User talk:Tunnizar

Unblocked Pls, Help Me.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tunnizar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tunnizar/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tunnizar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, I'm Edderiofer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of animated television series of 2023, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Edderiofer (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tunnizar,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Xx236, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Xx236}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tunnizar. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

]

Orphaned non-free image File:FNAF Film.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FNAF Film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

Thanks for your contributions to The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails

WP:GNG

, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dr vulpes was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at

The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids

. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Merge this with

WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 02:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dr vulpes was:

No changes were made between submissions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  10:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dr vulpes was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Topic does not appear to be notable. Author has submitted twice without improving article.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids/Gallery. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no content and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids/Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rabbid Quiz. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Rabbids Invasion episodes.
It has clearly explained to you several times, above, that you should not add links to draft articles, but you have continued doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 15:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Madagascar (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2011 in animation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2010 in animation, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Waxworker Bukan Lah, Upin & Ipin Ada lah. Tunnizar (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fram (talk) 08:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Fram (talk) 09:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Development of Rabbids Invasion 10 Years Anniversary

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as

section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Fram (talk) 07:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rabbids Invasion 10 Years Anniversary

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as

section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Fram (talk) 08:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Administrators' noticeboard discussion

I've started a discussion about your edits, with a proposal to block you from editing, at

Fram (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tunnizar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ingenuity | Ingenuity]], Don't Do It Blocked Me, Unblocked Pls, Bringing Back Bringing Back Bringing Back Heeeeeelp, No Infinite No Hoax, Ingenuity I'm so sorry.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tunnizar (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingenuity

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tunnizar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Bringing back Tunnizar (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help Me

Ingenuity, Don't Do It Blocked Me, Unblocked Pls, Bringing Back Bringing Back Bringing Back Heeeeeelp, No Infinite No Hoax, Ingenuity I'm so sorry. Tunnizar (talk) 02:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Ingenuity Tunnizar (talk) 08:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenuity said

Autounblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Tunnizar". The reason given for Tunnizar's unblock is: "not Disruptive editing". Tunnizar (talk) 08:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious right now bruh?

-IShowSpeed. PotassiumLover72 talk 08:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse

Don't pull a stunt like that again. If you do, expect to lose access to your talk page. Your abusive actions here will count against you in any future unblock consideration. --Yamla (talk) 12:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla what do you mean. 🤓 Tunnizar (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This nonsense where you falsely edited other people's comments to make it seem like your unblock request had been accepted. That firmly demonstrates you are being deliberately abusive. --Yamla (talk) 22:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is probably too young to have Wikipedia.... He kept creating multiple articles about a kids TV show, Rabbids. And he keeps talking nonsense about "why" he got blocked. like saying "No Hoax Please". PotassiumLover72 talk 07:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait, I know why he is making nonsense. Its necause he is in Malaysia. PotassiumLover72 talk 07:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fun fact: he still dont know the basics of wikipedia. like what the hell is a revert, what the hell is a block, how to contribute wikipedia properly, how to create an article, how to create citiations on articles (like what i dont know how yet), how to be unblocked, stuff like that. PotassiumLover72 talk 08:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 08:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rabbid Quiz

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 06:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids

Hello, Tunnizar. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rabbid Quiz

Hello, Tunnizar. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rabbid Quiz

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids/Gallery

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Draft:The Mystery of the Disappearing Rabbids/Gallery

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,

welcome page

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]