User talk:Renamed user 7hq09uwypo226qfc

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome! — 

MS products shipping with Arial Black Italic. — Edokter (talk) — 13:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you have renominated it for G6 in spite of the fact that I re-created it. Perhaps you have forgotten that recreation automatically renders deletion controversial. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. That is quite true. But how did you get from there to "trolling"? Trolls attempt to steal the spotlight; if anything you must accuse me of vandalism. . But seriously, I disagree with the move. That's all. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my many years experience with Windows Update, it always started at 10:00 AM Los Angeles time, sharp, not a minute before or later. Of course, I don't have a reliable source for this, but you should not challenge information without a reson. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of sources, I do have one: The Administrator Shortcut Guide to Patch Management By Rod Trent, p. 51, [1]. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The updates show up in Download Center before they are added to WU, and the KB articles and the Technet bulletin get unlocked even later. Reverted.

talk) 20:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	HI, thanks for your message about undoing my edit in which you erroneously assert that I made a modification with not explanation. I explained that I removed a redirect because it led to a page that contained unverified material which was factually incorrect. Keith.w8888 (talk) 07:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G8'd the sandboxen of new users

A) Being sandboxen, those pages aren't really dependent on the redirect target so much as the user existing. That, and moving around and then deleting the sandboxen of inexperienced users so they can't follow what's happened is just bad encyclopaediaship for the reasons explained at Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. WilyD 11:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I responded here so do you have a response? At the very least, I think you should discuss it with User:Johnuniq rather than dump a sandbox there that isn't wanted. I have an RfC related to that fairly large project, I'd like to know I can move forward on it without having things reverted without discussion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:04, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This should now be resolved. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Regarding your merger proposal for the

Hello Ï¿½. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chu Jetcheng/common.css, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Creator was not the only editor of this page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you'd like to look at the case of

talk) 20:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay, I've deleted it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I want my archives tidied I will do it myself. Please do not interfere with my pages. --

Hi. I've undone your closes because (as I understand it) a non-admin can't close on a verdict they can't enforce. That is, a non-admin can close as Keep, Merge or Redirect, but not Delete as they can't do it. Anyway, the discussions were only started today, and are supposed to be up for about a week. It is OK to put a speedy tag on something listed at XfD, but the discussion stays open until either the tag is acted on and an admin deletes it (and the discussion may then be non-admin or admin closed as 'Speedy Deleted') or removed (in which case the discussion stays open anyway...). It is possible to close as Keep before time, but really only if someone has called SNOW and there are loads of Keeps and no Deletes (except the nomination). It's safer to leave it. Things can change quite quickly some times. OK? Definitely don't close something where there's only the nomination present. Even after seven days. If it's got that far, relist it. Peridon (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found this while looking for something else

WP:NACD. I was right. (Breathes sigh of relief...) Peridon (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, just to mention that after a RFD discussion has been closed, Template:Old RfD needs to be added to the subject's talk page. To help, I have done this at Talk:COPY (command). HTH. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"handling the data through the data" is not a grammatically, technically or logically correct statement... what is "handling the data through the data" mean? it is a confusing statement that does not ad any value or clarifies anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikEditor (talk • contribs) 23:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ï¿½

Please visit the talk page of Boeing X-48 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boeing_X-48) to see the notability of the Boeing 797 hoax.

Wikipedia is a very important source of information for people, today. Removing tiny bits of information does not help educate people. At the time of creating that section, I visited wikipedia searching for info on the Boeing 797. failing to find anything, i resorted to the rest of the net. at the end, i managed to collate quite a bit of info including the exact issue from which the image was sourced.

the whole point of wikipedia is to educate people, not to hide info. for your info, this design is based on BWB-450 on which the X-48A and subsequently B & C are based. in short, this render was inspired from an actual physical concept model preceding X-48. also fyi, the BWB-450 was supposed to be a 450 passenger aircraft BWB concept but when the design was carried over to X-48, it was decided to scrap the passenger part for the time being with more focus on military applications like air-refuelling.

officially, there is no talk by boeing or nasa to bring in such planes to the commercial sector in the imminent future. and this is where the 797 hoax has to be mentioned and cleared.

I am open to further discussion but as a hoax, it is still quite notable. I would like to revert this by the weekend, if possible.

Perhaps we can arrange a discussion on the Talk page of Blended Wing Body to reword the info a bit - however, it is important that people are educated about this hoax. We want wikipedia to be a source of reliable knowledge, right? If nothing is available here, the average person will resort to a questionable blog and think the info there is correct.

Till the date a Boeing 797 is truly released & a wiki page created for it, this section needs a home under the Blended Wing Body page. --Krishvanth (talk) 01:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not me who deleted the section. You’re talking to the wrong person.

talk) 07:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Hello! Please have a look at a recent expansion I've made to the

Hello, Ï¿½. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ï¿½. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move this page to User:Umbrella? anshAnsh666 07:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Um, because that user page was not created by

talk) 08:22, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I see your point. Do you think it's really necessary at this point, though?

User:☂ hasn't edited in 3.5+ years and was never really active in the first place. If you do, I guess you can move it back. ansh666 16:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

This has been done incorrectly (i.e. it shouldn't have been done at all), and Ansh666 was right to revert your change. There are two separate accounts at play here: Special:CentralAuth/Umbrella and Special:CentralAuth/Umbrella~enwiki. The first one (Umbrella) has it's home wiki on trwiki and should not have an enwiki userpage until they create it. The second one (Umbrella~enwiki) is the current username of the old Umbrella account (see more at mw:SUL finalisation). User:Umbrella should be moved back to User:Umbrella~enwiki and User:Umbrella should be deleted, as the Umbrella~enwiki account does not retain the right to the Umbrella name and userpage. I'd also suggest that users be more careful when moving pages that have been previously moved due to renames. Nihlus 01:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that

talk) 05:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

HEY WHY DID U DELETE MY PAGE!????? U KNOW I DIDNT PUBLISH IT SO WTF HAPPENED THAT U DELETED MY DRAFT!!! THAT WAS A DRAFT NOT EVEN PUBLISHED THAT U DELETED IT! CANT I EVEN MAKE DRAFTS ON THE WIKI!??? PLUS THE LINK IN YOUR MESSAGE TO ME WASN'T THE PLACE I COPIED THIS STUFF FROM! https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH98539.html PLS RECOVER MY PAGE OR UR A **** and also a *** :D. THX FOR NOTHING! (666)

First, you're not allowed to copy content to Wikipedia from anywhere. That's why your draft was deleted. Second, please do not make

personal attacks on people doing the right thing. ansh666 16:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, would you consider changing your username? Those characters can be very hard to type on most standard keyboards used by anglophones and in the era of the ping can be disruptive. If you want to check if another username is free you can go here. If you want you can request a rename either by pinging me here or by going to Special:GlobalRenameRequest. All the best, TonyBallioni (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop doing this. That serves no purpose whatsoever. That is not what shortcuts are for. They are for editors to use to make typing faster in talk pages and in their own URL bar. Use as a piped link target, all it does it make it harder for users (especially new ones) to have a clear idea where the link is going to take them. "WP:LQ" is completely meaningless to anyone who is not a long-term editor already (and still meaningless to any who are a) not frequent MoS visitors and b) have been for so long they were around before the "MOS:LQ" shortcut style was introduced something like a decade ago).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 23:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

LOL. Anyway, sorry if that was grousey. Concurrently, I've been dealing with weird resistance (without any rationale) to expansion of shortcuts as link targets by a pair of people at

WT:MOSTV#Recent edits 23 July 2018.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• If the conensus at RFCN is to disallow your usernaame, do you already now what you will want your account renamed to?
  ✉ 17:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Ï¿½, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Renamed user 7hq09uwypo226qfc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log

)

Accept reason:

User has been renamed.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(my former username)

Can you login and confirm that this account is yours? Otherwise, you'll need to place a usurp notice on the page and wait 7 days.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!

I have closed your deletion nomination of Philosophy of color. Just because an article doesn't contain a certain piece of information does not mean it has to be deleted. I've been guilty of using deletion as cleanup myself, I admit. If you think the article is missing something, then add what's missing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am by no means someone who would be able to rewrite the article, but the yeah, the AfD nomination was an impulsive reaction after being appalled at the

talk) 19:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Sometimes I can't read. It even says that it's a hard-coded instance... my apologies. Primefac (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nowak Kowalski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 15:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi what are all these pages you have created without any text in the title? Dom from Paris (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

On a second thought, i was overreacting and these don't need to be deleted. It's not like there is another thing called

talk) 14:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I admit that it is my error. Thanks for fixing that. Cheers. 1233^Talk 02:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nowak Kowalski. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tft still has some related orphaned content (e.g., Template:Tft/doc), and numerous other template docs still link to it. As far as I can tell, all uses of it have been replaced over the years, but it's been a while since I've worked much with templates, and it's hard to verify since it's a subst template. Do you think you (or someone else with more recent experience) could clean up the now-outdated links and pages? Along the way, chances are you'll also find some other metatemplates I made ages ago that have been orphaned, since they were primarily used by tft. If you're not able to do the cleanup, I can attempt it, but it might take me a while since I haven't worked with any of this in several years. Thanks! —Zenexer [talk] 04:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 16:58, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Talk Talk - The Colour of Spring.jpg

talk) 16:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Talktalkalbumcover.jpg

talk) 17:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Merlin Monroe listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Merlin Monroe. Since you had some involvement with the Merlin Monroe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 19:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R other listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:R other. Since you had some involvement with the Template:R other redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

"􏰉" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 􏰉. Since you had some involvement with the 􏰉 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lesbian treaty" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lesbian treaty. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#Lesbian treaty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vahurzpu (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GPT-2

A tag has been placed on GPT-2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Need this cleared out so I can move my user subpage to the mainspace article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. jp×g 17:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia:HITLER

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_28#Wikipedia:Hitler

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

talk) 18:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

"Wikipedia:HITLER" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

talk) 18:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination for merging of Template:WMF IP

Template:Private IP. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Category:Philosophy/Science articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion

Category:Philosophy/Science articles needing expert attention has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Windows®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

Windows® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Windows® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

"Harlan Ellison®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

Harlan Ellison® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Harlan Ellison® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

"Template:R codename" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R codename and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Template:R codename until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Terminal value (philosophy/" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Terminal value (philosophy/ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21 § Terminal value (philosophy/ until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bitness" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bitness has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Bitness until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]