Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 22

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

September 22

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 22, 2015.

2014–15 Pakistan Super League

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. -- KTC (talk) 03:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is either a faulty

WP:CRYSTALBALL or confusing, since the Pakistan Super League won't launch until 2016. Therefore, these seasons/tournaments don't actually exist. -- Tavix (talk) 20:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. -- KTC (talk) 03:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:CRYSTAL, no mention of this at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2006-2007 NHL Team Playoff Run

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- KTC (talk) 03:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an implausible search term, and it's confusing. What is an "NHL Team Playoff Run" anyway? -- Tavix (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The NHL playoffs are the Stanley Cup playoffs, since the Stanley Cup is the NHL seasonal champion's trophy. The 2006-2007 NHL season ends with the 2007 playoffs. All playoff runs are part of the playoff article, so it is what it is. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll explain further. When I think of a playoff run, I think of a run towards the playoffs: when teams watch their Magic number (sports) decrease as they make a run towards the playoff. -- Tavix (talk) 18:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Non-Resident Students' Centre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quite generic term to redirect to a particular university alone. While the article was made for AMU, had it stayed it would have needed disambiguation. But the target is ambiguous and should be deleted. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom as there appears to be no suitable target. --
    computer 15:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
that is not a blog posting as it is clearly visible and it is not a student newspaper (it has not claimed so far). Also see (http://wikimapia.org/16921869/NRSC-Club-AMU), (http://www.batori.in/education/2013/12/17/writers-speak-against-communalism-and-casteism/). Arifjwadder (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the blog tag shows as a top row tag when viewed in Firefox > but in Chrome and IE the blog tag looks like it is part of the breadcrumbs leading to the page. What is
reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
You are mistaken. The Blog tag must come after the health section, but it is coming below Home which is giving an impression that the article is a blog but it is not (Blog is coming below the bar). See the URL, it is in the EDUCATION section of the site. Batori, in India means NEWS. This word is used in Bengal and north east. You can find dainik batori, ajir batori etc which are all reputed newspaper in Assam, India. I am not sure why About Us page is not opening. Arifjwadder (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
computer 19:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Where in the home page it says as Blog. It has many sections, and one among them is Blog. The news item was there in the Education section. Thanks,- Arifjwadder (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
computer 19:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Please search by using the term NRSC Club AMU. EyThink (talk) 06:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:PIMP

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- KTC (talk) 03:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't at all think that this redirect was created in the spirit of trolling. However, it is neither an acronym for nor an obvious shortening of the essay it redirects to (Wikipedia:Process is important). While the redirect invokes the term 'pimp', the essay is not related to that term and does not mention it.

Wikipedia:RCFP already redirect to the essay, so it isn't apparent why this redirect is needed. gobonobo + c 07:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@
computer 20:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep as per everyone above me - Harmless and humorous. –Davey2010Talk 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep got a chuckle on this one. Anyways it's useful and also funny so I guess it's a keeper. --Lenticel (talk) 00:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Basically just cuts out the "is": WP:ProccessIMPortant = WP:PIMP. It is a reasonable shortening of the essay name, easy to remember, and
    Wikipedia is not censored. Humorous and harmless per GrammarFascist above.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 21:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Rename as WP:PIIT for Process Is Important. 112.79.36.120 (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing !vote to delete after viewing GorillaWarfare's link. We have evidence of it being used in a harmful light, let's kill it before it gets worse. -- Tavix (talk) 23:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Öga

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:46, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:R#D8; obscure synonyms are unlikely to be useful. -- Tavix (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2018 NHL Entry Draft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- KTC (talk) 03:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:CRYSTAL, no information about this draft exists at the target. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a bot error by Eubot. Delete as a implausible search term. -- Tavix (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Eubot just creates messes that takes decades to clean up -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Why's this bot even running if it's creating moronic redirects ?, Anyway quite obviously an implausible search term. –Davey2010Talk 13:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as patent nonsense (
    computer 15:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iraq mistake

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:RNEUTRAL, which implies that a non-neutral redirect must be an established term in order for it to be allowed. Some people have the opinion that the Iraq War was a mistake, but I don't see anyone calling it the "Iraq mistake". -- Tavix (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Not sure I was with Tavix. Typing in "Iraq was a mistake" into Gsearch gives me as first hit
Where the first of the lede starts "Invading Iraq was a mistake". That would be fine to mention in
WP:GAME?) Si Trew (talk) 07:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
This could also refer to anything involving Iraq that was a mistake. For example, Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait in the
Iran-Iraq War. -- Tavix (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Um, we don't actually have that section at that article, I was just guessing to make an example. Si Trew (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Southern kurdish native homeland/southern Kurdistan/KRG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- KTC (talk) 03:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a

WP:SUBPAGE violation and an implausible search term. -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iraqnam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:XY problem as it could just as easily refer to Iraq or Vietnam (and their respective wars, I guess). -- Tavix (talk) 01:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

I think we are between Iraq and a hard place. Si Trew (talk) 19:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a poor analogy, -gate is a well-known suffix and I've never heard of -nam being used as one. If anything, it's simply a
portmanteau of Iraq and Vietnam. -- Tavix (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
You mean Watergate-gate? Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done. -gate as a suffix does come from Watergate, and has been used ever since as
WP:NOTDIC
.

One cannot hope to bribe or twist

Thank God! The British journalist
But seeing what the man will do
Unbribed, there's no occasion to.

— Humbert Wolff

Si Trew (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You left out
Crackgate. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
...
Gamergate, Deflategate... Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WAR (file format) (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as completely useless and misleading. This would suggest that there are multiple file formats named WAR, but the disambiguation just shows one: WAR (file format). -- Tavix (talk) 00:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - is double disambiguation a thing we do? I recall there being a WAR compression format in the 90s but we don't have an article about it. Even if we did, this is just too weird. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there used to be a disambiguation page at this location. It was moved to the destination location in 2008. The destination location was overwritten by an article at 03:56, 5 January 2014‎ by Lankiveil. There used to be a WAR file format (KDE) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a suitable target no longer exists. --
    computer 15:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

War V (comics)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Gazer and War (Marvel Comics)#War (Abraham Kieros), respectively. --BDD (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm really confused about these redirects. Is there really multiple things (let alone anything) at War (disambiguation) that could mean "War V (comics)" or "War II (comics)"? -- Tavix (talk) 00:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Susan Campbell

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. A disambiguation page has been created to solve the problem. Since it is no longer a redirect, RFD no longer applies here. Contact me with concerns. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 02:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletion of redirect Currently a redirect is in place so that searches for ‘Susan Campbell’ bring visitors to the article Susan Foreman. This confusing because there is another article on Susan M. Campbell. I believe it will be less confusing if visitors conduct a search on ’Susan Campbell’ that they will be brought to the Susan M. Campbell article. Susan Foreman is the name of a fictional character in a television programme. I think the character’s married name was Campbell, which may be why the redirect was put in place originally. However, this seems a little confusing for visitors searching for Susan M. Campbell. In reality, the latter is more usually known as Susan Campbell but the article title appears to have had an ‘M’ added to it at the time it was created so as to differentiate between her and the TV character. Would it be possible to have the redirect deleted so that searches for ’Susan Campbell’ bring visitors directly to Susan M. Campbell? Fbell74 (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_22&oldid=1138580763"