Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nate Speed/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Nate Speed

Nate Speed (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 January 2015
Suspected sockpuppets

I have been adding sourced information to a number of entertainment company articles. I ran into an IP editor 68.98.224.182 who then began disruptively reversing the work done with out that I request page protection for which was then 6 articles on November 6, 2014 for which the user was blocked after continuing disruptive editing. The IP editor returned after the block to continue warring on November 13, 2014 to which I filed at 3RR. I noted that Nathaniel43284 then began to take up where the IP editor left off complete to which administrator PhilKnight considered him a sock puppet of the IP and apparently of Nate Speed. PhilKnight also block Nate Spidgewood as a sock puppet of Nate Speed. Fayenatic London finds that editor Nathan3068alt has by December 2014 stashed his preferred version of the articles in his sandbox that I had fought with 68.98.224.182 over plus more entertainment company articles (now 15 articles) that I had edited. To which he responded that I "destroy" these articles and added the version urls of the versions he liked. Most of the articles' version linked were last edited by Nate Speed or Nate Spidgewood.

68.98.224.182/Nate took advantage of another sock puppeter, who reported me for "edit warring" over another disruptive editor which I respond to with a counter 3RR report which got me block. To which 68.98.224.182 jump into action on January 7, 2015 to restore the various articles:

68.98.224.182, reports an IP editor who opposed his edit war to 3RR with supposed comment that this is my sockpuppet as I am still under block thus unable to defend myself (rejected slopply reported -User being reported: 68.98.224.182; amongst other errors). Other step in by not tracking down all his OWN reversions. 68.98.224.182 manages to get himself block the next day 00:21, 8 January 2015 along with a few of pages in question. Nathan3068alt picks up editing the same set of article on 8 January 2015

  • 19:28, 9 January 2015 (diff | hist) . . (-3,845)‎ . . United Artists ‎ (Undid revision 641751932 by 109.153.177.64 (talk))
  • 22:45, 8 January 2015 (diff | hist) . . (-15,383)‎ . . MGM Holdings ‎ (Undid revision 641638960 by 109.157.116.188 (talk))
  • 22:07, 8 January 2015 (diff | hist) . . (-15,383)‎ . . MGM Holdings (plus additional edit,)

After my block ends, I start reversing his removals to which he stars an edit war (in which he add additional other recent edits to retaliate) reported at RPP rejected for SPI while he again reports me at 3RR again slopply and attempting to paint it as if I am sock puppeting and again goes after another IP editor at 3RR as my sock.

As you can see the IP editor, 68.98.224.182, have acted in a coordinated manner and has connections to Nathan3068alt, Nate Spidgewood, Nathaniel43284 and Nate Speed. Spshu (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • I've blocked the only remaining account, Nathan3068alt, as the behavioral evidence seems quite conclusive. I don't think a check is needed right now, as the behavior is readily apparent and I didn't see anything else on the article history pages that raised concerns. Mike V • Talk 03:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Like Nate, the user has tendencies to edit war, edit film articles, including DreamWorks Classics. The IPs above have resorted to edit warring via persistent/disruptive reverts accompanied by all-caps, vulgar, and profane edit summaries, a number of which have already been revision deleted. The following page histories yield the relevant diffs: DreamWorks Classics (page history), Talk:DreamWorks Classics (page history), and User talk:Sro23 (page history). Since the privacy policy discourages linking accounts with IP addresses, consideration for a range block, monitoring, or other administrative action, such as preventive measures, are invited. JustBerry (talk) 02:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I've extended the semi-protection on DreamWorks Classics to 3 months. Unfortunately I don't see how any sort of a rangeblock could be effective against such a massive list, and it's still too premature to attempt an abuse filter. Closing. The talk pages can be semi'd for brief spurts whenever the vandalism ramps up. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

26 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Username, plus they have been sending me threatening emails. I will forward them to anyone who asks. Sro23 (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added Nate Is Pissed Off. Please be sure to disable email as well for these socks when you block them. Sro23 (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - Please block the sock. Thanks, GABgab 01:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocked, not tagging as per
    WP:DENY, closing. GABgab 02:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]


26 February 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Some ducks on a Saturday night... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 03:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Randomtable001 for making same edit requests on Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer as other socks. Trivialist (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I just received an abusive email from Nate Spidgewood is PISSED, so don't forget to disable email as well. Trivialist (talk) 03:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could somebody please reblock Randomtable001 w/o talk page or email enabled, per past abuse? Sro23 (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Please yank email. Thanks, GABgab 17:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Closing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK: Long semi-protected edit requests, semi-profane threats when reverted. Trivialist (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

WP:OP. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

10 March 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK: Same edit requests on Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, same abusive manner ("GRRRRRR!!!! This IS the good version! I SAID I'm TRYING to PROVE it by ADDING MORE SOURCES! HEAR ME?!! YOU LEAVE it the way it's SUPPOSED to be RIGHT NOW, or ELSE!!! >:") Trivialist (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note blocked for a week. Could be someone who's just trying to stir up trouble, but the effect is the same. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

I have no on-wiki evidence, but this user sent me the same threatening email socks of Nate Speed have sent me before Sro23 (talk) 23:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Created Dawg-Town, a miswriting of the name Dawgtown that seems intentional given that the name is written correctly within the article, right after the latter was create-protected and its creator, User:FW365668, was flagged as a sockpuppet of Nate Speed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Dawgtown. Also, compare this user's name to ASFREJ57U5YKJI, blocked as a sockpuppet of the same master a few days ago. Largoplazo (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked but not tagged. I could be wrong, but it looks like we're not tagging these socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

The same edit-warring, incivility and threats on Vestron Video, DreamWorks Classics, etc. [1] [2] CU requested for potential sleepers or any possible rangeblocks Sro23 (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I upgraded THJNTYUHJNED's 48 hour block to indefinite. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 April 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; fixation on film distributors and their libraries; edit wars; incivility, emoticons, and bowdlerized profanity in edit summary: (STOP removing all the friggin' filmography and distribution info, you damn idiot! >:() THAT'S *NOT* WHAT YOU THINK, YOU F*CKING IDIOT!!! >:() Trivialist (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note I blocked a number of IP addresses before I realized some of them were candidates for range blocks – in fact, I had already range blocked one of them earlier this month. Besides blocking 104.244.231.34 and 128.234.130.243 briefly, I range blocked 188.126.71.0/24 and 103.14.116.0/22 for one month since they've been spewing nothing but disruption. I also semi-protected all the articles that the IP socks have been edit warring on. @Trivialist, Sro23, and NewEnglandYankee: if I missed something (or it spreads), you can contact me on my talk page if you want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note I long-term blocked 82.212.78.0/24 and 185.44.195.0/2 as open proxies (SumRando is a commerical VPN/anon-webbrowsing provider and it's not the first of their netblocks to be blocked as such). DMacks (talk) 03:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


02 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ebyabe&action=history Admits to being Nate Speed/Spidgewood. Also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMGM_Home_Entertainment&action=history ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 22:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Some of the throwaway IP addresses were blocked briefly, and the targeted pages were semi-protected. The IP addresses seem to have gone stale, so we're probably done here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

New sock adding the same stuff to Warner Bros. [3] Sro23 (talk) 23:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Account now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK; fixation on film & TV production/distribution companies, abusive edit summaries with distinctive use of all-caps Trivialist (talk) 21:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I blocked all the IPs and semi-protected pretty much every article he edited. @Trivialist: I'm going to close this, but please ping me if there's any further disruption to clean up. I'll get to it as soon as I get back from a night out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

25 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK: Fixation on TV/film production and distribution companies, uncivil editing ((GRR! WB OWNS the Hanna-Barbera ASSETS now, do you hear me?!) Trivialist (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]


This IP editor responded to the 106.222.80.0 talk page defending the edits as if they were IP 191.70 editor's edits with the usual uncivil messages. Spshu (talk) 23:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has already been block (31 hours) by Administrator Oshwah, most likely for its language/attack on the 106.222.80.0 talk page. Spshu (talk) 23:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, that's exactly why he's blocked :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • IP now inactive, closing. GABgab 05:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. Fixation on film production companies (currently Paramount Pictures), ARGUMENTATIVE edit summaries with DISTINCTIVE CAPITALIZATION. Trivialist (talk) 22:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Added IPs, sorted. Trivialist (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

They're all blocked for a week. Also, it looks like he's been using open proxies at 103.239.175.0/24, so I blocked that for a month. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. Note comments at User talk:NinjaRobotPirate concerning this edit. General Ization Talk 21:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The IPs are now all blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; editing categories related to production companies, abusive all-caps edit summaries with many exclamation marks and D:< emoticons. Trivialist (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Though their block has expired, and the area of editing seems different, there are large similarities between the RAGE EDITING style of this IP (among others, only pulling up one) with the personal attacks and reverting. Also, when I pointed out[4] the similarities between this IP and the "angry https one", they admitted it here[5]

Not sure if I did this right, feel free to put this in the proper place, but it's best if things like this don't slip through the cracks. Gatemansgc (talk) 02:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Both the 109 IPs are blocked for a week, and the targeted articles semi-protected for a month. The 129.208 IP is definitely him, but it's stale. I'll block it if it becomes active again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK: Fixation on production companies, signature threats in edit summaries when reverted. ((PUNCHES YOU IN THE FACE), *STOP* REMOVING MY EDIT REQUEST, YOU DOUCHEBAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D:< Trivialist (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


02 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

On

WP:DRN, NS4545678 wants the same production deals list that Nate Speed IP socks have been trying to add to be re-added to Paramount Pictures, which is semi-protected (because of Nate Speed). Sro23 (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Looks ducky. GABgab 22:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Blocked and tagged. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

1.52.193.17 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) making Wall Street Journal "fix" edit requests again. See here for more information. Pinging @NeilN and NinjaRobotPirate: Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  IP blocked for 31 hours. Mz7 (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Creating WSJ link fix edit requests again. Details here

talk) 23:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Pinging blocking admin
talk) 23:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Editing the WSJ links again, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 23:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Before filing this I went to AIV... and then twigged the edit summaries looked familiar so did this request anyway Widr has blocked for block evasion, Anyway I've marked this as closed, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

30 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

IP is making WSJ "fix" edit requests in the same style as the sockmaster. Pinging @

talk) 23:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Yeah, that's him. Blocked. We're probably going to be doing this all night, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


31 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

More WSJ "fix" edit requests, as can be seen here.

talk) 00:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked. GABgab 00:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


31 July 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

diff Reverting back a WSJ "fix" edit request. Dynamic IP.

talk) 01:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

All set now. IPs have been blocked by
talk) 01:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
There are probably more IPs, but the page that he kept disrupting has been semi-protected temporarily. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

While not exactly WSJ "fix" edit requests, these IPs exhibit a similar WSJ "fix" behavior, as shown in

talk) 03:38, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The edits to Qubo (a kids TV channel) and the user summary by 27.6.112.128 ("It's a DEAD LINK! Leave it alone!") are pretty strong evidence. Trivialist (talk) 10:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Yeah, he's resuming the same edit wars as previous socks. All IP addresses blocked for a month. He doesn't seem to reuse IP addresses often, but it does happen sometimes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


24 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Duck
-y—fixation on entertainment companies and subsidiaries, but mostly the distinctive edit summaries:

Also unconvincingly denying that they're Nate Speed. Trivialist (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

74.91.2.0/24 hard blocked for a year. It's apparently part of a VPN called SumRando. I should have looked into that further last time I range blocked it. Sorry for being lazy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Making same edits as IPs listed in earlier 24 August 2017 report. Trivialist (talk) 21:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Proxy blocked. GABgab 22:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Plus 200.121.203.117 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). GABgab 23:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


24 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; making same edits to same articles. Maybe we should leave this open for a while, since this is the third report today. Trivialist (talk) 23:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

26 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Making same edits to same several articles (Universal Music Group, Turner Broadcasting System, MGM Television, Seven Arts Pictures, New Line Cinema). Trivialist (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

It's obviously him. Blocked. It looks like the articles where he's edit warring are already protected. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if there are others that need to be protected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

26 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Same pages as above, plus distinctive attack on my talk Legacypac (talk) 03:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

For what it's worth, that's Nate Speed (talk · contribs). A clerk could merge this to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nate Speed if desired. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Clerk note:  Done. GABgab 14:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 August 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. These have already been blocked; noting here for completeness and if any admins want to do any range blocks. Trivialist (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Most have been blocked; as of right now 192.64.26.76 hasn't been blocked. Trivialist (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • He's using proxies in Oklahoma, Egypt, India, and Latvia, so we've done all we can do. GABgab 01:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Continued evasion of prior blocks. The IPs listed all have had the same reverts over just a few hours, with characteristic abusive language in edit summaries (see, for example, [11] (never mind, edit summaries have been deleted by a helpful administrator!)). See also this message one of the IPs left on my talk page, similar to previous such notes. Note that the user jumped to new IPs as soon as prior IPs were blocked. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the time it to write this up, several of the IPs were blocked by helpful admins. Leaving this request up so a history of the continuing abuse exists. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 23:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; hitting same cluster of pages (including New Line Cinema, Seven Arts Pictures, Tribune Entertainment) with same edits. Trivialist (talk) 23:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • IPs blocked; target articles protected (with the help of my partner in crime, User:Drmies).--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, right, that's loudmouth's name. Ha, I was tangling with another one. What are the odds that two screamers, this one and Modern Fire, show up at the same time? Drmies (talk) 23:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Administrator note Both proxies now hardblocked for 6 months. GABgab 23:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; children's television–related targets, distinctive and abusive talk page comments. 46.98.132.183 is already blocked; including for completeness. Trivialist (talk) 00:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Added IP 154.68.4.225 to the list. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just looked at the contribs of 46.98.132.183, as that is the only one which is not already blocked. Irrespective of the possible socking, those edit summaries alone would justify a block for extreme incivility. I'd suggest a good long block too, so long as there is no great likelihood that it might hurt an innocent party. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • What a pain. I hard blocked the unblocked ones for 1 year. He'll run out proxies eventually. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


04 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Seems to be a

WP:DUCK
, when considering the totality of the following:

I was skeptical whether it was Nate Speed at first but the totality of the evidence above has convinced me otherwise. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 07:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 青い(Aoi) (talk) 07:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Making changes to previous pages Nate has been involved with as well as this comment "It's NOT "unsourced trIvia"! Do you NOT SEE the LOGOS at the beginnigng of the movies?!!" makes me believe that 197.52.139.100 is another IP of his.
(talk) 22:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

To make life a bit more difficult for him, I reblocked all these proxies for 2 years. GABgab 15:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 October 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Focused on production deal on Paramount Pictures by returning false production deals (may have distribution agreement for film series) with reverts becoming verbally abusive
  • Diff of known Nate IP 94.98.103.172
  • I was send email that was verbally abusive over me "destroying" production deal list by NATE HATES thus IDing as Nate. Text of email in "Extended content".
Extended content
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. 
HOW *DARE* YOU GODFORSAKEN *DESTROY* THE FRIGGIN' *PRODUCTION DEALS* SECTION ON THE PARAMOUNT PICTURES PAGE, YOU STUPID, ILLITERATE COMMUNIST FAGGOT WITH NO SENSE OF SPELLING, GRAMMAR, READING AND WRITING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU DON'T EVEN *READ* SOURCES THE *RIGHT FUCKING WAY*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *NO* PRODUCTION DEALS SECTION *DESERVES* ANY OF YOUR BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *CHANGE THAT STUPID LIST BACK TO THE WAY I WANTED RIGHT FUCKING NOW* OR I'LL KICK YOU IN THE STUPID BALLS AND *SEND YOU TO GRAMMAR SKILL*, YOU *DUMB FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* D:<

As you can see they have been block or ban, thus I am listing them for completeness and for possible additional extension of blocks if responding admin decides. Spshu (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Reblocked, closing. GABgab 23:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Warner Home Video; shortly after, 82.202.236.245 began editing the same section that 95.213.203.185 had been editing. Trivialist (talk) 03:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Trivialist (talk) 03:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Nate has return to continue where he left off. No other user uses this editing pattern than Nate. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  •  Clerk declined - CheckUser evidence cannot be used publicly connect a registered account to an IP address. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  IP blocked and articles semi-protected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Readding deleted info previously added by other socks. Trivialist (talk) 00:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

04 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Making same edits to

Sony Wonder once semi-protection expired. [18] [19] Trivialist (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Nearly exact changes as previous Nate Speed socks. See [20] vs [21]; and [22] vs [23]. Requesting an admin to temporarily block IPs and protect the targeted pages. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 青い(Aoi) (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

Usual random IP making the usual edits to the regular targets. See this edit from the IP listed above vs this edit from a previously blocked sock, and this edit from the IP listed above vs this edit from a previously blocked sock. Requesting block of the IP and temporary protection for the targeted pages. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 December 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

One more

WP:DUCK here. See, e.g., this diff with his characteristic comments. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Extended the proxy's block. GABgab 01:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 March 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

User keep adding unsourced content, as well of threats. Can anyone check and revdel these threats. This IP has been blocked but I want to left it for checking. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:E50E:6858:5C66:442A (talk) 21:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • There's nothing left to do. Sro23 (talk) 21:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

31 March 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

He threatened with an angry (childish) response to

talk) 08:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC), edited on 10:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Can confirm, it was Nate. I've been helping TV Tropes in reporting his sockpuppetry there, and he's taken exception to my assisting their administration with doing so. GethN7 (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

31 March 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

talk) 22:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC), edited on 22:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I second HarvettFox96's recommendation for page protection, Nate is a persistent individual who will not stop and sadly believes his lashing out in spite will somehow make things go his way. GethN7 (talk) 22:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked as a proxy. I also semi-protected both talk pages for a week. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


talk) 11:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


talk) 05:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 June 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Went to disturb GethN7's talk page[24], recurring behavior. Pudeo (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

That was indeed Nate, he sent me that in response to my informing him I filed a report with law enforcement over his admitting to sending me malware a short time ago. GethN7 (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Both IP addresses already blocked, and the talk page was semi-protected. Looks like we're done here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Usual creations, see (possibly deleted) sandboxes. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 09:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Not meaning to delay the archiving, but had any of those sleepers started editing yet? Just curious. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 14:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, no edits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


05 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Quacking at his usual target film studio articles. Requesting a CU to check for sleepers. Aoi (青い) (talk) 09:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Based on the usernames he's been using lately, and the topics he's writing about, I'm calling these ducks. Trivialist (talk) 10:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

See sandbox. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC) —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Ditto. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC) —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 September 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

Again. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC) —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 10:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 November 2018

Suspected sockpuppets


Usual fixations, yelling in edit summary. Trivialist (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

08 December 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK; usual targets (in this case,

Lionsgate Home Entertainment, Artisan Entertainment, Vestron Video) and behavior (quick reverts to any changes, erupting in slightly censored profane threats after a few reverts). Trivialist (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Trivialist (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • IP's blocked, pages liberally semi-protected. Case closed. Courcelles (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

A couple of this user's edit summary appears to be similar to socks of Nate Speed's socks. -INeedSupport- :3 02:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This case is  Stale. With the account already blocked, there's nothing more to be done here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19 April 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me abusive emails, just like other socks of his who sent abusive emails to other editors.

WP:DUCK. Make sure to pull his email access when blocking. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. UPDATE - The account was blocked by User:K6ka, please close the report. --IanDBeacon (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the account is blocked but email wasn't disabled. Can someone disable email just to be sure? Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, never mind, taken care of below. Thanks! Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Email abuse? Thanks for letting me know. All blocked and tidied up. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22 May 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

User shows behavior that met the critera of

WP:NLT a lot. INeedSupport :3 13:30, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The target article seems to be:

INeedSupport :3 13:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: This user is now blocked for

WP:NLT. INeedSupport :3 14:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • For the record, this is certainly not Nate Speed. GABgab 14:58, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me abusive emails again.

Quack, quack... IanDBeacon (talk) 04:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 June 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Just like the last one I reported here and the one before that, sent me abusive and attack emails. Passes the duck test easily. IanDBeacon (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23: Yeah sure.--IanDBeacon (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@IanDBeacon: Could you forward one of the e-mail to me? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Done --IanDBeacon (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This case is  Stale. Q3WSURSYT is  Confirmed to
    WP:Emergency. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

02 July 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK: Hitting frequent target Cambridge Animation Systems as soon as page protection expired, all caps semi-censored edit summary with lots of exclamation marks, etc. Trivialist (talk) 23:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07 July 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent more vulgar emails. I have reported this to

WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 02:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

 It looks like a duck to me Adam9007 (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The IP is now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


02 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

 It looks like a duck to me Adam9007 (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

 It looks like a duck to me Adam9007 (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent more abusive emails - reported to

Quack! IanDBeacon (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
FYI, the sock was blocked by another admin, still a good idea to check for sleepers though. --IanDBeacon (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I did a sleeper check as well and blocked with no tags. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:35, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

03 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Same as the one I reported before. Reported to

QUACK!. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sock blocked by User:Oshwah. Please still run a sleeper check in case there are any. Looks like his socks were out in full force yesterday and today. --IanDBeacon (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Closing. Sro23 (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I looked and saw enough for a NOTHERE block, but having no data, nothing more. Oshwah may be able to do more, or Bbb23, who's looked at this person before. Drmies (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. Trademark reversion with angry edit summaries with ALL CAPS, c*nsored profanity, and angry emoticons. Trivialist (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Affected articles protected. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 02:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

27 August 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Clearly the same person, see other blocked accounts Kb03 (talk) 02:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC) Edit Drmies got him, this can be closed[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk assistance requested: This should be merged to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nate Speed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done. Bonus points to Drmies for the amusing block reason. GABgab 02:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

A few IPs have been editing

duck test. Most have been blocked but I just wanted to add it to the case file. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

21 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar username to Jesse Coffey (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), a user that was blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Nate Speed [25]. This diff by the editor I'm reporting as a suspected sockpuppet that mentions that they have multiple accounts and specifically mention Nate Speed [26]. Jesse Coffey has made 2 unblock requests, which were both declined. [27], [28]. One of Nate Speed's targeted areas is television networks and based off their contribution history, this editor has made more than 50 edits to articles that are television network/stations. (Clovermoss (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  •  
    Help resolve disputes! 02:06, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

I think this may be him because look at this edit summary made by an IP he used - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allied_Filmmakers&oldid=915790057; And this one made by the account I am reporting - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allied_Filmmakers&oldid=918096450

This one definitely is a duck, and quacks loudly through a megaphone too. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

@ST47: Yes, definitely check for sleepers. I have it requested already --IanDBeacon (talk) 01:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not necessary to run a check. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


27 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me an abusive email, reporting to

WP:EMERGENCY
. Quack!
Please check for sleepers this time though. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Account is now blocked. Please still check for sleepers as he just created another sock that was blocked by ST47. --IanDBeacon (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • There's no need to file an SPI for every troll account they make, I've already blocked this one with TPA and email revoked. And I won't claim to speak for the checkusers, but a sleeper check is probably not very helpful when the accounts are being created moments before they are used - probably why Bbb23 declined above. ST47 (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
* Good point ST47. Please close this case. --IanDBeacon (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closed ST47 (talk) 01:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


27 September 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent another abusive email, quack! IanDBeacon (talk) 02:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

14 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me a vulgar email. Check for sleepers. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Account being report was blocked by User:Edgar181. Please still check if needed and close. --IanDBeacon (talk) 22:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

30 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

See edits on Untied Artists talk page. Quack. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked without tags — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12 December 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Just look at the edits on CBS Theatrical Films and compare that to the edits made by a few of Nate’s IPs. This user name also quacks like a duck too. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Red X Unrelated. @IanDBeacon: As you well know, diffs are required when you file a report at SPI. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

25 December 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me a very vulgar email, reporting to

WP:EMERGENCY
. Quack!!!! IanDBeacon (talk) 02:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, quacking in a megaphone. Edit summaries were: "*THIS PAGE IS STAYING THIS WAY, NOW LEAVE IT THE HELL ALONE, YOU MOTHERF**KERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* >:(". IP blocked 31 hours for disruptive editing, but we may need a longer block with the correct reason. JavaHurricane 12:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note IP was blocked by another admin and I got rid of the edit summaries. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:43, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • rapid IP hopping so leaving blocks as is should work. Reporting IP socks to AIV (as LTA page says) may be easier and quicker, especially as the SPI contents page seems to be broken. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 14:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

02 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This is for reference only, as user was blocked for 72 hours. Also, we might need a longer block for this one too, like the previous sock IP. JavaHurricane 13:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

11 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Quacking too loudly. Please nuke the edit summary as it is, as usual, full of profanity JavaHurricane 08:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  IP blocked I've deleted the edit summary as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for cleaning up. Looks like we're done here – for now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Quack. Usual type of edits, but no bad edit summaries so far. JavaHurricane 17:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Se

sm M e to have been reported on AIV, and has been blocked for sockpuppetry. -- JavaHurricane 17:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)ems[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 February 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This sock has already been reported on AIV by IanDBeacon, but you might want to nuke the edit summaries... JavaHurricane 02:43, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP has all the usual hallmarks of Nate, with rude edit summaries[29][30] and personal attacks once he was blocked[31][32].

(Honk!) 01:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

21 July 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

A range block may be valid, but some edits from the IPv6 range appear to be constructive in a minor way (although edit summaries are sparse). Repeated removal of valid info at The Way of the Dog. Edit warring and abusive edit summaries at Template:Region 1 home video (pinging Sro23). All edits from these IPs appear to be the same person, quite likely including edits by the blocked user TheImmortalKitten (see long history of warnings and eventual block at User Talk:TheImmortalKitten). – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • (Non-administrator comment) No comment on the IPv6 edits, but the IPv4 are all classic Nate (all caps edit summaries, stupid insults, laughable death threats) and were all previously blocked as such. However, I don't think TheImmortalKitten is related to Nate Speed. Nate's never had an interest in politics or current events to my knowledge (beyond calling people "nazis" and "communists"). TheImmortalKitten did use some vulgar edit summaries but they're not the characteristic Nate Speed-vulgar. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The IPv6 is /64 rangeblocked and the IPv4 addresses haven't edited in more than a week. If they start editing again, please do file another report. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent me an abusive email. Do a sleeper check here too please.

WP:EMERGENCY if needed. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Adding User:AWSRGVETYRET. --IanDBeacon (talk) 20:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

*@Mdaniels5757: I have already for both users in this report. --IanDBeacon (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both users have since been blocked, along with a sleeper account, so please close this case accordingly. --IanDBeacon (talk) 23:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

19 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

This IP address appears to have the same obsession with corrections to the corporate history of United Artists as previous IP addresses and sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked for a week. But there will probably be a few more IPs before he gives up for the day. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

If this is not Nate Speed, it may be a copy-cat. But if it quacks, it might belong to genus Anas. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked, salted, closing. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets


WP:DUCK: Same targets, all caps edit summaries with death threats. Trivialist (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked IP. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Sent a intimidating email. I have sent an email over to checkuser mailing list as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked the sock. Sro23 (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • IanDBeacon If you would like, there's a way to prevent brand new users from emailing you. In preferences under email options, simply uncheck the "Allow emails from brand-new users" box. Sro23 (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

See edits to TokihikoH11's and TPercival's talkpages.

WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I'm guessing this is most likely the other user (who also got blocked on that wiki) who was reverting Nate Speed socks. Closing with no action. Sro23 (talk) 23:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs, which have edit summaries in all caps + attack comment.

WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 06:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

16 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. All caps summaries.

WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 22:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@
talk) 23:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

A set of users apparently located all across the northern hemisphere (central USA, Norway, Israel, Palestine) collaboratively using abusive, full caps semi-censored threats of violence/death, with exclamation mark abuse and role-played punches.

WP:DUCK
- if it's not the genuine article, then it's a very convincing impostor. [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] Rhythdybiau (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • IP's are long stale.. Closing case. Sro23 (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

See edits to

WP:DUCK IanDBeacon (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Update - User was blocked by User:Longhair. Still do a sleeper check in case he comes back. --IanDBeacon (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They've clearly got sleeper accounts as they're using sandbox edits to pass the 10 edit threshold, and bypassing semi-protection once those edits are performed. -- Longhair\talk 02:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


01 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I want to report just for the record, as I'm almost positive that this user is Nate Speed. Requesting Checkuser for any sleepers. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 20:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • For a variety of reasons, I am very certain that this is not Nate. no Closing without action. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nate_Speed/Archive&oldid=1142566771"