User talk:Sanathndk

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

Sockpuppet investigation

Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sanathndk:

This is a reply to the email you just sent me- I thought it was best to reply on Wikipedia itself, since a problem seems to have come up.

The problem here is, Santhndk, that you're undoing edits without giving any reason why you're doing them. You're also not following the rules on Wikipedia, and you're making the article worse in terms of references. I understand that you're trying to improve the article, but you need to understand that that's what I'm trying to do as well. Let me try and explain what's going on here.

First, I notice you've rolled back both edits I've done. In both of those edits, I removed the

like 'psc' and 'ndu' because I felt it was pointless to have so many of them in one article- the article ends up looking like an Army website, not an encyclopedia article. Have a look at other Wikipedia articles for military units- you wont find them full of postnominals, because the ordinary reader isn't here to look at what awards the officers have- they're interested in reading about the Signals Corps. What does RWP and USP and the other postnominals add to the article other than confusing a non-Sri Lankan reader? If I were a foreigner reading that article, how would I know what these letters were? Instead of undoing the edits and sending me an email telling me not to edit the article and stay off the page, you could've written a message on my talkpage and we could have discussed this and come to an agreement.

Second, the article doesn't have any sources or references (

. You can't just add information because you're in the Signals Corps and claim it's the 'correct' details. Most of the edits I did before you started editing the page were from the Signals Corps webpage- I was about to add some references for the information I added when you started editing the page again, and now, I'm quite sure the details on the article and the details on the website don't match. So now, it's impossible to add any references to that page, because the only source for a lot of that information is you. There's no official website or news article or book to give as a reference.

So the question is, how do we fix this? - ක - (talk) 15:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - ක - (talk) 16:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Sanathndk, unfortunately you've had more than sufficient time to respond both at ANI and to the preceding attempt to communicate with you. Communication is required. You can't just revert an editor and contact them off-wiki telling them not to edit the page. If you want to continue editing here, you need to show us you're willing to communicate. Swarm ♠ 17:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanathndk. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 12:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]