Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Assessment

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject Hong Kong

Main page (talk)

Project participants (talk)

Manual of style

Naming conventions (talk)

Templates (talk)

Departments

Assessment (talk)

  

talk
)

  

talk
)

  

talk
)

Review (talk)

Article

Article alerts (talk)

Article requests (talk)

High quality articles (talk)

New articles (talk)

talk
)

Useful tools

Categories and lists (talk)

Hong Kong Portal (talk)

Workgroup

talk
)

Cinema (talk)

Football  inactive

Transport  inactive

Shortcut

Welcome to the Assessments Page of the WikiProject Hong Kong. This department assesses the quality of Wikipedia's Hong Kong articles. The article ratings are also used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{

WPHK}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Hong Kong articles by quality and Category:Hong Kong articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist (Index · Statistics · Log
).

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the WikiProject Hong Kong community is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{

WPHK
}} project banner on its talk page: 

{{WPHK
|class= FA/A/GA/B/C/Start/Stub/FL/List/Cat/Dab/Image/Portal/Redirect/Template
|importance= Top/High/Mid/Low
|attention= yes/no
}}

Quality scale

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hong Kong articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] MTR

Jackie Chan

Flag of Hong Kong
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging
    lead
    that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
    • (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
    • (b) statements are
      four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations
      .
    • (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for
      content-forking guideline
      , does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
    • (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting,
      colour
      ; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked.
    • (b) Media files. It has
      are labeled accordingly
      .
    • (c) Accessibility. It
      alternative (alt) text
      .
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing
    edit wars
    and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of tallest buildings in Hong Kong
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. None
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the
      list incorporation
      .
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
      the layout style guideline
      ;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
    audio
    :
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are
      relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
      .
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Cathay Pacific

Lam Tin

Stanley Internment Camp
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is
    suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web
    }} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an
    A-Class article
    , although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an
    technical terms should be explained or avoided
    where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Hong Kong dollar
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Kowloon
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Chow Yun-Fat
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Jade Solid Gold
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of football clubs in Hong Kong

Importance scale

Top importance articles provide an over encompassing view on Hong Kong.
Low importance articles are those that generally meeting
local notability guidelines
. Any notable articles not described in the table below is considered low importance. A low importance article is not the same as a bad or unnecessary article. But in some cases there is more value to merging it under the umbrella of a larger article, as this will enhance both topics.
Importance is not necessarily related to the popularity of an article and it should not make these articles less of a priority.
Group Top High Mid Low
General References which provide an overview for Hong Kong (e.g. Hong Kong, Outline of Hong Kong) Essential references that covers Hong Kong generally (e.g.
Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
) 		Knowledge of specialized topics that branch off an essential reference. All other notable references related to Hong Kong.
Geography Exceptional topics related to the Hong Kong geography. (e.g. Geography of Hong Kong, Demographics of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Shenzhen) Overview of a sub-area of a main geography topic. Essential locations with high significant value to Hong Kong. Major area surrounding the boundary of Hong Kong. (e.g. Geology of Hong Kong, Yau Tsim Mong District, Tai Mo Shan, South China Sea) Summary on a specialized geography area. (e.g. List of birds of Hong Kong, List of mountains, peaks and hills in Hong Kong) Any other articles on geography.
Politics Overview of government and politics in Hong Kong. (e.g. Government of Hong Kong, Politics of Hong Kong) Significant government policies, constitutional laws, overview of government structure and functions. (e.g. Hong Kong Basic Law, Right of abode in Hong Kong) Specialized political topics such as individual politicians, government project, other policies, and political organization. (e.g. Donald Tsang, Principal Officials Accountability System, Liberal Party (Hong Kong)) Any other political topics.
History Overview of the history focusing Hong Kong. (e.g. History of Hong Kong) Major historical events, highly preserved structures and protected monuments, and summary of different time periods. (e.g.
History of Colonial Hong Kong (1800s–1930s)
) 		Notable historical topics that are partially related to Hong Kong. Selectively preserved structures or areas. Past local events that achieved local recognition, but not internationally. (e.g. East India Company, List of Grade II historic buildings in Hong Kong, Site of Special Scientific Interest (Hong Kong), Military history of Hong Kong) Other notable historical topics and events.
Culture Cultural topics with a grand overall representation of Hong Kong. (e.g. Culture of Hong Kong, Religion in Hong Kong) Overview of specialized groups in the culture. (e.g. Christianity in Hong Kong, Sport in Hong Kong) Any notable person related Hong Kong who passes the
WP:N guidelines. Summary of a specialized topic from a cultural group. (e.g. Jackie Chan, Football in Hong Kong
) 		All other articles related to culture of Hong Kong.
Economy Overview of major areas related to Economy in Hong Kong. (e.g.
Hong Kong Dollar
) 		International corporations headquartered in Hong Kong. Summary of specialized economy related topics. Stock exchange and index. Companies with superior influence in Hong Kong. (e.g. HSBC, Tourism in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Hang Seng Index, MTR) Internationally recognized tourist attractions. Globally recognized commercial buildings and structures. Any other international economic topics related to Hong Kong. (e.g. Ocean Park Hong Kong, Disneyland Resort, International Finance Centre, Banknotes of the Hong Kong dollar) All other economy related articles.
Education Education in Hong Kong Overview of specialized area related to education. (Higher education in Hong Kong) Accredited higher learning institutions. Regional examination. (e.g. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination) All other educational topics.
Infrastructure Overview of major infrastructures in Hong Kong. (e.g.
Transportation in Hong Kong
) 		Summary of specialized infrastructure topics. Structures that are classified as megaproject. (e.g. Rail transport in Hong Kong, Hong Kong International Airport) Major railways, harbour crossings, suspension bridges, routes. (
East Rail Line, Cross-Harbour Tunnel, Tsing Ma Bridge, Route 1 (Hong Kong)
) 		All other notable infrastructures.
Other None Exceptional topics, to be discussed at
WT:HK
. 		Notable phenomenons in Hong Kong and specialized topics. (e.g.
Bus Uncle
) 		Everything else not listed, but notable enough to have its own article.


Requests for assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to add it at the bottom of the list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please list for

Peer Review
instead.

or articles listed for Peer Review will be considered for A-class assessment. Two uninvolved reviewers will need to review the article and agree on its promotion.

New requests

  1. 2018 Hong Kong bus accident - rated C-class, Low-importance Hkbusfan (talk) 09:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. John Rawling Todd - currently stub-class, though article is no longer a stub --Leonstojka (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Office for Safeguarding National Security of the CPG in the HKSAR - Recently made by someone else. Ominae (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  2. Committee for Safeguarding National Security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region - Recently made. Ominae (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  3. Priscilla Chan (singer) - Made significant changes recently. --Will629 (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Completed assessments

Completed assessments are listed below. Older assessments can be found in the archive.


Statistics

By workgroup

Hong Kong football articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
GA 2 2 4
B 1 3 1 5
C 1 10 15 26
Start 1 1 108 217 19 346
Stub 1 169 670 114 954
List 3 20 23
Category 243 243
File 9 9
Project 7 7
Redirect 6 6
Template 77 77
Assessed 2 3 295 925 342 133 1,700
Unassessed 2 2
Total 2 3 295 925 342 135 1,702
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 7,581 Ω = 5.68
Hong Kong road transport articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA Total
GA 1 1
B 2 2
C 3 10 13
Start 2 3 6 23 34
Stub 1 6 39 161 207
List 1 1 2
Future 1 2 3
Category 62 62
Project 7 7
Redirect 4 11 15
Template 9 9
Assessed 4 11 50 201 89 355
Unassessed 1 1
Total 4 11 50 202 89 356
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,472 Ω = 5.73
Hong Kong Cinema articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 2
FL 1 1
GA 3 2 5
B 1 2 4 1 8
C 1 6 39 46
Start 29 832 13 874
Stub 9 769 10 788
List 1 13 47 2 63
Category 39 39
File 1 4 5
Project 2 2
Redirect 2 9 11
Template 11 11
Assessed 1 5 64 1,695 65 25 1,855
Total 1 5 64 1,695 65 25 1,855
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 9,316 Ω = 5.41
Hong Kong Transport articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1
GA 2 1 3
B 6 3 5 14
C 1 2 5 16 24
Start 2 15 108 1 126
Stub 1 11 207 5 224
List 1 3 4
File 1 1
Project 6 6
Redirect 14 13 27
Template 38 38
Assessed 1 12 37 354 58 6 468
Unassessed 1 1
Total 1 12 37 355 58 6 469
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 2,118 Ω = 5.42

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.


April 27, 2024

Assessed

April 26, 2024

Reassessed

Assessed

April 25, 2024

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

April 24, 2024

Assessed

April 23, 2024

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

April 22, 2024

Assessed

April 21, 2024

Assessed

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hong_Kong/Assessment&oldid=1008030285"