User talk:Reenem

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shlomo Ben-Yosef, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaza and Robert Briscoe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1860s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Lister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mordechai Gazit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kastel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Sergeants affair page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations Special Committee on Palestine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaza, Sofar and Transjordan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Narendra Modi does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you go back, you'll notice that I actually did use an edit summary, explaining that I was expanding the section, as had been previously requested.--RM (Be my friend) 13:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps so. But every edit needs a summary. Especially when you move text from one place to another, it is useful to have a summary line that says that stuff has been moved but with adding/deleting any content. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selahattin Demirtaş, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mossad page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello. There is an ongoing discussion about your addition for the objectors' viewpoint. I think it's an important opinion among those rejecting the right of return, but it would be better if you explain to Kingsindian why you added that paragraph.--LoveFerguson (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Multiple citizenship page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, Reenem. You have new messages at Talk:Jews#Please_explain_these_words.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploading File:Hemed.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basil L. Plumley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian Campaign. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Capital punishment in Israel

added a link pointing to Kapo

Israel–United Kingdom relations

added a link pointing to Transjordan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narendra Modi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bullet train. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kigali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green space. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Anarchist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrow (missile). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judah Leon Magnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joint Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to join the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Law and Order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7th Armored Brigade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your edit summary here. Yes, seriously. Please see

Hi, your signature, most recently used here, contains some invalid markup. The HTML tags <font color="green"/> and <font color="red"/> do nothing - the slash terminates the element before it has taken effect, and it also puts the page into Category:Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags. Please also note that the font element is obsolete in HTML5, which Wikipedia has been serving for some years now. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Standard of living in Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Reenem, there is an HTML syntax error in your signature; please adjust to not used invalid self-closing tags.

--[[User:Reenem|RM]] <small>([[User talk:Reenem|Be my friend]])</small>

could be changed to:

--[[User:Reenem|<font color="green">RM</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Reenem|<font color="red">Be my friend</font>]])</small>

If you want to use those colors. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 17:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: Fluxbot has cleaned up most of the errors caused by this on old pages. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  @Xaosflux: See my post of 20:14, 23 August 2016 two sections up, same title as this one. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reenem. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's an extra space here above the new "Technological development" section. Could you fix it? Also I think that section should be merged with "Weapons and equipment". It has repeated weapons and was copy-pasted from Israel#Military, probably to show more pictures of Israeli inventions.--181.1.249.224 (talk) 01:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1982 Lebanon War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaufort Castle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please add the following opinion of a Sudanese human rights activist in the section

Thank you very much--190.137.172.84 (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the third time, please fix your signature. It doesn't actually display correctly for starters, causes technical problems for Wikipedia's HTML5 rendering, and creates work for editors fixing errors in Category:Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags. They will have to constantly clean up after you for every single signed comment you make, when all it would take on your end is following the guidance you've been given. Thanks. Opencooper (talk) 07:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:1982 Lebanon War#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2017--181.110.135.183 (talk) 01:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section on fathers rights in Israel requires much work and better sources The name spelling of a currently arrested family justice reform activist is not Moti Libel (sic) but Moti Leybel.-Yohananw (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Welfare in Israel, Reenem!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would you please add what "Welfare in Israel" is, in the lead? I mean, if it is a government initiative/programme, or a government department, or a private department supervised by government? I tried to find it myself, but couldnt find it. Thanks again.

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about

—usernamekiran(talk) 16:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It contains invalid HTML, and therefore does not do what you (probably) intended but instead just creates some disruption by throwing error messages. I see this has been mentioned to you repeatedly...could you please fix it? Not doing so (or even bothering to respond to others' concerns) is against our sitewide Wikipedia:Signatures behavior guideline, a standard that all users are expected to follow. DMacks (talk) 02:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I changed it, though I'm a bit bad at navigating the whole process. Let's see if this one works.--RM (Be my friend) 04:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine now. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Shamir.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying, for example: here

is permitted, but please note our best practices edit summary wording Wikipedia:Copying within WikipediaS Philbrick(Talk) 13:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reenem. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Reenem. Was wondering how you know so much about Shimi Tavori? There were a few details in the article which only a few people know about, such as his son Daniel playing drums on one of his records. Thanks for your input. 109.66.141.19 (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew Wikipedia was my main source, along with Israeli news. This was my source for Daniel Tavori playing the drum on one of his records. I literally put the citation in the article. It's been reported in the media, not exactly a secret.--RM (Be my friend) 17:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to provide some references for the "crime family" stuff in Inbal Gavrieli's article. And could you not leave bare url as references? Cheers, Number 57 12:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did provide the references. They're in the bare URL's. I'll go over them though.--RM (Be my friend) 12:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Khaled Kabub, Reenem!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello Reenem: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 08:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about

Abishe (talk) 08:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because Amin al-Husseini was the most important Palestinian leader. That's why the picture is there. Could you please restore it?--Gyanfranco44 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-eichmann-refused-to-admit-guilt-in-last-ditch-bid-for-clemency-1.5396373. Copying text directly from a source is a

Could you please check if this is correct?--יניב הורון (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revival of the Hebrew language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_8oE7AVRKwIwbzox&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your edit, but could you please search a source for IDF, PLO and Syrian casualties during the siege? Leaving only the civilian Lebanese casualties gives the false impresion that there were no military casualties. Thanks.--יניב הורון (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've made an improvement in the meantime.--RM (Be my friend) 17:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Yoram Kaniuk does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Btw - 127 sections? Time to archive some of one's talk page? Trafford09 (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You really ought to learn the difference. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:38, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an alternative source to prnewswire which isn't a

I'll see what I can find.--RM (Be my friend) 11:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An IP user seems to be vandalising the article "List of modern great powers"

Hi wikipedia user, an IP address seems to be vandalising the article "List of modern great powers". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_modern_great_powers If possible please request the page to be protected. Dajo767 (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Beit Dagan.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic . Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was it listed as own work on Hebrew Wikipedia? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No it wasn't. I assumed that there would be few problems using it here if it was already used on Hebrew Wikipedia. If you're not sure perhaps asking the original uploader is in order.--RM (Be my friend) 11:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reenem. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Yael Willner.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article needs more citations to

independent

sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Preziosi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Preziosi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 05:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jewish insurgency in Mandatory Palestine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarafand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Gad Frumkin.

Nice job on the article. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reenem!

Hello, Reenem. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.Etchubykalo (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Lind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your !vote here is in

Sure please do. Thanks.--RM (Be my friend) 12:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilan Ramon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thought you might be interested in a discussion taking place on Talk: Cheddar Man, regarding Talk:Cheddar_Man#Brace_2018_vs_Other_stances and Talk:Cheddar_Man#File:Human_Skin_Colour_Distribution_26,000_BC_-_1500_AD.gif. All the best, Vaurnheart (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central Jail of Nicosia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add sources for your recent edits? Thanks--Aroma Stylish (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--RM (Be my friend) 20:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Council for Judaism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elmer Berger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that User:Alarics mentioned this to you 7 years ago and it's disappointing to see that you are still just adding Google books urls as references. What someone sees when they look at the link depends on what part of the world they live in, and thus they do not give enough information to verify it or even see if it's a reliable source. When you cite books you must provide title, author, publisher, date of publication and page numbers. It's easy to do, see Help:Referencing for beginners. It's vital that you do that and I've reverted some of your edits where you haven't. You also are not leaving edit summaries, and if editors don't understand why you made the changes you made and aren't sure if they are an improvement, it's reasonable for them to revert them. I'll leave a message below about edit summaries.

You also shouldn't use newspaper articles as sources for articles such as Jewish diaspora unless there is some actual relevant news. Gilad is just a grad student in any case. Doug Weller talk 14:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did I just add the book without a direct link to the page? My bad, I typically link to the page inside the book in Google Books where the thing I want mentioned in the article is mentioned. I'll take a closer look and try to add in more info like title and author as well. I don't recall the conversation from 7 years ago, in any event I'll see what I can do about that, in the vast majority of Google Book sources I've used I linked to directly within the book.--RM (Be my friend) 14:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

See comment on (now) Talk:Yehoshua Blau -- AnonMoos (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Law enforcement by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "Support this fresh proposal". - Thank you, but please move your support into the corresponding section,

Wasn't that discussion closed?--RM (Be my friend) 03:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion thread is already off on a thousand tangents, so I thought I would bring my question here. You wrote: "Funny how you argue the fallacy of division when right above you were comparing the situation in the West Bank to the bantustans of South Africa, implying that they were similar to what is going on in the West Bank."

I am struggling to understand how that is a fallacy of division?

Onceinawhile (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You kept arguing that calling these bantustans isn't necessarily calling Israel an apartheid state, that doing so is a fallacy of division (despite the fact that this argument is nearly always brought up when people want to compare Israel to an apartheid state). Then when someone tells you that the term "areas under Palestinian rule" is imperfect but better than bantustans, you go on to imply that actually Area A is closer to South African bantustans.--RM (Be my friend) 11:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that corresponds to the fallacy of division though? Onceinawhile (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You said that it's fallacy of division to assume just because you called these enclaves bantustans then it's apartheid, and then you heavily implied you think the situation is pretty close to how it was in South Africa.--RM (Be my friend) 12:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To use the example on our fallacy of division page:

1. The second grade in Jefferson elementary eats a lot of ice cream
2. Carlos is a second-grader in Jefferson elementary
3. Therefore, Carlos eats a lot of ice cream

Similarly we could write this fallacy:

1. Calling the second-grade in Jefferson elementary "unhealthy" is non-neutral
2. Ice cream is an unhealthy food, and Carlos is a second-grader in Jefferson elementary
3. Therefore, calling Carlos unhealthy is non-neutral

The equivalent fallacy here is:

1. Calling Israel an apartheid state is non-neutral
2. Bantustans were part of apartheid and the West Bank is under Israel's control
3. Therefore, the term West Bank bantustans is non-neutral

How does implying that "the situation is pretty close to how it was in South Africa" fit this framework? Onceinawhile (talk) 12:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elias Katz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. 11Fox11 (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't participate, respect! Selfstudier (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982 Lebanon War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Jezzine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’m from Israel Some of the information isn’t true.. 9 deaths and 500+ wounded And in Gaza 100 of the deaths were actually terrorists It’s important to mention that Hamas sent 1800 rockets to Israel and 300 lended in Gaza, so Israel didn’t kill innocent children. The IDF tells them to leave they just don’t... The rockets I’m getting on a daily basis are war crimes.! Israel hasn’t done any war crimes.! I’m currently sitting in a bomb shelter, in fear. And yes, it’s not Gaza, it’s Israel. Israel is under attack. And the media is only showing one side and people are stupid enough to believe that. Seagull2000 (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

אני גם מישראל אחי. אני יודע RM (Be my friend) 14:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Israel didn’t kill innocent children. The IDF tells them to leave they just don’t..." This editor might benefit from reading our article on Dehumanization, and perhaps getting therapy.

תשמור על עצמך

Onceinawhile (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

On 22 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. starship.paint (exalt) 15:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 05:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Reenem. I need to ask u a question about edit that u did almost four years. ago but first of all, do you speak Hebrew? since your an Israeli I assume that you can understand Hebrew and if I right it would be easier for me to explain my question in Hebrew... Benbaruch (talk) 23:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do. I'm not a native speaker but i know it very well. RM (Be my friend) 02:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

עלי, היישוב שבו הוא התגורר כתוב כככה:"במאי 2011 הודיעה המדינה על כוונתה להכשיר את הבתים ולהשאיר שטח חלופי לצורך פיצוי אם יימצא טוען לבעלות על הקרקע (על פי הצעתו של דן מרגלית)" לא ברור אם רק הבית שלו הוסדר וכל שאר הבתים נהרסו ולכן רציתי לשאול אותך אתמול אם אולי אתה זוכר אם במקור של ישראל היום היה כתוב שהבתים נהרסו כדי לתקן את מה שכתוב בויקיפדיה העברית אבל עכשיו מצאתי את המקור הזה

(שיצא ב-2015; אותה שנה שבה כתבת בעריכה שלך שכל הבתים חוץ מביתו של קליין נהרסוׁׁׁׂׂ) כתוב שבית אחר בשכונה נהרס אבל כל הבתים שהיו בסכנת הריסה, כולל ביתו של קליין (שאלמנתו גרה עם אלמנתו של רס"ן אלירז פרץ) הוסדרו ולכן אני עכשיו שואל יכול להיות שהתבלבלת בין שתי ההריסות וטעית ושכל שאר בתים בשכונה כולל הבית של רועי קליין לא נהרסו? ובית אחר נהרס ב-2015 ומה שכתבת לא נכון? אתה יכול לענות לי באנגלית אם זה נוח לך יותר, אני מבין אנגלית טוב מאוד אבל מתקשה קצת בכתיבה של דברים ארוכים באנגלית.

Benbaruch (talk) 11:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW can u please fix this mistake:Talk:Israeli casualties of war#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2021? Benbaruch (talk) 11:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

יכול להיות שטעיתי. אני באמת לא זוכר כל זה,זה היה כמה שנים לפני. אם יש הוכחה שאני לא היה נכון, אז תשנה את זה. RM (Be my friend) 11:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it! is it clear? English isn't my native language and I will be glad if you would be able to tell me if it is understandable... Benbaruch (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, obviously not written by a native English speaker but understandable. I might make a few minor grammar edits later though.--RM (Be my friend) 14:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Request for inputs: A Peer review request has been made for the article Women's shelter to brainstorm and understand information gaps and uncovered areas and to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved, please do share your inputs at the review page.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 03:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohsen_Fakhrizadeh&diff=1045066885&oldid=1045065810 Did you use your own wording, not a copyrighted copy and paste ? --92.184.102.229 (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't copy and paste. My own wording may have been pretty close to it but I'll go over it again and see if there's more I can change. RM (Be my friend) 12:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of Fiji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pickle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reenem. I came across this article while correcting cite errors. You added a section titled "Murder case", but the supplied refne was never defined. I've commented out the section as

Do you want the memoirs of an Egyptian commander about the war of attrition at your command, sir? Dante Rixy (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which memoirs are you talking about?--RM (Be my friend) 16:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Egyptian General Ahmed Ismail has a great detailed description of the war of attrition, as well as the memoirs of Saad El-Din El-Shazly and others Dante Rixy (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's it called? And is it available in English?--RM (Be my friend) 17:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course, it is available in English Dante Rixy (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will bring you the link. Inside my page on the discussion sir only a minute Dante Rixy (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Action of 5 April 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action of 5 April 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 23:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We are having a mess after the edit you made (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1070348214). I honestly don't understand why the article is not under ARBPIA protection in the first place. After all, it deals with Zionism. Could you please interviene? Maybe ask for extended-protection, participate in the talk page or something? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauleredge (talk • contribs) 09:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get back to you after work. RM (Be my friend) 10:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yishai Schlissel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yishai Schlissel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reenem, I nominated Levantine Article for FAC, one of the many Arabic varieties spoken in Israel. As you contributed to Languages of Israel, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 09:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yair Lapid, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reenem. I noticed that you often edit biographies and are in

For this edit in 2010[2]. Doug Weller talk 15:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The article 2009 Espinar bus crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I find no lasting coverage either in English or in Spanish; doesn't meet

WP:NEVENTS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DFlhb (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you add 1 killed on Israel casualties, here your sourceshttps://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/04/middleeast/jenin-israel-operation-not-over-intl/index.html , put it there Mlakop12 (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

RfC

Siege of Khan Yunis has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]