User talk:SmokeyTheCat/Anchovy 1

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. THF (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

This article was one of many that was protected in an attempt to prevent a highly disruptive

True, but you did make it out to read like you were actually a rioter, I apologise if I labeled you incorrectly. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 08:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Your virtual novel sounds interesting though, I would be glad to help in some way if I can =). Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 08:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

We already had this discussion. For relevant quotes, see, for instance Talk:Elvis Presley/archive11. Onefortyone (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Smoking ban are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Also on Gordon Brown talk page. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

An adventurer is me as well. What happens to be your in game name in KOL? ...Ω...^..¿TooT?.._..¡StatS!.. 02:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah. Killimanjaro, is my handle, personally. Did you quit before or after NS13? ...Ω...^..¿TooT?.._..¡StatS!.. 02:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

While "they would have happy to have it used", you need to provide the proper proof of this through the

WP:OTRS verification system. Follow the aforementioned link for details on how to get permission to use this image. Skier Dude (talk

) 21:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! I am one of the editors on the medical cannabis page. I have added 3 studies to the cannabis talk page, with a request that it be added to the article as i cannot do it myself. Thanks! 68.13.134.213 (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Why not just become an established editor then you can can edit the article? It's free and commits you to nothing.  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 10:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Lesliana Pereira, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesliana Pereira. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~Zoe O'Connell~ (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, SmokeyTheCat. You have new messages at Zoeoconnell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~Zoe O'Connell~ (talk) 12:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi! You wanted to add some more reliable references to cannabis_(drug). It would be really helpful. If not I try to improve this section according to wiki standards. Have fun, Panoramix303 (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

It appears your comments at Template:Election box metadata were intended for a different article, but the way they were added they were posted to the main template instead of the talk page you originally intended. I've moved your question about privatisation to the template's talk page. You may want to go back to the original article's talk page and add them back. However, please use "edit this page" at the top of the talk page, rather than the edit button next to "Election box metadata," otherwise your comments will just reappear back at the main template. Thanks.DCmacnut<> 14:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

About Alexander the Greats birthday. It has been concluded that he was born on July 22 but many philosphers believe that the calenders are different from then and now but it is still believed that he was born on the 22. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anubislayer (talk • contribs) 19:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, SmokeyTheCat. You have new messages at Bongomatic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

^Bongo_matic 01:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi SmokeyTheCat, I replied here [1] Mick gold (talk) 07:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

You need to do something about your article on a compilation album called Reggae Greats: Lee "Scratch" Perry. the article is written entirely in personal opinion, you put no citations, and their isn't even proof that the CD exists. Judging by the editing history, it looks like you pretty much made the whole thing. YOu need to either fix it, making sure all the info is well cited facts, or get rid of the article all together.Iminrainbows (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

At least change it so it is less opinion and more what is concrete fact. you can't just make a wierd page and hope that someone else will fix it totally.Iminrainbows (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh excellent with the Reggae Greats thing, it's much better now. I don't think it should be deleted, now that it's benn fixed.Iminrainbows (talk) 01:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

There is no official admin recall process yet. If you have a problem with an administrator, it is best to talk to them on an individual basis. Some admins have their own recall process set up, but the name you used in the header (LessHeard vanU) states on his user page that he has no official recall process, just talk to him, and if a bunch of people say it's a problem, he will consider giving up the mop.

Short version: Talk to LessHeard vanU, or any admin you have a problem with.--Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail Review} 16:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

And to clarify, according to the deletion log, that article was deleted under

A7, which is a perfectly valid administrative action. --King Öomie

16:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

		The WikiProject Films Award
		I, WikiProject Films. For creating the article Steelyard Blues . Awarded 06:42, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Why thank you very much HairyWombat!  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 17:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Steelyard Blues is my all time favourite film. You might like to move the barnstar from your talk page to your user page. It is your choice where you display it. HairyWombat (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Per Spartaz's request, I am notifying you that this discussion that you participated in has been relisted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Una Healy (2nd nomination) in the hopes to gain a more fair consensus due to the participation of three sock puppet accounts in the earlier discussion. The three sock accounts that checkuser confirmed are the same person voted to delete or redirect and made multiple edits to the discussion which closed as "redirect" and therefore may have created a false impression of consensus by vote-stacking. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 20:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The article Curate's bladder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible

non-notable neologism

. Cannot find any sources to verify.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

The article Ian Page (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the Ians listed have articles, so it's a bit pointless

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

• What is preventing you renaming Ian Page to Ian Page (musician)? Have you never seen a move option on each page? (In a pull-down list with my skin.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The article Ian Page (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable potential parliamentary candidate - would become notable if he won

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Hello SmokeyTheCat/Anchovy 1 and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I noticed that you nominated the article Barack Obama for deletion but failed to create a discussion-page. Please do so. Thank you! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated Giselle Lorimer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giselle Lorimer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. edg ☺ ☭ 16:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure, delete her if you want. I don't really understand people like you who seem to have a mania for deleting articles which some people might find interesting but you feel that the presence of this article makes Wiki a significantly worse place then go ahead. I don't care.  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 12:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! / edg ☺ ☭ 14:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Just as a matter of idle curiosity why did you want to delete the article? Like I say I don't mind but I don't understand. Okay, she was of very minority interest but how is Wiki improved by her absence? I've been an editor here a few years now and It's never occurred to me to want to delete any article.

Just wondered.  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 10:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't reply at length because you had proposed that I had some mania for deleting articles—it didn't bode well for a serious conversation. The Giselle Lorimer article was unverfiable and uninformative. I didn't see a way I would ever be able to improve this article, so I proposed deletion. No one in that AfD objected. I was a bit surprised you didn't participate.

If you think Giselle Lorimer is likely to become notable in the near future, you might request

it be restored to your usespace for further work. The best way to do this is to ask one of these administrators. When the article is userfied, tag it with {{Userspace draft

}} to keep it from being XfD'd again.

You can also create an

original research article on another wiki, such as wipipedia or SMiki

.

Wikipedia has plenty of well-developed porn, BDSM and author articles. This was not one of them, and because of the lack of available references, it was not going to get better. / edg ☺ ☭ 10:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

I very much doubt that Giselle Lorimer will ever become notable. Her books are very much minority interest and will probably stay that way. She seems uninterested in publicity anyway. There are numerous hits on her but all they just just cite her three books and her publisher. Not a word of biographical information. She interests me tho and I wrote her a snail mail but I doubt I'll ever get a reply. One of those many little small mysteries of the WWW.

Anyway, thanks for the information, happy Wiki editing and I'll see you around no doubt, George George aka  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 08:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I can imagine erotica writers often choosing to remain anonymous. For what it's worth, in an author article the work, and then the career, are usually more important than personal details. Hardcore biographical information is not needed in most BLP.

I don't know anything about Lorimer, but I'd say if

self-published) cult that sprang up around his Gor novels, which most agree are poor writing but distinctly valuable as erotica. The anonymous graphic artist Dolcett has been deleted at least 3 times, despite having a somewhat interesting publication history, a passionate fanbase, and occasional WTF

notice in somewhat straight internet-based media.

Until someone does some serious research on these topics, I don't see how they can have Wikipedia articles—without the Wikipedia:Reliable sources restrictions, Wikipedia would quickly be packed with articles comprising rumors, scams and promotion. I wish it were otherwise.

/ edg ☺ ☭ 14:13, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

The article Virtual novel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, and I couldn't find sources to support this article's claims.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

I have nominated Virtual novel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual novel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fences&Windows 14:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Feminist views on pornography are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to bother you, but your signature seems unnecessarily distracting to me. Would you possibly consider making it smaller? Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I've replied to your post at HJ's

N419BH

17:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Paste the following into your custom signature box in preferences:

Copy it right off this page, don't click "edit" then copy as you'll get the <nowiki></nowiki> tags (you don't want those). You'll get

N419BH

17:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

18:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

How about:

• [[User:SmokeyTheCat|SmokeyTheCat]] [[User talk:SmokeyTheCat|(talk)]]

  SmokeyTheCat (talk)

The current one is pretty garish and you need to change it. The one BH offered is a tad better in that it integrated the talk link, but it's using the from-hell font-element.

• <span style="font-family:Arial,serif;border:1px solid Black;">[[User:SmokeyTheCat|<span style="color:White;background:#c00000;">Smokey</span>]][[User talk:SmokeyTheCat|<span style="background:White;color:#c00000;">TheCat</span>]]</span>

  SmokeyTheCat

Cheers, Jack Merridew 20:25, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin

The article

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Unsourced original essay about unnotable song

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Herostratus (talk

) 03:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

re

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin

Okey-dokey. It's your perfect right to remove the tags. I will send it to

WP:GNG showing some press mentions of the song or whatever, if these exist. Thank you for your contribution, sorry again if you lose an article that you have grown fond of, and I look forward to your future contributions to the Wikipedia. Best, Herostratus (talk

) 19:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

All wi doin

Do you really thing that single is worthy of wasting any time on at an AFD? Its not worthy of its own article and you should let it be deleted and should not have removed the prod.

Off2riorob (talk

) 19:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin

for deletion

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Wi Doin' Is Defendin until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Off2riorob (talk

) 20:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Andi Osho.jpg

File:Andi Osho.jpg doesn't have a license and stuff. Even if you add one, it will probably be deleted since there's no reason to think that the stuff on her Facebook page is free to use. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Andi Osho.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Andi Osho.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see

Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk

) 10:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fifteensquared.net

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians_open_to_whale_squishing

Hi. Category:Wikipedians_open_to_whale_squishing, which I see you added yourself to, has been nominated for deletion. Your comments at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_October_14#Category:Wikipedians_open_to_whale_squishing would be appreciated. What purpose do you think this category has? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Azed Examples

Hi Smokey,

With great reluctance, I have removed your example clues from the Azed article. As well as some intrinsic problems with their text, you’ve put the clues into The competition section where they interfere with the main explanation of the set-up. Could you perhaps clean up the text and give them a section to themselves (possibly just before or after the Well-known Azed competitors section)?

What do I mean by "clean up the text"?

1. You didn’t quote either clue accurately. Before I decided that I had to delete, I had already corrected Don Manley’s clue to get rid of your non-anagram. I’ll let you check with & lit and adjust Colin Dexter’s. Your version wouldn’t have won the First Prize.

2. Get rid of your personal opinions – "elegant", "admirably brief", "very neat" (see NPoV, Verifiability). As it says at the beginning of Verifiability, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth— whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." I agree with the opinions you expressed but you and I are just little editors hiding behind pseudonyms. Our opinions must not feature in the encyclopedia - unless we can provide in-line citations to show that they are opinions previously expressed in a reliable, authoritative and verifiable source.

3. Take Don Manley out of the main text. His authorship of the clue may merit mention in a footnote but not in the main body of the article, I feel.

4. If you want to credit Don Manley, do the same for Colin Dexter

5. Perhaps revamp your layout a bit. The way that sample clues are shown in

Cryptic crosswords

looks better to me and is obviously considered satisfactory. It makes sense to have a consistent layout for similar pages where possible.

Also, would you like to consider whether the inclusion of a clue from Jeremy Morse (the other member of the Big Three) would improve the balance? My favourite clue of his (one of the eight used by Azed in his tribute puzzle No 1906 and described as "wonderful" by him in the Slip) is that to RAMILLIES. Its ingenuity and erudition took my breath away when the competition results came out (this was before the Internet and Google made everybody experts on everything). You may prefer a different clue, of course, but I think it should be one of Azed's eight. Since this is a brand new suggestion from me, I’ve written some text for RAMILLIES and include it below.

Marlborough’s second crusher in conclusive quartet of victories (9) ^[1]

for RAMILLIES. Ramillies, in Chambers as a hat or wig, was also the second of Marborough’s four major victories in the War of the Spanish Succession.^[2]. In the wordplay, Marlborough’s second is "a", "mill" is the crusher and these go inside "ries", the last four letters of "victories". The whole clue defines Ramillies, the battle.

Refs

1. ^ Sir Jeremy Morse Azed No 419
2. Oudenarde and Malplaquet

Incidentally, Wikipedia's motto is be bold, isn't it? And when you do, it seems as though everyone jumps on you and tries to kick your teeth in (today it's me, tomorrow Joe Frazier, perhaps). I think the basic problem is that Wikipedia is using unpaid amateurs while trying for the standards of a top-grade professional encyclopedia. An employee at Encyclopedia Brittanica would expect to take a long time before getting things right first time – here it’s a nasty shock when you're told you haven't. There’s a very steep learning curve but a lot of satisfaction when you get it right.

Regards,

Dinoceras (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry – I forgot to leave you your original text to re-edit. Here it is below complete with non-anagram.

Examples of elegant winning clues include:-

• Item gran arranged family slides in. for MAGIC LANTERN (An anagram of ITEM GRAN with CLAN inside and giving a literal definition.)
• A representation of M Hilda say. for SHIELD-MAY (A shield-may is a woman warrior and this admirably brief clue by Don Manley references Ex-Prime Minister Margaret Hilda Thatcher in a very neat anagram.)

Regards,

Dinoceras (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

What Keeps Mankind Alive?

Hi. Rather than propose this for deletion, I'm going to suggest removing the POV and merging what's left of it to

The Three Penny Opera where it belongs, and leave a redirect. It might still get deleted however if you or other editors cannot find references for it.--Kudpung (talk

) 08:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from

haybale amphitheatre

and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Emily Reuben

Please don't create essentially unsourced biographies. The link you used was not a reliable source. I have made an attempt to source the article, but I can find little indication that she is notable. Fences&Windows 21:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The

Contribution Team

cordially invites you to Imperial College London

We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice...

11:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Sig SmokeyTheCat 10:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

speedy delete reasons

Hi Smokey

your nomination of Amazing Mr. Waller, Vol. 1: Jiving with Fats Waller deletion was declined, because your reason was not a valid speedy delete reason. If you think no one will contest your deletion proposal you can use prod. Otherwise you will have to go with the effort of an AFD if there is controversy potential. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Fats Waller

Easy — it's the

Articles for Deletion process. The directions should be simple; if they confuse you, ask me and I'll try to help you. Nyttend (talk

) 22:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

John Perkins (Royal Navy officer)

Dear Smokey, I noticed a discussion thread on the Trafalgar discussion section about black british sailors. The subject is somewhat a hobby of mine. I have been researching and writing about John Perkins (linked above) for a while. He was, to the best of my research the first black british officer to serve in the armed forces of the crown. Arguably there were people who served in the Ethiopian and Black regiments during the American War, like Colonel Tye although these were militia units and not regular army units. I wrote the wikipedia article and the article in the BASA newsletter (no.47) and an article on the http://www.blackpast.org website. I'd be more than happy to dicuss Perkins or any of my other research with you if you're interested. All the best, Corneredmouse (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure where this is specifically dealt with although I shall take a look at a few books tonight. I do know that there was a significant enough presence that at least one black sailor is included in the sculpture at the foot of Nelson's column in Trafalgar square. The sailors who posed for the sculpture (if I remember correctly) were sailors who served on the Victory during Trafalgar. The link to the National Archives page is [2]. Also a link to an article in the Independent [3]. Also, Tom Wareham at the Museum of London in Docklands is quite a good contact. He has access to a lot of facts and figures. Corneredmouse (talk) 13:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Duke Ellington's "Guitar Amour"

Hi Smokey,

The Duke's composition "Guitar Amour" appears on several recordings:

• Paris Blues (United Artists, 1961) - two versions (one titled "Bird Jungle") recorded on 2-3 May 1961
• Duke 56-62 Volume 2 (Columbia) - titled "Bon Amour" recorded 25 October 1961
• Midnight in Paris (Columbia, 1962) recorded 30 January 1962
• In the Uncommon Market (Pablo, 1986) recorded 6 or 7 February 1963
• All Star Road Band (CBS) recorded 31 May 1964

I would suspect that the version you are looking for is on either of the last two albums. A good source of Duke detail is at the Duke Ellington Panorama.

Hope this is of assistance

DISEman (talk) 02:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Smug twat

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EchetusXe 12:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Milpharm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NTox · talk 15:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

As reviewing administrator, I deleted it. I think they are just a generic drug manufacturer, and therefore not significant unless there is some special reason of major business presence or market share, that would take references. Companies with products of their own --those are the ones where there is might be an implied claim to importance even if nothing more is indicated. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

{talk archive}}