User talk:NineFiveSeven

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ——SN 54129 08:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-ghost4

Template:Uw-ghost4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ——SN 54129 11:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NineFiveSeven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for everything. I was only trying to brighten people's days with my humor pages and essays, and truly tried to contribute to Wikipedia. I made many mistakes, and want a fresh start. This is on me. I am truly sorry. I just don't want to be accused of being a troll or a sockpuppet when I was never trying to be one. I am sorry, everyone.

Decline reason:

No answer to question. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your relation to Einkatzeinformatics (talk · contribs)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Einkatzeinformatics is my friend in real life. I'm sorry I wasn't able to respond sooner, I've just been very stressed out after finding that I was blocked. I'm trying to forget about Wikipedia, because I know there's no way that you'll believe that I am not a sockpuppet or an editor with many honest mistakes. ~~ NineFive Seven 15:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Snow clause

Template:Snow clause has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Humorous categories

Template:Humorous categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians in this category has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians in this category, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 00:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NineFiveSeven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again. I know this is probably futile, but please listen. I apologize for not being productive and only making joke articles. I sincerely do. As I was questioned previously, I would like to put this in here: Einkatzeinformatics is just my friend in real life. He is not a sockpuppet, and if it appears that he is, we are both part of the Connecticut school system IP, so CheckUser may not work. Again, I do apologize for my past mistakes. If I do get unblocked, I will most likely make a new account for a clean start.

Decline reason:

I see no indication that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia, and plenty of indications that you are not a new editor. Huon (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not the third edit of a user who hasn’t been blocked before. Regardless, the fact that you’ve obviously been blocked in the past or have a previous account that hasn’t been disclosed is the secondary reason for your block. Your only purpose here appears to be to create jokes that aren’t particularly funny. You aren’t here to build an encyclopedia and the number of deletion notices here is a testament to that. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Connecticut school system you say? I actually happen to very familiar with those IP addresses as a recent graduate (w00t). Is there any further details you would like to share about that? Post-secondary or secondary school? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you probably should've listened to me earlier. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently in 9th grade, part of Valley Regional High School. And again, I've been doing a lot of thinking and reading pages, and I really would like to help the project if I do get unblocked. ~~ NineFive Seven 22:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also yes, I should have listened to you :P ~~ NineFive Seven 23:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I have a few follow up questions for you. You're welcome to answer them here or on WP:Discord. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NineFiveSeven, "Einkatzeinformatics is just my friend in real life. He is not a sockpuppet, and if it appears that he is, we are both part of the Connecticut school system IP, so CheckUser may not work. Again, I do apologize for my past mistakes. If I do get unblocked, I will most likely make a new account for a clean start." The classic "we are part of public so checkuser may not work" is OBVIOUSLY a LIE. I request CheckUser to FIND WHETHER this person IS in the Connecticut school ip. {{3125A|talk}} 16:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]