Doctrinal background of Zen

Zen has a rich doctrinal background, despite the traditional Zen narrative which states that it is a "special transmission outside scriptures" which "did not stand upon words."^[1]

Polarities

Classical Chinese Chán is characterised by a set of polarities:^[2] absolute-relative,^[3] Buddha-nature - sunyata,^[4] sudden and gradual enlightenment,^[5] esoteric and exoteric transmission.^[6]

Absolute-relative

The Prajnaparamita-sutras and Madhyamaka emphasized the non-duality of form and emptiness: "form is emptiness, emptiness is form", as the Heart Sutra says.^[3] This was understood to mean that ultimate reality is not a transcendental realm, but equal to the daily world of relative reality. This idea fitted into the Chinese culture, which emphasized the mundane world and society. But this does not tell how the absolute is present in the relative world:

To deny the duality of samsara and nirvana, as the Perfection of Wisdom does, or to demonstrate logically the error of dichotomizing conceptualization, as Nagarjuna does, is not to address the question of the relationship between samsara and nirvana -or, in more philosophical terms, between phenomenal and ultimate reality [...] What, then, is the relationship between these two realms?^[3]

This question is answered in such schemata as

Hakuin's Four ways of knowing.^[8]

The

Three Natures and the Trikaya-doctrine

, also give depictions of the interplay between the absolute and the relative.

Buddha-nature and sunyata

When Buddhism was introduced in China it was understood in terms of its own culture. Various sects struggled to attain an understanding of the Indian texts. The

Sunyata at first was understood as pointing to the Taoist "wu", nothingness.^[9]^[10]

The doctrine of the Buddha-nature asserts that all

Yogacara theory of the Eight Consciousnesses explains how sensory input and the mind create the world we experience, and obscure the alaya-vijnana, which is equated to the Buddha-nature.^[12]

When this potential is realized, and the defilements have been eliminated, the tathagatagarbha manifests as the

Dharmakaya, the absolute reality which pervades everything in the world.^[11] In this way, it is also the primordial reality from which phenomenal reality springs. When this understanding is idealized, it becomes a transcendental reality beneath the world of appearances.^[13]

Sunyata points to the "emptiness" or no-"thing"-ness of all "things". Though we perceive a world of concrete and discrete objects, designated by names, on close analysis the "thingness" dissolves, leaving them "empty" of inherent existence.

Heart sutra, a text from the prajnaparamita-sutras, articulates this in the following saying in which the five skandhas

are said to be "empty":

"Oh, Sariputra, Form Does not Differ From the Void,

And the Void Does Not Differ From Form.
Form is Void and Void is Form;
The Same is True For Feelings,

Perceptions, Volitions and Consciousness".[web 1]

The teachings on the five skandhas belong to the central teachings in the

Samyutta Nikaya

. The five skandhas are also mentioned in the Lankavatara-sutra:

The
Citta dances like a dancer; the Manas resembles a jester; the [Mano-]vijnana together with the five [Vijnanas] creates an objective world which is like a stage.^{[web 2]}^{[note 1]}

The

Yogacara explains this "emptiness" in an analysis of the way we perceive "things". Everything we conceive of is the result of the working of the five skandhas—results of perception, feeling, volition, and discrimination.^{[note 2]} The five skandhas together compose consciousness. The "things" we are conscious of are "mere concepts", not Ding an sich.^[12]

It took

sunyata does not refer to "wu", nothingness,^[9]^[16] nor does Buddhism postulate an undying soul.^[9] The influence of those various doctrinal and textual backgrounds is still discernible in Zen. Zen teachers still refer to Buddha-nature, but the Zen tradition also emphasizes that Buddha-nature is sunyata, the absence of an independent and substantial self.^[9]

Sudden and gradual enlightenment

In Zen Buddhism two main views on the way to enlightenment are discernible, namely sudden and gradual enlightenment.

Early Chán recognized the "transcendence of the body and mind", followed by "non-defilement [of] knowledge and perception", meaning

sudden insight into the true nature followed by gradual purification of intentions.^[17]

In the 8th-century the Ch'an-history was effectively re-fashioned by

Hui-neng into prominence as the sixth Chán-patriarch, and emphasized sudden enlightenment, as opposed to the concurrent Northern School's alleged gradual enlightenment.^[18]

According to the sudden enlightenment propagated by Shenhui insight into true nature is sudden; thereafter there can be no misunderstanding anymore about this true nature.

In the Platform Sutra the dichotomy between sudden and gradual is reconciled.^[19] Guifeng Zongmi, fifth-generation successor to Shenhui, also softened the edge between sudden and gradual. In his analysis, sudden awakening points to seeing into one's true nature, but is to be followed by a gradual cultivation to attain Buddhahood.^[20]

Chinul, a 12th-century Korean Seon master, followed Zongmi, and also emphasized that insight into our true nature is sudden, but is to be followed by practice to ripen the insight and attain full Buddhahood. This is also the standpoint of the contemporary Sanbo Kyodan, according to whom kensho is at the start of the path to full enlightenment.^[21]

This gradual cultivation is also recognized by

Hakuin.^[8]

This gradual cultivation is described by Chan Master Sheng Yen as follows:

Ch'an expressions refer to enlightenment as "seeing your self-nature". But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experience again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch'an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as of the Buddha, you are not yet a full Buddha.^[22]

The emphasis which Shenhui placed on sudden enlightenment, also reflected a growing appreciation of the Diamond Sutra in 8th-century Chinese Buddhism.^[23]^[24] The Lankavatara-sutra, which endorses the Buddha-nature, emphasized purity of mind, which can be attained in gradations. The Diamond-sutra emphasizes sunyata, which "must be realized totally or not at all".^[24]

Once the dichotomy between sudden and gradual was in place, it defined its own logic and rhetorics, which are also recognizable in the distinction between Caodong (Soto) and Lin-ji (Rinzai) chán.

Huayan classification of teachings, the sudden approach was regarded inferior to the Perfect Teaching of Hua-yen. Guifeng Zongmi, fifth patriarch of Hua-yen ànd Chán-master, devised his own classification to counter this subordination.^[20] To establish the superiority of the Chán-teachings, Chinul explained the sudden approach as not pointing to mere emptiness, but to suchness or the dharmadhatu.^[27]

Esoteric and exoteric transmission

According to Borup the emphasis on 'mind to mind transmission' is a form of esoteric transmission, in which "the tradition and the enlightened mind is transmitted face to face".[6] Metaphorically this can be described as the transmission from a flame from one candle to another candle,^[6] or the transmission from one vein to another.^[28] In exoteric transmission requires "direct access to the teaching through a personal discovery of one's self. This type of transmission and identification is symbolized by the discovery of a shining lantern, or a mirror."^[6]

This polarity is recognizable in the emphasis that the Zen-tradition puts on maintaining the correct Dharma transmission, while simultaneously stressing seeing into one's nature. According to Rinzai master Tōrei Enji:

The matter of learning from a teacher is most essential. People of old who arrived at the source of
seeing nature, passed through many barriers clearly and completely without a dot of doubt, and traveled freely through the world opening big mouths in discussion, only came to know the transcendental message of Zen after they finally ran into Zen masters of great vision. Then they sincerely sought certainty and wound up with the duty of the teacher's succession, bearing the debt of Dharma, never to forget it for a moment. This is called dharma succession. Since ancient times the designated succession of the ancestral teachers has always been like this.^[29]^{[note 3]}

Nevertheless, while the Zen tradition has always stressed the importance of formal Dharma transmission, there are well known examples of

Mushi dokugo, such as Nōnin, Jinul and Suzuki Shōsan

who attained awakening on their own, though all of them were familiair with the Zen-teachings.

The Bodhisattva ideal

An important, though easily overlooked aspect of Zen is the bodhisattva ideal.

jukai.^{[web 4]}

Part of this Bodhisattva-ideal are the pāramitās, which are also being mentioned in the Diamond Sutra:

Dāna (generosity, giving of oneself),
Śīla
(virtue, morality, proper conduct),
Kṣānti
(patience, tolerance, forbearance, acceptance, endurance),
Vīrya (energy, diligence, vigour, effort),
Dhyāna
(meditation, tranquility), and
Prajñā (wisdom, insight).^[32]^{[note 4]}

The Bodhisattva-ideal is a central theme in the prajnaparamita-sutras.[34]

Dogen mentions the Bodhisattva-ideal throughout his works.^{[web 5]}^{[web 6]}

Buddhist path to awakening. Hakuin emphasized the need of "post-satori training",^[36]^[37]

purifying the mind of karmic tendencies and

[W]hipping forward the wheel of the Four Universal Vows, pledging yourself to benefit and save all sentient beings while striving every minute of your life to practice the great Dharma giving.[37]

The insight in the need of arousing bodhicitta formed Hakuin's final awakening:

Wasn't a shaven head and monk's robe the Mind of Enlightenment? Wasn't reciting sutras, mantras, and dharanis the Mind of Enlightenment? [...] [At] my forty-first year, [...] I at long last penetrated into the heart of this great matter. Suddenly, unexpectedly, I saw it — it was as clear as if it were right there in the hollow of my hand. What is the Mind of Enlightenment? It is, I realized, a matter of doing good — benefiting others by giving them the gift of the Dharma teaching.^[37]

Buddhas and bodhisattvas such as

Gautama Buddha.^[38]^{[note 5]}

By repeatedly chanting the Avalokiteshvara sutra (観世音菩薩普門品, Kanzeon Bosatsu Fumonbon) (chapter 25 of the Lotus Sutra

emptiness and the Mahayana notion that all things have Buddha-nature

, one understands that there is no difference between the cosmic bodhisattva and oneself. The wisdom and compassion of the Bodhisattva one is chanting to is seen to equal the inner wisdom and compassion of the practitioner. Thus, the duality between subject and object, practitioner and Bodhisattva, chanter and sutra is ended.

Notes

^ The influence of these teachings can be seen in the sayings of Mazu:
Master Liang visited Ma-tsu.
Ma-tsu said: I heard that the master is great at explaining the sutras and sastras, is that so?
Liang said: Indeed
Ma-tsu said: With what do you explain?
Liang said: I explain with the mind
Ma-tsu said: The mind is like an artist and consciousness is [like] his helper, how can you explain the teachings with that?^[15]
^ Translations do differ, which makes a difference. Vijñāna can be translated as "consciousness", but also as "discernment".^[12]
^ The modern framing of Zen as the experience of 'ultimate truth' or reality^{[citation needed]} may influence the institutional shape western Zen is going to take, where individual freedom is highly appraised. See also Bodiford 2008, pp 277-279
^ Wai-tao and Goddard re-arranged their translation of the Diamond Sutra topically, using the six paramitas as a framework^[33]
^ ^[39] mentions: Blofeld, John (1988), Bodhisattva of compassion - the mystical tradition of kuan Yin. Boston: Shanbhala