User talk:Vinay84

If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me. If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page, unless you request otherwise. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Vinay84, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hi, and welcome to the

Military history WikiProject

! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our
  navigation box
  points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several
  detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics
  .
• We have a number of
  task forces
  that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a
  style guide
  that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! TomStar81 (Talk) 05:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vinay, Dont remove large sections from the article. Your last edit has been reverted. It is full of spelling errors also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.65.96 (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vinay 84, thank you very much for your kind barnstar award! I highly appreciate your thoughtfulness. My ongoing contributions are greatly encouraged by editors like you. Thanks again! With regards, Anupam^Talk 21:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vinay84! Several days ago I began the GA review for Burmese Indians and left some comments at Talk:Burmese Indians/GA1. If you still have an interest in the article being promoted to GA status, I would most appreciate a response to my comments. Thank you! Dana boomer (talk) 17:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

Wait sometime for what? Spiderone 08:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just doing the stuff in the GA Review I wasn't aware of any edit conflict. Spiderone 08:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'll be off in a minute and won't be making edits for a while so you can edit if you want. Spiderone 08:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I credited you with the Bhutia article on my user page if you don't mind. Spiderone 07:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you may have seen this article just transformed at present it has no details from the

Force C is a problem we should have links to the 1/2 battalions involved at the moment the links are to the areas. Do you have any knowledge of the correct regiment names and if so do they have articles ? --Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't 5th Light Infantry be added to Force C? They were deployed to East Africa after the mutiny. --HistorianBell 08:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianBell (talk • contribs)

• I have always seen them listed as the 5th Light Infantry (e.g. Farwell, Armies of the Raj, Hopkirk, Like Hidden Fire, and on http://www.britishempire.co.uk/forces/armyunits/indianinfantry/5thltinf.htm). Apparently, pre 1903 reform, they were the 5th Bengal (Light) Infantry (earlier they had been 5th Bengal Native (Light) Infantry (1861-1885) and originally 2nd Battalion, 21st Bengal Native Infantry(1803 - 1824)). I think the only Mahratta Light Infantry during the First World War were 103, 105, and 110th Maharatta Light Infantry (2 of which were with Force D)(reposted here as well in case). --HistorianBell 09:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianBell (talk • contribs)

Here's the citation: "The 5th Indian Light Infantry was reconstituted and sent to fight in Africa, first in the Cameroons and then in the East Aftican campaign." -Byron Farwell, Armies of the Raj: From the Great Indian Mutiny to Independence: 1858-1947 (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1989) p. 244. That would make them part of Force C, I think, as a reinforcement. Also, take a look at this thesis http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/p4013coll2&CISOPTR=65&filename=66.pdf#search=%22german%20east%20africa%3ECISOSEARCHAL%22, the author has the OOB for Force B. --HistorianBell 18:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianBell (talk • contribs)

Hi in the Independent brigades I am getting a bit concerned that there is no further information on he South Persia Brigade which was formed in 1915, for service in south Persia and the Gulf. I am starting to think it may be a forerunner of Indian Expeditionary Force D only because of the location of both. Do you have any details or further info ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes go ahead and add it to the list - there is normally a delay of 2/3 weeks so it gives time to polish it --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to keep an eye on Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Indian Army during World War I I have put it in for a peer review from Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please please please do not just add articles with NO TEXT. Please I know you are trying to help Wikipedia by giving notable subjects but do not just add articles with a template and no words! People will delete that otherwise. So please add words and a reference to prove the events are real and not made up and make everyone happy! Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is OK. I just hate seeing people add a lot of content on Wiki then the next day they see it all deleted because they did not follow the minimum requirements for Wikipedia (i.e. a cat, a reference (to establish notability), WORDS, and to wikify the article). Happy editing.Calaka (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The text says The term "Burmese Indian" refers to a broad range of ethnic groups from South Asia, most notably from present-day Bangladesh and India. Shouldn't that include Nepal (there is a sizable gurkha population in Burma, if I'm not mistaken.) I'm assuming that you're an expert on this :-) --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 17:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For a 'not an expert', you're doing a great job with the article! --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 12:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of IX Corps (India), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/9-corps.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

Hi. I appreciate that you made some efforts to paraphrase the text on IX Corps (India) so it would no longer be a copyright infringement. Unfortunately, adding synonyms and minor alterations in the sentences won't relieve the plagiarism issue. As it is currently written, the text will need to be deleted as a copyright violation. You are welcome to rewrite the text using original language. The page on WP:Close paraphrasing can provide you with some explanations and help. In the long run, it is always better to simply write the text from scratch using your own words. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Regards. Theleftorium 16:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - sounds good at the moment I am working through the List of regiments of the Indian Army (1903) trying to create articles for all of them. I did the cavalry some time ago and have now started on the infantry. Sorry to say most are just stubs (see 43rd Erinpura Regiment for example) but at least its a start. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great I did a quick check and I am unable to find anything for the

50th Kumaon Rifles so if you could find out anything about them. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

There is this which gives us some basic information http://www.britishempire.co.uk/forces/armyunits/indianinfantry/indianinfantry1903.htm

Thankyou for your edits and efforts here both of you for this under-documented area. Can I politely please request you to add sources for the List of Regiments - preferably hardcopy books - and the individual regiments? It's much more difficult for others who come afterwards to do so. As a start, can you tell me where you got the list of regiments in 1903? Best regards Buckshot06(prof) 10:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

65th Yes looks like another made up one unable to source it --Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vinay, can you confirm that the 1903 list at the British Empire site is exactly the same - with no omissions/changes - as your list? If so, would you please change the page linked to the individual service arms - cavalry, artillery, infantry - for each section? Thanks Buckshot06(prof) 21:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed some of the infantry that were no longer around in 1903 --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vinay, you asked if sources for lists could only go at the bottom. If Jim can confirm that the list is exactly the same as one of the two sources, then yes. Then you remove the other source, because it's not being used. But Jim's just said that the list has regiments that were not around in 1903, and thus it's a composite listing from more than one source. Deviations from the main source should be footnoted, yes. That would apply whether we had

WP:MILMOS or not. Does that explain better? Buckshot06(prof) 20:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Did the Gurkha regiments come under any of the commands or did they remain separate / --Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about the Gurkhas I have a source that says there were 20 battalions in 10 regiments so presumed that was two battalions each - the date is 1914 so they could have formed between 1903 -1914 --Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinay84. You have new messages at Roger Davies's talk page.
Message added 19:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-MBK₀₀₄ 19:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinay84. You have new messages at Sumanch's talk page.
Message added Sumanch (talk) 13:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Vinay84. You have new messages at Prashanthns's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Actually WP India seems more or less dead. I think you may raise the issue on WP India Noticeboard. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We need more nominations. If you want to manage and inspire people in collaboration, then please go ahead. But, its better to find people first who has time and interest to participate. Thanks.--GDibyendu (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm continuing this discussion on Gdibyendu's talk page. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 16:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But, why? World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 03:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is the problem with myself. I don't get want you want me to do in the review. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 03:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finished. But, please don't shock me by undo-ing my edits again. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 04:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried my best to move the info to the correct section. Could you also try? World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vinay84,

 Abu Torsam  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile

}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Friend, just wish to know the reason behind this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Madhya_Pradesh&oldid=316896136, as to add category in Madhya Pradesh Portal is Ok, since to categorize in Portals section; refering to Indian Portals as Parent Category. Thanks (

Hi Vinay, just a note. There have been too many attempts to do category fauna of XXX country and there is a problem since most of these are too slipshod. Additionally it is very difficult to cite or see the validty of the classification. List of fauna of XXX is usually a lot better since there one can add citations and sources. The problem is perhaps due to one IP editor who frequently adds Fauna of Pakistan and keeps declaring certain animals/plants/bacteria etc. as national xxx of Pakistan and so forth. The current categories do not serve much purpose since List of reptiles of South Asia is a better option for people to browse from. Shyamal (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The list of Indian regiments is coming along well. One other thing you may want to help with is the 16th Division. I am trying to find out what regiments were in what brigades etc and if the took part in any of the frontier action. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just changed this articles name from List of Indian divisions etc to Indian Army during World War II and started work. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Indian Army during World War II, it might just get in expanded x5 and within the time frame --Jim Sweeney (talk) 04:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info box or template ? apart from the two article Indian Army during WW I/II are there any other articles you can thick on that would use the template ? --Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am struggling to find images for the Italian campaign section - I know there are some for the Monte Cassino battle but they are well hidden - If you see any that are suitable it would be appreciated --Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Indian Army during World War II Great news Almost there now just need to find the refs --Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A 36k article is a jargon for a 36 kbyte long article. That was a note for the promoting DYK administrator. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a loss, will try to find out Taprobanus (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the existing page's talk page that you want to replace and start a centraliosed discussion. Then announce aboutit in history and Induia related project pages and ask people to contribute. Taprobanus (talk)

My comments can be found here. Mspraveen (talk) 11:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-SpacemanSpiff 03:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your entries in the article Muziris. Are you a member. friend of KCHR and the Muziris project? If so meet you at the next meeting. In the meanwhile if I get the official confirmation, I might add, coorect or alter some of the entries in that article.Neduvelilmathew (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to COREX has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article has had to be deleted. You were advised of our copyright policy in September 2009 and should not have been copying content from other sources in October. Please be careful, as future violations of this policy are likely to lead to a block. If you have questions about the reuse of previously published content, you are welcome to come by my talk page or to visit the

help desk. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Please note that I have tagged three of your articles (Battle of Messines (1914), XVI Corps (India), and 81 Armoured Regiment) as copyvios. Feel free to rewrite them in your own words, but make sure that you follow the instructions on the template that was placed over the articles. Theleftorium 17:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A decision was made long ago to not advertise portals at teh top of the page. Please respect this consensus YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 02:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new sentence on how a batter scores a run is better, thank you. How is a batter dismissed? —Preceding

Hi Vinay how are you? I am new in Wikipedia. I'm really interested in business and I read that you are into business too. I would like to know if you could help me to know how can I search more information about it because I'm just learning :$ Best regards Minerva. Mph267 (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You placed a "criticism section"-tag on the Criticism section of General semantics, referring to a discussion on the talk-page, but after some activity in the section nothing further happened. Do you still believe the tag is warranted? If yes, please discuss, but if no, please remove the tag. Thanks. Hpvpp (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pmstudy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pmstudy.com/aboutus.asp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ScottSteiner ✍ 05:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ScottSteiner ✍ 05:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinay84. You have new messages at Talk:Edusys global.
Message added 07:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution,

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Edusys global and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Edusys global with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the
  CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Edusys global
  .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vinay84, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions . We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Hi,

You may be aware that Collaboration of the Month has been revived by members of

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 15:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Your addition to

Hi, I started a new article named India in World war I, but cant advance any more, can you please help me? The link is- Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/India_in_World_War_I#cite_note-1Ovsek (talk) 07:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Vinay84. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Vinay84. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Some of your edits are minor, others are clearly not. It would probably better not to mark any minor if you aren't sure of the difference. Doug Weller talk 18:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of role-playing games (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Horror

Pax Hispanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Henry IV

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Call of Cthulhu (role-playing game) into History of role-playing games. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saraiki and Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gondola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deconstructivism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constructivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vinay.

]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here !

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurangzeb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Carpenter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European balance of power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Habsburg Austria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into European balance of power. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

10th Mountain Division has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Early modern warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Lützen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your edit to No. 2 Squadron IAF has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please be aware that you risk being blocked from editing if you have any further violations of our copyright policy. Diannaa (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]