Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 9

< January 8	January 10 >

January 9

File:Unicode 2400 Chrome Ubuntu.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Invalid deletion rationale, is used on

WP:AGF, but really, how could you possibly miss that? Anomie ⚔ 01:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CongSpaceMedal.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Husnock (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Procedural nom. Image has been twice speedy tagged as having no source information. However it seems wrong to delete this file for having no source when the source has no bearing on whether it's PD. The argument that it's PD is the same as is use for a better version on commons - essentially that the medal is PD as it's a work of the federal government and any 2D representation of it does not display enough originality to be copyrightable. Hence source information is irrelevant, as the argument is that it's PD no matter what the source. Not sure that this is quite the right venue for this discussion but no idea where else to have it. Dpmuk (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant RfC started here. Dpmuk (talk) 08:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YelpTiers-4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, I can't see this being used:Jay8g

WPIM 01:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DennisJames1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

possibly unfree (commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dennis James.jpg); without proper sourcing information, doesn't qualify for fair use either so no point in having discussion here. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atul krishan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

deletion discussion should occur at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atulkrishan.jpg (ineligible for F8 because of discussion there). Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tunit.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, no target article or encyc use provided Skier Dude (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alma Taylor Cinema Chat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alma Taylor Life 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blanchero.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo with no realistic encyclopedic use. Sreejith K (talk) 07:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blank Map Falklands san carlos.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map with no realistic encyclopedic use. Sreejith K (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blondie-Parade.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 08:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bluecanvas logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 08:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bollard.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low quality. No foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BostonYouth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality image with no encyclopedic value. Sreejith K (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrianE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photograph. No foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 10:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Billie Burke postcard 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Wikipedia is

not an image repository. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

These are all photographs of notable actress Billy Burke, and certainly not low quality enough to be worthless; they are quite functional scans of postcards, press photos, etc., and in fact are of no lower quality than the images currently in that article. Based on their age, and the fact that all of them are either works of corporate authorship or (one, I think) works of unknown authorship, they should be the public domain in the UK (their country of origin). So do not delete, instead move to Commons. If there are any that cannot be transferred for whatever reason, see if they can find a place in the article. postdlf (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brookhaven motel room.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution image with no foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 10:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:British council.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution logo with no foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:World population history.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Husnock (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Husnock (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Husnock (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

VampWillow (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Shimgray (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Husnock (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Dtobias (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Ta bu shi da yu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Orderud (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

)

Mass nomination. Orphaned, all rendered obsolete by svg version, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 10:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Has the attribution been checked for all these images? I believe GFDL requires that all prior versions must be kept around. So delete all PD images here (definitely), and check all the others. 124.168.218.102 (talk) 11:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did a spot check, and several of these are in the attribution path of the SVG replacement image (e.g.

cool stuff) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, this is a problem so it may be best to close this nomination. Even when a file here has an attribution requirement, the corresponding svg file does not always provide a link back (or even a descriptive reference back). Even in ideal circumstances such as
orphan image}} tagging here was, at best, inappropriate. Thincat (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

But Public Domain does not require attribution path, so surely all images here that are tagged PD can be deleted. 124.168.218.102 (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From a licensing point of view I expect you are right. However, for text and media, we are supposed to attribute even to PD material to avoid plagiarism (

Wikipedia:PLAGIARISM#Attributing_media_copied_from_other_sources). Of course, if we delete these PD files the actual problem would often emerge on Commons rather than here but we seem to have some responsibility if actions here create the attribution problem. What about external websites, etc., using these files and attributing back to WP? Do we have a responsibility in such situations? Thincat (talk) 09:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T T MATH-014.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned math formula, not needed because this could be recreated with

WP:MATH functionality. Calliopejen1 (talk

) 14:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC) Also nominating:[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T Lambert.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Taylor Lambert) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T 06APLL.WTGm.7-20-06-2.JPG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, somewhat unclear rights release (copyright plus public domain) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T Truong.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source, does not appear to be pre-1923 Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T-Eckert.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned crop of File:Thomas T Eckert 06182.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it's a headshot crop, so usable if people want just a headshot. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T-maxx broken control arm.triddle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

apparently a broken toy? unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It should probably be treated as unfree. A real car is just functional industrial design, but a toy car could be viewed as "sculpture" and thus copyrightable. postdlf (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Smallvenusprobe.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; fur added. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without fair use rationale Bulwersator (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's used in three articles and the uploader (who uploaded it way back in 2005) is far from a frequent contributor (only one edit since 2010). You really need to post article notices in such circumstances, as the lack of the NFUR could be fixable. I'll take care of it in this instance, but please try to be mindful of that in the future. postdlf (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pioneer Venus was a NASA probe, so it's possible this is a NASA diagram. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided FUR.
talk) 13:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caneelbay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Unused low resolution image with no foreseeable use. Sreejith K (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just move it to Commons. It's not so low-res that it is illegible, and the location is identified (Caneel Bay in Saint John, U.S. Virgin Islands) so it is informative. postdlf (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soanya Ahmad (from Channer Conversations).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator

~~This file looks like a screencap of an almost certainly copyright TV programme. Has been tagged with OTRS pending since November.~~ ukexpat (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. – ukexpat (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file was originally uploaded on 21 November 2011. At the time I did not yet have permission to use it, so I tried to have it tagged under the "Fair Use" clause. When that failed, the file was deleted from the system. I was finally able to get permission from the owner of the copyright on 20 December 2011. He had been very slow to respond. I immediately forwarded his letter of permission to the Permissions Dept. of the OTRS.

I then discussed the new situation with User:Nyttend at my Talk Page (User_talk:Skol_fir#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:Soanya_ahmad-2010.jpg) where he told me what to do next. Please look at the file history since Dec. 31, 2011, especially the diff here. You will see that Nyttend restored the file, as I had already sent the permission letter TWICE to the permissions department (once on 22 December 2011, again on 28 December 2011 ). Please note the change to a copyright tag for a "Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike 3.0 License". Furthermore, the "OTRS pending" tag was first applied on 31 December 2011 (not November)!

On Jan. 1, 2012, I got a letter from the permissions dept. (OTRS) saying they were backed up.

"Thank you for your email.

We've merged tickets #2011122810023737 and #2011122210017219 to ticket #2011122210017219 but didn't deal with them by now.
I'd like to apology for any delay. We're dealing with a huge amount of tickets at the moment.
Yours sincerely,
Florian Löser"

There is no reason to have this file deleted now, when just 8 days ago, the permissions dept. said they were working on my case. Please pay more attention to the history of a file before just brusquely tagging it for deletion. I think I deserve more respect for all the effort I have made to comply with your wishes on this matter. --Skol fir (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my discussion with Nyttend before he restored the file on Dec. 31, 2011 -- Discussion at Nyttend's Talk Page. --Skol fir (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above comments, as there is no reason for this file to even be nominated for deletion, at this point in time. --Skol fir (talk) 02:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah & Martin Luther King, Jr..jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the

non-free content criteria 8, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Strongly Keep - The reason why
Martin Luther King, Jr. together, this is the only image available. Nkrumah and Martin Luther both shared great common interest of Pan-Africanism and were both historic prominent figures so if Nkrumah's article is read properly then one would see that the image does indeed enhance the understanding of the topic and the article does contain critical commentary about it, if not directly. -- MarkMysoe (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Du Bois 95th birthday in Ghana 1963.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the

non-free content criteria 8, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - The photo is an important element of the biographical article W. E. B. Du Bois. In the later years of his life, he was accused of being a communist by the US govmt (during the McCarthyism witchhunts). The U. S. govmt confiscated Du Bois's passport. At the same time, he fought vigorously to have European colonial powers grant independence to their African colonies. He befriended the leaders of many African nations. After he regained his passport, the president of Ghana invited Du Bois to come to Africa, his ancestral homeland. Du Bois took him up on his offer and went. In a very controversial move, once there, Du Bois renounced his US citizenship and became a citizen of Ghana. The photo shows him with the president of Ghana, soon after he became a citizen of Ghana. Du Bois died within a year of the photo, and is buried in Ghana. All of the preceding information is in the article, and the photo greatly helps the readers' understanding. --Noleander (talk) 22:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Keep - I'm not the one that uploaded this image but I'am strongly in favor for this image to be kept as W. E. B. Du Bois was an historical figure and so was his 95th birthday. If the article is read from the beginning to the end then is would show that the image does indeed enhance the understanding of the topic and the article does contain critical commentary about it. The reason why File:Du Bois 95th birthday in Ghana 1963.jpg should be kept and not deleted is because there is simply no other image of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah the First-President of Ghana with W. E. B. Du Bois before he died at the age of 95 in 1963 in Ghana other than this image. -- MarkMysoe (talk) 22:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Old Faithful Start Erupting .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality image of Old Faithful erupting. There is a gallery full of higher quality images of Old Faithful erupting in the article itself, most of which are of substantially higher quality.

Wha? 22:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Presidential election party percentages test image.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image was never intended for articles, it was used in a discussion in 2007 and hasn't served any real purpose for several years.

Wha? 22:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ErisApple5.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No description, no apparent encyclopedic value.

Wha? 22:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shyam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a copyvio. Best I can tell, none of the previous images have been used constructively, and there have been four usurpations now. I.f.f. this gets deleted, I recommend that the title be salted, forcing users to choose a more descriptive name.

Wha? 23:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AWM16518Sword.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/REL/16518 - the source website, does not give any indication as to when the image was taken. The image is not in the AWM's Flickr Commons collection either. There is no way to be sure that this meets the requirements set by {{

Wha? 23:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree. My mistake. I was thinking of the object, not the photo. I will delete it. Thanks. --Rskp (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AWM19479Bayonet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/REL/19479- the source website, does not give any indication as to when the image was taken. The image is not in the AWM's Flickr Commons collection either. There is no way to be sure that this meets the requirements set by {{

Wha? 23:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree. My mistake. I was thinking of the object, not the photo. I will delete it. Thanks.--Rskp (talk) 23:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.