User talk:Taung Tan/Archive 1

@

Tartan357: I don't care who you are😇. Where my canvassing ? I calling for a discussion not for AfD. Why so serious? Ok I will ping admin to decide that is a canvassing or not! Taung Tan (talk

) 08:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I wrote this at the end of my comment at ANI (this one) but decided it was too off-topic so removed it before posting. I've reworded it and added to it and am posting it as direct advice to you. I haven't looked that much at your editing, so I apologise in advance if any of this is offensive, but I feel it may be part of the reason you're having problems here.

You need to recognise that despite our desire to reduce WP:Systemic bias, we cannot ignore our sourcing requirements particularly when it comes to BLPs. So the problems in Myanmar you know better than me i.e. the lack of anything resembling a local free media and other severe restrictions and risks that come from investigating and publishing, combined with Myanmar being an area of the world which doesn't get that much attention from the rest of the world, and that those restrictions also affect people from outside who do give Myanmar attention; means that sometimes our coverage will unfortunately sometimes have to remain limited since reliable sources in any language simply don't exist. This may be particularly frustrating when it's something we can have excellent detailed articles for something similar in the developed free world.

What you need to do is concentrate, with the help of others, on finding those areas where reliable sources do exist so we can improve our articles. While I appreciate it's frustrating, what you're certain is correct or the people you're sure are notable, are not things we can cover without sources. While the growth of the internet and social media, and chat apps and the like, have enabled information to flow which governments have previously been able to suppress, we do need sources we can trust to assess this information and publish it before it's of any use to us for many reasons including that it's also enabled false information to flow easily.

As I said at ANI, you'll find many editors who'd like to help you, including editors you often get in dispute with. And we really need your help since there are very few editors here who speak Burmese so can help us find and assess sources in Burmese.

Remember also that the sources need to be reliable, the situation in Myanmar means that unfortunately you can have the problem where there are government supported sources heavily in favour of the government, and opposition sources heavily opposed which can sometimes mean neither are reliable. Recognition of these problems means we can make allowances and accept sources we would normally reject, but it depends a lot on what we're sourcing and the sources. So you're likely to find sometimes others feel your sourcing isn't sufficient even if you feel it is. None of this unique to Myanmar, similar problems but significantly less severe exist in Malaysia where I am originally from, it can be incredibly frustrating but there are limits to what we can do on Wikipedia.

Nil Einne (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Nil Einne you are right! I noted in deed. Thanks you so much for your kind advice. I will improve my skill in the future. Taung Tan (talk) 09:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khin Oo Hlaing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khin Oo Hlaing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 22:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

On 24 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article U Din Kyaw Khaung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Konbaung-dynasty general U Din Kyaw Khaung was the only warrior said to have continued fighting after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/U Din Kyaw Khaung. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, U Din Kyaw Khaung), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wow....omg...this is my very first DYK. I'm proud 😇. Thank you so much Maile66. Taung Tan (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yin Yin Oo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yin Yin Oo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

On 15 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Khin Maung Lat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Khin Maung Lat, a servant at the king's palace in Ratnagiri, India, eloped with Princess Myat Phaya Lat against the will of the king and queen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Khin Maung Lat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Khin Maung Lat), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ritchie333 (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created,

With respect Yours Editor in Myanmar (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

On 23 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Linn Nhyo Taryar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the astrologer Linn Nhyo Taryar was arrested after performing yadaya (magic rituals) against coup leader Min Aung Hlaing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Linn Nhyo Taryar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Linn Nhyo Taryar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hey friend. I think you're thinking my acc as vandilism only acc but it is not. I totally agree that most of my edits may be personal. Writing ကြူခေါ is, I think, vandalism but I do not do like that much in wikipedia. If you check all my edits, you'll find that this acc is not only used for vandalism.

So, be safe. :)

Editor in Myanmar (talk) 15:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Taung Tan. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Note that this nomination has just been marked for closure. If you wish to continue your nomination, you'll need to return right away, before the nomination is closed. Best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Khin Ma Ma Maw has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

• Diannaa nonsense! What are you talking about? I've already rephrasing the sentence with my own words. How much do you need? The sentence "cleaning streets to caring for patients in hospital" it is how to violates copyvio? It is a minor or general fact! Pls don't abuse using your power and right on me. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 13:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Source says the org is established for patient and clan roads in Myanmar. In Source "Daw Khin Ma Ma Maw – wife of Dr. Ba Maw – which was founded on 12 January 1943 mobilized young women to work in towns and cities, from cleaning streets to caring for patients in hospital. Rangoon found itself deserted, ...

The Forgotten Army: India's ". My rephrased contents are very different and shrieked. If not for dogs? Or for your fris? So how can I add this facts to article? Taung Tan (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

• • • • If you don't explain me, I will report to (ArbCom) for using power for abuse. Taung Tan (talk) 13:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
      • As I'm one of most important and active Editors (now only one) on Wikipedia Myanmar Project, I've noted general facts are not serious copyright violation. 95℅ of contents are came from Burmese language. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• I would like to mention my respected and not biased admin Hut 8.5 for needed light on me. Am i wrong? Pls check article history. Taung Tan (talk) 13:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
  • • Well well, other words or usages of "towns and cities" is nothing! how to use these words via own words? Taung Tan (talk) 14:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Source:

mobilized young women to work in towns and cities, from cleaning streets to caring for patients in hospital.

Your version:

organizations with young women to work in towns and cities to cleaning streets and caring for patients in hospitals.

The portion I removed is almost identical to the source. Overlapping content is highlighted in bold. If you can't figure out a way to reword it, please don't add it.— Diannaa (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

• Hi Diannaa, Thanks! But other usage of towns and cities are unknown, so hard to reword them. Earwig report — 10% likely. I've learned that Basic facts are not copyright violation. Example for Reword, "father" >>> "daddy"? It is nonsense! "Taung Tan (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Presenting the same facts in the same order using almost identical wording is a violation of our copyright policy. Substituting random words with synonyms is also a violation, if you don't change the basic structure of the sentences and re-write the material using completely new wording. For example "young women to work in towns and cities to cleaning streets and caring for patients in hospitals" becomes "The volunteers helped clear rubble from the streets and worked in the hospitals."— Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Looking closer at the source, I discover that the organization accepted both male and female volunteers. The text goes on to say that while men were expected to go out and perform difficult and potentially dangerous tasks, women were expected to stay home and look after their own health and wellbeing.— Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Diannaa Thank you so much for light on me. I really want a mentor like you. You shown me with the good example. I've learned from you now. Regards Taung Tan (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Diannaa, you may also want to look at Template:Did you know nominations/Han Nyein Oo, where I identify some copyright issues at that article too. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Taung Tan,

Thank you for creating

More references needed to establish notability. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.

1. Contain
   significant coverage
   addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely
   independent
   of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a
   reliable
   source.
4. Be a
   secondary source
   ; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

• @
  WP:NPOL. Cheers Taung Tan (talk
  ) 12:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Taung Tan:, Good work. You have expanded the article considerably. Moreover, I am pleased to read all the additional detail. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Any specific reason to blank

Hi @Nirmaljoshi:, it was creaed on Bagan Archaeological Museum repalce of redirect, Thanks for your contents. Cheers Taung Tan (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

On 16 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kyaymyin Mibaya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kyaymyin Mibaya was King Mindon's youngest, last and richest queen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kyaymyin Mibaya. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kyaymyin Mibaya), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created,

I have seen everywhere. So many Chinese users are pushing POV across multiple articles which are significant. Where are all the Burmese users? If everyone is simply reading, then Wiki is just a playground for others' propaganda. Stress theorist (talk) 08:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

• Stress theorist I agree with you! Yes many Chinese users are trying to dominate on Wikipedia and pushing POV across multiple articles that they want to remove. It is not fair ! Unfortunately there are a few Burmese editor because of the Wikipedia banned by the military junta in Myanmar. Currently I'm one of the 5 only active Users from Myanmar who granted the IP block exempt. Taung Tan (talk) 08:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see

Wikipedia:ONEEVENT

for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs context on when this became popular beyond the local folks, and whether there was national, even international coverage. Is it a meme? Is it now a tourist attraction?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pee sao tukta mai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Taung Tan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Could you provide me your email/viber No / FB acc to contact and create wikipedia article for Mooler?

Thank you. 37.111.4.165 (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

You already know me! I've helped Moolar's blue tick as I'm a media operations associate of Meta. I'm not sure for Wikipedia. Taung Tan (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello ma sorry i couldn't find your FB acc so i had sent you a short email by wiki user account. I am not sure you receive it or not as my user account under poekwar name is still blocked. Could you help us to write article for him? i do have article/contents that we published and deleted by wiki team. I am a new user so i really dont know their criteria and how to write the article and contents. May i send it to you and you can review and free to edit/add? Could you please provide me your email address to send the file? Thank you and best regards, KK 117.55.251.49 (talk) 08:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi No! Sorry I can't for now because you are blocked from Wikipedia. You need to read this Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. ဟိုင်း ဝီကီမှာ အသုံးနှုန်းကို ဂရုစိုက်စေချင်ပါတယ်, မူးလာရဲ့ အမ ဆိုပြီး ဝန်ခံနေခြင်းက နောက်ဖန်တီးရာမှာ ပြသနာရှိစေပါတယ်, ဝီကီမှာ ဘက်လိုက်လို့မရသလို, ကိုယ့်အကြောင်း, သူငယ်ချင်း မိသားစုမွေးချင်း တွေရဲ့ အကြောင်းကို ရေးသားပေးလို့မရပါဘူး ရေးမယ်ဆိုလဲ ဘာမှ မသက်ဆိုင်သူလို ဟန်ဆောင်ပြီးရေးရမှာပါ, မူးလာအမည်နဲ့လာရေးလိုက်ခြင်းဟာ ပြသနာကြီးကြီးဖြစ်စေပါတယ် မူးလာကိုယ်တိုင်လာရေးသလိုဖြစ်သွားလို့ပါ အခု မူးလာနာမည်နဲ့ လာရေးတဲ့အတွက်ကော အကောင့်အသစ်ဖောက်တဲ့အတွက်ကော အခု အပေါ်မှာ မူးလာ အမ ဆိုပြီးပြောတဲ့အတွက် အနာဂတ်မှာ မူးလာအကြောင်းရေးဖို့ခက်ခဲသွားနိုင်ပါတယ်, အကြုံပြုချင်တာကတော့ အကောင့်အသစ် လုံးဝထပ်မဖောက်ပါနဲ့ ဖောက်မိရင် ကုရာနတ္ထိဆေးမရှိပါ, အကောင့်ဟောင်းကိုပဲ talk pageမှာ မူးလာ နဲ့မပတ်သတ်ကြောင်း appealရေးပြီး အကောင့်ကို ပြန်unlock လုပ်ပါ, ပြီးတော့emailပိူ့ပြီး တို့ကိုရေးခိုင်းတာတွေက COI နဲ့ငြိနေတဲ့ အတွက် တို့ပါ ဘမ်းခံရနိုင်တာမို့ အပြောဆို ဂရုစိုက်ပေးပါ, အဆင်ပြေပါစေ Taung Tan (talk) 07:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

ဟုတ်ကဲ့ပါရှင့် ကျေးဇူးပါ 117.55.251.222 (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created,

On 21 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maung O, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Maung O, Prince of Salin, and his sister Nanmadaw Me Nu became de facto rulers of Burma when King Bagyidaw was suffering from depression? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maung O. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Maung O), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Good one! Feel free to put up your articles on Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk

) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

On 9 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shaw Loo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Burmese scholar Shaw Loo was Bucknell University's first international student? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shaw Loo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shaw Loo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

On 12 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taingda Mingyi U Pho, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taingda Mingyi U Pho engineered the massacre of around 40 members of the Burmese royal family in order to eliminate nearly all possible heirs to the throne? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taingda Mingyi U Pho. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Taingda Mingyi U Pho), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't know who to alert about this, but there's an error in the DYK hook. It says that she is "one of the two only living princesses to have attended the 1974 Panglong Conference", but the Panglong Conference was in 1947, not 1974. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Metropolitan90 my apology ... My mistake. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 07:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Myoza (royal title). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

• • Hi Greeting and Happy New Year Diannaa, I already appeared the tags see [4] and [5]. Thanks. Taung Tan (talk) 05:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

    Sorry I missed that! Sorry for the unneeded message. Happy New Year! — Diannaa (talk) 16:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talabaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drumstick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

On 5 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sao Sanda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sao Sanda (pictured), the last princess of Yawnghwe, is one of only two living princesses to have attended the 1947 Panglong Conference? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sao Sanda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sao Sanda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,541 views (1,295.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aye Nu Sein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sithu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I promoted Talabaw to Template:Did you know/Preparation area 3, but the look was over the 200 character limit so I had to shorten it. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi

bamboo shoots, is the national dish of the Karen people in Myanmar, where it is used as a rice complement? . (only 187 characters) Taung Tan (talk

) 05:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Done. SL93 (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks SL93, You are so kind. Taung Tan (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

On 16 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Talabaw, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the soup Talabaw (pictured), which consists primarily of bamboo shoots, is the essential dish of Myanmar's Karen people, who use it to supplement rice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Talabaw. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Talabaw), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

On 17 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tayaw kinpun, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the traditional shampoo tayaw kinpun (pictured) has been used by successive Burmese kings to wash their hair ritually to cast away evil, and augment their powers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tayaw, kinpun. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tayaw kinpun), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,040 views (418.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Theleekycauldron Thanks for informing me. Hybernator Thanks ako for your nice work on my article. Cheers Taung Tan (talk) 07:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Theleekycauldron, A question, how can I know the view count of the Dyk. I want to see that page view record. Taung Tan (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Taung Tan: you'll want to navigate to WP:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders, navigate to the correct month and year, and then go looking!

If you're looking for this hook, just click on the link in the above box. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myo Myint Kyaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myo Myint Kyaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

On 10 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Honey Nway Oo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that former Burmese actress Honey Nway Oo (pictured) turned rebel and took up arms against the military junta following the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Honey Nway Oo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Honey Nway Oo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 19,195 views (1,599.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work!

Oh my god, No-1 at top view chart 😊😍. I'm happy. Taung Tan (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Precious

Myanmar

Thank you for quality articles around Myanmar with a focus on its activists in resistance such as Honey Nway Oo, for Shaw Loo, Myat Phaya Gyi and Talabaw, based on living there, for "starting today, I'll be smart editor", - user named after a beautiful mountain, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

Oh my goddness, Thank you very much for your kind award, @Gerda Arendt:. I wasn't expecting it. What a surprise that you remembered my quote: "starting today, I'll be smart editor" at [6]. I consider my recent contributions to Wikipedia a positive beginning towards making a difference. Previously, I found it challenging to communicate effectively with other editors on the platform. However, I am delighted to have the opportunity to create articles about topics related to my country. I aim to continue this work and contribute more in the future. Best regards. Taung Tan (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

---

Administrators:

Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement

).

Yamla (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Yamla, My account was blocked for using multiple accounts, and I understand that my case is complex and difficult to explain. To clarify, Vocal is a friend I know from Facebook who lives in another country, and he occasionally shares his account with me. As a mentor to Vocal, I have occasionally used his account to provide guidance and support. (I am a mentor for numerous Wikipedians and others who are interested in Wikipedia, and I teach them how to write articles for Wikipedia on my Facebook page. I am famous in my country for my teaching Wikipedia and creating articles about the Burmese revolutionaries during the dark period, and you can verify this by asking other respected Burmese Wikipedia editors.)

To clarify, I invite you to compare our edit histories through CU or the User Compare Report [7]. It will be evident that our origins are not the same, and our contributions are only related to some AfD discussions and not our respective articles. Additionally, as a Check user, you may compare our devices and locations to verify that we are distinct.

Upon closer examination, you will notice that our locations and devices are significantly different. Additionally, as a user from Myanmar, I was unable to access Wikipedia during the country's coup d'état on February 1, 2021, due to a nationwide internet shutdown. The Myanmar military government has blocked all language editions of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia, part of a widening post-coup internet censorship regime imposed by the military junta. (https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2021/feb/21/myanmar-blocks-wikipedia-in-all-languages-netblocks-2266920.html). During the time of the internet shutdown, I requested Vocal's help to edit Myanmar coup-related articles via Telegram when I had the opportunity to use the internet for a very brief period. Vocal made an edit on February 1 on a military-related topic, specifically about the coup leader Min Aung Hlaing. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Min_Aung_Hlaing&diff=prev&oldid=1004147888). As you can see, Vocal was able to make edits on Wikipedia while I was unable to do so due to the internet shutdown in Myanmar. I was only able to come online on February 4 with the help of a VPN, and I was granted an IP block exemption in order to be able to edit on Wikipedia using the VPN. (My first edit on Wikipedia after the coup, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aung_Pyae_Sone&oldid=1004822235). I still have the IP block exemption, but since I left my country in 2022, I am now able to edit without using a VPN. Please check my profile and activities during the coup (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Taung_Tan&oldid=1127830114).

To clarify, I was active on Wikipedia before Vocal's block in March 2021. Therefore, it is evident that I am not attempting to evade Vocal's block, and our contributions and interests are separate and distinct from each other. While I am working on improving Wikipedia articles related to my country, Vocal is working on topics that interest him and his country. Following Vocal's block on Wikipedia, I continued to remain active on the Myanmar project. Presently, I'm the leading editor for the Wikipedia Myanmar project after leaving my country. Meanwhile, Vocal focuses on topics related to Chinese mythology and India, which are not my areas of interest. Vocal reached out to me for help in getting his account unblocked after his appeal was rejected by an admin. Unfortunately, I wasn't available to assist him at the time. However, I now have some free time and am taking a closer look at his account block. I logged into his account and drafted an appeal on his behalf.

Regrettably, I forgot to log out of my Taung Tan account and carelessly made some grammar changes on Vocal's account, which led to my own account being blocked. While I acknowledge that I am associated with Vocal, I am not the same person as him. Additionally, it's worth noting that Vocal and I have different genders [8]. I would appreciate it if you could spend more time examining and contrasting our respective contributions to gain a clearer understanding of this situation. Taung Tan (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Sharing accounts is strictly prohibited here. I'm afraid you've violated

WP:GAB. --Yamla (talk

) 19:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I want to clarify that I was not aware that sharing accounts violates Wikipedia's policy on Meatpuppetry (

WP:MEAT). In this case, Vocal shared his account with me to address an issue, and I did not ask to share his account. It is important to note that I did not agree with all of Vocal's contributions, and I have even opposed his opinions in certain AfDs. I feel extremely disappointed with this situation. It seems unfair that I am being blocked when it was Vocal who shared his account with me. I am a leading active user for my country's Wikipedia project, and I need to continue my contributions. He worked for his country, and I work for Myanmar. In my opinion, the block should be applied to Vocal, not me. I would like to "Super CU request" for my justice. You can see my good works on my Talk pages. Taung Tan (talk

) 19:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I don't believe you. See for example, this edit made with this acccount. --Yamla (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I already admitted this above. "Regrettably, I forgot to log out of my Taung Tan account and carelessly made some grammar changes on Vocal's account, which led to my own account being blocked." I wrote the current appeal on Vocal's behalf by logging into his account, and the mistake that led to the block was caused by me forgetting to log out. Please carefully read my explanation above. Taung Tan (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

You are free to contest your block. Sharing an account is a blockable offense and editing on behalf of a blocked user is a blockable offense. Any checkuser can see the same technical data I saw, though frankly you've already admitted to sharing an account and to editing on behalf of a blocked user. I'm really surprised you think you shouldn't be blocked for this. But, again, you are free to contest your block and another admin will review it. They are free to lift the block without consulting me. For anyone reviewing it, checkuser technical data doesn't show anything other than what's been admitted here, so you are free to ignore that part of the block. Taung Tan may demand a review by a checkuser, though; that's their call, though I'd argue it'd be pointless here. --Yamla (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Taung Tan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is new for me. So, please point me in the direction of a method to unlock my account. I made this mistake as per Vocal's request for his block appeal. I did not hack his account, and I'm not a hacker. I'm a Wikipedia mentor. I would like to request a deep review by a checkuser. Please see; User talk:Taung Tan/Archive 1#Explain. Taung Tan (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A checkuser isn't needed here any more than there has already been one. It sounds like(though it's confusing) you used their account, and not the other way around. But editing on behalf of a blocked user is sufficient to block this account, and I don't disagree with Yamla's assessment. 331dot (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks

WP:COMPROMISED, I'm not sure how to request that my account be unblocked. My block is will be forever?. Regards Taung Tan (talk

) 20:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure that the reason for you using another's account is particularly relevant. If someone's English skill is insufficient to participate here, they should edit something like the Simple English Wikipedia or the Wikipedia of their primary language. There's nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it isn't the premier Wikipedia. I accept that this may have been in good faith, but it was a poor decision. As WP:COMPROMISED states, it may be your only pathway forward is to contact a checkuser or even a steward and convince them you and only you are in control of this account. 331dot (talk) 21:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I echo what 331dot says. I'd also want a complete list of any other accounts you've ever accessed, an assurance that you understand what you did was inappropriate, and a promise never to do so again. To be clear, you should never access another account even if the person grants you permission, nor should you work with a person blocked for

WP:CIR to improve the English of their unblock request. What you did was staggeringly inappropriate and I'm just not seeing you understand that. It's not that you didn't know the policy. There are lots of policies. It's that your actions were so staggeringly inappropriate. --Yamla (talk

) 22:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

On 19 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ywet Nu Aung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while defending Zaw Myint Maung following his arrest by the Myanmar junta, lawyer Ywet Nu Aung was herself arrested and charged? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ywet Nu Aung. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ywet Nu Aung), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khin Oo Hlaing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Taung Tan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

---

Administrators:

Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement

).

Yamla (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)