User talk:Muzzleflash

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to China Tobacco has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 06:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Muzzleflash, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Muzzleflash! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply ]

China Tobacco article

You left a comment on my talk page regarding rolling back your edits to China Tobacco. Your comments to me appeared a bit snide. Your edits had been previously flagged by a bot as possible vandalism:

• 06:20, 24 December 2014‎ ClueBot NG (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (9,490 bytes) (-27)‎ . . (Reverting possible vandalism by Muzzleflash to version by Wikiklrsc. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (2072438) (Bot)) (undo)

Your only edits to the English Wikipedia are to

and you just started editing under this id "Muzzleflash" December 24, 2014. Fair enough. In your edits you moved material out to other places, revised content re: China Tobacco.
You've restored your edits after my rollback.
If I've made an error, which I likely have, I apologize. So apologies.
I've been editing Wikipedia without trouble since January 2005.
--- Wikiklrsc (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

]

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

February 2015

.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

As I said in my edit summary, a medical journal article is not a good source for economic info. Additionally, you appear to be confused about how editing works here.

]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sinocare. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

]

Re:Deletion

There is a trinity at work here, so to explain why your article was axed you need to look at three points.

First, notability. Your article had notability, the company was considered worthy to have a wikipedia article and the subject was permitted under all relevant policy and guideline material for the site. Accordingly, then, on this ground the article earned a point for keep.

The second of the three points is

WP:NOTABILITY

. Significance, on the other hand, is not a subsection of notability, its an independent barometer to measure why an article should stay. What has it done? What does it show? In your article's case, the material failed the significance criteria. So an independent company in China makes pharmaceuticals. Why should we care? Did they have a Nobel prize for work in the field? Are they sole supplier to the army in times of war? Is the product patented? The absence of any information of this nature left the article loaded with simple statements and no real encyclopedic material. Which brings us to the last point:

Advertisement. Without the material to show significance the article had only a few lines that resulted in its being read not like an encyclopedia article but an ad in the paper, and ads are not permitted on Wikipedia because

Wikipedia is not a web host or an advertisement service

. Having broke even over the first two points, this point sunk the article by bringing the tally against it 2-1 in favor of deletion.

Now, if you disagree with the reasons provided and would like the article restored, I can do that; however if it is restored it will be nominated for deletion, which will result in a minimum 7-day period of discussion about the article and its value to the site. If you would rather not have the article up at afd, I could restore it to user subpage so as to allow you to work on the article until such a time as it reaches a point that it can go into the article space without risk of deletion. I could also put the article over at the articles for creation section of Wikipedia, where a team of people can monitor the article's progress and offer feedback to help out with the article's development. Lastly, if you want to challenge the deletion directly, you can go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and file an appeal to the community to see if they agree with you. If they do, they will restore the article to the article space exactly as it was before it was deleted. Lastly, you have the unattractive but ever present option to do nothing with these venues and simply leave the situation as is. I await your response on the course of action you wish to take, should you decide to petition for your article back. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the article and moved it to the draft space, you can find it at Draft:Sinocare. Good luck on the reworking of the article, and I look forward to having it out and retained here soon. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muzzleflash. It has been over six months since you last edited your

".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Dong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Dong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   16:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Council. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tempo Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fangshan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hami Railway Station

added a link pointing to Hami

Muqam

added a link pointing to Hami

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Polyphenylene sulfide page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks, ]

Ways to improve Wangsu Science & Technology

Hi, I'm Triptothecottage. Muzzleflash, thanks for creating Wangsu Science & Technology!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey, I just think there's a couple of phrases like "the path of global expansion" which probably don't belong in an encyclopaedia article. Otherwise, well done!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

.

Triptothecottage (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.yiwu-market-guide.com/yiwu-market-map.html. Copying text directly from a source is a

]

The article Qixing Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORDEPTH. Notable for a one time event which was solved (relatively) easily. Serves more as an example of general levels of debt of corporations and lending practices in China. Lacking individual notability as company, though

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih^Talk 05:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yanqi Hui Autonomous County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving this message as there seems to be a problem with pings at the moment.

]

DYK nomination of Altan Xire

]

DYK for Xiangshawan

Alex Shih^Talk 00:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one! You might be interested in putting your articles up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

]

DYK for 2014 National Security Agency illegal seizure

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the only thing that I can found on the Internet was this blog article. Sorry about that.--Namoroka (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask where you got the photo you added here? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC) User:Anna Frodesiak[reply]

I took it and release it into the public domain. Muzzleflash (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's great news. Thanks! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Business process outsourcing in China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

Kehinde Wiley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I really enjoyed reading your article. Thanks for your contribution. Abductive (reasoning) 18:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Very Best of Regards, Barbara ✐  ✉ 21:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive feedback User:Abductive, User:Barbara (WVS). Muzzleflash (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AAAAA Tourist Attractions of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhangjiang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Wins Finance Holdings, Muzzleflash!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about

.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Telling Telecom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]