User talk:Hektor

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World Youth Day has been nominated for merging with Template:Catholic youth work. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 16:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EtosTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EtosTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect First American Princess. Since you had some involvement with the First American Princess redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't assume that I was being "US centric". I'm not even in the US, nor do I even know when the series premieres in the US. I was basing it off of the reliable sources in the article stating that the series was set to premiere on 30 October. It was not yet 30 October. -- /Alex/₂₁ 21:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a reliable source that supports that it has aired in another country? If not, the additions will need to be reverted. -- /Alex/₂₁ 13:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here Ep 1 and 2 were broadcast on broadcast TV on Monday evening in France and Tuesday evening on Dutch TV. FYI all episodes are available for streaming in Europe on the MyCanal web service. Hektor (talk) 13:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the source, and it's appearing as six episodes. Thus, I don't believe it matches up to the original eight episodes (likely it's been merged and re-cut as six episodes for the French broadcast), much like how the other The War of the Worlds UK miniseries is three episodes but aired in New Zealand as two. Best to stick to the original order as listed in the FOX source provided. If anyone adds that the whole series became available on MyCanal, a source is needed to support that as well. -- /Alex/₂₁ 13:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another source which list eight episodes. I can confirm that MyCanal has eight episodes to view in French. I can make a screen grab if you want.Hektor (talk) 14:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, screengrabs are not reliable sources, as they can be modified. It has to be reported by a secondary source. -- /Alex/₂₁ 14:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok we have this source for eight episodes and broadcast of the Ep 1 and 2 on Monday Oct 28 in France. I am not sure there is any secondary source on the content of MyCanal. I can produce a secondary source that says that all TV series which start broadcasting on Canal + have immediately all their episodes on MyCanal but you are going to tell me that deducing from that the fact that all episodes of War of the Worlds are on MyCanal is OR ? No ? Hektor (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not

WP:SPS. -- /Alex/₂₁ 21:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Found one! I've added it to the article. Happy watching. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sts-125 crew 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

Template:EM1 chronology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EM1 chronology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alpine A120. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 6#Alpine A120 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Note there are three redirects in the listing. You created "Alpine A120", as well as "Renault Alpine 210 RS" which you created as an article in 2006. Thanks A7V2 (talk) 10:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Porsche 929. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 17#Porsche 929 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 03:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir:

I take the liberty to contact You, an highly qualified Wikipedian with relevant competence in aerospace history, to draw Your attention to an article draft that I (an Italian 61 years old and a total newbie in Wikipedia) have recently submitted.

Even though I could have published the article by myself, I preferred to submit it to the «Article for Creation» process, and in fact previous reviewers gave me the opportunity to improve the draft further.

In a couple of weeks another honor - the New York State Conspicuous Service Cross - will be bestowed upon Edwin Foresman Schoch, a well-noted test pilot dead in 1951 on his 35th birthday while investigating metal fatigue issues affecting the McDonnell F2H-3 Banshee.

About the relevance of Ed Schoch, it suffice to Google for:

• https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Ed+Schoch%22+%22Test+Pilot%22 (433 results)

• https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Edwin+Schoch%22+%22Test+Pilot%22 (185 results)

About my draft, it was thoroughly researched, with 28 selected references cited. I'm in contact with Ed Schoch's son and I had access both to unpublished and published information - that I duly and extensively cited.

After being initially declined, my draft was extensively reworked. I wonder whether You are in the position to approve it for publication, and whether you deem that it may be published.

Here is the link: Draft:Edwin Foresman Schoch

I am submitting this very same request to a few selected Wikipedians in the hope to get the article published before mid-January, when Governor Cuomo is expected to sign the bestowal act of the Conspicuous Service Cross to Ed Schoch.

Many thanks for Your attention, all the best and an happy 2021!

Cesare Brizio CesareBrizio (talk) 10:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Awoman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 7#Awoman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 23:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Adventures of Justine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable films, nothing found in a

WP:NFILM

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 14:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Sembroski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ITN recognition for Idriss Déby

On 20 April 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Idriss Déby, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Sitaphul (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Sembroski (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Christopher Sembroski instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Sembroski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christopher Sembroski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hektor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Sembroski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Sembroski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Sembroski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Logo 2011 su candidature shenzhen.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 10:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of MPPF (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MPPF (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MPPF (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 16:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Shoffner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Shoffner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Shoffner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Seddon ^talk 19:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christopher Sembroski

A tag has been placed on Draft:Christopher Sembroski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is a copy with less information of Christopher Sembroski.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 00:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

May 2021

tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 07:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Albertville Tignes 1992 Paralympics logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Rugby union at the 2016 Summer Olympics" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

Rugby union at the 2016 Summer Olympics. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 28#Rugby union at the 2016 Summer Olympics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. boldblazer (talk) 23:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lausanne 2020 logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiration4

Thanks for helping to add material to the page I just created. However, going forward, please observe the protocol of following the established referencing format in the article. I fixed the two you had added to your new section. RobP (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia rules

I am getting all sorts of notifications about your changes to the pages regarding the Inspiration4 Mission, And many of them are problematic. I don’t know about the French Wikipedia but in English Wikipedia you cannot put entries just because they are facts if they don’t have citations. Doing so it’s considered

WP:OR. Please undo the changes you made in this regard or I’m going to have to spend time doing so and contact an administrator. RobP (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Proposed deletion of Nicolas Gessner

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Marie Forså for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Marie Forså is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Forså until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

"BMW Z2" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect BMW Z2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#BMW Z2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alexandre coste.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alexandre coste.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Audi Q6" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Audi Q6 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10#Audi Q6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 03:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mercedes-Benz CLT-Class" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect

Mercedes-Benz CLT-Class and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10#Mercedes-Benz CLT-Class until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 11:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bmw i logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bmw i logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Histoire d o.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Histoire d o.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gq by citroen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gq by citroen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Michelin nyc 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michelin nyc 2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nik Halik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nik Halik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nik Halik (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elttaruuu (talk) 11:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali AlGhamdi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Fram (talk) 08:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Walter Villadei

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Fram (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Alper Gezeravci moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 17:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Laurent Gathier

The article Laurent Gathier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Effectively unsourced BLP. Refs are 1) name in a larger list 2) non-independent interview 3) non-independent website. A

WP:BEFORE

search reveals no further sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ljleppan (talk) 06:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stibidi dop dop Yes Yes Yes

My Style Is Ri-dic-dic-diculous-ulous-ulous Brr Stibidi Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Yes Yes Yes Yes Shtib Shtibidi Dip Dibidi Wwww Yes Yes Yes Yes Brr Stibidi Dop Dop Dop Dop Dop Yes Yes Yes Yes Shtib Shtibidi Dip Dibidi Wwww Yes Yes Yes Yes We Ain’t Here To Hurt Nobody Stibidi Stibidi Stibidi Wanna See You Work Your Body Stibidi Stibidi Stibidi 23.134.91.143 (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Vaillante

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Vaillante is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaillante until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alper Gezeravci

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 18:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Alper Gezeravci

Hello, Hektor. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alper Gezeravci

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Night and the Doctor

The article Night and the Doctor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Doctor Who minisode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Mariusz Handzlik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariusz Handzlik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariusz Handzlik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anamor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anamor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anamor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southati (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]