Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

June 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 4, 2024.

Technogypsie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The previous discussion on this seemed to be to merge into digital nomad; however, no mention of this term is on the subject page. I would propose deleting this until some serious RS can be found for this term. GnocchiFan (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It doesn't seem like any content was actually merged. And the original article was still about the same topic, just using a synonymous term, with much poorer content and references. The current article is superior in every way. It just seems to be a little-used alternate term, difficult to find any reliable sourcing for, so no real harm in deleting. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Raisi

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 12#Raisi

INDIA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

If someone types in INDIA in all caps, I doubt they're looking for the country. I think this should be retargeted to

WP:DIFFCAPS. Cremastra (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Surfjam Steve

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bruh, 16 years with this redirect from a fake name for Sufjan Stevens? Yilku1 (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The nickname appears as early as a 2005 forum discussion: Harmony Central. Unfortunately, it's also a parody name by another artist: Bandcamp. For the ambiguity, low pageviews and unhelpfulness as a search term (not even one Google page full of results for an exact search), delete. Air on White (talk) 00:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I look forward to seeing this on
WP:DAFT. Free Realist 9 (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Kakaka

Kakaka isn't necessarily an evil laugh, as much as

jajaja aren't. It is an onomatopoeia of kkk in Brazil, derived from quá-quá-quá, according to Wiktionary. Soares2000 (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment purely in academic interest - there actually was an AfD in 2005 where the closer made a bold decision to redirect. Jay 💬 17:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sweartgar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Thryduulf (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is supposed to be a variant of

Sverker I of Sweden, this was deleted already in 2013 due to lack of sources. There have been similar issues with other articles related to names of medieval Swedes, see e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richardice of Sweden. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've gone ahead and bundled the other identified redirects into this discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom and subsequent explanation. Jay 💬 17:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Stressed out

This redirect has targeted

WP:DIFFCAPS, see discussions at Talk:Stressed Out and an older one at Talk:Stressed Out (A Tribe Called Quest song)#Requested move 26 November 2015. In terms of Psychological stress I understand we aren't a dictionary but at the same time it could be argued that its safest to disambiguate the lower case. In terms of the options, option A, target Twenty One Pilots song, option B, target DAB, option C, target Psychological stress. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • B either the generic meaning or Twenty One Pilots song could be primary so its probably best to have no primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Option A, revert back to
    Stressed Out (Twenty One Pilots song) and Stressed Out (A Tribe Called Quest song) are not relevant to the lowercase Stressed out. I see no evidence for DIFFCAPS here; all the articles at the Stressed Out (disambiguation) dabpage are spelled with both capital letters. 162 etc. (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    @162 etc.: The closer of the 1st RM Special:Diff/694445799 created a redirect to Stress (psychological) in 2015 and it was changed to the DAB page in 2016 and ended up targeting the Twenty One Pilots song as it was moved to the base name in September 2016 which seems to have been an error from the page move or just people not thinking DIFFCAPS was appropriate. It was changed back to the DAB by me in 2019 and stayed this way until last month when you changed it to the Twenty One Pilots song. I then changed it back to the DAB. So the undiscussed change to target the Twenty One Pilots song need discussion here as it could arguable be changed back to the original target. If all the uses were upper case and Psychological stress didn't exist I agree the default would be to follow the primary topic title case but there is a generic meaning though as noted I'm not sure how likely it is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A per 162. mwwv converse∫edits 13:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • C with a hatnote to the disambiguation page. At this capitalisation,
    and capitalisation matters, my judgement is that most readers are looking for the feeling of psychological stress and not a song. There's no merit in B because all the entries on the dab page are Title Case. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • With fewer than one hit per day on average, no incoming links and no article that would actually be titled "stressed out", it could really be deleted (option D, anyone?). Although capitalization certainly does matter, it's also true searchers often do skip using the shift key. If "stressed out" really were a likely alternative search term for "psychological stress", I'd say proper capitalization wins out, but I don't see many readers expecting that, and I'd hate to put a hatnote on psychological stress pointing to list of songs, so I'd avoid option C. And just as we shouldn't assume searchers skipping the shift key want a lower-case article, we also shouldn't assume they want the upper-case title, even though with a hatnote already on Stressed Out, that's less of an issue. So option A is reasonable, but because capitalization matters and because we can't say with certainty what most of the tiny number of readers landing on the redirect want, absent deletion I lean toward option B. Station1 (talk) 06:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Should Stressed out be deleted, typing "stressed out" in search would result in a reader reaching the page at Stressed Out. This means that "option D" would result in the same thing as option A. 162 etc. (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a good point. And I suppose someone would just recreate a redirect eventually anyway. Station1 (talk) 23:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Target to Stressed Out, regardless of whether that's kept as the current primary topic, or made into a dab page as primary. Reward the folks looking for something specifically named this. I suspect the vast majority of folks looking for information about psychological stress are going to just look up "stress" instead (already a dab page). 35.139.154.158 (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • C - Sorry that this is spreading out the consensus more, but I really and STRONGLY agree with Shhh's assessment that capitalization matters, and that psychological stress is the best target for this particular capitalization. As a secondary option, I would grudgingly accept the disambiguation page, but I strongly object to making this target the song as the primary topic. Capitalization matters! I also object to deletion, as there really should be a way for a user to easily reach psychological stress from this search string, and the default search is unlikely to get there easily. Fieari (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • C. When not written in title case, psychological stress is the clear primary topic and we do our readers a disservice by not taking them there. A hatnote to the dab page and song will cater for everyone not looking for the primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pussy in bio

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and restored content at the target.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Section with information about this subject was removed (Special:Diff/1227241681) by FMSky. J3133 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Rusalkii (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and restore cited content to the article, or to a comparable article on tactics of malicious and fake social media accounts. The sudden ubiquity of these specific phrases was the subject of coverage in reliable sources. Removal on "notability" grounds is tantamount to whitewashing. The content that was deleted is as follows:

In March 2024,

The Intelligencer
reported on the proliferation of spam posts containing the phrase "░P░U░S░S░Y░I░N░B░I░O░", or similar references to pornographic content appearing in the poster's bio, apparently formatted so as to evade counter-spam measures.<ref name="Intelligencer PIB">{{Cite web|url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/who-is-behind-all-the-pussy-in-bio-porn-spam-on-x.html|title=Who's Behind All the 'Pussy in Bio' on X?|first=John|last=Herrman|date=March 26, 2024|website=Intelligencer}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/twitter-porn-bot-sex-meme-1234973030/|title=Why Porn Bots Have Taken Over Your Twitter Feed|first=Miles|last=Klee|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |date=February 22, 2024}}</ref> The commonality of "pussy in bio" or "PIB" spam made it fodder for jokes, including one posted by Elon Musk himself.<ref name="Intelligencer PIB"/> The Intelligencer further noted that most of the accounts that posted this spam were short-lived throwaway accounts, and that links provided by the accounts typically routed users through several layers of redirecting websites, ultimately landing on a provider of simulated sex chats.<ref name="Intelligencer PIB"/>

Additional sources can be found reporting on this, and it is even the topic of its own Know Your Meme page, here. BD2412 T 18:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Khogyani (article disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguator is so unlikely and nonstandard that it's not helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This isn't something that anyone is going to search for or use. Gonnym (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Valinor Hills Station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 11#Valinor Hills Station

Rich young man

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 11#Rich young man

2025 United Kingdom general election

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 11#2025 United Kingdom general election

Gastrosexual

Not mentioned. Retarget to wikt:gastrosexual if there's no mention anywhere else. --MikutoH talk! 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft redirect Gastrosexual to wikt, and delete Gastrosexuality. Not mentioned anywhere in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment. Gastrosexuality existed as its own page before, though the correct term is gastrosexual because it's named in reference to lifestyles like
    ubersexual, ultrasexual, macrosexual, cinesexual, machosexual, and many others. --MikutoH talk! 19:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of Gastrosexuality?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both. If you want to send the latter to AFD, or even treat it as a soft delete/expired PROD, I don't think that's unreasonable either. I also don't think a soft redir to Wiktionary serves any useful purpose here, and just impedes normal searching. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect Gastrosexual to wiktionary, delete other. Wiktionary contains useful information about the subject. I am not sure how this would impede normal searching. The history is useless since the text was not incoporated anywhere, and thus carries no attribution issues in deletion. Ca talk to me! 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore Gastrosexuality without prejudice to AfD. The discussion cited was just one person saying "do you mind?" and the other saying "I don't mind", that's not consensus for deletion. Gastrosexual should target Gastrosexuality if it is kept or wiktionary if it isn't. Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population 0

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Does not appear at the target. Only mention I could find is on Wiktionary at wikt:frozen star. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment would this be a plausible synonym for Population Zero? --Lenticel (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm quite skeptical one that stuff since it does make some sense but barely anyone really does it. Okmrman (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "0" and "Zero" could be searched either way. Unless someone actually sees the logo of them they are unlikely to know which uses which term and even still they may assume we always use numbers or letters. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Appears to be a speculative term for a future star population, but couldn't find any published research on it. "Population 0" was mentioned once as a synonym for Population III stars, but this could stem from a misreading of this paper calling them "Zero-population stars". Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate there is also Aftermath: Population Zero so maybe Population Zero should be a DAB. I used to use "Population Zero" to get to Aftermath: Population Zero and suddenly found a different article there. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak disambiguate per Crouch's findings (and also maybe this is gallows humor but the first thing I thought of was Extinction or especially Human extinction, so that should be added as well). Duckmather (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes Extinction and Human extinction should be included on the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate - There are enough potential targets that a DAB would be worthwhile. I don't find this an implausible search string either. Fieari (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Population Zero. The disambiguation arguments should really be at a RM for that article. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to
    Talkback) 14:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_June_4&oldid=1229714950"