User talk:Onel5969/Archive 26

Hello. Thank you for all of your wonderful tips. I was unaware of the "should" and "shouldn't"'s. I apologize and will be sure to research more about Wikipedia for the future. Please let me know if you notice anything else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indy16 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Indy16 - No worries, and welcome to Wikipedia. Just wanted to make sure you saw the notes. Don't be afraid to ask questions. Most editors are more than willing to help. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

• Dychen (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Zanata (Software) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, as English is not my first language, I was unable to identify the sentences that sound like advertisement. Would you mind pointing out which sentences sound like advertisement so I can revise accordingly?

Hi Dychen - Wow. Congrats on making the attempt. You deserve as much encouragement as you can get. The Lead and the History section are okay. However, almost the entire Features section is promotional. I tell you what, if you're patient, I'll work through the article, but it could take a couple of weeks. I still have another editor who I've promised, and haven't gotten to that yet. Let me know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I appreciate your offer and I am willing to follow your guidance. 4:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dychen (talk • contribs)

Hi Onel5969 Appreciate your comments. I have addressed the issues you raised (1) referring to "Ong" after the full name is used the first time around; (2) cutting down the overlinks to providing link only once when a name/place/town, etc is first mentioned in the text; (3) removal of redundant "Significant Timeline"; and (4) re-examining the entire text with the purpose of deleting "informal expressions". I believe I have addressed most, if not all, the issues you are concerned with. Further comments is appreciated before I "Resubmit". Thank you once again for the guidance. Aaron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.209.196 (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi 211.30.209.196 - nice job. Why don't you resubmit, and let's see if another editor takes a look at it. If no one does in the next few days, leave a message here, and I'll go through it in more detail. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there Onel5969, happy new year! Just before Christmas, you very kindly reviewed my draft for Kinder Joy and I wanted to reach out about a related draft: a proposed new draft for the Products section of Kinder manufacturer Ferrero SpA. As I mentioned at Kinder Joy, I'm working for Ferrero as part of my work for Glover Park Group with my company Beutler Ink, so I'm looking for editors to review suggested changes rather than editing the article myself. If you're available and interested to help, I'd very much appreciate your input! Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi 16912_Rhiannon - I would love to help, as I always like to encourage responsible editing by COI and paid editors. However, I am just so backlogged at the moment. I've promised to help two other novice editors with their articles, and if you look at my Sandbox, I have another 20 or so projects that I would like to get to. If you can't get anyone in the next month or so, feel free to leave another message and I'll see what I can do. I went to the page, and it's not something I can knock out in an half-hour or so. Sorry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me, and I totally appreciate how busy you are. I'll see if I can get help elsewhere, meantime good luck with everything on your plate right now! Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi , I'm from iran , the name of that village is hossein abad , I born in it , please change the name LosIGx (talk) 15:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi LosIGx - The references in the article support the current name. Do you have a link to something which shows that the town is known by a different name? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee!

greetings- you removed the notable dancer section from this page indicating that you had removed the non-notable dancers.

the list posted was vetted by members of the show. can you explain why you removed the content?

we are also about to modify the page to indicate that the show is closing next month. is that something you're going to remove as well? are you involved in the show in some way?

thank you

tom porter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.130.116.30 (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. The "members of the show" don't get to vet who is or who is not notable. Wikipedia has guidelines which describe notability. Of the dancers listed, none met those criteria. I could have left an empty section, but that would have been sad. Regarding the show closing next month, as long is it's cited, it shouldn't get removed. If it's uncited, then there's always a chance that it could get removed. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:45, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• Information Provided (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:David Yost (American football) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. I've listed over 20 references for this article that I just created. I created a page for a well known American football coach who was just hired by the University of Oregon football page. I provided a numbered citation to a reference after every sentence written on this person. After comparing it to another article that I created (Matt Lubick), I can't see why that article was accepted and the article for David Yost was denied. Please reply and thank you for your time.

Hi

WP:GNG. They fall under the category of routine or trivial mentions. Nothing to show that he is notable above and beyond the thousands of other assistant coaches in the country. Unfortunately, Lubick falls under this problem as well. Wish I had better guidance for you, other than to take a look at the notability requirements and focus on folks who meet those requirements. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

16:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I have to disagree. The pages that I have created for Matt Lubick and David Yost were done so because they are offensive coordinators in the college football ranks, they are not just assistant coaches. These coaching hires are often listed as news on ESPN. College football is a major sporting event and many offensive coordinators become head coaches in college football and later the National Football League. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Information Provided (talk • contribs) 18:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

As a matter of passing interest, and as a former resident of Kinnaird Street, I can confirm that the street was in fact formerly known as Chichester Street, and adequate citations are available. There is, however, no justification for adding it to this article. The street was renamed during the 1930s, long before The Blue Lamp was made. Bjenks (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Bjenks - That was exactly my thinking. I didn't check to see if the info was accurate, just simply that it is irrelevant to that article. Thanks for letting me though, however. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

• Drew.Tholke (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stuart Acher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, I would like to add this director the website. What do you suggest I change?

WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk

20:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for John Marriott (actor)

On 18 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Marriott (actor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during his 50-year acting career, John Marriott originated the role of Joe Mott in Eugene O'Neill's The Iceman Cometh, and played the asthmatic security guard in the film Dog Day Afternoon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Marriott (actor). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks, HJ Mitchell! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

• Ivan Mato (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:NEXTEV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there, my name is Ivan Mato. I've been trying to create the Nextev wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NEXTEV with the help of the community. It's my first time creating a new page, in the past I've been successful with completing existing articles.

Editors seem to focus on two things 1. Lack of notability and 2. Promotional undertones. I've tried to fix both but I've been unsuccessful. I would be extremely grateful if someone could help.

Regarding notability, the company has appeared in a plethora of reputable media outlets and agencies such as Fortune, Fast Company, Reuters, Bloomberg and multiple sector websites. It has also hired hundreds of designers and engineers and made some high impact hires such as Martin Leach and Padmasree Warrior, both with Wikipedia articles to their name. Also, regarding the lack of a product, other companies still without a product (such as Faraday Future) already have a Wikipedia page. The company has announced a product and it's already sponsoring the China racing Team FormulaE team.

In terms of 2. Promotional Undertones, I've tried to keep the language as descriptive as possible but any help will be welcomed. Would it be possible to get some direct advice about the parts that are the issue?

Many thanks in advance for your help, Ivan

Ivan Mato The article simply still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall to solidly satisfy the companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

User:LucianoMendez —Preceding undated comment added 14:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for writing, the changes I made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_planet si in fact a revertion to the image that was there for the last 4 years up to 7 Jan 2016, when it was changed by Maranello_Prime for an non-stated reason. I would like to know why exactly "it did not appear constructive" while the removal of it was constructive. I think is a mistake. The image I put again today, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oceanplanet_lucianomendez.JPG has been used in several other languajes wikipedia as you can see in the section "File usage" (among other reasons I think is more constructive than the one you put). In fact, I didn't know exactly how to revert the change 11:26, 7 January 2016 without affecting the subsequent editions, so I simply put back the image today. Maybe that was a wrong procedure...if you know a better way to do so, could you please informe me how to do it? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucianoMendez (talk • contribs) 13:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi

WP:SELF PROMOTION issue with inserting it. If you take it to the talk page of the article and gain consensus, I would have no issue with its inclusion. I personally like both pictures, and would have no issue with both appearing in the article. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

15:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi onel5969, I apologize if my answer sounded somehow harsh. I didn't know that putting this image could be taken as self promotional, in fact I wonder how can one editor contribute if he/she cant put an image created for that purpose, and not being seen as self promotional. Should other editor put it? Anyway, I will take it to the talk page later, thanks for the details! it helps me understand more about editing and regulations.

Hi LucianoMendez - No worries. But take a look at the page, I combined the two pictures. Personally I like it. Let me know your thoughts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi onel5969, I think it is ok with both pictures, it may help to illustrate different possible aspect of this kind of planets, since is still unclear wheter they look like. Lets leave it like this until some other editor rises another option, in case it happens. Thanks.

Please be so kind as to help me edit the Steve Comisar article. I see that you have worked on it before. I'm new at this and don't know how to do it. I'd like to add these 2 new sentences to the end of the "career" section:

The FBI ranked Comisar in the top ten con men of all time, second only to Frank Abagnale, the subject of the motion picture, Catch Me if You Can, directed by Steven Spielberg.[12] Comisar had supporting roles as an actor in various motion pictures, television shows, and commercials.[3]

[12] is a new link from "The New York Observer" (reliable source): http://observer.com/2015/11/how-watching-mr-robot-made-me-paranoid-about-getting-hacked/

(see last 2 pages of Observer article referencing Comisar)

[3] is the existing link from the GQ Magazine article.

Thanks for your help with this. I'm only a beginner. Curiouskitten777 (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Curiouskitten777 - The issue is, it is not backed up by a reliable source. Your link is an opinion piece, and the underlying link is to a blog. You'd need a link to an official FBI listing showing that he ranked that high. Now it's just rumor. His acting creds are not going to go into the article. I can find no credible references that he ever acted. There's quite a bit about the acting stuff on the article's talk page. Sorry, but it doesn't seem appropriate for inclusion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

• Sam3346 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Actor Samuel Abiola Robinson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Why did you decline my article, did you even read it? there are less notable pages of Nigerian Actors on wikipedia which were approved. What more do you want from me. The subject in in the front page of news papers in Nigeria. Please Google Samuel Robinson Nigeria Actor. What do you want from me? do you take joy in frustrating upcoming writers?

Not here to discourage anyone, also not here to listen to someone who's uncivil. Take care, and please do not contact me again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Why did you decline my article, this is like the 6th time the article would be declined. I have corrected everything you have complained about. I have properly referenced everything you want referenced and I made sure there is no use of peacock language, What more do you want me to do. did you even read it? there are less notable pages of Nigerian personality/presenters on wikipedia which were approved. What more do you want from me. If you would like to know the person of Soni Irabor I think you should google him up. Its like declining a page for Steve Harvey. What is the fun you get from frustrating writers from this part of the world.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplyedit (talk • contribs) 14:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ivanvector - Because it's written like a press release, or a CV not an encyclopedia article. But if you're simply here to rant, please go elsewhere. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

I don't think you meant to ping me, Onel. Did I miss something? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Ivanvector - I think I had copied your username on a different discussion, and my cache didn't clear out. I meant to ping Simplyedit. My apologies. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

I thought that was probably it. Cheers. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

On 21 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lionel Royce, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lionel Royce, who fled Europe due to the Nazi persecution of Jews, became well known in American films for playing a Nazi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lionel Royce. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Casliber - long time no speak! Btw, don't think I ever said congrats on the 5,000,000. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The GQ article is a reliable source. It was an investigative piece written by Sabrina Erdely, an award-winning journalist. (see her Wikipedia page) The article clearly references Comisar's acting. GQ was used to reference Comisar's acting in the very first version of the article. Every subsequent version of the article over the past 4 years mentioned his acting until last month. The mention of his acting only became problematic when IMDb was added as an additional reference. One short sentence about his acting, referenced by GQ, at the end of the career section seems reasonable. This in no way implies that he is notable as an actor. This merely reveals the biographical fact that he did some acting. If anyone agrees, please edit.

"Comisar had supporting acting roles in several motion pictures, television shows, and commercials.[3]"

[3] GQ article link.

I also strongly disagree that the Observer piece is not a reliable source. It was not an opinion piece, and it was not from a blog. It was an investigative article from the actual New York Observer newspaper, a very reliable source. (see their Wikipedia page) I'd ask that you please reconsider this edit as well. If anyone agrees, please edit.

"The FBI has ranked Comisar in the top ten con men of all time, second only to Frank Abagnale, the subject of the motion picture, Catch Me if You Can, directed by Steven Spielberg.[12]"

[12] The New York Observer http://observer.com/2015/11/how-watching-mr-robot-made-me-paranoid-about-getting-hacked/

I completely agree with everything else that all of the other editors had to say about this article. A big heartfelt thanks to @Tokyogirl79, @DanielRigal, @LjL, and @Onel5969, for educating me on the Wikipedia editing process. You all seem like very intelligent, dedicated, and decent people. Keep up the good work.

205.115.188.114 (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

• 2605:E000:6221:5400:8140:424A:C5AC:C8E4 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jordan Lawson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I just added and created a page for Actor Jordan Lawson. I finished the page, put his IMDB link under the reference section, which was enough evidence and reliable info to show that this person was not only notable, but actually getting to be well known in the Film and Television industry. I've seen wiki pages about actors with a LOT less info and work but they still have a page. ??? The page was denied at first, then I added interviews from other reliable and respected sources about Jordan Lawson and his career and life. Still...again it was denied. Please can you tell me what is wrong here? Like I said, there are MANY wiki pages that are nowhere near as referenced or credible but they are on your site here at wiki. Please let me know why the sources, sites and reliable info I've provided are not satisfying you. ???

Thanks!

Hello,

I recently created a page for Actor/Musician Jordan Lawson. The page keeps getting denied??? Jordan Lawson is even mentioned on several other wiki sites about movies, music and specific work related to his field that he's done in the past. I provided an IMDb page that shows all his work, credits, bio, story, interviews, past, present and future film and television work he doing. Please tell me WHY this page was denied when there are so many other pages on this site with a lot less reliable sources. I'm confused here about what to do.

Thanks! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/draft:jordan_lawson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.32.243.183 (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

I created a page for Actor Jordan Lawson. However, the page was denied. I see other actors pages on this site that only have 1 reference and its IMDB page that shows their biography, films, television credits, etc. point is, I have provided that link and other confirming his work and story. Please re-review this info and consider this for a wiki page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:6221:5400:14AD:24BA:EC08:8ED8 (talk) 23:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

(

another Wikipedia article. I took a look to see if I could find any of the type of sources we do want, but I wasn't able to find anything. That doesn't mean they don't exist, but after that attempt I think it unlikely they do – which makes me think in turn he is not a suitable topic for an article (at this point in his career). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 23:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

There is no such thing as taking a bath in dilute hydrogen and it would not have a bleaching effect if somehow, maybe by making bubbles in the water with hydrogen, this was done. Show me the original source. We can also just say he periodically lightened his hair color chemically without specifying exactly how but leaving the article as it is looks dumb.--Jrm2007 (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jrm2007 - the original source is there, it's the footnote. I've checked it three times, because I thought the exact same thing you did. But it clearly says simply hydrogen. There were three other sources (including Life magazine), which also said exactly the same thing. I think that back in the 30s and 40s that Hydrogen Peroxide might have been referred to as simply hydrogen. It "looking dumb" is your opinion, but the citation does not say hydrogen peroxide. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I've deleted the page to make way for the page move, but just so you know, it's possible to move pages over a redirect with no edit history (like that one, before you tagged it for speedy deletion). --

Hi Jakec - Thanks. Didn't know that. Last year I tried that, and it didn't work. Perhaps I was doing it incorrectly. That's where most of my CSD's come from, so I'll try it next time. Anything to alleviate the workload. Again, thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

• Eljumillano (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Monterebro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Thanks for your notes on my article, which you declined. Is the main problem the final paragraph? If so I can simply delete it. I think I should have deleted this before submitting, as this information is not required, and as you mentioned, it does appear a bit like an advert. Regarding the citations point, could you possibly provide an example of how this should be done? I have looked into it, but it seems very complicated to grasp. Perhaps an example would help to clarify. Thanks. Eljumillano. Eljumillano (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eljumillano - There are two issues with the draft. First, it is still very promotional, all the quotes are simply meant to promote the wine. Second, the sources are still not adequate. If there is no on-line link provided to a source, it's very important to be as complete as possible, i.e. author name, page number, etc. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	You demonstrate amazing involvement in all things Wiki! Thank you for your outstanding contributions. Thank you for service to our nation. Tristaniel (talk) 15:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Tristaniel. Appreciate that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

• Atalante88 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Henri Hauser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

it is said that Henri Hauser is an Agrarian.... and it is not true, this was Walter Hauser the Agrarian and not Henri who was both Historian, Geographer and Economist probably writer but certainly not Agrarian...

Hi Atalante88 - The difference is that your draft is better. That's not the issue. The issue is that an article on that subject already exists. Robert McClenon took a shot to get yours inserted and delete the current version. Unfortunately, that chance did not concede as the consensus was that it didn't matter that your version was better, that there was already an article, so it was best for you to simply work on the existing article. I actually see both sides of that discussion. There are articles which I would have loved to have started, but they already existed, so the current article, even though I didn't create it, I've probably written about 80% of what is there. No one is saying that you didn't do good work, you did. But you need to edit the article which currently exists. Hope that explains it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

As I have said at

the Teahouse, there are several ways to address this. I don't think that incremental edits are in order when there already is a better draft. The question is how to replace it. The first would be a straight copy-and-paste. The second would be an RFC, which unfortunately takes 30 days. The third would be one of the three deletion procedures, but this isn't a situation that is normally addressed: mediocre article that wouldn't be deleted in its own right, better draft that still needs work. I have asked for comments at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk

) 22:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

• Atalante88 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Henri Hauser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Atalante88 You have not added any comments and it has been mentioned the article now exists at Henri Hauser. SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

• A1unlimited (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Angelo Maristela (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Why do you keep denying my draft? I have already added sources and they are verifiable and independent. They are neutral sources as they are not connected with the subject. Please tell me what exactly do you need. Thanks. A1unlimited (talk) 03:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk

05:06, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Based on the WP:CREATIVE guideline you mentioned, I have added some more sources to satisfy the requirement mentioned. I believe I have already supplied as per the following: The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. I have citation from the Chianciano Museum in Italy, when he was selected to exhibit for Biennale 2015. Aside from this, I have cited a critical analysis from International Confederation of Art Critics. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. I have citation from a peer - a known Filipino artist/professor Maestro Orobia. or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. I have cited numerous articles and review from art critic. I have reviewed some articles already published in wikipedia. Some of those approved has less citation than him yet you have published it. One example is that of his peer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJ_Ta%C3%B1edo A1unlimited (talk) 05:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		For taking the time and trouble to make carefully researched, policy-driven AFD comments like this [1], and doing this so reliably. Great editing. Thanks. E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks E.M.Gregory - nice of you. I do try. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I think I improved the draft articles in the best way I could.I am talking about

Hi. I said it during the review, don't know how else to say it - you need independent sources. Which your edits still don't show. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I would like to explain something about the draft articles I have created. By creating the draft articles

• Clc136a (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:John Vere Hopgood (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, John Vere Hopgood is is my first submission and I'm doing this on behalf of a family member who has just written a book compiled from a family archive of letters and other materials. However I'm finding most reviewers leave a generic message message that is not very helpful :-( I have looked at several pages to ascertain what this generic message means in context of what I written and made quite a few alterations to try to comply (most recently today), obviously trying to keep the gist of the original text provided by the family member. I think it would help me a lot to point to (underline??) text that offends - I think I understand why this isn't general policy but in my case it would definitely assist. I am very keen to get this accepted and move on :-) Many thanks, Clc136a (talk) 18:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Clc136a - it's not a question of offending text. Just state facts, stay away from commentary like "Hopgood then coaxed his plane", "easing the way", "An engine caught fire on his Lancaster AJ-M and it would have been difficult to control the aircraft.", "easing the way for the following Lancasters", and there are quite a few others. Just tell the story. Leave out the perspective. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to ask you a question about why you declined this- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:William_T._Kerley_RMS_TITANIC_victim Yes, this is about a relative of mine so it's VERY personal to me. But the message I received told me to have something about more extensive research. A lot of my information *does* come Encyclopedia Titanica.com because they are the premiere source for information about anything RMS TITANIC related. They have any & all newspapers articles ever printed about each victim & survivor from the RMS TITANIC. They have all the minutes recorded from the RMS TITANIC Relief Fund. In spite of this, I *did* have other sources that I cited that didn't include information from Encyclopedia Titanica.com. I searched everywhere I could think of. I'm in America, not in England, so I don't have the luxury of being able to go to the parish where he lived to physically look through the parish records & find his actual birth date & other such information. I do believe I did the best I could do from where I am.

The sinking of the RMS TITANIC is still spoken of today & is considered one of the greatest tragedies in history. In fact, I watched a new special about it the night I submitted this. I strongly believe EVERY person on the ship deserves to have their story told, not just the rich & powerful like J.J. Astor, Benjamin Guggenheim & Molly Brown. EVERYONE on board came from a family, had a mother, father, siblings. EVERYONE was loved by someone. Its been a 104 years since the sinking. I think it will only benefit history to know a more about the people on the ship like the crew who were lost. My cousin Janna married into a family that lost 2 relatives on the ship. I will happily do more research. But I thought you would like to know my position on this matter. I'm a Kerley & I was proud of it even before we learned about W.T. Kerley. If there is anything you would like to suggest I do, please do so. I will happily welcome suggestions. I'm a writer. But please be aware that I searched EVERYWHERE for a picture & his birthday along with more facts.

Thank you!

Krista L. Kerley

Keepcalm&write The article still seems questionably notable. First, remove the second list of links and also add any further available in-depth third-party sources overall to enhance the amount of links. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Onel5969, hope you're doing great! I didn't get an opportunity to welcome you to ACC, so, welcome!! Just a small thing, it's essential to set your signature in User preferences, which will add your signature at the end of your emails send from the tool. I'm sure you'll become familiar with the tool soon on your own, but if you feel like you need help from others, feel free to join us in #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect. But before that you'll need to register an account with freenode and get a Wikipedia cloak, since access to #wikipedia-en-accounts is restricted and an admin has to manually add you to the invex list for you to be able to join the channel.. Else you'll be forwarded to #wikipedia-en-accounts-unreg. More details here. Feel free to leave me a message if you need me. Regards—UY Scuti ^Talk 13:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi UY Scuti - Thanks for the welcome. Is the usual procedure on those types of signatures to use your username, or your real name? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Usernames are generally used, but if it's not a problem to reveal your identity, you are welcome to use your real name. You could go through list mails to see how others sign their emails. I personally use, UY Scuti, ACC team and my possition in the team. Regards—UY Scuti ^Talk 18:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, If you check my talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scr81 you'll see that the article has been heavily edited with help from Jcc.

Can you please let me know how I can edit it further as the original reviewer even said: "Yes, I personally think that it's fine, and if I were to review it now, I would accept it. I have formatted some of your images for you, now just resubmit it and see what another reviewer thinks! Good luck, jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)"

Please let me know as I'd like to make sure it's right. :)

Thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jennings_Motor_Group_(2)

[[User:|Scr81]] (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi

WP:CITEKILL

. Choose the best one or two cites for any given assertion, and get rid of the rest. I'd also get rid of pics which included recent people, but that's just me. Also, it's preferred if an article is in prose form, rather than in an almost bulltpoint presention like this article, breaking the recent decades down. Just leave it as "Later management changes and expansion", with one or two paragraphs. Finally, look at how I formatted that section heading - that's how they should be formatted. Hope this helps.

Hello again Onel5969, I think that the awards section is justified as they are significant industry awards, in a similar manner that you wouldn't exclude Academy awards from an actors page. Also the change of the directors is vital to the Jennings Story and the director section is extremely concise and highlights the charitable work that the company does which has led to the awards. Having attempted to write the Later management changes section in prose, alongside the original reviewer, it was decided that in order to keep the article concise that it was better changed to the current format. It was longer and more confusing as prose. As far as citation goes - I'll happily cut it down. Please take a second look at my talk page so that you can see the discussions that I've already had about this and the confirmation from the original reviewer about how best to proceed.

Scr81 (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

• PatrickWaters (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:David M. Knipe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

• Jeanmichel.sellier (talk · contribs)
  • User:Jeanmichel.sellier (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

My name is Jean Michel Sellier and I am a mathematical physicist and the developer and maintainer of several GNU packages.

One of my GNU packages is named Archimedes and has a page on Wikipedia. I think having a page on Wikipedia is important as it allows other people to see what is being developed in the community, much faster than the way it happens by means of scientific journals. Actually, this visibility help society to access knowledge which, eventually, brings to progress. Nowadays, thanks to websites like Wikipedia, I have literally thousands of students, researchers, etc, using my code to make the world a better place.

Now, a few years ago I came up with a new GNU package named nano-archimedes (which is released under GPL on the corresponding GNU webpage). This software is a simulator for quantum systems. As you might know, quantum mechanics is the theory which makes possible things like electronics, drug design, chemistry, etc, i.e. EXTREMELY important things which ultimately help human kind to have a better life. Therefore, it is easy to understand that it is a theory of PARAMOUNT importance. Sharing knowledge on theories like this one, with the rest of the world, literally helps entire communities and speed up progress all around the world.

During the development of this new software, I came up with the development of a new formulation of quantum mechanics which was published on the Journal of Computational Physics several months ago. This theory has shown to be drastically better, from a computational perspective, than ANY other formulation known so far. As a matter of fact, my simulator is able to run incredibly complex simulations on a reduced amount of resources. This fact has even been presented at Linuxcon 2015 in Dublin with great interest from the programmers/scientists community.

Now, I personally think that it is EXTREMELY important to share this formulation with as much people as possible. This is going to speed up the development of new computational paradigms like quantum computing, etc. This is why I have been trying (for quite a while now) to share this knowledge with other people on Wikipedia. The problem is that I always have been rejected for VERY strange reasons which I don't understand. The last one says that my article is not original. With all the respect I have for Wikipedia and the reviewers who spend their personal time, how is it possible that this article is not original? This is my theory which I personally published on a respected scientific journal with impact factor..

I suppose there must be some kind of misunderstanding happening here which I really would like to fix. I want to support science and society by sharing my knowledge and results on Wikipedia for the reasons described above. I think this would be a VERY good thing. I am not looking for personal glory or amything like that. So, my question is: could someone explain me how to make this article published on Wikipedia? What am I doing wrong?

I thank you VERY MUCH in advance for your answer!

I respectfully disagree with your reason for declining

the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk

) 04:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon - First off, sorry about the tempest in the teacup that you attempting to help that new editor caused with the Henri Hauser article. Regarding this issue, since you posted on the Teahouse, I'll respond there. Suffice it to say, I see your point, but I felt that "Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them" was very prevalent in this instance, since all but one of the sources in the article is primary. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

• Wynton1989 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Georg Kraus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Onel5969, thanks for your quick answer. I tried to upload another document (pdf) as reference for the professorship, but I couldn't find a way to do so. Is there a way to upload a pdf? All best --Wynton1989 (talk) 07:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Wynton1989 The article simply still needs any futher available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969. Thank you for your comment and direction for the article I submitted. I've followed some editor suggestions and tried to remove any descriptive adjectives and colorful wording with my re-submission. If you (or any other editor) has any further comments or suggestions, please let me know. The draft url is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Carolyn_Pollack_Jewelry

I've tried to follow the Wiki guidelines as closely as I could, but it seems I got article tunnel vision when researching.

Thanks! Shenlyism (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Shenlyism The article simply still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I worked hard today to add as much external sources and references from varied sources for every single items and words mentioned in the article on the practice. Let me know if you think it s great now. Thanks a lot

About the Saturn Awards pages, I'm simply not certain if they're solidly notable. SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Why erase my editing at the FEE article? I added good ref info th the page? Thank you. 166.171.187.92 (talk) 04:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

• Durgakirankumar (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:A. C. Govindan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I had resubmitted after getting a confirmation from the previous reviewer. This is the conversation I had with the reviewer jcc.

This is an article about an Indian writer from early 1900s. As he lived and worked in a period prior to the internet there are no many internet references available. Though there are references in newspaper archives, they are only available based on log in or becomes obsolete after a period of time. Please suggest a solution. @Durgakirankumar: Ok, cool, just resubmit it. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Durgakirankumar (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Durgakirankumar Still not enough in-depth sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Why doesn't anyone do something about the draft articles that I have created? Don't you care about these draft articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.212.188 (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969, I've been working on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fife_Contemporary_Art_%26_Craft and I have added as many citations as I can find at the moment, so there is quite a bit more than when it was declined. More recently got some advice on the TeaHouse page about citations so have neatened them up. I am keen to see what you think about it now. It's been in the queue to be re-reviewed for a while now. If there's more I can do to improve it I would like to do it. thanks Loolah (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Loolah - It does look better. I'm still concerned that the citations are not truly in-depth coverage about the organization, but are more about the organization's projects, and only mention them tangentially. Those are good for verifying the underlying facts of the article, but not for establishing notability. But you've resubmitted it, so let's let another editor take a swing at it. My guess is that other folks are also on the fence about evaluating it, and that's why someone hasn't yet. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Onel5969, I added a paragraph at the end about the organisation's official arts council (Creative Scotland) support and a couple of other citations. I could write more if you thought this wound be useful for the reviewers? but have kept it concise as I want it to be basic, factual and minimise concerns over content. It's a good point about the project news links - this organisation, even more than other arts orgs - lives in public through its projects as it doesn't have a fixed venue. I've tried to also look at other similar orgs for tips but often they have also struggled to get commentary about the actual organisation rather than their projects (I am guessing this as often citations are to their own website or news stories around the launch of projects). This other Scottish arts org is sort of similar because it is also itinerant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATLAS_Arts and this is the physically nearest other visual arts org: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dundee_Contemporary_Arts are there things from their pages which would be good for me to adopt? thanks again Loolah (talk) 00:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

We are group of people, and fan of actress and model Mahika.. please google her and get more of links but pls help in creation of the article. Please help us out.. Popopo222 (talk) 05:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Popopo222 - Two things. First, user accounts are supposed to be used solely by individuals, not groups of people, so you might be in violation of the Wikepedia user policy. Second, the individual just simply isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia page. It's been deleted a few times, and is nowhere near notable enough for inclusion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear sorry! Group of people means by individual Account many a times we tried creating Mahika Sharma on the other side it was deleted by the same person. You can check out each time Indian telly celeb faces page issues. I feel wiki is for all notable person. And sometime similar news is cover by different websites which is not even a PR or paid work. Kindly help me out please Popopo222 (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear sorry! Group of people means by individual Account many a times we tried creating Mahika Sharma on the other side it was deleted by the same person. You can check out each time Indian telly celeb faces page issues. I feel wiki is for all notable person. And sometime similar news is cover by different websites which is not even a PR or paid work. Kindly help me out please Popopo222 (talk) 05:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

@Onel5969 please kindly create article on Mahika Sharma you may google her and the page meets notablity you may have a look. And if u find something missing. Kindly help but pls create the page. 18beauty (talk) 10:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I saw you didn't approve the article I submitted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Patrick_Acquaviva due to lack of references, so I have added quite a few more references from established sources in Latin America as well as UK, hope its ok now, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.17.28 (talk) 08:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi - Please see

WP:ILC on inline citations. The article also needs to be clearer. You claim he's Ven. national champion. Of what? Once you make those corrections, you can resubmit. At that point, I'll let someone with more knowledge of South American sourcing evaluate it. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

19:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

on the wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28high_schools%29 it mentions how hard it can be for schools in Asia to find reliable internet sources - we are a small island within Asia and this seems to be exactly the problme I am encountering, we are very notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia but it is all local coverage.

"In major developed countries, many independent, reliable sources about schools can be found on the Internet, beyond the scope of the trivial. However, outside those countries, and particularly for countries in Asia and Africa, Internet coverage is poor. Where this is the case then, to avoid systemic bias, local sources should be sought."

Could I ask for your advice how to proceed so we can get the article included in wikipedia and part of the encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarah white 1 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Si Ri Panya School Koh Phangan

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Si_Ri_Panya_School&redirect=no

You reversed an edit from IP 64.134.146.47. That is a McDonalds--I work there from time to time, so I got the message. You probably want to ban that IP if you can from unregistered edits. I don't edit much, so I don't know how to do it, and likely don't have the permissions. Polscicontrib (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to the historical record of Australia. I note you were born in New York; do you have some research knowledge of the topic in question?

The section I have deleted (and will continue to delete) provides evidence that smallpox killed aboriginals (which is not disputed), but then implies that this was premeditated policy, for which there is no evidence whatever.

The article is about a fleet of ships and the people on them. It isn't about the invasion of Australia or other matters related. Consequently, there is no place in this article for the section.

The people who are edit warring are those, like yourself, who keep putting the content back up and perpetuating the 'black-armband view of history' promoted by those with a political agenda to make these ridiculous claims. If Wikipedia silences me (due to the allegation of edit warring) regarding the take down of this content, it will confirm Wikipedia's reputation that it is not a scholarly resource but merely a blog post site.

If you review the page history carefully, you will see that the original two-line entry regarding smallpox was benign and that it has escalated since to have more content that the rest of the article. If you truly want to help, move the content to a new page.Outback1964 (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Outback1964 - And if you would truly like to help, learn the guidelines and rules of Wikipedia. I really don't care about that article. I care that you are ignoring consensus building, and choosing to simply edit war. There's no allegation of edit-warring. You are edit warring. Your tone, and your actions have depleted any sympathy I have for your position, and any desire I might have had to spend any time on researching to see if you have a valid point. Do not post on my page again, for I do not have time to waste. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for listening me. I do not know what to say.I am happy that you finally understand me.I want to contribute to Wikipedia. talk 85.72.212.188 18:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi 85.72.212.188 - No problem. Two things, have you thought about creating a user account? If you're going to create articles, it would probably be a good thing. And I think you'd be an asset to the project. Second thing, stay calm and patient. We're all volunteers here, so sometimes we may not answer, or act, as quickly as you'd like. I still think you're articles need more sourcing (as do the other Saturn articles), so hopefully within the next month or so, I'll get around to improving them. But feel free to beat me to the punch! . And don't be afraid to ask questions, most of us here are willing to help. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

• Christopher.rayalexander (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:William Egginton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Hey, there! I just saw my submission was declined citing a lack of notability and insufficient sourcing. My subject seems to match all of the notability criteria (he is a well-respected and oft-published scholar and author), and the sources I referenced are hosted on Academic Websites, so I'm a little confused. Could you provide me with greater specifics or advice as to how to make the article pass review standards? Thank you kindly for your time and consideration!Christopher.rayalexander (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Christopher.rayalexander (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

I made a mistake writing the article about alex adriano

is full name is Alexandro Adriano thats why you were unable to find any reliable source.

Thank you so much for the support tha article name should change to Alexandro Adriano.

metalhammer86

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alex_Adriano

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalhammer86 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk

05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969. Please kindly respond to my message on your talkpage on Jan 26/27. Thanks. A1unlimited (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk

05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing Gopala Davies (Actor), Link below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gopala_Davies_(Actor)

I would like to query what is different from this page in comparison to another actor who has an existing page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Dennis_(actor)

Thank you for your time :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.66.153.100 (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi

other stuff exists. Just because there is another article about a subject similar to yours which is either crappy or poorly sourced, has no bearing on the viability of your article. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

01:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your requested talk page discussion has been opened. I'll be interested in seeing if you participate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.230.37 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

• Miriamceoverton (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kadisha Onalbayeva (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Hi Miriamceoverton - There's nothing in the article's current references to show her notability. She's certainly an accomplished pianist, but that doesn't necessarily mean she's notable. You'll need about 3 in-depth articles from independent sources about her to show notability. If she's been affiliated with a group/organization, that mean's it's not independent (e.g. Steinway, any of the orchestras, university's, etc.). Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

You reverted my edit, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Americans_for_Prosperity&oldid=prev&diff=701756524 because the link is dead? The link works for me. Am I formatting it incorrectly?

The reason for my edit was to quote the pledge from the original source rather than paraphrasing it (inaccurately, I think) from a secondary source.Fitzaubrey (talk) 00:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Fitzaubrey - absolutely, as I stated in the edit summary. I also prefer the prior wording, but that would simply be my preference, and I would discuss that with you, rather than reverting. The fact you inserted a quote, but didn't have an accurate link to that quote, that needed to be corrected. Especially in an article which has had a somewhat contentious edit history. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

One more try. The link works, now -- at least for me. Fitzaubrey (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• 58.84.63.71 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Darshan Raval (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

what is the issue

music notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk

06:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

• DrSchlagger (talk · contribs)
  • talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Commented at draft. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi

WP:SCHOLAR. That will give you an insight as to what constitutes notability. This person may indeed be notable, but the current references don't show it. Looking at him on Scholar, his citation count would seem to indicate his notability. I see that {{u|SwisterTwister} has invoked the name of {{u|DGG} on the draft to take a look, and he's much more adept at academic articles, so I'll leave it in his hands. Take it easy. Onel5969 ^{TT me}

15:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Commented at draft. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)