charged particles with long-range interaction, such as the Coulomb interaction. The equation was first suggested for the description of plasma by Anatoly Vlasov in 1938[1][2] and later discussed by him in detail in a monograph.[3]
Difficulties of the standard kinetic approach
First, Vlasov argues that the standard kinetic approach based on the Boltzmann equation has difficulties when applied to a description of the plasma with long-range Coulomb interaction. He mentions the following problems arising when applying the kinetic theory based on pair collisions to plasma dynamics:
Theory of pair collisions disagrees with the discovery by
t. Note that the term is the force F acting on the particle.
The Vlasov–Maxwell system of equations (Gaussian units)
Instead of collision-based kinetic description for interaction of charged particles in plasma, Vlasov utilizes a self-consistent collective field created by the charged plasma particles. Such a description uses distribution functions and for electrons and (positive) plasma ions. The distribution function for species α describes the number of particles of the species α having approximately the momentum near the
position
at time t. Instead of the Boltzmann equation, the following system of equations was proposed for description of charged components of plasma (electrons and positive ions):
Here e is the elementary charge (), c is the speed of light, mi is the mass of the ion, and represent collective self-consistent electromagnetic field created in the point at time moment t by all plasma particles. The essential difference of this system of equations from equations for particles in an external electromagnetic field is that the self-consistent electromagnetic field depends in a complex way on the distribution functions of electrons and ions and .
The Vlasov–Poisson equation
The Vlasov–Poisson equations are an approximation of the Vlasov–Maxwell equations in the non-relativistic zero-magnetic field limit:
Vlasov–Poisson equations are used to describe various phenomena in plasma, in particular
double layer plasma, where they are necessarily strongly non-Maxwellian
, and therefore inaccessible to fluid models.
Moment equations
In fluid descriptions of plasmas (see plasma modeling and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)) one does not consider the velocity distribution. This is achieved by replacing with plasma moments such as number densityn, flow velocityu and pressure p.[6] They are named plasma moments because the n-th moment of can be found by integrating over velocity. These variables are only functions of position and time, which means that some information is lost. In multifluid theory, the different particle species are treated as different fluids with different pressures, densities and flow velocities. The equations governing the plasma moments are called the moment or fluid equations.
Below the two most used moment equations are presented (in
SI units
). Deriving the moment equations from the Vlasov equation requires no assumptions about the distribution function.
Continuity equation
The continuity equation describes how the density changes with time. It can be found by integration of the Vlasov equation over the entire velocity space.
After some calculations, one ends up with
The number density n, and the momentum densitynu, are zeroth and first order moments:
Momentum equation
The rate of change of momentum of a particle is given by the Lorentz equation:
By using this equation and the Vlasov Equation, the momentum equation for each fluid becomes
As for ideal MHD, the plasma can be considered as tied to the magnetic field lines when certain conditions are fulfilled. One often says that the magnetic field lines are frozen into the plasma. The frozen-in conditions can be derived from Vlasov equation.
We introduce the scales T, L, and V for time, distance and speed respectively. They represent magnitudes of the different parameters which give large changes in . By large we mean that
We then write
Vlasov equation can now be written
So far no approximations have been done. To be able to proceed we set , where is the gyro frequency and R is the gyroradius. By dividing by ωg, we get
If and , the two first terms will be much less than since and due to the definitions of T, L, and V above. Since the last term is of the order of , we can neglect the two first terms and write
This equation can be decomposed into a field aligned and a perpendicular part:
The next step is to write , where
It will soon be clear why this is done. With this substitution, we get
If the parallel electric field is small,
This equation means that the distribution is gyrotropic.[7] The mean velocity of a gyrotropic distribution is zero. Hence, is identical with the mean velocity, u, and we have
To summarize, the gyro period and the gyro radius must be much smaller than the typical times and lengths which give large changes in the distribution function. The gyro radius is often estimated by replacing V with the
Alfvén velocity
. In the latter case R is often called the inertial length. The frozen-in conditions must be evaluated for each particle species separately. Because electrons have much smaller gyro period and gyro radius than ions, the frozen-in conditions will more often be satisfied.