Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Glenfarclas (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
CarterCopters
Article Wizard
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Hi. I don't fully understand your comment. Do you mean you would like to see the template used in an example article (like the one that was here, if you seen it)? Rehman(+) 02:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes :) I looked at the old example first, only to find it deleted. TGCP (talk) 15:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talkback
Hello, TGCP. You have new messages at User talk:TGCP/HEAT-1X. Message added 16:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dobrogea Wind Farm
Hi, TGCP. There is a
Fântânele Wind Farm articles. Your opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanet wind farm
Hello, I undid your edit regarding estimated output because it is
WP:OR. If you can find a source specific to Thanet that would of course be fine. But it's not for us to judge what the output is likely to be. Cheers. pgr94 (talk) 21:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Template talk:Infobox power station
Hi. Regarding the implementation of {{Infobox power station (temp)}}, the discussions there has sort of stalled, and I believe it is somewhat clogging the normal editing process. It will be a month since I started the discussion tomorrow, which is a bad sign. The purpose of the discussion was basically to understand if the merge is error-free, which I believe is already achieved.
We could always improve the template after the merge just like any other template. Waiting for the perfect template to be formed doesn't make sense; Wikipedia is an ever-improving encyclopedia.
Please state here, or at the talkpage, if you agree that the support arrangement for the merge is properly done. Or the reasons why its not. I look forward for your response. Kind regards. Rehman 07:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Now that the dust is settled and all major fixes complete, I would like to formally thank you for helping bring the rugged template:infobox power station thorough its merges and transformations. Thanks! Rehman 02:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Lists of wind turbines in Denmark, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Handschuh-talk to me 03:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maersk Triple E class; thanks for your help! bobrayner (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
You are more than welcome, you did most of the work. TGCP (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Late DYK for Transformer (flying car)
Qwertyus
Heat 1X Tycho Brahe
This is a project and written as such. Therefore I have merged the articles again and renamed it as origional.
Feel free to add information there. I copied a part of your text in your subpage. --Kind regards, Ro de Jong(Talk to me!) 10:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A note not worth noticing.
But I thought it noteworthy enough to mention I have taken liberties formatting your comments here, though not changing any text of course. I wouldn't mention it except I put a break into what looks like a sentence at the point where your signature was, and so you may want to reverse that. Apologies if it was offensive. Penyulap talk 13:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your note
I am trying to understand this. Can you explain please. Thanjs Kanatonian (talk) 21:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox for fuel production facilities
Hi, TGCP. There is a discussion concerning infoboxes for fuel production facilities. Your input is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 09:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Abrams transport
From the way the citation is worded, it looks like the M1 Abrams got a permanent waiver and does not need one every time it is transported.
Hi, TGCP. I am proposing to merge articles about the Ulla-Førre hydroelectric complex into single article. Your opinion is appreciated. The discussion is here. Beagel (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groasis Waterboxx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Thanks for creating the Groasis Waterboxx article back in 2010, and for your efforts to improve the encyclopedia for the public. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On your diagram shouldn't the v-22 and harrier be semicircular rather than straight? Both of them have thrust vectoring of one type or another. For example angled at 45 degrees I would expect about 70% of the thrust in each direction.GliderMaven (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They could be, but we don't know. So the line is a conservative approximation - perhaps a shaded area would be better. Also, the Harrier changes engine conditions in order to attain sufficient lift, so it's not a true circle arc. Something about the XV-5 made me abstain from a line. Feel free to edit it; I can upload the .odf file again somewhere (the mediafire file is offline). I made the image primarily to display the unique flow multiplication ability of the
disc loading of the LiftSystem. TGCP (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Shale oil
Hi, and thanks for your edits on shale gas and shale oil. However, I reverted your addition to the shale oil article, because, as it stands now, the article is about oil generated from kerogen-bearing shale, rather than about oil produced from oil-bearing shale. This is a source of increasing confusion, as the news media, the oil industry, and (as you properly cited) government sources have increasingly used the term shale oil as you used it, and not as the Wikipedia article uses it. Please contribute your opinion to the Shale oil talk page. Plazak (talk) 22:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A Tesla Roadster for you!
A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox power station
Hi, TGCP. You have been one of contributors to the {{Infobox power station}}. Therefore I notify you that There is a discussion about changes to the power station infobox template. Your contribution is welcome. Beagel (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A barnstar for you!
The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for an interesting read Polyglot (talk) 22:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You've got mail!
Hello, TGCP. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 13:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{
Were you planning on completing your merger proposal by choosing which talk page to use and properly formatting the discussion on that page? I've removed the tags until you've completed the proposal. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was late and I was
bold - so I just copied the template without looking at procedure. The first example doesn't even have a date stamp. TGCP (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
OK, no worries. On second thought I probably should have just completed the process myself, which is why I went ahead and started the current discussion. - BilCat (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Electricity sector in Poland
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on
section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
I am no longer going to stand in your way over edits you choose to make over marginal cases. Perhaps I should apologise for doing so in the first place. I had hoped that the situation would be more clear-cut, but it seems that nobody has been able to clarify. I hope you can forgive me. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your consideration. I work towards being more cooperative and not just go my own way, and your reply here is an inspiration to me. Let's hope I can remember that next time I disagree with others ;-/ . I "boldly" made the first clumsy tiltrotor edit, but now it turns out that AW only sought money, source didn't say they got it - so it actually was not notable, and the revert is right. It was a paper project anyway, and it will be at least a decade before it flies, so we have plenty of time to discuss ;-) I guess the blurred lines mean tech is moving towards the best. TGCP (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your recent edit to Northrop Grumman did have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide an understandable summary of every edit you make. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
Thanks! --Wuerzele (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean - those edits were merely additions of ref=references, as stated by the edit summaries. TGCP (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Pilot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope
The Wikipedia Library
has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chevrolet Corvette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacking. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wind power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They are not good, I agree, but they're better than nothing. I prefer using my time on content, not form. Through the years I have made complete refs manually, but that's tiring. I am aware of the tools to autofill refs, and I plan to include them on my pc later. TGCP (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vestas V164
I've added a bit on the talk page about your reversion of my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Possums (talk • contribs) 12:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Right, fixed. TGCP (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 22 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VTOL X-Plane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MW. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IIHS crash test results in the Lexus RX article, under the fourth generation AL20 section. Although the AL20 went into production on September 28, 2015, it is not the 2015 model officially nor the specific example tested by IIHS that you referenced. The example tested was a variant of the outgoing AL10 (2008-2012; 2012-2015). I will be relocating your addition to the third generation AL10 section.—Carmaker1 (talk) 07:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Author deletion
Hi there,
I noticed your PRODded
WP:G7. As there's only one other editor, Diannaa, and he/she only made minor changes, it should qualify. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 17:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
I went ahead and deleted it. As a side note, could you please go back to Rommel and make sure you provide page numbers for each citation that uses a book as a source? Thanks, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wind power in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Autoblog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
please use full refs, instead of dropping raw links into articles like you did here
instead of inserting your personal comments inline as you did here !--Wuerzele (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is good for those who have time. I prefer to spend my efforts adding content. If you think refs should be expanded, feel free to do so. Otherwise, I sometimes use autofill for the articles I usually read, fixing several refs in one go. TGCP (talk) 20:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see:
you have the time to reply, but not to add the details on
coal power in the US
.
ANd you dont ping the person when you reply assuming very presumptiously I watch you.
All clear, i'll try to remember, when I see your edits around.--Wuerzele (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You asked on this page, I answered. I don't know how to ping. I sometimes edit a lot, with varying degrees of ref fill. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort - I add some, you add some, someone else adds some more. It all works out eventually. TGCP (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest accelerating SUVs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 02:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Someone made the original image work, so the other (identical) image with a different name has no use. Didn't work anyway, don't know why. TGCP (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 30 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wind turbine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maintenance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Grants-IdeaLab Drag-n-drop references between articles Metis3.PNG listed for discussion
the merger discussion. Thank you. Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solar power in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WECC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 16 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curtain wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Lucid Motors
Hello TGCP,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
promotional
, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tiven gonsalves 11:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!
Hello, TGCP. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hey TGCP, since this article is about the charger (standard) not the cars, it's a bit strange that you reverted a change which correct the the dimensions of the system, including a source for this. Can you explain your actions please?
Hi Cyrotux . My correction is explained in the edit summary and edit. I will elaborate: Your source quotes this source called <ref name=e145> which was already used in this article. Both state that the Tesla charger supplies up to 145 kW and the cars can accept 120 kW maximum. The article could be improved by referencing that each charge controller (which are quite expensive and use several parallel charge units) supplies two stalls to optimize cost/benefit of the overall installation. The reason is that charge rate is reduced when the battery is near full, so the charger can shift its power to the adjacent car which came after the first. Tesla has made this system quite clever, but also a little complicated to understand. The charge controller is housed in the large boring white box, not the pretty red stands we see in the picture. In short; each stand (not charger) provides a maximum of 120 kW power, which is also what Tesla states. TGCP (talk) 10:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 23 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
I noticed that you contribute a lot of work related to energy production. I made some major changes to a rather weak article, Availability factor, managing just a single inline-source. I also did some significant changes to the related, but better Capacity factor. I was wondering if you would maybe give these two articles a look, perhaps for a bit of copyediting but more importantly to see if the text makes sense to someone other than myself. Thanks either way. Lklundin (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I added a bit. They are adequate for the time being. More data could be added, either manually or when Wikidata has time series available. TGCP (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you find the coordinates you added in this edit? Just curious, because I couldn't find them when writing the article. Thanks! ···
Join WP Japan! 23:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
The coords are a low precision version of the "5 miles west-northwest" in the text ;-) Coordinates for large projects are usually given with meter-precision, which I consider strange. Such large areas should be shown with kilometer-precision. The project adress is 1145 South 800 East, Suite 117 Orem, Utah 84097, Orem, UT 84097. Alternatively, this says Latitude: 38.99556, Longitude: -110.15964TGCP (talk) 23:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That address is not the location of the project. It is simply their working address while everything is worked on. Orem is about 150 miles away from the location of the project itself. I have removed the coordinates until they announce the specific location of the site. Otherwise, it's just original research since "about five miles west-northwest" covers a very broad area. ···
Join WP Japan! 19:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Regarding the Energy Justice link you mentioned, that's just the center of town for Green River, which is very obviously not the right location. ···
Join WP Japan! 19:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Ah, ok. Those were just some options. The 5mi coords were a different way of saying 5mi, with the associated lack of precision. Actually you can express less precision with 39°N 110°W than with "5mi", because those coords could be 38.5-39.4° according to rounding, showing a very large area. The coord option direct readers to the map area, but I guess they can just figure out the place like I did by going Five Miles Out from Green River. This paper has a map on page 106, near the curve in the road. I couldn't find this paper in the article - seems to quote page 5 in this; my coordinates were pretty close. It also describes cooling towers. I was looking for reservoir descriptions, it seems to be a 100 acre sedimentation pond (about 3 million gallons), to which water is lifted from the river by pumps in 12 pipelines. Max 73 cubic feet per second (32,765 gallons per minute). TGCP (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the paper, I've readded the coordinates and cited that report for the coordinates. Thanks for pointing me to the report. ···
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Cold Metal Transfer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pipeline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An update from the Sustainability Initiative
Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!
Hi, TGCP! Thank you again for supporting the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. Over the past two years, more than 200 Wikipedians from all over the world have come together to push the Wikimedia movement towards greater sustainability.
What's new?
We are writing you this message because there is great news: The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has finally passed a resolution stating that the Foundation is committed to seeking ways to reduce the impact of its activities on the environment. Also, we have created a cool logo and found a nice name for the project which you can see on the right :-)
What's next?
Currently, we are working with Wikimedia Foundation staff to make sustainability a key priority for the selection of a new location for Wikimedia servers in Singapore. Also, we have presented the Wikimedia Foundation with a green energyroadmap to have all Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy by 2019.
Please help!
Let's keep this project moving forward – and there are several ways in which you can help:
Ask other Wikipedians to sign the project page as well – this way we can show the Wikimedia Foundation that this is an issue that the community really cares about.
Talk to Wikimedians you know about the importance of reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement.
If you have any questions, you can contact us on on Meta. Again, thank you very much for your support! --Aubrey und Gnom, 2 April 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 21:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
USA Parkway
Hey there, do you have a reference for USA parkway being mileposted N-S rather than S-N? I can't find anything on the pages of the Route Log you added, and pages 173 and 178 of the same pdf do say S-N and give a route description in a S-N manner. Thanks, "Pepper"@ 23:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. I didn't know there was a nomenclature for that - it seemed odd to start the road at a dead end in the middle of nowhere - for now, until it connects with US50. You can check the distance in Lyons County, as I don't know if the standard requires mile marker (adding) or distance within that section. TGCP (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the mileages as unreferenced - mileposts in Nevada reset back to 0 at county lines, so until we have a reference or they complete the route and actually lay out the posts, I think we should leave it blank. This, while helpful for some routes, isn't helping here as it was published before NDOT took over the road. "Pepper"@ 03:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why ? Lengths are shown on page 215, and there are only two - that should be reference enough. We can choose the accuracy, and 6 and 0.1 is the length regardless of whether distances are added or separate. We can look at other roads to see if the unpaved section should be 10 (separate) or 18 (added). TGCP (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A few reasons: if the road is actually S-N, then mile 0 would be at US 50, not I-80. I also think you were misinterpreting the log slightly with the 0.1 - the road actually ends at I-80 (so that would be mile 0 were the highway N-S), and the Washoe/Storey county line is 0.1 miles south of that. Eventually, the goal would be for the RJL to look like Nevada State Route 28's. On a different note, I believe the case you presented for sig figs is exactly why they are typically not used for RJL's in favour of a fixed number of decimal places. The road definitely exists in Washoe County, and rounding its length to 0 as it is less than a tenth of the length in other counties strikes me as a disservice. In the prose, sure. But not in the junction list. When we are given 0.123 and 6.136, why not use them? "Pepper"@ 15:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The road doesn't start at US50 - yet. It "starts" (by NDOT nomenclature) at the roadblock up in the empty hills 10 miles north of US50, where grading is moving south towards US50. Most people would consider the road to start at I-80, because that's how they get there - the only other way in is the Waltham Way bridge near Patrick (detour). But okay, we follow NDOT and say S-N as the table says now. I can see from NSR-28 that the numbers are added within each county, because mile markers are reset at county lines as you say. What a confusing system. With only two sections, it should be easy to copy the method from NSR-28 and show lengths within counties, with the precise 6.136 and 0.123 given. I wanted to use them first but I wasn't sure if they should be added or separate, but 6 and 0.1 would have worked in either case. We can add the blank unopened 4 mile section in Storey as well. When nearing completion, NDOT will update the numbers, and we can update the table again. TGCP (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think at this point you understand what I'm saying and I'd be more than fine with you populating the table as done for SR 28. Agree that it is a weird system, but hey, that's what we have to work with. How were you planning on showing the unopened section in Storey County? (Mile -4?) Personally I would leave the unopened section without mile numbers until the road is complete and, as you say, NDOT updates the numbers. Could always get more opinions at
WT:USRD if you're really invested in the article's current state :) "Pepper"@ 22:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
I think I understand the system now. I thought the table showed distances between junctions (as shown in the document), but it does not. It shows the /location/ in relation to a specific point. There are probably physical mile markers beside the road, and the junction table correlates to those markers (the county line is 0.136 miles from the 6-mile marker pole). We have no NDOT reference to show those numbers or what the starting point is, so we cannot show them. The actual mile markers may be something different. The road was graded to the Lyons/Storey county line some years ago, but not paved. We don't know where the start point is. Let's wait with more edits until NDOT publishes something, which shouldn't take more than ½ year. TGCP (talk) 20:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nikola Motors
Hi, I noticed an edit you made to the Nikola One section of this page some time ago, stating a post-gear-reduction torque output of 100,000 lb-ft. I was unable to find any supporting evidence for this figure, and changed it to 86,000 lb-ft as claimed in May, 2016. If you have a source to your 100,000 lb-ft (or any other) figure, please revert and provide a link to your source. Glenebob (talk) 22:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Are you ok with the above file being deleted (since it is no longer needed)? I just came across it when doing some cleanups. Rehman 08:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coronation of Elizabeth II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Science Museum.
I have started an individual good article reassessment of Photovoltaic power station which was rated "good" in 2013 and I think it needs modernizing. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hopewell tradition
There are multiple reasons why this is simply wrong. Eg the fact that corn/maize wasn't a staple at the time, that there is no evidence the sites were contemporary or not ritual burning sites, technical problems about comets, etc. Let alone the authors. And a good example of why we should often avoid using primary sources. Doug Wellertalk 17:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited River Shira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beinn Bhreac.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Crimean Bridge explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.
