Bremen-Verden campaign
Bremen-Verden Campaign | |
---|---|
Part of the Duchies of Bremen and Verden | |
Result | Allied victory |
(from end October)
5,600 Swedes in Stade
800 Swedes in Carlsburg[1]
4,000 Münster troops[2]
2,800–3,100 Brandenburg troops[3]
2,500 Danes[4]
3,000 Lüneburg troops
1676
12,000 men[5]
The Bremen-Verden Campaign (
Bremen-Verden, a remote outpost of Sweden's Baltic Sea empire, was the third Swedish imperial fief in
Background
After France had invaded the
Encouraged by the Brandenburg victory, on 17 July 1675 the imperial ban was imposed on the Swedish king in his capacity as an imperial prince in Pomerania, Mecklenburg and Bremen-Verden. A Reichsexekution was declared by the Holy Roman Empire against Sweden. The Westphalian and Upper Saxon Circles were charged with the enforcement of the ban against the Swedes. A little later came the declaration of war by Denmark on Sweden.
In this large-scale war, the Allies, Denmark-Norway and Brandenburg, initially intended to conquer the Swedish possessions in northern Germany, then turn use their full might in the theatres of war in
The war planning that took place on the Swedish homeland envisaged military victory being achieved through the deployment of the Swedish fleet which was likely to defeat the Danish-Norwegian fleet in the Baltic Sea, thus relieving Sweden's North German possessions, so it could then, in a further step, land on Zealand, the heart of Denmark. Sweden's chances in the Duchy of Bremen-Verden, therefore, lay principally in the strength of her own fleet, which was to have ensured a military victory by dispatching additional troops from the motherland. However, since the Swedish fleet could not sail due to delays in equipment, Bremen-Verden was not reinforced and had to rely on its in-place forces.
Sweden's forces in the Duchy of Bremen-Verden were numerically weak and distributed across several fortified bases. The bulk of the Swedish army was in
Diplomatic preparations
The Roman Catholic Prince-Bishop of Münster,
That treaty between the four allies was signed primarily because it was in the political interests of the imperial princes involved, rather than in discharge of their obligation to
Autumn 1675 campaign
Invasion of Bremen-Verden by the Münster army
Chronology: Autumn 1675 campaign
Spring 1676 campaign
|
The campaign began on 15 September 1675 in the southwest of the Swedish territory when, according to the reports of the fired across the Weser.
A Brandenburg force of 1,600 infantry and 700 cavalry under Major General Freiherr von Spaen, coming from Westphalian territory, also arrived in Bremen at the end of September.[12] The Danes participated with 2,500 men under the orders of Count Gustavus Adolphus of Baudissin.
The Münster troops under Prince-Bishop von Galen marched from neutral Bremen to the fortress of
After Verden the town of
Buxtehude was well fortified, had plenty of food and munitions and, according to the Theatrum Europaeum, a garrison of nearly 400 men. A siege appeared inevitable. After occupying an important eminence in front of the town that same day, the Allies drew up all their artillery of 14 mortars and 37 cannon into battery positions. Shelling commenced on the morning of 13 October, setting fire to over 60 houses. On 14 October a total of 100
Because the shelling had already resulted in heavy damage, the Buxtehude commandant, Hamelton, was forced to surrender the town having been implored by its citizens and his German mercenaries who had learned of the pronouncement of the
After the fall of Buxtehude several Allied regiments pushed forward towards
Brandenburg and Danish landing operations
In parallel with the advance of Münster, Brandenburg and Danish troops, there were two unsuccessful landing attempts by Danish and Brandenburg forces, that were repulsed by the Swedes with heavy losses. The first
On 28 September, the troops were landed near
In order to relieve Carlsburg Fortress, 13
Roughly at the same time, a Danish
Allied change of command
In October about 3,000 men
In the
In the aftermath of this campaign there was considerable disagreement and distrust, as the Protestant federated princes did not want to give the Roman Catholic Prince-Bishop von Galen too much influence in a Protestant
Attacks on Stade, the Siege of Carlsburg, Swedish raids
On 4 November the Allies advanced on Stade, the HQ of the Swedish regional government of Bremen-Verden. The Stade garrison under Field Marshal Henrik Horn, the Swedish governor general of the Duchy, had 5,624 soldiers and 600 militia at his disposal.[16]
In the face of the threat, Horn had the town thoroughly prepared for defence. To prevent the desertion of German mercenaries in Stade upon arrival of the Allies, the marshal used material incentives and propaganda. Since Sweden had been declared an enemy of the Empire and
Repeated attacks on the fortress of Stade on 6 and 7 November 1675 were unsuccessful, and the Allies could not agree on continuing the siege of the town because of its stubborn resistance and the onset of winter. Finally, on 9 November, the Allies withdrew their troops into winter quarters. The hitherto captured forts remained under Allied occupation, in order to maintain the blockade of Stade. The Brandenburg troops left the theatre of war heading for the
The Swedes took advantage of the lull around their garrisoned fortresses to temporarily wrest back the initiative. They repeatedly carried out raids and sent out
In early January, Colonel Sydau, with about 400
This successful phase for the Swedes came to an end when Carlsburg, which had been besieged since the end of October, capitulated. A lack of ammunition, food and soldiers resulted in the surrender of the fortress on 22 January by its commander, the Frenchman, Colonel Jean Mell, to the united Münster, Danish and Lüneburg siege troops. The Swedish garrison, still about 380 strong (of which 200 were unfit to fight), were given free passage. At the surrender of the fortress 80 cannon fell into the hands of the Allies. In accordance with the treaty a mixed Münster and Lüneburg garrison took over.[18]
Allied disagreements
Because the Prince-Bishopric of Münster and the Duchy of Lüneburg had agreed in advance to exclude Denmark and Brandenburg from the future division of Bremen-Verden, there were serious arguments amongst the Allies, which affected and endangered the continuation of hostilities against Sweden. For example, the Prince-Bishopric of Münster demanded the former
This dispute involving conflicting territorial claims escalated to such an extent that it threatened to come to open war between the Allies. The General States endeavoured to mediate between the parties to this situation, so as not to jeopardize the war against France. They therefore sent ambassadors, initially van der Tocht and, later, Amerongen, to Bremen for the negotiations. The statthalter ("governor") of the Netherlands,
Although the Elector of Brandenburg did not ratify the decision of his envoy, he dropped his objections to the deployment of Lüneburg auxiliaries to Bremen-Verden in the light of the favourable progress being made in the war against Sweden in Swedish Pomerania.[20]
Nevertheless, the Elector secured Denmark's support in a secret agreement in early 1677 that Brandenburg should get "at least one fifth of territory to be divided in Bremen-Verden."[21]
Siege of Stade, 1676
The ongoing dispute over the distribution of Bremen-Verden amongst the allies delayed the onset of the siege of Stade until spring 1676. The Allies agreed the terms on 28 April and 8 May in Bremervörde. This envisaged the attack on the last Swedish possession to be carried out with 16,000 infantry and 4,000 cavalry. The conquered fortress was to be filled equally by troops from Denmark, Brandenburg, Lüneburg-Celle and Munster.
Stade had access to the sea by virtue of its location at the mouth of the Schwinge, a tributary of the Elbe. Part of the Swedish fortifications also included a fieldwork that guarded the mouth of the Schwinge in Stadersand. Under its protection, several Swedish ships were able to reach the town, providing much needed supplies during the course of the siege. So to prevent access to Stade from the sea and thus tighten the stranglehold of the siege, the Allies decided to seize the Schwinge fieldwork. To this end, they called for artillery from Glückstadt and also brought in two 18-gun Lüneburg ships into the mouth of the Schwinge. All Swedish attempts to disrupt the preparations were repulsed. The Allies drew closer and closer to the hill and established a battery that opened a continual fire on the Swedish position. On 23 April the Swedes carried out a new raid with 300 horsemen, but were again driven back after initial success, with a loss of 46 men, according to contemporary sources.[23] On 4 July, the Allies completed their earthworks and shelled the Schwinge position so heavily that its roughly 100-man-unit capitulated.[17]
With the loss of the Schwinge fieldwork, the resupply of Stade from the sea was no longer possible. When three Swedish warships, held up by unfavourable winds, and six other transport ships loaded with supplies, reached the mouth of the Schwinge, they were shelled by Allied batteries stationed on the banks of the Schwinge estuary. The Swedish fleet had to withdraw from Stade and, after a few raids into the area around the Elbe, they left.
Cut off from all resupply, the situation in the fortress of Stade deteriorated considerably. An outbreak of shigellosis reduced the strength of the garrison to around 3,000 soldiers. With the deterioration in the material situation, moral amongst the besieged fell. Twice there were mutinies amongst the Swedish soldiers which could only be put down with the use of repressive measures. The desertion of German mercenaries now grew to such an extent that active defence with patrols and raids was no longer possible.[24]
In June, the earthworks on the Allied side were so far advanced that they reached the town moats. However, the town was not shelled, because they intended to starve its citizens and not storm it in order to protect their own forces. Countermeasures by the Swedish garrison consisted of flooding the surrounding area by opening the
As the supply situation in the town became ever more critical, the Stade citizens and the garrison's governor general, Horn, were forced to negotiate with their besiegers. The negotiations began on 13/23 July. However, they were delayed at the behest of population who, despite the tougher conditions preferred to be garrisoned by Protestant Lüneburg troops rather than Catholic Munster forces. As a result of the surrender negotiations, the town was to be occupied by nine Lüneburg companies under General Chauvet. The German mercenaries had to terminate their Swedish service. In the early morning of 13 August 1676, Field Marshal Horn, with 10 cannon and 800 Swedish soldiers, pulled out. The 1,400 German mercenaries were either detained (untergesteckt) or released.[25] The last Swedish bastion in Bremen-Verden was now in Allied hands.
Aftermath
Following the conquest of Stade, 3,000 Lüneburg troops under the command of Major General von Ende were sent to Swedish Pomerania to support the local Brandenburg troops.[22] The rest went at the end of September, with some Münster troops, to fight the French at Wetzlar on the River Lahn.
During the occupation of Stade, Prince-Bishop von Galen led a re-Catholicization of the area he controlled, and Catholic services were reintroduced in many places. At the end of the war, Bremen-Verden remained in Allied possession. Denmark left 3,000 men as garrison troops in the Duchy of Bremen.
The plans for the division of Bremen-Verden were dashed when Lüneburg-Celle concluded a
Verden, Langwedel and Rotenburg were cleared of Münster troops on 14 January 1680, Bremervörde followed on 15 January and Ottersberg and Carlsburg on 17 January. The departure of Lüneburg soldiers from Stade was delayed until 10 March 1680.[27]
See also
References
- ^ The Swedish forces comprised so-called "national Swedish", German mercenaries and subordinated prisoners of war
- ^ 10,000 men according to Theatrum Euroaeum. Henning Eichberg gives the numbers as 4,000 on p. 503.
- ^ of which 2,000–2,300 men were under Freiherr von Spaen as part of the Allied Army. The figures vary. E.g. Curt Jany states 2,300, Henning Eichberg gives 2,000 men.
- ^ a b Henning Eichberg, p. 503.
- ^ Figure from Danish sources. According to Swedish sources there were over 20,000, Henning Eichberg, p. 506.
- Gregorian Calendarfor all dates.
- ^ Henning Eichberg, p. 534
- ^ Henning Eichberg, p. 535.
- ^ Ersch/Gruber: Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Section 1, Part52 (G – Gallatin), p. 334.
- ^ Henning Eichberg, p. 488.
- ^ a b Theatrum Europaeum, S. 725.[permanent dead link]
- ^ a b c Curt Jany: Geschichte der Preußischen Armee – vom 15. Jahrhundert bis 1914, Biblio Verlag, Osnabruck, 1967, p. 230.
- ^ a b c d e Theatrum Europaeum, p. 726.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Page 2 (pdf file; 46 kB).
- ^ von Eichart: Geschichte der königlich hannoverschen Armee, p. 397.
- ^ Henning Eichberg, p. 504. Theatrum Europaeum, Vol. 11, gives the number as 3,000.
- ^ a b Theatrum Europaeum, p. 864[permanent dead link] and Henning Eichberg, p. 506.
- ^ a b Ersch/Gruber: Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Section 1, Part 52 (G – Gallatin), p. 335.
- ^ Georg Reimer: Urkunden und Actenstücke zur Geschichte des Kurfürsten Friedrich Wilhelm von Brandenburg, 1866, p. 447.
- ^ Georg Reimer: Urkunden und Actenstücke zur Geschichte des Kurfürsten Friedrich Wilhelm von Brandenburg, 1866, p. 448.
- ^ Theodor von Moerner: Kurbrandenburgs Staatsverträge von 1601 bis 1700, 1867, p. 393.
- ^ a b von Eichart:Geschichte der königlich hannoverschen Armee, p. 398.
- ^ Theatrum Europaeum, p. 865.[permanent dead link]
- ^ Henning Eichberg, p. 504.
- ^ Henning Eichberg , p. 508
- ISBN 3-11-016470-1, p. 277.
- ^ Peter von Kobbe: Geschichte und Landesbeschreibung der Herzogthümer Bremen und Verden, 1824, p. 288.
Literature
- ISBN 3-412-01988-7
- Curt Jany: Geschichte der preußischen Armee- vom 15. Jahrhundert bis 1914. Biblio Verlag, Vol. 1, Osnabruck, 1967, pp. 229–231
- Studienrat Geppert: Die Geschichte des Emslandes im Rahmen der allgemeinen deutschen Geschichte. Osnabrück III. Teil, Seiten 6–21 in: Emslandbuch. Ein Heimatbuch für die Kreise Meppen, Aschendorf, Hümmling. 1928, self-published by the counties of Meppen, Aschendorf, Hümmling.
- Maren Lorenz: Das Rad der Gewalt. Militär und Zivilbevölkerung in Norddeutschland nach dem Dreißigjährigen Krieg (1650–1700). Böhlau: Cologne, 2007.
- Matthias Nistal: Oldenburg und die Reichsexekution gegen Schweden. Oldenburger Jahrbuch 104, 2004, pp. 65–99
- Matthias Nistal: Die Reichsexekution gegen Schweden in Bremen-Verden, in Heinz-Joachim Schulze (ed.) Landschaft und regionale Identität, Stade, 1989
- von Eichart:Geschichte der königlich hannoverschen Armee. First volume, Hanover, 1866, pp. 396–398
- Anon: Theatrum Europaeum. Vol. 11 (1682, appeared 1707), pp. 721–732, 864–865
- Ersch/Gruber: Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Section 1, Part 52 (G – Gallatin), Leipzig, 1851, pp. 334–335