User talk:VEO15

I have read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) and Wikipedia:Article titles but have not reached a firm conclusion yet on the best way forward in establishing a consistent approach. The issue does matter with respect to the corrections I must make to existing pages and the tens of pages yet to be prepared. It could also carry implications for some of the articles that you currently contribute to.

I think that the matter would best be addressed on a proper basis and encourage that the issue is considered on the Talk Page of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Finland task force. If the matter is of concern to you as well, please add your name to the list of participants on the main page.

You may also wish to comment on the project structure that I have prepared.

Kind regards - (

Hi, The change you have made does not make sense. For it to be logical the definition of the "British" category would have to be changed to "People of England, Wales and Northern Ireland native to Ireland, or with Irish ancestry." Downsize43 (talk) 04:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. To my simple mind, as an Australian descended from both Irish and Northern Irish, the following should apply.

1. All persons born in either Ireland or Northern Ireland of ethnic Irish parentage are ethnic Irish.

2. If they continue to live in either Ireland or Northern Ireland they are not members of an expatriate population.

Downsize43 (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is there any chance of you designing the away and third kits for 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season? While the away one is already on the article, it's inaccurate. Cheers -- Lemonade51 (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Lemonade51 (talk) 12:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, good work on the new kits you've been doing, as always! Any chance you could do the new Man Utd away that was released today? –

I think we should leave the third kit blank until we get confirmation on it. Cheers mate. –

Jay 19:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Good point. Although knowing United, they'll ask Ajax Cape Town to wear their away kit so we can use one of our two new kits and then unveil a new third kit in a few weeks! –

Jay 23:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to work on the typography of this title, please try to do so with some greater subtlety. Putting double quote inside double quotes give mismatched quotes, which is a malformed construct in any case. The double-quote capital O interpretation is rare in sources anyway. Dicklyon (talk) 14:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No petty bureaucracy. Your kits are not as detailed and were removed for that reason alone. Please explain why your kits should be used. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You participated in RfC on Talk:Frédéric Fontang. Per the advice of closing admin "This result sets no precedent for similar articles. To address the other articles, I would suggest a broadly-worded RfC" I have confirmed the title of the second RfC addressing the other 105 affected articles with the closing admin and that follow on broadly-worded RfC is at Wikipedia:Requests for Comment/Duplicate name in basic ASCII character set. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, but actually Vietnamese is not really an exception - although it's evident there isn't the SNOW support en.wp has for European Latin names, we had a RfC last year that confirmed 23-10 a majority (or 23-16 with canvassing) that the project favours treating Vietnamese names the same as Czech or French. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Vietnamese) is not an adopted guideline, in effect an essay by one editor who has engaged in repeated sockpuppeting, for which he has been blocked in the recent past, and something between 1400 to 1500 undiscussed moves in his 1-man campaign against Vietnamese names. I have restored the "historical" tag. Perhaps if you're interested in Vietnamese (which I hope more editors would be) you could also add the page to your watchlist. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Every place I look, I find IIO lying and bullying. The RfC he is talking about was closed as "no consensus" and "too much of a mess to do anything else". If you read though it, you can see why. IIO did everything he could to disrupt it: repeated declarations that he would not accept the outcome, enormous photo galleries, personal accusations, and prosecutor-style questioning for those who dared disagree. There was no vote count. Kauffner (talk) 00:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This following is usual. 23 supported 16 opposed. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No one named you vote counter. You putting together the votes of everyone who wrote anything favorable about diacritics, even it was only on your talk page. These people didn't vote for any particular proposal. They certainly didn't vote for marking the page "historical", an idea that didn't even come up at the time. Kauffner (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish League representative team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

apologies for adding logos to the kits, I didn't know it's not permitted (i'm the one who did it on man united) --85.210.127.51 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

]

Melbourn Victory alternative kit

2011-Present A-League Adidas

Hi, your edit on the kits for

Melbourne Victory

was reverted, but your alteration was in good faith. As similar as the above kit is to the home shirt, it IS the official third kit for the team, which is why it was reverted. Have a good day :)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Montenegrin First League may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Prva crnogorska fudbalska liga; 1. CFL}}) {{IPA-sh|pr̂ːvaː t͡srnǒɡorskaː fûdbaːlskaː lǐːga|pron}}) is the top [[Football (soccer)|football]] league in [[Montenegro]]. It is headed by the [[Football

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montenegrin First League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FK Rudar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Day Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knowing Me Knowing You with Alan Partridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please discuss the use of flags at Talk:Amsterdam Tournament. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there VEO, AL from Portugal,

what i meant in the edit summary with "i know my Spanish football" was nothing aggressive or similar, i meant i know how the Spanish football is "taken care" of in Spain and also in England. For what's important, this WP, i know that the club is known as ZARAGOZA as much as REAL ZARAGOZA in your country, same goes for

However, seeing your last reversion and reply (basically telling me "Do what you want in the Spanish entry, leave this one alone") i know i don't stand a chance, don't worry, article stays as you say, not going to edit war over this.

Happy editing --AL (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to UEFA Team of the Year may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ||{{flagicon|France}} [[Thierry Henry]]||{{flagicon|England}} [[Arsenal F.C.|Arsenal]||align="center"|3

Thanks,

Hi mate, happy new year! I just noticed that the 1999 FA Charity Shield article has been promoted to GA status, but that the Arsenal kit graphic looks a little off. The white sides are too wide, and there should be some navy blue trim separating the red and the white. The shirt apparently also had a white collar and red trim on the ends of the sleeves. Any chance you could have a go at that for us? –

Kits look great, buddy. Wasn't expecting you to have it done so quickly! –

Jay 18:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, congratulations on the recent GA. I have nominated this article for Did you know, which will hopefully result in the article appearing on the main page. The link is Template:Did you know nominations/Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990). Thanks, Matty.007 08:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 FA Charity Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there VEO, AL "here",

first things first: i apologize if my reaction seemed aggressive, did not mean it like that. Now for the technicalities, he may have that in his shirt, but it's of no encyclopedical interest, player's know as Cissé, period.

Two examples, past and present:

All in all I have not reverted you again, i am leaving WP for good in July, so can not be bothered to enter an edit war that will produce only negative things in my opinion. The "Sam" stays.

Happy editing --AL (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, i totally understand where you're coming from man, but we must keep data simple in my humble opinion. Sergio Ramos may have both his first name and surname printed on his shirt, but we must address him as Ramos no? Cheers again --AL (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. --AL (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1990 Manchester United-Arsenal brawl is the only instance in English league football history in which a team has been docked points due to player misconduct? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Flags should never indicate the player's nationality in a non-sporting sense; flags should only indicate the sportsperson's national squad/team or representative nationality (and it is not an exception to #Avoid flag icons in infoboxes). Where flags are used in a table, it should clearly indicate that they correspond to representative nationality, not legal nationality, if any confusion might arise. (emphasis is mine)

Hi, please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ohconfucius as I have had to mention you in my outline. Thanks. GnGn (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of current American soccer players by US state may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Tony Walls (soccer)|Tony Walls], [[Rochester Rhinos]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

User talk:GNEbandit

Regarding

Hey over there. I noticed that you are also working a lot at that list, great job by the way. I just saw that you use references in this way "Cref2|Note 44|5". Do you know if the last number in this example (5) actually does something? I also did references in this way in the past, but I found it just unnecessary work and deleted them all, e.g. at List of foreign Bundesliga players and am using them in in this format "Cref2|Note 44". I think it's just really exhausting work without a real benefit. What do you think? Kind regards DrunkenGerman (talk) 09:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. It's nice that you share my point of view. What do you think about just deleting all of them? (Of course I just mean the numbering) DrunkenGerman (talk) 17:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1997–98 Copa del Rey may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhys Ifans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Importance of Being Idle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Throwback uniform page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hey man, how are you? I was looking for someone who update kits for clubs and they name you. Corinthians is launching its new kits this week (1st and 3rd kits, actually) and I'd like someone to create them so we could update the articles related. If you're willing to, I can send the pics for those new kits. The third is based on the template Nike's using for this season (like Internazionale, Barcelona, City...) The first one seems to have the same design as Atlético de Madrid's 2nd kit, but with different combinations obviously. Anyway, thanks! Gsfelipe94 (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just managed to do them by myself. Thanks! Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

Hi. Just so you know the editor who posted this message is almost certainly the same editor who has made and continues to make large numbers of clearly nonsensical edits to various random football teams infobox kits, so please don't feel bad about reverting any similar edits on sight. Fenix down (talk) 22:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually to be honest, I'm not sure what the appropriate adjective would be, so feel free to restore your changes.

talk) 16:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Why did the logos have to be removed, seeing as they are freely available elsewhere on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cully1973 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of British football commentators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Helm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done GiantSnowman 17:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1963 (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Order. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me create Sarawak FA's away kit? Unfortunately there aren't any accurate picture of it but this what I could find (it's the black kit) - Larcombe (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
http://sarawakcrocs.com/crocs-launch-bold-new-jerseys-for-2016/
http://www.newsarawaktribune.com/upload/images/np1455099091.jpg

Sorry, I made a mistake in reverting you. For some reason when I loaded the page I could not see the Test match table at all, so believed you had removed it all. I have self reverted. Much apologies. Koncorde (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, any chance you'll be making United's 3rd kit for this season any time soon? –

Great work, as per usual. Thank you. –

Jay 12:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umbro International Tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Campbell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Squad number (association football) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, VEO15. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VEO15, I appreciate the information you added! As you probably noticed the article is on a debate for erasing it. Could you please vote on this discusion too?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident

Thank you! Bruspek (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VEO15. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''[[User:VEO15|<font color="red">VEO</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:VEO15|<font color="black">one</font>]][[Special:Contributions/VEO15|<font color="blue">five</font>]]</sup>''' : VEO^onefive

to

'''[[User:VEO15|<span style="color: red">VEO</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:VEO15|<span style="color: black">one</span>]][[Special:Contributions/VEO15|<span style="color: blue">five</span>]]</sup>''' : VEO^onefive

—Anomalocaris (talk) 10:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of edit warring, take it to talk.

Before making futile edit wars, read what is written: the paragraph refers to confederation club competitions: UEFA is a confederation ("a group of associations recognised by FIFA that belong to the same continent (or assimilable geographic region)" according Definitions, in 2016 FIFA Statutes, p.4), FIFA is not, it is a federation and much less FIFA Club world Cup is a UEFA competition.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 00:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are being disputed and are being reverted.

Rather than reverting, please discuss things, and get consensus, at the article talk page before reverting to your preferred version of the article.

I do not want to have to block you. Please, talk, discuss, get others to agree with you, then make the changes, or even ask others who agree with you to make the changes. But, no more edit warring, okay? Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I shouldn't have to be templating a user of your experience, but unfortunately it seems necessary. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Remembrance poppy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vrelo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I take no position on which image is correct. I have also warned Tvx1. DannyS712 (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Edit warring complaint about use of a logo on Great Britain Olympic football team.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it your position that File:Team-gb-logo.svg can be used both at Team GB and also at Great Britain Olympic football team? Has this been decided somewhere? The edit warring complaint will need to be closed one way or the other. If you know of any agreement about this please point to it. Otherwise the next admin may feel they should impose blocks. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On his talk page, Tvx1 argues that #17 of the non-free content criteria covers this case. In other words, that the parent entity's logo can't be used for the child entity. Do you want to submit this to a decision at an appropriate copyright board? Admins are not going to let the back-and-forth continue forever. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:28, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the closure of the edit warring report. If you are correct about the fair use issue, I assume you can find someone to agree with you? EdJohnston (talk) 22:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VEO15. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Kit shorts adidasspikesonwhite.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

It's not a bot. Amazon prime documentary reads better that Amazon Prime documentary. Not sure what is better english though... Kante4 (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United Treble Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –

Thank you for creating ChampionsWorld Series.

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:07, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing an explanation in the edit summary of your revert. Yes, I am happy with it - but don't agree. Those post towns are within the

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 09:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:VEO15/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:VEO15/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VEO15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VEO15. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to '''[[User:VEO15|<span style="color:red;">VEO</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:VEO15|<span style="color:black;">one</span>]][[Special:Contributions/VEO15|<span style="color:blue;">five</span>]]</sup>''' ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:UAE FA.png

Thanks for uploading

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]