User talk:Tinucherian/Archives/2009/July

Delivered by

Happy to see the Bangalore meetup featured at the Signpost ! -- Tinu Cherian - 10:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

...sock-puppetry? Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly looking at the similar Userpages ( or may be friends ?) . I havent checked the edits...It is not really sock puppetry issue unless the accounts are used for disruptive editing or double voting etc -- Tinu Cherian - 17:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Not only the user pages, but content contributions are also quite similar. But as you said, I guess it's not an issue unless it gets disruptive. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 09:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes. Just watch out for any abusive behaviour if any. -- Tinu Cherian - 09:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Can you have your bot run through

Wokey..-- Tinu Cherian - 17:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The WikiCup Newsletter

The WikiCup Newsletter Round III, Issue 6 - July 12, 2009 Archive after Pool leaders In this round of the WikiCup, the top contestant from each pool, along with four wildcards, will advance to the next round. The pool leaders are: Pool A Sasata (505) Pool B Ottava Rima (592) Pool C Candlewicke (380) Pool D Theleftorium (666) Wildcard leaders Scorpion0422 (584) Shoemaker's Holiday (493) Mitchazenia (443) Juliancolton (261) For a full guide see Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2009/Full All scores are accurate as of talk at 18:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Content Leaders As of this newsletter, the following is a list of participants in this round with the most: Featured articles Juliancolton (1) Scorpion0422 (1) Shoemaker's Holiday (1) the_ed17 (1) Featured lists Scorpion0422 (5) Featured topics Nobody Featured pictures Shoemaker's Holiday (11) Featured sounds Nobody Featured portals Shoemaker's Holiday (2) Good topics Scorpion0422 (2) Theleftorium (2) Good articles Theleftorium (13) Did you know? items Ottava Rima (26) In the news items Candlewicke (21) For Round 1 stats, see Newsletter 10 . For Round 2 stats, see Newsletter 18 . WikiCup At a Glance As of this newsletter, the WikiCup participants have collected a Round 3 total of: 4 Featured articles 13 Featured lists 0 Featured topics 14 Featured pictures 0 Featured sounds 4 Featured portal 3 Good topic 48 Good articles 74 Did you know? items 21 In the news items This combines with the Round 2 totals to make a grand total of: 29 Featured articles 60 Featured lists 3 Featured topics 189 Featured pictures 24 Featured sounds 6 Featured portal 6 Good topics 250 Good articles 521 Did you know? items 103 In the news items Biggest Jumps The difference between each contestant's point total from last week, and their point total from this week are: Rank User LF TF D 1 Shoemaker's Holiday 36 493 457 2 Ottava Rima 241 592 351 3 Scorpion0422 389 584 195 4 Theleftorium 518 666 148 5 Gary King 17 150 113 6 Mitchazenia 160 290 130 7 Sasata 442 505 63 8 Rlevse 109 143 34 9 Wrestlinglover 228 248 20 10 ThinkBlue 206 219 13 LF = Last Week's score, TF = This Week's score, D = Difference between last week and this week's scores This was generated from this diff. From the Judges There were a few mistakes in last weeks' newsletter. Apologies about that. In regards to the competition, a few of you shot up in points this week. Very, very impressive. However, now that some have shot up to the top, others of you have to work even harder to catch up! There are about 3 weeks left in the round, so if you're behind, now is really the time to start nominating content, so that it can count for this round. If you wait too long, we won't be able to hold off the round while your content is being reviewed. Per this tiny poll, the remainder of the competition has been altered.. sorry!! The changes being made are as follows: "We will be combining the last three rounds. Round 4 will now last from August through September, with 8 contestants. On September 1st, however, we will eliminate the bottom four contestants. The top four contestants will continue the round with the same score. Then, one person will win out of the remaining four on September 30th." You can also see this change to the main WikiCup page. Lastly, we'd like to welcome back Shoemaker's Holiday into the competition! ' talk at, and The Helpful One If you don't wish to receive this newsletter in the future, remove your name from this list. If you are not a participant, but would still like to receive this newsletter, feel free to add your name to the list. --EdwardsBot (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Similarities between Tamil and Kannada languages, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Page appears to be original research; it cites no sources. It is simply a list of cognate words in two Dravidian languages. As such it has little information value.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

Why this msg to me ? I havent created the article? -- Tinu Cherian - 16:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I posted duplicate messages to the talk pages of all of the major contributors to the page: you, User talk:Patton123, User talk:C21K, and page creator User talk:M rajeswaran. Sorry if the message is an unwanted distraction. In that case, please disregard it. Cnilep (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XL (June 2009)
From the coordinators The big news this month is the launch of the Academy content drive (see below if you want to help). But otherwise it has been a very busy month for both reviewing and contest department entries, surprisingly so considering the wind down of the academic year. If you'd like to do some wiki-gnoming over the holidays, please help with the huge backlog (currently 30 articles) at Category:Military history articles with incomplete B-Class checklists.  Roger Davies talk 11:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of the Coral Sea Battle of Vimy Ridge Brazilian battleship Minas Geraes Hastings Ismay, 1st Baron Ismay Military history of Australia during World War II Otto Becher Moltke-class battlecruiser Yamato-class battleship New featured lists: List of Medal of Honor recipients (Veracruz) List of Philippine–American War Medal of Honor recipients List of United States Military Academy alumni (athletic figures) List of United States Military Academy alumni (engineers) New featured pictures: Governor Davey's [sic] Proclamation to the Aborigines Test Baker, Operation Crossroads Tuskegee airmen New A-Class articles: Army of the Tennessee Battle of Bosworth Field Battle of Corydon Battle of the Coral Sea Battle of Ticonderoga (1777) Helgoland class battleship Operation Sky Monitor Rupert Downes Sd.Kfz. 10 Werner Mölders
Project news The Cold War task force has been created. New members are welcome! Congratulations go to Patar knight and Cool3, who have both successfully passed RfA. Feel free to chime in on the longrunning discussion about the firearms article structure. The Contest department has completed its twenty-seventh month of competition, with 54 articles entered by 10 editors. Sturmvogel 66 placed first this month with 64 points, followed by Parsecboy on 49 points. They receive the Chevrons and the Writer's Barnstar respectively. Ed! commendably came third with 44 points, with honorable mentions going to AustralianRupert (38), Mynameinc (11) and The ed17 (10). Thanks also go to Gaia Octavia Agrippa, Bernstein2291, Piotrus and Wild Wolf, who also fielded entries.
The Academy content drive Introduced in February, The Academy is an online school for new members. This month, we're launching a drive to increase the breadth and depth of its content. If you can help, by writing four to six paragraph articles, please do so! Barnstars galore to be won!
Awards and honours Our top Nosedown, Ost316, Parsecboy, Redtigerxyz, Rosiestep, Ruhrfisch, Socrates2008, Sumanch, TechOutsider and Xatsmann .
Editorial: How to prepare an A-Class Review Perhaps the most important—and, indeed, most respected—aspect of the Military History project is our rigorous A-Class Review (ACR) system, which puts articles through the most robust review outside of WP:FAC . Although reviewing might seem daunting to newcomers, this article will give you an outline of three popular reviewing methods so you can actually start contributing yourself. General nit-pick - this is one of the easiest - and one of the most common - reviewing styles seen throughout Wikipedia. It is a similar approach to that you would see in proofreading and classroom marking. Basically, it is a general overview of the article, not getting too specific on aspects of the prose. The most common statements include This article could benefit from a light copyedit before going to FAC or You might want to check the endash and emdash placement in the article. It's a style that is incredibly easy to manage, and one that requires little-to-no experience in previous reviewing. Specialization - it often is the case that those who have been reviewing articles for a long time will move away from the general review towards more specific areas of articles. As an example, Tony usually stays within the realm of prose and copyediting while reviewing Featured Article Candidates, Tom used to focus almost entirely on external links and disambiguations, while others specialize their focus exclusively on copyediting, reference formatting, dashes, punctuation and flow, image licensing, and a host of other areas. This is a review method that is not nearly as time-consuming as other methods, as it allows you to quickly scan an article, spot the things that you work on, and how they need to be fixed. Sectional - My preferred style of reviewing, this is one of the most informative styles. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most time-consuming and exhaustive styles. Essentially, it involves going through the entire article, section by section, and pointing out every major (and often many of the minor) flaws present within each section. Everything from prose to reference formatting to content. It is a reviewing style that is exhausting, and often takes two or three goes through the article to get everything (sometimes even more), but it gives the article's main contributors two benefits. First, everything is well organized, mostly under section headers like this one, and it often makes finding individual sentences or refs much easier, as they are within that section. Secondly, it points out a lot of the problems from a lot of the areas. Best of luck, and happy Reviewing! Cam (Chat)
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here .

This has been an automated delivery by

Feel free to deliver the newsletter above. John Carter (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

OK. I will work on it.. Sorry I was busy with the blore meetup -- Tinu Cherian - 14:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Ready when you are. Considering we're hoping to get some new nominees for coordinators, with Secisek apparently having bowed out, sooner would probably be preferable to later. John Carter (talk) 00:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Can you help find references fro Estonia–India relations? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Considering Secisek seems to have retired from wikipedia, it seems to me to very much make sense that we do try to find someone to replace him as one of the Christianity coordinators. I don't think that will happen unless the members get notification of potential new elections. On that basis, I think it would probably help a lot if the newsletter were delivered shortly. If, for whatever reason, you cannot do so, please let me know and I will try to deliver it manually myself thereafter. Thanks. John Carter (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

John, It is not possible to deliver it by me today... If you are able to deliver it today plz do,Else I will deliver it tmrw morning Indian time , around 15 hrs from now -- Tinu Cherian - 14:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks John for delivering it ....But you could have {{subst}}-ed instead of transclusion of the newsletter. Sorry for the delay I had made, I was very involved in the real life promotions of Wikipedia in my country..But next month, free feel to let me deliver it myself :) -- Tinu Cherian - 04:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Tip Line  |  Editors The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter Issue X - July 2009 Project news The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles! Member news It was a big month for new members, with User:RandomNumberSee, User:Per Ardua, User:Muzhogg, User:Arlen22, User:Scotchorama, and User:Jaybird vt joining, bringing us up to 292 listed members. Thanks to you all, and a special welcome to our new members! Other news I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum . One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much. Related projects news The Christian films . All interested parties are welcome to join and contribute. Member contest of the month The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month . Christianity related news Pennsylvania Amish farmer jailed for outhouse violations Obama expands Bush's faith-based initiatives Relics of 39 saints found by British Museum From the Members Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page. John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC) To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 22:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello all, iMatthew here. I just wanted to let you know about "The Great Wikipedia Dramaout" which starts this Saturday. The goal of the Dramaout is to spend five days working on improving articles and abstaining from any of Wikipedia's drama. I don't think that any of you will have a problem focusing on articles for five days, because of course, any work you get done during the Dramaout will count towards your score in the WikiCup. Details are on the page; hope to see you all signing up! :)

hey there, I was wondering if you could weigh in here: [1]. I could use a new view. Sephiroth storm (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The other day the image did not show up. Now it does show up. Anyhow, I don't see what purpose it is serving there. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 12:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The look and feel is better when there is an image there...instead of just words.. Just wanted an India related image. Would you like to suggest another one? -- Tinu Cherian - 12:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Ganesh, the same thing happened to me the other day: The images were very slow to load, and the Wikipedia logo wasn't appearing in the left corner. I agree with Tinu Cherian—I've been putting those particular images [1, 2] simply for patriotic eye candy. They're certainly not required. Also, in my opinion, if any user wants his or her photography (of India) featured, the newsletter would be a great place. Thanks, [sd] 01:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

I removed the Food and Drink template that TinucherianBot placed on this page. It is very unlikely that anyone will ever drink this one. Maybe the "Not to be confused with Pine nut oil." at the top of the page confused the bot? Regards,  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for signing up for the

This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

Hi. I think it is a bad idea splitting the Malayalm language films by year. Even English-language films are not even split. The convention seems to me to place all the films in one category. Was there a specific reason you felt it necessary to split by year? Was the main category really unmanageable? We have

I recently think categoring per year is good, be it for malayalam or english language films. An yes, I respect the consensus at the CFD -- Tinu Cherian - 08:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

The WikiCup Newsletter

The WikiCup Newsletter Round III, Issue 7 - July 18, 2009 Archive after Pool leaders In this round of the WikiCup, the top contestant from each pool, along with four wildcards, will advance to the next round. The pool leaders are: Pool A Mitchazenia (653) Pool B Ottava Rima (617) Pool C Candlewicke (427) Pool D Theleftorium (673) Wildcard leaders Shoemaker's Holiday (600) Sasata (546) Juliancolton (346) Wrestlinglover (337) For a full guide see Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2009/Full All scores are accurate as of 15:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC). Content Leaders As of this newsletter, the following is a list of participants in this round with the most: Featured articles Juliancolton (2) Featured lists Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (6) Featured topics Mitchazenia (1) Featured pictures Shoemaker's Holiday (14) Featured sounds Nobody Featured portals Shoemaker's Holiday (2) Good topics Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (2) Theleftorium (2) Good articles Theleftorium (13) Mitchazenia (13) Did you know? items Ottava Rima (30) In the news items Candlewicke (26) For Round 1 stats, see Newsletter 10 . For Round 2 stats, see Newsletter 18 . WikiCup At a Glance As of this newsletter, the WikiCup participants have collected a Round 3 total of: 5 Featured articles 14 Featured lists 1 Featured topics 19 Featured pictures 0 Featured sounds 4 Featured portal 3 Good topic 54 Good articles 85 Did you know? items 26 In the news items This combines with the Round 2 totals to make a grand total of: 30 Featured articles 61 Featured lists 4 Featured topics 189 Featured pictures 24 Featured sounds 6 Featured portal 6 Good topics 256 Good articles 532 Did you know? items 108 In the news items Biggest Jumps The difference between each contestant's point total from last week, and their point total from this week are: Rank User LF TF D 1 Mitchazenia 443 653 210 2 Shoemaker's Holiday 493 600 107 3 Wrestlinglover 248 337 89 4 Juliancolton 261 346 85 5 Candlewicke 380 427 47 LF = Last Week's score, TF = This Week's score, D = Difference between last week and this week's scores This was generated from this diff. From the Judges About two weeks left, now. To those of you in the back, don't give up. There is still enough time to get some more work done. To those of you in the front relaxing... don't. We've seen it happen before, where users in the back will jump ahead in the final weeks and make it though. We'd also like to wave goodbye to Scorpion0422, and thank him for all of his hard work this round even though he knew he needed to withdraw at the end of it. ' talk, and The Helpful One If you don't wish to receive this newsletter in the future, remove your name from this list. If you are not a participant, but would still like to receive this newsletter, feel free to add your name to the list.

Delivered by

Your friend wikireader41 should not be vandalizing actually one would expect this Pro Indian trashy edits like these: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] I request you to open your eyes and stop feeding Indian pov pushers and ignoring there pov and stop targeting Pakistani editors get your house in order first don’t start a pov war and then don’t cry if Pakistanis respond to Indian abusive editors like wikireader41 I request you not to be hypocritical and look at the edits of Indian users first then moan if Pakistanis respond to the Indian pov pushers 81.151.100.91 (talk) 23:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

As much as I agree that the edits in question are despicable, they are from the beginning of the year, and are less likely to be attributed to a current event. Sephiroth storm (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Why the double standards then User Adilyour made those stupid edits at the start of the year which was 6 months ago actually why is he being abused and picked on by Indians now? why aren’t the Indians punishing wikireader41 who’s still sending out abusive comments like this [9] why do they still abuse Adilyour I shall tell you why because he’s Pakistani well we cant help it if these guys get taught this in American schools which are sadly being infected by exported Indian Hindutva textbooks [10] I will continue to answer back to any wise guy Indian pov pusher like wikireader41 until he’s blocked forever why is he allowed to send abusive edits while if a Pakistani responds it’s a big tragedy If Indians are willing to dish it out abuse like wikireader41 they should also be able to take some and stop moaning peace out 86.158.235.174 (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

While I dont agree with the above edits of wikireader41, those edits are a long time ago. The user is no friend of mine... Do you expect me to go to every article on Wikipedia to check its NPOV? I havent seen those above edits earlier as the above article is not in my watch list. I have seen Adilyour and Yousaf POV pushing on some articles like State sponsered Terrorism and I've commented on them. You have no idea about my working style on Wikipedia when I have objected some India biased POV in some of the articles. Having said that , I know that you are registered user and commenting here as an IP sock. Please login and comment here if you require further discussion -- Tinu Cherian - 17:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Why were all the Malayalam-language films removed from all the Malayalam-language films by year categories? Do you know?

This is a result of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_July_11#Malayalam-language_films_by_year. While my personal opinion was such categories are needed, I respect the consensus. -- Tinu Cherian - 17:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Never mind that... my question is resoved now.

What do you think of having the Malayalam-language films by decade placed directly in

Talk

21:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I dont have any strong opinions either for or aganist this suggestion. I am Ok either way -- Tinu Cherian - 21:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Tinu, Congrats for hosting the Bangalore meetup so nicely.

Thanks Rajith for the kind words of appreciation and encouragement. :) -- Tinu Cherian - 05:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. I was wondering why I am not in this list -

 Done : Thank you for your contributions -- Tinu Cherian - 08:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

That was faster than the speed of light. Thanks! --Belasd (talk) 08:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

:) I was in the middle of editing something and noticed the yellow msg notice -- Tinu Cherian - 08:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

On In the news candidates page .

--BorgQueen (talk) 09:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

For better and faster discussion between WikiProject Software Members a IRC channel has been created: irc://irc.freenode.net/WikiProject-Software. For instant access click here: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=WikiProject-Software. Please your Wikipedia nickname. You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Software --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 13:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Can you spread the following message to all WikiProject Software members: For better and faster discussion between WikiProject Software Members a IRC channel has been created: irc://irc.freenode.net/WikiProject-Software. For instant access click here: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=WikiProject-Software. Please your Wikipedia nickname. You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Software. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 13:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

So how do I go about requesting for permission to use AWB? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Request permission to use @

Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Users -- Tinu Cherian

- 09:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Can you now just guide me to a startup using AWB? #REDIRECT Target page name

--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Here is a small guide to WikiProject Tagging with AWB. I can probably do a demostration on AWB on a next WikiMeetup -- Tinu Cherian - 05:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :D --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at

• T:TDYK
  for Did You Know nominations
• WP:GAC
  for Good Article nominations
• WP:FAC
  for Featured Article nominations
• WP:FLC
  for Featured List nominations
• WP:FPC
  for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --

• WikiProject Body Modification - Wikipedia:WikiProject Body Modification
• Template Name - WikiProject Body Modification
• WikiProject abbreviation - WPBM
• WikiProject category - Body Modification
• Parent project name -
• Classes supported - list, fl, stub, start, c, b, ga, a, fa
• Options - Importance
• Optional - Category Intersection

ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Please confirm whether your request was the create WP1.0 Assessment Categories for your Project, WikiProject Body Modification? -- Tinu Cherian - 05:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Is it already done ? -- Tinu Cherian - 08:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe so.. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 18:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I was going to PROD this article, but thought you might be able to improve it, it's an unsourced list and the list of Malayalam movies exists separately anyway. Let me know if you think you can improve it. cheers -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 05:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Let me see if I can find some reliable sources to support it. -- Tinu Cherian - 05:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I couldnt find any reliable sources to back up the list. Nevertheless, the article should be renamed to

List of top grossing Malayalam films in 2008 -- Tinu Cherian

- 09:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll PROD it for now, if someone else can find sources good, and then we can move the list; I figured you'd be the best person to do that before I PRODded. cheers -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 14:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

It will be good. Thanks for the faith in me too :) -- Tinu Cherian - 14:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

The WikiCup Newsletter

The WikiCup Newsletter Round III, Issue 8 - July 26, 2009 Archive after Pool leaders In this round of the WikiCup, the top contestant from each pool, along with four wildcards, will advance to the next round. The pool leaders are: Pool A Mitchazenia (661) Pool B Ottava Rima (659) Pool C Candlewicke (443) Pool D Theleftorium (727) Wildcard leaders Shoemaker's Holiday (638) Sasata (583) Juliancolton (424) Wrestlinglover (383) Durova (370) the_ed17 (266) ThinkBlue (232) Those in italics are not currently in place for the next round, but are very close. For a full guide see Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2009/Full All scores are accurate as of 14:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC). Content Leaders As of this newsletter, the following is a list of participants in this round with the most: Featured articles Juliancolton (3) Featured lists Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (6) Featured topics Mitchazenia (1) Featured pictures Shoemaker's Holiday (14) Featured sounds Shoemaker's Holiday (1) Featured portals Shoemaker's Holiday (2) Good topics Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (2) Theleftorium (2) Good articles Theleftorium (14) Did you know? items Ottava Rima (31) In the news items Candlewicke (27) For Round 1 stats, see Newsletter 10 . For Round 2 stats, see Newsletter 18 . WikiCup At a Glance As of this newsletter, the WikiCup participants have collected a Round 3 total of: 5 Featured articles 14 Featured lists 1 Featured topics 21 Featured pictures 1 Featured sounds 4 Featured portal 3 Good topic 61 Good articles 90 Did you know? items 27 In the news items This combines with the Round 2 totals to make a grand total of: 30 Featured articles 61 Featured lists 4 Featured topics 191 Featured pictures 25 Featured sounds 6 Featured portal 6 Good topics 263 Good articles 537 Did you know? items 109 In the news items Biggest Jumps The difference between each contestant's point total from last week, and their point total from this week are: Rank User LF TF D 1 Durova 178 370 192 2 the_ed17 83 226 143 3 Juliancolton 346 424 78 4 Theleftorium 673 727 54 5 Wrestlinglover 337 383 46 LF = Last Week's score, TF = This Week's score, D = Difference between last week and this week's scores This was generated from this diff. From the Judges The round is over in about four days from now. Sit back, watch your nominations being reviewed, and hope for the best. In these four days, you don't have much control over your score. It's what you did prior to now, that's going to pile up your points (or not). We're very, very pleased with this round's results so far, and of course hoping to see some more submitted before the round ends. Not much else to say for now, but you'll all be getting a newsletter on Thursday or Friday between rounds. ' talk, and The Helpful One If you don't wish to receive this newsletter in the future, remove your name from this list. If you are not a participant, but would still like to receive this newsletter, feel free to add your name to the list.

Delivered for the

Cheers, --ragesoss (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, Is the Signpost ready ? Can I start? -- Tinu Cherian - 06:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

 Doing... : Working on the delivery of Signpost. Thanq for using the services of my bot. -- Tinu Cherian - 06:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!--ragesoss (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done : You are welcome. The bot task is now completed -- Tinu Cherian - 15:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

You know the movie is based of mudrer case in kerala of 1980's it made a film Madrasile mon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.176.35 (talk) 07:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Madrasile Mon (1982) ? -- Tinu Cherian - 08:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by --

Cherian BOT

- 14:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Commons:File:Cherian philip.JPG

This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Please also consider checking Commons for other media that you may have uploaded locally, but which was subsequently transferred.

Special:Log for uploads can help in this.

Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the information available is ok -- Tinu Cherian - 14:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia India

Hi,

Let me introduce myself as an NRI Wikipedian, much interested in seeing the formation of Wikimedia India. It is very important for the growth and promotion of wiki in India (even though its currently very popular, the scope is massive). I understand that this was discussed in the recent Bangalore meetup hosted kindly by yourself. Could u pl. give me an update on the progress made so far? Thanks, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 13:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

I am not in the loop for the latest developments regarding Wikimedia India. I suggest asking User:Arunram, User:Sundar or User:HPN for the latest updates on this -- Tinu Cherian - 15:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Malayalam films

Hello!! Glad to see there is now a Malayalam film database. There is vast amount of films missing, if I have time I'll help start a few!!

As I've found a site that lists them by year I think I will start lists of films by year like Bollywood and Tamil, after all this is what you were trying to achieve with the categories right? Sorry I opposed your categories by year but I'll give you some help on this, if you want it? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Blofeld, I knew sooner or later I will get ur help in this ;).yes, there is a huge lack of articles of Malayalam films ( approximately 3500-4000 ) . Btw can your split the decade list articles to per year for Malayalam films also ? You may want to see http://www.prd.kerala.gov.in/1981.htm too... -- Tinu Cherian - 14:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Yep I will, certianly, I have a lot of cleanup/error fixing errands to sort out at present i'll get to it in a week or two. I did the Tamil films the other day. My only concern is that some of the years seem to be missing like 1970 etc and that the tables are not formatted like the standard ones for Bollywood and Tamil. From what I saw the website starts listing the films from 1961. At present there onyl seems to be a few listed for the 60s so I've red linked from 1970 to present OK? If you could fill out 1970 in the 70s list somewhat I can begin then at 1970 when I come around to it. Keeo up the good work! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanq Blofeld for your kind words. To be very frank, you are one of greatest inspirations on Wikipedia. -- Tinu Cherian - 11:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Software IRC channel

It would be great to see you at the WikiProject Software IRC channel. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 22:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXVII

The WikiCup Newsletter

The WikiCup Newsletter Round III, Issue 9 - July 31, 2009 Archive after Pool winners In this round of the WikiCup, the top contestant from each pool, along with four wildcards, will advance to the next round. The pool leaders are: Pool A Mitchazenia (757) Pool B Ottava Rima (672) Pool C Candlewicke (489) Pool D Theleftorium (763) Wildcard winners Shoemaker's Holiday (641) Sasata (586) Juliancolton (437) Durova (417) For a full guide of Round 3, see Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2009/Full/Round 3 All scores are accurate as of Round 3. Content Leaders As of the end of Round 3, the following is a list of participants in this round with the most: Featured articles Juliancolton (3) Featured lists Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (6) Featured topics Mitchazenia (1) Featured pictures Shoemaker's Holiday (14) Featured sounds Shoemaker's Holiday (1) Featured portals Shoemaker's Holiday (2) Good topics Scorpion0422 (withdrawn) (2) Theleftorium (2) Gary King (2) Good articles Theleftorium (14) Did you know? items Ottava Rima (33) In the news items Candlewicke (31) For Round 1 stats, see Newsletter 10 . For Round 2 stats, see Newsletter 18 . WikiCup At a Glance As of this newsletter, the WikiCup participants have collected a Round 3 final total of: 7 Featured articles 14 Featured lists 1 Featured topics 23 Featured pictures 1 Featured sounds 4 Featured portal 4 Good topic 65 Good articles 97 Did you know? items 31 In the news items This combines with the Round 2 totals to make a grand total of: 32 Featured articles 61 Featured lists 5 Featured topics 193 Featured pictures 25 Featured sounds 6 Featured portal 6 Good topics 267 Good articles 544 Did you know? items 113 In the news items Biggest Jumps The difference between each contestant's point total from last week, and their point total from this week are: Rank User LF TF D 1 Mitchazenia 661 757 96 2 Gary King 170 233 63 3 Durova 370 417 47 4 Candlewicke 443 489 46 5 Theleftorium 727 763 36 LF = Last Week's score, TF = This Week's score, D = Difference between last week and this week's scores This was generated from this diff. From the Judges Right, last newsletter before the next round and it's a congratulations to eight of you lot. Unfortunately we say goodbye to a fair few users along the way but that is the competition. Next round, there will only be one pool which will see the lowest scoring users eliminated two months into the round. Should be good fun! Get your nominations in soon! ' talk, and The Helpful One If you don't wish to receive this newsletter in the future, remove your name from this list. If you are not a participant, but would still like to receive this newsletter, feel free to add your name to the list.

Delivered for the

WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN 

at 21:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.