically, was pinged here, but having looked into the issue, I tend to agree with

Black Power movement? The article doesn't say so. The same goes for many other topics linked in that sidebar. We should give that sidebar a stronger focus on topics clearly associated with Black Power. Huon (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

For clarification purposes, I had asked Huon for a second opinion over IRC. Not for a particular "reason" I would say. --JustBerry (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guys just change the sidebar, its okay, no need to message me, its your responsibility! Do whatever you wish, to be honest the only thing I knew a lot about was the ideologies.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zapatismo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What does "mash up" mean in regards to the image File:BPowerLogo.png? Mitchumch (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Flying Lotus page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Sorry, but although the new article message has gone, this is still creating a line space at the start of the articles it is on.--SabreBD (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you suggest we do SabreBD?

I will have a go at fixing it, if that is ok. If that fails I will see if I can get some help.--SabreBD (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it just don't ruin anything.

I think I got it.--SabreBD (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What did you fix?

I think there was an extra line in the list that was, for some reason, turning up as a line at the top of the page.--SabreBD (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Three weeks ago you expanded Anti-German sentiment including at least 14 new References (count up from 79 to 93). Perhaps you can find a 15th that is broken, for an error message now (newly with your big edit) follows number 93. --P64 (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Black Power movement page, your edit caused a URL error (help), a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Parrotz1461. Mangokeylime, thanks for creating List of left-wing movements!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. active/defeated is not NPOV

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of left-wing movements for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Parrotz1461 (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to Draft:List of left-wing movements. I don't think it is an attack page, and perhaps doesn't have POV issues either, but you should probably work on adding some references before moving it back to the mainspace. Going to talk to the concerned user as I don't think they are qualified to be patrolling. Hope this helps, happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Days of Rage

added links pointing to Jeff Jones and David Gilbert

Brink's robbery (1981)

added a link pointing to Armored car

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Riders Liberation Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ten Point Program. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hippie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• radar/big-lebowski-spawns-religion Big Lebowski Spawns Religion] - Don't Panic.com - 11 April 2011]</ref><ref>[http://otisryanproductions.blogspot.com/2012/02/interview-oliver-benjamin-founder-of.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ethnic riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pulaski riot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulaski. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mangokeylime, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you created Draft:Template:Leninism sidebar. However, drafts are for drafting articles and not templates, so I moved it to Template:Leninism sidebar, which is now in the correct namespace (Template namespace). —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Black Liberation Militia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Black Liberation Militia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment here:

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Specifically needs major book reviews to achieve notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Workers' Councils and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Workers' Councils, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 22:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need that? Not only does it mess with the lede photo in most of those articles by shoving it down, "Mound builders" as a term is a leftover fantasy from the 1800s, there was no overarching "mound building" society but a bunch oftentimes unrelated cultures. Also, most of the links included in it are in collapsed navigation templates at the bottom of the pages. Heiro 02:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per your reply at my talk[1] (and can we keep this at one talk page, how about here?) Archaeologists and historians did not "coin the term", as I said it is a leftover from the 1800s when many thought the "mound builders" were one great civilization, and on top of that they thought they were Romans or Celts or Phoenicians or Egyptians, etc. Archaeologists and historians rarely use the term. Use of and promotion of this term perpetuates a flawed thinking about who these different cultures were and how they related to each other. It is why you do not see it used in individual articles about those cultures, but confined mostly to the article about the term. Heiro 02:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heironymous Rowe: What do you recommend as action? I personally just wanted to organize a box on pre-colombian civilizations in North America. Mangokeylime (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While it could be useful on the

Mound Builder page itself, since it condenses much of the material in the article to a system of links, I don't think it's appropriate to be at the top of all of the other pages for the reason outlined above. On the mound builder page the nature of the term is discussed, but having it on the other pages without explanation that it is deprecated terminology that does not accurately describe current understanding of those cultures and their relationships would give people the false impression that it is still valid terminology. Also it pretty much duplicates this Template:Pre-Columbian North America and other nav templates created for the individual mound building cultures such as Template:Mississippian and related cultures and Template:Hopewellian peoples. Heiro 04:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@Heironymous Rowe: That makes sense, I'll move the box to more relevant parts of the page rather than just the very top.

I guess I wasn't clear in my language. It is not only about its position on the page, it is that I don't think a box using deprecated terminology based on an archaic and flawed understanding of these cultures (and not explaining anywhere that it is archaic, flawed, and deprecated by professionals in the field) should be placed on any of these articles except for possibly the Mound Builders article itself and only then as a navigational aid. It's not about having it somewhere other than the top. Heiro 00:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Heironymous Rowe: Well what do you recommend as a better way of organizing a box? In general I just was trying to make a box for Northern American civilizations.

I am unsure as to why they need one at all? A box isn't required for any of these pages. The navigation boxes at the bottom of the pages already have loads more links and information than that box could ever comfortably fit. Except for the catchall Template:Pre-Columbian North America they are all custom built for each of the mostly unrelated cultures; the Mississippian culture box alone has links to hundreds of articles. Having a box for the sake of having a big box visible on the page makes no sense to me. Heiro 03:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have a template, why would we duplicate it with an infobox that might easily get out of sync with the template. If you want more input, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Archaeology is the right place IMHO. Doug Weller talk 11:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - It's good to see your interest in the indigenous peoples of Florida and other parts of the Southeast, but I encourage you to learn more about some of the conventions in this area of academic study. The study of ancient and historic indigenous peoples in the Americas has been increasingly well-developed. There are academic classifications and conventions about how to refer to them, in part based on documentation through archeology and/or written records. For instance, peoples who are identified through archeology are generally referred to as participating in an

@Parkwells: Okey dokey, good to hear you guys came to a consensus

Category:Black Power, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anomalous+0 (talk) 10:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jamaican Maroon religion.

Great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am looking to revive the Cuba WikiProject over at

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariel boatlift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime

Thank you for creating Acts of repudiation.

Thanks for contributing this article on a Cuban term to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Newslinger}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Newslinger talk 01:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft evasion into Draft evasion in the Vietnam War. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you copy content from one Wikipedia article to another, you are required to include an attribution statement. I have added the statement to Draft evasion in the Vietnam War for you. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Schazjmd (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Schazjmd, I had thought it was done automatically.Mangokeylime (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the software isn't quite that smart. Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian removal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam War: Missing section on Mercantile Companies Proxy War. The Vietnam War was nothing less then one of the last Mercantile Companies Proxy Wars. French mercantile companies versus Localized, with pretends of resoure maraudes.

Iraq War, similar. Statements made by Barack Obama in relation to the Russia in the Ukraine was also a merantile company proxy statement. Large U.S., U.K., French investments in East Germany, also a Western (mostly U.S.) mercantile empire move in quote conquest.

You should add those particulars, completing the article and joining patches of overal Western society kickouts the World over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.185.141.186 (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is this about?Mangokeylime (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghetto riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox George Floyd protests has been nominated for merging with Template:George Floyd protests. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. The mango key lime pie sold by Publix is one of my all-time favorites. Have a great day! Jacona (talk) 11:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have good taste!Mangokeylime (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the prod and then did some work on the article. I found it very interesting. Thanks for starting the article. Lightburst (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangokeylime,

I see that you added a list of notable members, but did not provide any references to reliable sources. Accordingly, I will remove that section and start adding back names that are properly referenced. You are welcome to add names too, but they must be properly referenced. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——Serial 04:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per your addition of the "country" infobox to several protohistoric and early historic Native American entities pages, please do not. They were not, and are not, described in academia using the modern sense of a "country" or "state". No academic cite exists for using this term for these entities. What you are engaging is is basically

@Heironymous Rowe: What do you recommend? I see some pages use the ethnic group infobox which I feel is inappropriate for a chiefdom. A polity isn't an ethnicity. Is there a more appropriate infobox? I don't want to imply that these societies were total nation states but they sure weren't just an ethnic group. (Also I just read our old convo, my bad for never starting that convo with other editors, I apologize).Mangokeylime (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles do not have to have infoboxes. It's nice when we have one that fits, but it's best not to try and shoehorn one in that doesn't fit just to have one. Especially when using one breaches

WP:OR by implying something about a culture, group, ethnicity, or people that is not born out in the academic literature. I know you like adding infoboxes, I do as well (I've added more than my fair share to many many articles), I just don't feel we have one currently for this situation (or I probably would have added it myself) and I'm not sure there are enough similar articles to warrant creating one specifically for this kind of group. Heiro 00:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Heironymous Rowe: Actually how would you feel about the government infobox? I feel it might fit best? If not I think we'll have to scrap the infoboxes on the chiefdom pages like you said.Mangokeylime (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please reread my last comment. I don't think any infoboxes describing modern concepts of nation states, territories, or countries belong there. We also do not really know enough about how these prehistoric and protohistoric groups worked to describe their "government'. You're looking to add an info box, just to add an infobox. Stop. Articles are not required to have one. We currently do not, to my knowledge, have one that is appropriate. I'm pretty sure the other knowledgeable long term editors of those article would probably agree with me. If you find one, take it to the article talkpage and ask for consensus from those other editors. Heiro 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Nations of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you're a member of the WikiProject Cannabis and I was wondering if you would you be able to help out with the creation of Poke A Bowl (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Poke_A_Bowl). I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. 67.76.114.156 (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Conflicts in the War on drugs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:85:C101:C9D0:3D8C:B4:93BE:7248 (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I saw that you "thanked" me for making some edits on the grey years page and realized that you are the one who created it in the first place. This was a school assignment but I just wanted to let you know I liked the original page before I went in and changed it up and I think your contributions were cool. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, I think it's pretty awesome that there are people out there working to make a free website a better place. --Fudgevillain (talk) 01:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mangokeylime (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do copy-paste moves, such as you did

I have removed the content you added and restored History of Cuba (1902–1959) to the redirect it contained in the version of October 2017 just before your edit. If you have any questions, feel free to {{

Reply}} below, or contact me on my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Honestly, you did the right thing.Mangokeylime (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anti-White Racism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 16#Anti-White Racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Afrikan Black Panther Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Afrikan Black Panther Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cocaine boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Nadir of American race relations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Sit-in movement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Communalism sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 23:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-White Racism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4#Anti-White Racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 23:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks, I try. Mangokeylime (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Vietnam War resisters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anarchies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 15:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]