User talk:SibTower1987

Welcome!

Hello, SibTower1987, and

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Please stop changing the template to the full version rather than for the 2010s decade; it is unnecessarily large, not relevant to the page overall, and you were reverted already. All the previous winners from past decades have nothing to do with this song specifically. If you disagree, take it to the talk page, or better yet, to avoid further disagreements and reverts, stop making wide-ranging changes to templates at all. Since they display on quite a number of pages, you're bound to run into opposition. Ss112 03:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actor in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Actress in a Short Form Comedy or Drama Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not split the navboxes by decades. This system was deprecated long ago. A decade split forces the navbox to be a certain height, rather than let the navbox find its own size. A split in this way is arbitrary and each entry has the year by it anyway. Splits should only be made if the navbox gets out of hand - when that has happened (usually if there are more than 50-75 entries), we have generally split into groups of 25, or by using a natural split, like in {{BAFTA Award for Best Actor in a Leading Role}}. Massive unilateral overhauls like the ones you have been making should be discussed first. --woodensuperman 11:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Talk Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you have changed various templates to be identical to {{

You just did it again after I asked you about it.

WP:WAWARD) 03:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

To combined the templates into one. I don't understand having multiple templates of the same subject. SibTower1987 (talk) 03:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 03:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have messed up the templates quite a bit. There should not be multiple identical templates for all the subjects that you edit. @

WP:WAWARD) 20:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• I would kindly request that you stop editing any of these templates. You'd made another mess of templates a few weeks ago that I had to go and undo. --woodensuperman 09:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be doing it anymore. SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:WAWARD) 18:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I didn't know they were all the same; I'm sorry and I won't be doing it again. SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have made different templates identical and redundant. What are you going to do to solve this problem?--

WP:WAWARD) 11:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:WAWARD) 17:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

The Editors; Even if I reversed everything, the editors would came back and change it. SibTower1987 (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make sense that you think people would insist that multiple redundant templates abound. Have you ever seen anyone create multiple redundant templates anywhere else on Wikipedia? A half decent edit summary should keep people from trying to restore multiple redundant templates.-

WP:WAWARD) 01:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Because the Editors changed the

ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture 2011–2020, the template now only shows the film winners, not the cast. It doesn't make sense to have that template on a page that doesn't have them listed on it. SibTower1987 (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Ah sorry I thought the BLP names were in that template, Okie dokie no worries, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 02:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...stop removing navbox shells from film articles, and restore the ones you removed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do that anymore. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop removing nav boxes from articles. From the above, it appears you have a substantial history of poor editing choices in this area. You also need to learn to use edit summaries. Could you explain why you are removing the Grammy Award templates to musicians’ articles? Jusdafax (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm removing the Grammy Award templates from some pages, because some of the names don't appear in the templates anymore when the templates were merged. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From reading above entries, it appears you were the one doing the merging, which messed them up. I’m asking you to stop editing templates entirely. And you have also been asked to use edit summaries, but refuse to do so. Why? Jusdafax (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't see from the dates, I stopped merging templates months ago (after another editor told me to); The edits I make are minor edits and when I make larger edits, I do use the edit summaries. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a nav box is not a minor edit. Please read

WP:CIR regarding the competence required of editors. If you think you need help, ask. When in doubt, use edit summaries. It appears you have made some big mistakes. Learn from them. Stop any further template editing, is my strong request. Find something else to do on Wikipedia. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

What is this about ? Nobody's name is in the template, those are film titles, please explain all these removals. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Editors removed the actors names from the template and only shows the film titles. It doesn't make sense to have the template on the actors page where their names is no longer listed. SibTower1987 (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the actors still connected to those movies ? - FlightTime (open channel) 15:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The actors name do not have to be listed to use the template, as long as the actors are somehow notable connected to the films listed. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense, because when you look at the template (sometimes) you don't know what movie the actor(s) appears in and some actor(s) appears in different movies. SibTower1987 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then maybe you should seek consensus for all this. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Editors has done this to other templates only listing the movie (Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture and Satellite Award for Best Cast – Motion Picture). Also I saw on some of the actors pages that the template was already removed. When the next cast winners are announced, they're going to list the film and only put the template on the film page (not on any of the actors pages). SibTower1987 (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)SibTower1987SibTower1987 (talk) 16:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SibTower1987. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to 78th Academy Awards does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Crown (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've noticed that you have added a lot of templates to articles that are about the Golden Raspberry Awards. I don't know much about them, but in looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers/Consensus summaries it was decided ten years ago to never include them on actor/actress articles. Did this get discussed with the Actors and Filmmakers WikiProject? Thanks! Jip Orlando (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that! - I've always wonder why there were no templates for the actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SibTower1987 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response and reverting. This can be a politically-charged manner. Note that Donald Rumsfeld got a Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor in 2004- I could see this as contentious. I think that the template for Worst Director is okay- but the other Golden Raspberry awards may not be appropriate, and not just limited to Worst Original Song, or whatever. I'm sorry you did a lot of work on this, but I don't want your good-faith work to cause many unhappy editors to come by demanding explanations. Thanks for your response! Jip Orlando (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm removing the templates from the actors and actresses pages. If the editors want to remove the templates as a whole, it's in their hands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SibTower1987 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted five of those navboxes under

CSD #4, recreation of a page that was previously deleted via an XFD. The remaining navboxes were not part of the original deletion discussion, so I've left them alone. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Peaceray: That wasn't a test, SubTower1987 created the navboxes but did not realize they had already been deleted via TfD and removed the navboxes from the pages that they added them to. See #Golden_Raspberry_Award_Templates. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Taylor Lautner, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop marking all of your edits as minor. Please carefully read

Thank you for your contributions to Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Combo, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. The comment about Lindsay Lohan was inappropiate. Sundayclose (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't making jokes about her. That's how the

Golden Raspberry Awards wrote it! Go to the pages of 28th Golden Raspberry Awards and Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Combo

to see that's the way they written it. You have to take it up with them. 02:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

That doesn't mean you have to put the joke into the Wikipedia article. You don't see that in other award templates where the website for the award makes a joke. Just don't restore it and there's no problem. Sundayclose (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing in the template about Lindsay Lohan is her name and the name of the movie that she "won" for. 02:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please take a few seconds to look at this version of the template that you wrote. The name of the film is not "as the yang to her own yin". Now just leave it out and move on and we're fine. I'm not going to continue arguing. Sundayclose (talk) 02:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to continue arguing either, but I didn't create that joke. When I created the template, I just copied what was on the page. I've should've taken it out before and after I posted it. I'm sorry, that was my mistake! 03:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for getting my point. Sundayclose (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're adding sources with the incorrect URLs for these. Please make sure the article you cite actually mentions the win or nomination. Otherwise, they're all going to get reverted if you cite the wrong source that doesn't support your edit. Starforce¹³ 20:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Artios Awards and the Casting Society of America are one in the same. The Artios Awards doesn't have their own page and on some pages, when you click on the Artios Awards it reverts to the Casting Society of America page. 20:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Here are the correct sources: Winners, nominees. (The article you're linking to is for movie nominees.) I've fixed some of them for you but the rest still need fixing before someone reverts them. Starforce¹³ 20:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Last Picture Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got the news from the 40th Golden Raspberry Awards page and they also put the winners up on their YouTube page. 20:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

That's great but source it!

talk) 20:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

The source is the same page link as before (Razz Newz). 21:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Personally, I think it should be sourced seperately...BUT if it's sourced it is sourced. My apologies.

talk) 21:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

No problem. I don't put up anything without sourcing it first. I didn't know they announced the winners until I saw it listed in bold on the page and then I clicked the link to their YouTube page and watch them announcing the winners. 21:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

You did recently edit The Caine Mutiny without providing sources. Also, you appear to be signing posts without including your name. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edit here. The wikitext [[Category:George Martin| ]] causes the article in which it is placed to be sorted as a null value in the applicable category; in this case, that means in Category:George Martin it will be placed at the very top on the category page, which is what we want when the article is the main article that corresponds to the category, as here.

When changed to [[Category:George Martin]], without the pipe, it will be listed under its ordinary sorting. That would be under "G" (for "George Martin"), except where there is a template like the {{DEFAULTSORT:Martin, George}} as here, which will have it sorted under "M" (for "Martin. George").

But we don't want either of those; it makes the main article get lost in the list. Using the piped-null trick (sometime a asterisk is used instead), it goes to the very top. TJRC (talk) 21:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must of did it by accident. I wasn't aware of it. Sorry. 21:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created,

Hi, could you please temporarily refrain from creating anymore navigational boxes for various film critic association awards and categories? The number of them being created an added to already bloated navboxes in articles is getting out of hand, and I would like to achieve some consensus on their use first. I'm talking about all the ones you've created recently in these categories. You've added six of these to

]

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your undoing of my revisions were unwarranted and allegations of vandalism were offensive and not in keeping with the principles of good faith. You are clearly connected to the entertainment industry based on your history of edits and not able to be objective. My additions were all supported by citations and reliable sources. Do not do this again. EdifyingEditor (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'm not part of the entertainment industry, I enjoy what's in the entertainment industry. Second I didn't vandalize Scott Rudin's page! I didn't add or delete words, or change a single sentence or change any facts on that page. 16:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

See

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Same as above. Please stop overlinking. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 08:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viva Zapata!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Writing for a Variety Special has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City Slickers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Stern.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EmmyAward Limited or Anthology Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinocchio (1940 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bobbie Gentry, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 23:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I removed the template from Bobbie Gentry, because there's only one award template listed. There probably were more templates listed before, but over time the templates were changed and were deleted from her page over time. Under the list of her awards only shows one template, giving it the false impression that there were more listed and that's why I deleted. Next time I'll give a reason. SibTower1987 (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George Carlin's American Dream

added a link pointing to Variety

The Tinder Swindler

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for updating the status of awards but if changing something from pending to won then needs a new reference as not covered by the old reference, e.g. [1]. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SibTower1987:, please see this again as you did same in this edit today [2], the old reference does not support the statement the show won the award, just that it was nominated, so need a new reference to verify it won. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 09:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SibTower1987:, same issue again today [3],[4],[5],[6], old reference does not support new statement of won so you are adding unsourced information, please stop and provide a new reference. Indagate (talk) 07:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited And the Band Played On (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mubi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[7] seems to now have a section Academy Honorary Award that seems to have nothing to do with Dianne Warren. Many of the dates are from before she was born. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.172.52.184 (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. Are this and this the same thing? KWiki (talk) 14:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, both templates are the same, but the Template:BAFTA Award for Best Original Music is the current name that they use for the award. SibTower1987 (talk) 17:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Did you get consensus for such mass additions of templates like this

The AARP Movies for Grownups Awards are over 20 years old. They also play a part in award season. Given that the award has it's own template, why it's awards doesn't. I feel this award should have it's own templates for each category. SibTower1987 (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to bring this up on the Wikiproject Film talk page since its being added to a lot of articles. Mike Allen 18:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to remember to do that. SibTower1987 (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - i removed some edits you made to Dakota Johnson because they removed an award templates! The other edits looked okay, but you didn't cite a reason for the removal in the edit summary so I couldn't tell if it was vandalism or not. I erred on the side of caution! If you edit in the future, try not to delete something without leaving an explanation! SpookyTwenty (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks @Indagate :D SpookyTwenty (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Saturday Night Live, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. hardly any sources for that article but that's no reason to not add a source when you add content Indagate (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SibTower1987!

• The
  New Pages Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read
  project talk page
  with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider
  applying here
  .

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DramaDesk WigHairDesign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DramaDesk MusicalFeaturedPerformance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignPlay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DramaDesk SoundDesignMusical has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]