If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Note that I have also tagged File:New Nightmare Claw.JPG and File:Freddy and Nancy.PNG as orphaned. J Milburn (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fictional isn't needed. The fact that it isn't linked to indicates that it isn't referring to the real Springwood. Jackie Earl actually shouldn't be listed at all until the film actually comes out. The section is for "Appearances" and to claim that title the film needs to be released. Who said he was German? Caucasian isn't "American", see Caucasian race. Also, the fact that he kills a multitude of people in a single outing makes him a mass murderer. If he killed one or two people over time, then he'd be a serial killer, but he kills too many in single spurts to be classified as such. Mass murderers don't have to stop after one mass killing, it just defines the number of people they kill in each event.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, the page should be "Freddy Krueger..... In the original film, the character is known only as "Fred Krueger". "Freddy" didn't come about till the sequels, but it's the most commonly known name (hence why the article is titled that). This "Frederick Charles..." stuff is purely fan trivia. He isn't known by that name outside of a single film, that's it. It's always "Fred" or "Freddy". My assumption is that because of his last name that it is assumed he has German...but that's not established in the films (as far as I know) nor is it relevant to understanding the character any. The reason "Caucasian" is listed is because it's associated with being "White", and with his burned face you technically cannot assume he's white be appearances alone. I cleaned up the Ash infobox. As for the claw stuff, I can try. I've been busy trying to finish the reception section on The Last House on the Left, but I can watch the development of the section as you work on it and assist where you need.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, because I don't go to the IMDb page. Since that page is user submitted, it could be that the person that did the Wikiquote page also did the IMDb page. Or they could have copy and pasted. Since Wikiquote isn't bound by the same rules as Wikipedia, it doesn't really matter all that much.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated KidsPedia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidsPedia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cameron Scott (talk) 11:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! I noticed you have done a lot of GA reviews lately, which is great, but are you sure you are reviewing each article thoroughly enough? Seven reviews in an hour seems like a lot. The nominee should be carefully checked against

I'll have a look. I just think it's important that we try to maintain quality and treat the nominee fairly by giving a thorough review. However, I am not a very experienced reviewer, so I have started a discussion at

WT:GAN, where a lot of good reviewers hang out. You may want to join the discussion there. Regards, decltype (talk

) 06:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hell, I even rushed to thank you for reviewing an article I put up for GA immediately after I saw you had reviewed it (something I don't have to do), and noticing your edits lately I commended your effort to be proactive in gaining more experience and even offered you a tip on other aspects to focus on that is often brought up in an Admin nomination (i.e. when I said you should look at the policy on Deletion and take part in some more AfDs.). In my above comment: "To me, it looks like you're showing a lot of initiative in trying to gain that experience for potential adminship (I saw when you were declined). That's good." -- You'll note that I clearly say "That's good", meaning I think it's good that you are trying to gain more experience for potential adminship. Now, if you find all of this hostile, I apologize for the misunderstanding, and I'll just mind my own edits and not bother to clarify anything anymore...so as to not create potential future misunderstandings.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 21:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

We cannot use that fansite as a source. If they say, "According to ...." then you need to click on the source they are getting it from and cite that one. In this case, we should be using The Times and not ANightmareOnElmStreetMovie.com.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead and make the request for the other page to be deleted so we can move the sandbox over. Now that I've cleaned up the page, it's looking nicer than I thought it could at this particular time. It probably still doesn't warrant a page to itself because of its size, but it's pretty organized and has good sources so I'm willing to back off my original stance and support the separation. :D  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Nightmare remake doesn't necessarily need to be mentioned on the 1984 page, except to put a hatnote at the top that says "This is for the 1984 film, for the upcoming 2010 remake see ...." As for The Birds. Just create a section entitled, "Remake", at the bottom of the page, below all of the stuff directly pertaining to the original film. As far as I've heard, there currently isn't a film being made for The Birds. They want to make one, but apparently they are having trouble actually coming up with an original script for the film. As such, they may never actually make the movie.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I saw your name over at the GOCE. Could you take a look at the article

Great new name. Oh, by the way - I made a nifty little ubx randomizer, in case you're interested (displays a random userbox of your choosing). {{Ubxdisplay/random}} –xeno^talk 03:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for trying it out! It seems that it can't accept templates with parameters (such as {{

User Wikipedian For}}). There is a workaround I described in the template documentation. You also have to write the whole name of the template for userboxes that begin with Template: –xeno^talk

15:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree. Nice name! Abce2|AccessDenied 03:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

What they said! I don't think there was nothing wrong with your old name, but I'm glad you found a name even the pickiest of editors can't disagree with :) Jafeluv (talk) 06:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I mean Qui. Abce2|AccessDenied 10:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Just got it. Abce2|AccessDenied 10:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, just now.Abce2|AccessDenied 14:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Is this bot authorized? Cirt (talk) 11:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

It showed up at

WP:UAA. Cirt (talk

) 11:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

You should see it there now. Cirt (talk) 11:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Serial killer should be removed outright and replaced with "mass murderer" where relevant. The lead only needs citations when there is something particularly controversial, as there should not be anything in the lead paragraphs that isn't in the body of the article (and thus, it's cited in the body of the article). Fictional wouldn't need to be cited anywhere, because it's obvious he is fictional. You'd have a hard time debating otherwise. The same goes for having appeared in all of the films, you can simply watch the film to verify that. Supernatural is a characterization, and should be cited when used in the body of the article.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Mass murderer isn't in the lead paragraphs, to my knowledge. As for when to "just watch the film to verify", that's typically for objective information. As pointed, there seems to be issues with serial killer and mass murderer that would constitute a reliable source characterizing Freddy as such. I don't need a source to say his sweater is green and red, because it's obvious from watching the movie and only someone colorblind would dispute such a claim.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 00:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

He is a "fictional character". A fictional character is one who is not real. Freddy is not real. A fictional fictional character is a fictional character within a fictional universe. For instance, Itchy and Scratchy are fictional characters within the fictional setting of The Simpsons. To say "he's a character" is vague, because there are different types of characters.

If that guy wants Freddy as his dad, more power to him. I doubt it would be a healthy relationship. As for your question about

List of Harry Potter films cast members, because it's a featured list.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me)

23:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Most of the references are for the upcoming films, because they haven't been released yet. Some of them, for the ones that have been released, are because a character was either incorrectly credited or the actor was not credited at all. The IMDb stuff really shouldn't be there, I would just cite the movies themselves because you can just view the credits to see all that's in there.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 00:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, can you revisit Talk:Treehouse of Horror/GA1 as soon as you have time? Thanks, TheLeftorium 14:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. Concerning your recent GA reviews; recently you reviewed several articles within a short time and put them all on hold. As a general rule of thumb, this allows editors one week to improve the articles per the suggestions of your review. However, some feel that your reviews/suggestions were extremely vague and in the five days since, you have not elaborated upon the reviews per their requests (myself included). You have been active within this time span, so I was just wondering if you were still planning on responding to the comments left on your review pages. Thanks. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

(edit conflict) I will remember that :). Personally i found that adding the template is often a good method to inform a user; Since i started using the template the amount of questions with just one question and responce have at least lowered. The template itsself is called {{helpdeskreply}} Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Many of those you reported were blocked years ago.

Tagging the pages is used for putting them in

Triplestop (talk

) 15:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia needs more people willing to do that and less willing to spam [citation needed] on everything. 67.232.95.224 (talk) 23:27, 25, June 2009 (UTC)

I have blocked

OK, unblocked for name-change request. I'm seeing your username around a lot at the moment, which may or may not be a good sign. You're coming across as very eager, but possibly over-enthusiastic and trying to run before you can walk (e.g. requesting a bot account authorisation when you don't really know the bot rules). Just don't try to do everything at once, take it slowly, learn how Wikipedia works over time and you'll be fine. Beware the dangers of "burn-out"!

Bencherlite^Talk

12:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for following up on your reviews from a week or so ago. Just to let you know, there is some confusion as to whether or not you actually passed some of the articles, as you seemed to imply they were GA ready while apparently closing the review without ever editing/changing the article's status to indicate that it was, in fact, promoted to GA. Here's an entry on a discussion page. Maybe you can shed a little light on this. Cheerio. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Can you expand on your Watchmen GAR? I need to know what to work on! igordebraga ≠ 20:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

On your classifacation, it says you started August 29 2009. Just saying.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 01:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

At the top it saya meet at a glance.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 03:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Per this, you've been on Wikipedia since April 29, 2009. -

The Vulcan Overlord

16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Never mind. I got mixed up. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 13:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

When you directly quote someone you are not allowed to change their wording or structure. If you do, whatever you do needs to be placed inside of brackets. For instance, if a quote says "him", but the rest of the quote doesn't identify who "him" is, then you would put [Person's name], to indicate that you've added something to the quote. Since the original Englund quote is far too long, and I had to trim stuff out, I had to put 3 elipses inside of the brackets to indicate that there is information that was taken out of the quote.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

If you undo something that has already been undone it doesn't show up because the action already took place. It doesn't indicate that it already took place, it just pretends to save it like normal. If you see vandalism, then you undo it and you do not see your name in the history (assuming of course the note of "There is 336 seconds of server lag" isn't at the top of the page), then assume that someone else must have done it before you.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Also, it's alright to drop the "A" in A Nightmare on Elm Street when it does not fit grammatically. In essence, the title is listed as "Nightmare on Elm Street, A" when you catelog, and so when the "A" interrupts the sentence you can drop it in favor of just "Nightmare on Elm Street".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Grammatically you can, because it isn't a quote. It isn't someone's own words you're quoting. Grammatically, dropping the "A" is fine, and correct.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

They are a fansite, and fansites are generally not considered "reliable". If they conduct their own interview, and post that, then sure. If they are just posting stuff from other sources (e.g., Fangoria, LA Times, etc.) then always go to the original source (which you obviously know, because I saw you change one of the sources to its original a few days ago). The only active, official website for any horror movie that I'm aware of is Halloweenmovies.com, because that is owned by the Akkads (who produce the Halloween movies). New Line/Warner Bros. typically creates a general film website that may or may not post production info. Since this is a Platinum Dunes film, Andrew Form and Brad Fuller often will post stuff on their personal website.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't think anyone has said she was Nancy's mom. I've read speculation from people saying they'd like to see her in that role, but nothing (not even scooper reports, which we cannot use) saying she would be. I'm not sure, based on the Google searches I just did, if they've indicated who either of those actors are playing. One could be Freddy's wife, or mom and dad.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 00:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Scarce, I only needed 2 sub-pages deleted (in future, I'll make sure sub-pages have their final name from the beginning!) - also I'm using IE7, so I can't use Twinkle anyway. Thanks for the suggestion though, much appreciated. PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 07:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me get Twinkle to work, although I'm not sure how I got it to work. Kotiwalo (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Hi Scarce, please don't add citation templates if the ref is already well formulated. Use of the templates can be contentious. See WP:CITE. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 08:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The

If you leave your name

here, I can deliver the whole newsletter (see the talk pages of the other editors listed there to see what it would look like). Let me know if you have any questions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib

) 08:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Userboxes generally start "This user", rather than the user's name. Your box here shows the reason why - if the user stores the box on a subpage (as many people do), it doesn't draw up their name properly. Perhaps you'd consider reformatting your userbox to "This user" for consistency and suchlike? Happy editing! Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 09:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Whilst it works on yours, if you go another subpage deeper, it'll stop working. And there's the consistency thing. But it's your userbox and your call entirely, I was just informing. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 09:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Missed one of your posts. Yes, the second link you provided is just a link to New Line's promotional department on their website. It's unlikely that will be updated with anything remake related until it is time to release the remake on DVD.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. I am concerned about your signature; it's prone to causing confusion among new users, as evidenced

User talk:Scarce/Archive/hp

A tag has been placed on Category:TV related templates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the

Hi, Scarce. Please don't provide answers like this at the

Thanks for understanding. I like your current sig, and the "in progress" one is better too. I didn't know about that quote, but I thought it was probably from something. Thanks again. -kotra (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Why was a [sic] added in this article? ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 02:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Scarce,

Sic means there's an error in the original text. This keeps Wikipedia editors from "correcting" the misspelled quoted text. In this text, there are a number of spelling errors. But we shouldn't be correcting them when quoting them. A [sic] just lets readers know that the error didn't happen on Wikipedia. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 06:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Are you the website owner? If it's possible, can you correct the text on the site so we can use the quoted portions without the spelling errors? I'd prefer to use text that makes Mr. Craven look good, and if it's quoted from an audio interview, it's not like he made those typos himself. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, but you said you wrote it as you heard it, right? So, did you write the version quoted on that website? If there's another version without the typos, I'd prefer to use that instead. Any ideas? Firsfron of Ronchester 06:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Ahh. I have no problem copying the quoted text, strangely enough. But it appears as though the text here and there are the same. Sadly. I'd prefer to get a correctly-spelled version, if one exists. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

We can't fix the typos if we use the site as a source. That's what the [sic]s are for. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I've approved the article for GA status; I just need you're final decision. Thanks and good luck. The Flash ^{talk} 16:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I've already reviewed and approved it; as you were the first nominator the article needs your final say/review. The Flash ^{talk} 01:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Good, but I might suggest giving the nominator the ideas for the lacking criteria. Once they meet that and the article is 100% a-okay, I believe it's your job to finish up the final steps declaring it GA, no? The Flash ^{talk} 02:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Gah! Just like the above post says...we need to know what aspects of the character you feel are not covered in the article to satisfy your request. Thanky. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 02:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

No prob. And good. The Flash ^{talk} 04:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello there. The reason for the speedy deletion was given as ... "it was created as a mainspace subpage sandbox that was un-discussed"... However this is very curious ... How do you discuss an deleted page. I specifically was started a discussion about this self same article to garner opinions about it. Talk:Death_of_Michael_Jackson#Possible_addition_regarding_Birmngham.2C_England_.2F_Death_of_Jackson Discussion started It matters not too much one way or the other, the section was absent from the article Death_of_Michael_Jackson. This is not my area ... writing about Michael Jackson. I thought I would let others know of the sources, images and write ups started. But if it is deleted, it cannot even be discussed... and the reason given was that it should be discussed so it is very circular going nowhere and it is also so confusing. But as Michael Jackson is not my subject area I will do nothing more in this regards to see if the Birmingham England Michael Jackson happenstance should be included or not. SriMesh | talk 00:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated File:Freddy Krueger Fonzies.png and File:New Nightmare Claw.JPG for deletion. You may also be interested in a discussion I have started here. Finally, please lose the "troll" message. The edit notice should not be some cabinet for you to display your personal pet peeves. The guidelines are that you may remove messages from your own talk page- not that you can show off to everyone about how you're ignoring someone. J Milburn (talk) 11:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

My God, there was no attack in my message, and paranoia about personal attacks is certainly not something that helps the projects/interactions with other editors. If I've attacked you, you've certainly attacked other editors, in labelling them "trolls". J Milburn (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, what? I don't really care whether you and Bignole have talked in the past. J Milburn (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I do... What's your point? J Milburn (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

You cleared the air... By putting a massive notice in your userspace about how he's a troll, and that you will ignore comments by him? Right. I don't really see what you hope to achieve by arguing to the toss here. The comment's been removed, and I would hope that you would have the sense not to ignore comments, just because they come from someone you dislike. J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Twice today, you've gone for a "hahah! I win! You suck!" type message- here and here. Not only is it incredible immature, but it makes you look like a fool if/when you are wrong. You need to calm down a little-

Yes, I'm an admin... I have been for a long time, pretty uncontroversially. What are you trying to imply? J Milburn (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

"Check and mate"? J Milburn (talk) 16:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll assume that was ironic, but be aware that humour doesn't really travel well. You say on your userpage that you're looking for an admin coach- here I am, a fairly prominent and well respected admin, giving you advice, and you're just throwing it back in my face. To repeat- calm down a little, and stop being so confrontational. We're all friends here, let's keep it that way, hmm? J Milburn (talk) 16:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

You don't appear to be a vandal, so what was up with this edit? Why did you revert my removal of old vandalism?—Kww(talk) 21:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know I didn't restore vandalism just now, I clicked revert and I forgot to make it present in the difference between revisions page to preview what edit it was, it's should be fixed now though. Thanks ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 21:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I take it you found the "Source: Variety" below the huge picture of Connie? They're link appears broken, but the dates are the same (May 21) for the reports, so it's got to be the same Variety article. It's a likely guess that she's playing Marge, but the we don't know for sure and we don't even know if they are going to keep the name "Marge". The only name their are keeping so far is Freddy and Nancy. Everyone else seems to be getting new names.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Scarce. You signed up to assess several articles for Good Article status, and, perhaps due to taking on a lot at once for a new reviewer, the assessments are being discussed at the project page.

Some of the reviews have been open a while now without activity. To finish things up, please would you weigh in again at the discussion linked above to say whether you want to continue as the primary reviewer or are happy to have other editors take over the 5 remaining reviews?

You have pointed out that you studied the criteria, which is great. While some of the criteria like good prose are easier to assess though, the underlying guidelines or policies covered in some of the other criterions can be harder to get to grips with. I see it's already been suggested that you ask a

Your enthusiasm for reviewing articles nominated for GA is admirable, Scarce. If you plan to take part in reviewing articles in the future though, you should please first make sure that you are familiar with the

You have edited daily across the site during that time. While all of us have offline commitments or may do small on-wiki tasks faced with limited time, if you are around, it is important you keep people informed when you agree to a task like reviewing an article they nominated. Because you have not responded and this is unfair on those waiting, I will withdraw your under-review notices on the articles you signed up to assess. This will let a new reviewer take care of them. Please do not sign up to review further articles without making sure you are both familiar with how to apply the criteria and prepared to respond to questions asked in the reviews. Thank you. –Whitehorse1 22:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

thanks for suggestion now i first search for references then edit & please don't revert shakira awards wikipedia Ashish vats (talk) 13:10, 11July 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated the above image for deletion. Twinkle seems to have difficulties notifying you. J Milburn (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I do my best ;) J Milburn (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I am not an admin but would like to point out that if you are "wanting to become an admin", chances are that the community will never let you be one. I looked at your very first edits and they don't look like coming from a new user; do you have any undisclosed accounts? Another thing:immaturity. The way your userspace is designed gives me an intuition that you may be 12 - 16 year old. --Truth Lover88 (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Scarce. Recently I check the article you write on the Spanish Wikipedia (this one) and I have to fix your translation to make it more comprehensible, though it could be understood by a native reader of

Yes, you can use some images on Spanish Wikipedia as flags, coats of arms, roundels, smileys; but the signature preferably don't exceed three lines of wikitext. It's not allowed the inclusion of offensive pictures (as nazi symbols, nor the

Was willst du mir sagen?

17:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, fixed those race images, thanks for pointing me to the right place, didn't realize I could only use commons images. But regarding the ==Headers== for races, I looked at it with and without them, and without them, it looks like crap. Do you have any other ideas, in-between no heading, and the ==heading==? And what's the objection to the ==heading==? Is it against the MOS somewhere? --^Despay_re (^tal_k) 07:08, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Scarce. Regarding this; the medical disclaimer includes articles, help pages and the reference desk. We can't provide a guarantee on the accuracy of any information about illnesses or medicine anywhere on Wikipedia. Cheers. ≈ Chamal ^talk 12:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Scarce. You have new messages at Chamal N's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

≈ Chamal ^talk 12:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

The portal looks good (though I'd probably not have the gray background with gray text, kind of hard to read), my only concern is that it's topic is too small. Meaning, you're going to be recycling a lot of information because there just are not that many pages for this topic.

As for 25/8, right now I think it doesn't deserve a page. I would either

Let me know when you start the discussion. As for the article number, I'm referring to actual topics on the mainspace (see what's at Category:A Nightmare on Elm Street). There are only 19 pages, and at least 3 probably need to be merged. I'm just saying I'm not sure there are enough mainspace topics to warrant a whole portal.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Unless these shows are explicitely stating "Freddy Krueger", we cannot just simply cite the show. There are only a couple of instances that I know of where that is the case (The Simpsons and Robot Chicken). I have no idea about the X-Files thing, or the other. That's why it's just sitting in the section. Without secondary sources most of this stuff will have to go completely, because it's based on original research of people saying "that's Freddy" when the show doesn't actually say it. It's like how a lot of shows will have a guy in a hockey mask. Yes, that's clearly "Jason", but the fact that they don't call him that means we cannot just cite the show and say "someone dress up like Jason", because they could have dressed up like anyone with a hockey mask.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

It's in the sandbox because I pulled it from the mainspace article a long time ago. Just about everything in the "Popular culture" section I pulled from the mainspace article a long time ago. What about you talking about with the couch gag? I said that The Simpsons and Robot Chicken were the only ones I could think of where it was clearly Freddy Krueger (whether through identical appearance, or identified by name). I never said the cough gag needed secondary source (though, I believe if you go to the Jason article, there is a secondary source attached to it that can be used - see <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/simpsons/episodeguide/season10/page3.shtml|title=Treehouse of Horror IX|publisher=[[BBC]]|accessdate=2007-07-14}}</ref>). What I said was that I have no idea about the X-Files or any of those other shows. If those shows are trying to make an "allusion" to the character, then we need a secondary source, no matter how obvious it is to us fans. If they are flat out identifying the character (by name, or identical appearance - which would be a full outfit and burned face) then we don't.

Just a helpful hint, never use Google Web as your search. Use Google News, Google Books, or Google Scholar. Google Web gives you nothing but fan sites and unreliable sources. The other three give you usable sources. When searching, always put any exact terms in quotation marks. If you don't use quotation marks then Google will find any word that even closely resembles the one your looking for, but if you put it in quotation marks then it will search only for that exact term.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

From what I can see at the source, that could be an official logo released by the studio. At least, that is the way the article is presenting it.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

In this case, the "A" would need to be dropped. You cannot have two articles back to back ("the" and "A") in a title like that. It should either be "List of characters in the Nightmare on Elm Street series" or "Characters of A Nightmare on Elm Street". To clarify. The series is called the "Nightmare on Elm Street" series. The first film is called "A Nightmare on Elm Street".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

That's up to you if you think it's ready.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate the award. :D  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

hi there: you want to delete Template:WikiProject Horror/Krueger task force/Invite, but it is transcluded on several user pages. Do you want to take it off all these pages, or just leave a red link, or change the box to say you are no longer invited? Or some other option I did not thin of? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please review Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive199#Use of this page do not bring stuff like this to the administrators noticeboard. You can tag the article for cleanup, clean it up yourself, or nominate it for AFD. –xeno^talk 20:21, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Scarce/Archive/hp I noticed your comment on an RfA... where you praised a candidate for low deleted edits. Note that those primarily come from tagging articles for deletion, so a low ratio is often viewed as bad, at least, if it's too low. This isn't as important if they don't want to work on deleting articles. Gigs (talk) 03:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Re [7]...if you aren't going to be helpful when replying then please don't reply at all. (And please get rid of the Newton's cradle and blinking text. It'll give someone a seizure.) Xenon54 (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

There's no point for an infobox on a franchise page like that. Almost everything in the infobox is linked directly to the left. The box would become obscenely long if we included every individual item that was released for the franchise. There are over a dozen books out alone.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 06:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

We have a table of contents immediately to the left, which is a link to all the appropriate sections. Those comic pages will be merged to the franchise page here in the future because they are not notable in their own right. The magazine should probably be merged. None of the soundtracks are notable and should merged back to their respective films. The only things that would have links would be the films, and they are in the first section of the article, plus in the nav box at the bottom of the page.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to take a moment to delivery a personal thank you (not "thank spam" :)) for your involvement in my RfA. (It passed 117-2-7 in case you hadn't seen.) I appreciated both the kind words you said about my accomplishments thus far, and the fact that you declined to support based on some flaws of mine. I am not perfect, and comments like yours will help me improve. I will take your mild criticism into consideration as I work to serve the community in my new role. If you would ever find my assistance as an editor or as an administrator useful, please don't hesitate to ask as I would be glad to help.

Thanks again, ThaddeusB (talk) 17:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Hi Scarce. Following this I just thought I'd point out that both of the following:

<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:trivia|trivia]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>

{{tl|nowiki}}

produce this:

{{nowiki}},

which may be useful to know. Now I just have to pray no-one comes to tell me a more efficient way of producing the second line of this post than the gargantuan tangle of tags I use above, lest we end up in some sort of infinite regress... Olaf Davis (talk) 12:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

As far as this goes, that's how the language is written. There are a lot of languages that are not written from left to right (like English). Some are written right to left, and even up to down. Regarding other language links that actually go to the original film. If they truly only cover the first film, then they need to be removed. If they go to a franchise page that is using the first film's poster as their "lead" photo, then that's ok. Just make sure it's only discussing the first film, and then remove it. They should already be linked on the film's page.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I presume this is in reference to Shakira? I was just passing through and saw the rather lamentable state of the talkpage, so I though I would be useful and archive it. In terms of Miszabot I have thought about it and I don't want to impose it on articles that I don't regularly edit. Even then I generally prefer manually archiving as then I can see what is being archived, whether I have missed something or whether I need to follow something up. Bots can't do that. It is personal opinion though and I don't feel strongly enough to remove it from articles once it has been introduced. Regards, Woody (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! This is just to let you know that the good article review for the Watchmen film has finally begun, in case you were not already aware. :) BOZ (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I've added the rollback flag to your account. Any questions please ask me. Full information is at

Thank you! • S • C • A • R • C • E • 19:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Ah yes, now I see the difference. I thought you had simply used a different word so as not to sound repetitive. Is this better? Andrea (talk) 03:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

True enough. However, saying something along the lines of "currently unpublished" implies that it will be published but just hasn't come out yet, which isn't correct either. Andrea (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I'm the one who changed it from "the film adaptation" to "a film adaptation". ;) I re-linked Pattinson because although it is linked once prior in the lead, it is done so when no mention is even made of who he is. I thought that when listing the main stars, which is probably one of the most important lines in the lead that most people will read, all of the actors should be linked. I wouldn't object to you removing it, though. Maybe that line should be moved up, actually, to right after the first sentence. Andrea (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

No worries! Also, I made some changes to the cast article, partly to deal with that Pattinson linking issue. Andrea (talk) 03:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Thank you very much. Actually it's not that great: the code is inelegant and requires lots of repeats of expressions like: "(24+{{#time:G}}+{{{offset|0}}})" because the MediaWiki variables extension isn't enabled on Wikimedia servers. And even for all that, it doesn't support fractional timezones. I thought about perhaps splitting it into two templates, so the second would be called like a function, but it's also nice having its source kept in just one page. (Any thoughts?) Thanks for the praise anyway. • Anakin ^(talk) 11:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about the possibile notability problem! The notablity guide

Thanks again! Liquidluck (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks- I'll wait until one of these films is released. He's a main character and the primary antagonist in The Last Song, so with that and 25/8 an article should be fine once release dates approach and more press comes out. Liquidluck (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

You found my hidden page! Congratulations! Copy this code to put the barnstar on your userpage:{{User:BIONICLE233/Barnstar}}

It will look like this:User:BIONICLE233/Barnstar

Hello Scarce! I am glad you had fun finding my page, but unfortunately, its being threatened to be deleted. Help me fight for my page here, if you want to. But if you have your own hidden page, I recommend you "lay low" and do not post anything on the linked page. Thank you. BIONICLE233 17:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Haha, what a coincidence! I didn't even realize there had been a conflict. Also, I just noticed the shout-out you gave me here. Thank you very much for the kind review, I really appreciate it! :D Andrea (talk) 05:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh my god, this article needs so much work. I don't even know where to start. Let's make it not suck, though. Any good ideas? Audiosmurf ^♪/♫ 09:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I think the article could take a page from The Colbert Report, with regards to the Segments section. That is to say, I don't really think it needs one. The recurring jokes really does need to be reworked, or (preferably, IMO) stripped down and written into another section. I'm just not sure it requires its own section, yeah? Also, you made your signature pretty slick. :0 Audiosmurf ^♪/♫ 10:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, I've never watched the show so I don't really know what the primary segments are, do you know? The whole "Joos" paragraph in the jokes section I think can be scrapped entirely. Same with the former segments. Do you think so? Also, ha, I was actually in the process of creating this when you sent that last note. :P Audiosmurf ^♪/♫ 10:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

It's good, huh? I'd take a look if we got Fox News up here without fancy cable, but maybe I'll stream an episode or two. We gotta figure out a less clumsy way to word this, though:

Gutfeld will also make frequent and graphic sexual insinuations regarding Bill Schultz, stating or insinuating that Schultz is a "pansexual dilettante", involved in various bizarre fetishes, is a virgin, is African-American or is a homosexual, among similar claims.

It just kind reads really awkwardly. I tried to fix it up a bit earlier, but it needs to be totally reworded I think. Good work with the segments, too. I think a bit about the "Pinch" character is worth keeping in, but I don't think it requires its own subsection. A mention somewhere, possibly in the same area that the "Pinch & Me" segment is worked into, would probably suffice, wouldn't you say? Audiosmurf ^♪/♫ 10:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Playing a bully in at least 2 of his major roles? I think I sense some typecasting XD. Thanks, I'll definitely contribute if I find anything! Liquidluck (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I didn't feel comfortable deleting this article under G7 given that it had survived AFD with a keep from a third party. I would suggest that if you nominate it for prod or AFD you would be pretty certain of getting rid of it. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, just dropping by. How's it going?Abce2|This isnot a test 01:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been working on Wikias too some. What Wikias did you work on, if I may ask?Abce2|This isnot a test 01:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

How do you feel about this one? Though I'm having trouble finding an original source for the image that doesn't have "Jacob" written behind him. Andrea (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Would you prefer this image of Jacob? We could crop off the bottom, where the logo is. Also, as far as I know there has never been a full group picture of the Twilight cast (too many characters!). There are, however, images of many of the individual groups (the Cullens, the wolf pack, the Volturi). Andrea (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Upload which one, the first or second? Andrea (talk) 04:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. If you have an issue with the tone of the article, could you please specify your concerns on the Talk Page, instead of repeatedly tagging it? Having contributed significantly to that article, it irks me to see a tag at the top with little explanation as to why, and I'd appreciate that you clarify any specific problems you see so that we can go about remedying them. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Wanted to say that I noticed some of the issues you seem to have had in one section (for the TV series), and I've attempted to deal with them. If these matters pop up again, can you consider tagging sections instead of the entire article? I believe that a tone tag for the whole thing is somewhat inaccurate, given that these matters don't exist everywhere, and some effort has indeed gone into the article. Of course, let me know if you disagree. -- James26 (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

I responded on the Talk Page. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I attempted a new approach by combining the statements. I'd appreciate your opinion. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

To Scarce:

I have been following all of your "instructions" to the fullest extent. You accuse me of mindlessly deleting the tags; however, perhaps you should have clarified your reason for deleting my images earlier. Moreover, you requested that I add a link to my file on the Volturi and to also procure a reduced version of it. I have followed it most completely. This is a valid link. Please provide more "evidence" before you revert my contributions to Wikipedia, or I will be compelled to take further action in response.

Universityoffelicity

P.S. I would appreciate it if you would be more specific as to why you think my image does not fulfill all the copyright standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Universityoffelicity (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't see significant coverage for that film on it's production, which is the requirement for

Don't get snippy with me. I'm merely telling you what NFF says, and currently that article fails NFF. As for "in the coming weeks", we've basically had the same information for months, with the only new update being that he changed the name of the film. I'd hardly consider that "significant coverage".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me)

19:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I follow the policies and guidelines we have. I'm sorry if you do not like that that is how I operate, or if you just do not agree with them. I have not come to that article and redirected it, started a deletion discussion or tried to merge it. Have I? Now, unless you have something to say to me in a more civil tongue, please do not return to my talk page and continue attacking me as you have been doing as of late. Good day.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Why are all the WOWP main characters pictures have been removed? I believe they DO qualify as free use! --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 01:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Does this picture qualify as "free use" (http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/alex-wizards-of-waverly-place-479556_300_399.jpg)? And this is the article I was talking about: List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters

And I've attempted to split off one article Alex Russo from the above page. Can you help me "clean up" the split? And we seriously need pictures for WOWP main characters! --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

How about this picture? http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/global/wallpaper.html?img=http://atv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/media/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/wallpaper_alex_800x600.jpg&bg=17224A

More can be found at: http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/index.html

--Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

File uploaded: Image:AlexRusso.jpg. Please upload the other main characters. Good night. I'm going to bed now. File:Grin.gif. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Pictures

Why are all the WOWP main characters pictures have been removed? I believe they DO qualify as free use! --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 01:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Does this picture qualify as "free use" (http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/alex-wizards-of-waverly-place-479556_300_399.jpg)? And this is the article I was talking about: List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters

And I've attempted to split off one article Alex Russo from the above page. Can you help me "clean up" the split? And we seriously need pictures for WOWP main characters! --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

How about this picture? http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/global/wallpaper.html?img=http://atv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/media/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/wallpaper_alex_800x600.jpg&bg=17224A

More can be found at: http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/wizardsofwaverlyplace/downloads/index.html

--Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

File uploaded: Image:AlexRusso.jpg. Please upload the other main characters. Good night. I'm going to bed now. File:Grin.gif. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 02:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

The project's

active member list if you have not already. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib

) 04:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

The Schulz article

I added a section on his role on Red Eye W/ Greg Gutfeld. He is on the show everyday, and my article describes his role on the show, how Gutfeld makes fun of him. I even included a video where he acknowledges the "pansexual dilettante" comment (not that he is one, but he has jokingly been described as one by Gutfeld). I included the proper context for Gutfeld's intros of his guests.

For you to accuse me of vandalism is outrageous.

The article is already short. If you think it needs a career section, then add it yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.242.217 (talk) 02:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I did misread your message, and I apologize. But you should realize that many articles are slowly assembled, piece-by-piece, and their quality is gradually improved. If I wrote about his role on Gutfeld (which is what he is known for), I would have added another information (with links). To delete the section just because it didn't have the specific "Career" section is unnecessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.242.217 (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Editors may remove warnings from their talk pages

Per your revert at

WP:BLANKING, however, anything else may be removed. —C.Fred (talk

) 00:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rhaeskg

If you see any other socks of this user pop up, just let me know on my talk page directly or privately (i.e. via email). I think further reporting to SPI is exactly what this user wants, and we shouldn't

give him that recognition. MuZemike

07:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Noted ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 08:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Barnstar awarded

		The Surreal Barnstar
		What a peculiar userpage you have! Indeed, I found myself strangely hypnotized by that little 'show' game at the end. :) œ™ 08:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 20:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Yeah, that user has an obvious bias. Based on their comments on that talkpage (and the move request for the 3rd movie), they oppose any move and has threatened to try and gets admins to patrol the page. Their comments are especially odd ad he tried to say the consensus was to keep the current name. I don't mind being on the losing end of a move request (although not happy either), but when the debate is ongoing and current consensus is on my side (it's 5-2 in favor of moving) I get irritated. TJ Spyke 22:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

Hello, Scarce! This is just a note thanking you for participating in my Phils )

Hello

I'm confused . . . I left a message at User talk:Bignole and you responded. Are you and Bignole one and the same? LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 19:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson

Hi would you consider my suggestion on the Robert Pattinson talk page please Starlemusique (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the

Wikipedia:Twilight

redirect

Hi, I just want to point out that I reverted the change you made to the redirect at

Project Twilight, have a hatnote at the top of the article that directs people looking for the Twilight taskforce in the right direction. I think that'll probably work well for everyone. -- SonicAD (talk

) 03:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I was just looking to be preemptive with my explanation so there'd be no misunderstandings. I've had enough of those in the past to try to be careful. Cheers.-- SonicAD (talk) 07:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Saw template.

Hey there. I stumbled upon the template talk for the

List of Saw cast members, does it belong in the film tab? I realize now it doesnt belong in the below tab, but shouldnt it go somewhere like the "Related" tab? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk

) 05:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. And thanks for the clarification despite my stubbornness. On a side note, I am perplexed by your user page, that must have taken a long, long time to perfect. I was wondering, may I borrow your "show game" for use on my userpage? also, what where may i find the codes for all of you userboxes? i looked for them but your coding was so complex i got lost lol Final side note, I noticed you edit a lot of Saw articles, so i thought i would let you know I have nominated

WP:FLC page. Cheers, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk

) 06:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

A little late...

I meant to get on here yesterday and wish a couple people a merry Christmas... so... uh... happy Boxing Day? :B Audiosmurf ^♪/♫ 15:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Google Logo

Try this in justification of the new logo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.136.69 (talk) 18:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

An open proposal for a WikiProject Talk Pages

I noticed you were involved in a past proposal for a WikiProject that dealt with talk pages, and I wanted to let you know that a similar proposal is now open. If you would support such a project, I would appreciate your vote.
-Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 09:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Notice in editing mode

Hello Scarce, congratulations for your beautiful user page! Just a question: how did you made the notice on the top of the editing page? (this one). How did you put that notice? Thank you so much! (I know that you're so kind, and you're going to reply me here :) :) :) ) --Vale maio (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, that's a pity, but I thought it was so... Yes, I'm going to ask to a local admin, but I think there's no way to do it. Thank you so much for your quick reply :) ! --Vale maio (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Mentorship

I write because your name is listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject User Rehab. I wonder if you might consider joining others in sharing the burden of a mentorship committee for me?

Perhaps you might consider taking a look at an old edit at Wikipedia:Mentorship#Unintended consequences? In the search for a

mentor deemed acceptable by ArbCom

, I cite this as a plausible context for discussing what I have in mind.

Please contact me by e-mail or on my talk page. --

talk

) 06:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank You.

Scarce,thanks to you,I know how to source things and prove to Bignole I know what I'm talking about.Thanks A Million for your help!--24.161.125.222 (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Bill Schulz

My mistake. Everything I read said he was gay.Racingstripes (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I just googled is bill schulz from red eye gay? That coupled with the character he apparently portrays. The only place that states he is straight is his myspace page. That also states he is 3'2", and his occupation is Registered Sex Offender.Racingstripes (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Renesmee Carlie Cullen (Nessie)

Yes, but if you think of it that way, then alot of wikipedia pages should be deleted. If something is considered notable in the series, and the series is popular in a particular generation (ie. the twilight saga boom), then it is considered notable in general as well. Has Senverus Snape or Louis lane contributed anything to our generation, other than through literature? No, they havent, but they are one of the main characters of their series. I understand that there should be wikipedia pages for the other characters, but im just saying... The other characters dont have a book totally about them right? Like there is jacob Black (being hte main characer in New Moon)and he has a wikipedia apge... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassyish (talk • contribs) 01:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello Scarce! You have nominated my page for deletion. You said that Renesmee is not a notable-enough character in the series. However, i believe this is not so. As you are probably aware (seing as you are a WikiVampire), the Twilight series is going into movies. Right now, there is Twilight, and New Moon available. However, Eclipse and Breaking Dawn are scheduled to be playing very soon. I am a very big fan of Renesmee, and as you probably know, the movie Breaking Dawn is centred totally around her. She is one of the three main Cullens; along with Edward and Bella. They are a family, and all have their own wiki pedia page. I wanted to get a head start, is all, before someone else creates the wikipedia page (which they sureley will in the future). So i would really appreciate it if you were to re-think the deletion of the page.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassyish (talk • contribs) 23:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Shakira

Her father was not Phoenician, but a Christian Lebanese Arab. The person who put the Phoenician claim goes against the source #2 at the end of the sentence. Probably vandilism, therefore, my edit should be restored. --Qvxz9173 (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Drag Me to Hell

Thanks very much, Scarce; perhaps the strength of authority of my sources was rather lacking (as you said you'd presume a pure horror unless the producers or someone directly involved stated it to be comedy-horror) however my intention was to convey that lots of people seemed to find the movie funny as well as scary. Will bear in mind not to hyperlink the sitesEugene-elgato (talk) 18:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Drag Me to Hell Again

Hi Scarce, I removed those comments as they seemed to be form non-notable sources that didn't even warrant their own page. They were also just added below the page where we already had more notable sources and critics citing their review. The section just shouldn't be so long and it can be summed up with a category, no? Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

What do you mean they can be removed? I have video sources that say Raimi wanted the film to be funny and scary. And I've cited Allmovie as calling it a horror comedy. So we do not need several non-notable internet critics to describe the film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

here is a clip about him talking about the humor and horror in the film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

July 25, 2009 Help Desk archives

I enjoy looking at the archives because the most interesting and sometimes silly questions get asked.

When you reverted vandalism, though, you forgot to put the page back the way it was.

I fixed it. Fortunately I looked at the history.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

There's a bear in there

At home I see a bear in this position.

Here, there's no bear. ???Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Where I was yesterday there was Windows 7.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Weird. Now the bear is gone.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Alice

Hey Scarce... I just saw you removed the category "Songs from film". You're correct that song was inspired by the film, but since it's been reported (notably in the Walt Disney/Buena Vista press release) that the song will be played over the end credits, wouldn't that count? I'm fine with your ultimate decision either way. Thanks. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 02:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Removing editnotice from Scream (film series).

I re-added the editnotice, permission given to use it

semi-protected, please leave it. Thanks. Geeky Randy (talk

) 18:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Kellan Lutz

It's usually best to explain on the User's Talk page what the problem is. I've issued a template:uw-blp1 warning to the most recent editor. If they keep it up, after the appropriate number of warnings you can report them to

WP:AIV. BTW, how do you expect people to figure out how to edit your Talk page? Woogee (talk

) 23:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

They did it again and blanked their Talk page. I've issued a blp2 warning and told them to read BLP and RS, and just blanking their Talk page doesn't mean people won't know they've been warned before. Woogee (talk) 23:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

They're now on a blp4 warning. Last chance. Woogee (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Signature

Are you aware that your apparently custom signature template does not work? Please fix it. Propaniac (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Wow, you've been on Wikipedia a whole nine months, I'm very very impressed. No, I was not aware that you were intentionally making your signature appear ugly and broken. I don't generally assume that's the intention of any user, no matter how long they've been here -- even a whole nine months. Propaniac (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Most editors don't use custom sigs at all. Even if I knew that a user had been active for several years, if I saw their signature was broken (as yours appeared to be) I would guess they had only recently adopted that signature and hadn't realized yet that they'd made a mistake. I have no idea how custom signatures work myself because I've never had any interest in creating one. Propaniac (talk) 00:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kerli_Tea_Party_music_video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

here

.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Remember Me

Hi. Thanks for your edits to the "Remember Me" movie article. I added some tweaks too after your edits. The pre-screening of the film I saw yesterday evening (March 10 2010) explicitly had in its opening "New York 1991" (the year was clear) and after Ally's mom's murder and aftermath, it faded into the caption "Ten years later". So I annotated that. It was clear we were in 2001 in the film at that point. Best wishes. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 03:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Walking on Air

Please review

WP:Capitals#Composition titles. Short summary: it doesn't matter how any other source capitalizes something, Wikipedia has internal rules that are followed.—Kww(talk

) 05:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Before_He_Cheats_music_video.png

I have tagged

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk

) 05:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

She Wolf

Ok i'll leave the image in. I previously campaigned for the image to be included last time but a consensus was set up against it. personally i dont have a problem with it so i will leave it in. If someone decides it should not be used it will be nothing to do with me. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Twitter.PNG in now a SVG

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that it appears you made significant contributions to File:Twitter.PNG or one of it's predecessors and that it has now been made into a vector graphic at File:Twitter Icon.svg when working with this logo please remember to use the SVG where it is superior, Thanks--Koman90 (talk), Network+ (Verify) 17:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

AfD nomination of Midnight Sun (novel)

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk

) 01:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)