Dositheos (Samaritan)
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
![]() |
Dositheos (occasionally also known as Nathanael,
Christian and Jewish sources
Dositheos probably lived in the first century CE. Eusebius and the Pseudo-Clementines portray Dositheus as Jewish, while Pseudo-Tertullian and Philastrius describe him as Samaritan. According to Epiphanius, he was an ambitious Jew who later allied himself with the Samaritans.[3] Some modern sources claim he was of Arab origins.[4][5]
According to Pseudo-Tertullian,[6] he was the first to deny the Nevi'im (Prophets), which gave rise to the party of the Sadducees.[citation needed] Jerome gives the same account.[7][need quotation to verify] Hippolytus begins his enumeration of the 32 heresies by mentioning Dositheos; hence the sect is made to appear older than the Sadducees,[8] and on the heresy is based the system of Philaster.[9] He was not mentioned by the two early patristic authors Justin Martyr or Irenaeus.[10]
The Samaritan chronicler
The Samaritan chronicles (the Book of Joshua and Abu al-Fath's Annales) recount a similar discussion between Zerubbabel and Sanballat. Josephus stated that the Samaritans had two advocates, he doubtless meant the two apostles Dositheus and Sabbæus, whose doctrine, including the sanctity of Mount Gerizim, rejection of the prophetical books of the Old Testament and denial of the resurrection, was on the whole identical with that of the Samaritans.[citation needed]
According to
Origen says[23] that the Dositheans were never in a flourishing state and that in his time, they had almost entirely disappeared, scarcely thirty of them being left. The Midrash, however, speaks of Dositheans, with whom Rabbi Meir had dealings,[24] and two names, "Dosion and Dosthion," are also mentioned,[25] which either refer to two Dosithean sectarians or form a double designation for the heretic Dositheus. Yet the fact that the patriarch Eulogius of Alexandria (who probably lived 582–603) disputed successfully against the Samaritan followers of Dostan (Δοσθήν) or Dositheus, and wrote a work expressly against them (Photius, "Bibliotheca," cod. 230), shows that the Dositheans existed and even exercised a certain power in the sixth century. Origen possibly refers to a Christian sect of the Dositheans, who in fact left no traces, while the Samaritan sect certainly continued to exist. In Egypt especially, the sect was probably numerous enough to induce the Christian patriarch of Alexandria to engage in polemics against it.
The Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions and Homilies tells how Dositheos, by spreading a false report of Simon Magus' death, succeeded in installing himself as head of his sect. Simon on coming back thought it better to dissemble, and, pretending friendship for Dositheus, accepted the second place. Soon, however, he began to hint to the thirty that Dositheus was not as well acquainted as he might be with the doctrines of the school.[26]
Dositheus, when he perceived that Simon was depreciating him, fearing lest his reputation among men might be obscured (for he himself was supposed to be the Standing One), moved with rage, when they met as usual at the school, seized a rod, and began to beat Simon; but suddenly the rod seemed to pass through his body, as if it had been smoke. On which Dositheus, being astonished, says to him, 'Tell me if thou art the Standing One, that I may adore thee.' And when Simon answered that he was, then Dositheus, perceiving that he himself was not the Standing One, fell down and worshipped him, and gave up his own place as chief to Simon, ordering all the rank of thirty men to obey him; himself taking the inferior place which Simon formerly occupied. Not long after this he died.[27]
Arabic sources
In Egypt the Arabic writers may have become acquainted with the Dositheans, though some may have survived also in Syria and Palestine, as is evident from the rabbinical sources.
Under the
The Samaritan Continuatio to the Chronicle of Abu'l-Fath sheds more light on Samaritans' relations with Dositheans during the Abbasid period. In the 840s rebellion of Abu Harb, Asasbi, Samaritan community leader (referred to as "King of Israel" in the Continuatio), banned Dositheans during a ceremony on Mount Gerizim, where the Samaritans pledged not to drink or marry Dositheans. During Caliph al-Mutawakkil's reign (847-861), Samaritans restricted Dositheans from praying with them due to Torah reading controversy. When the prominent Samaritan Yosef Iban Adhasi died, the Dositheans caused disturbance, possibly even expressing joy at the news. The Samaritan rais then decided that no one would give or take anything from them, and nobody would eat or drink with them either.[32]
See also
References
- ^ William Benjamin Smith, "The Meaning of the Epithet Nazorean", Monist XV:27, 1904.
- Jean Danielou, p. 95-96, 1958, Mentor edition 1962
- ^ Epiphanius, Panarion, Section I, Sect XIII, 11,3
- ISBN 978-3-8496-4047-7.
- ISBN 978-0-8356-3013-9.
- ^ "Adversus Omnes Hæreses," i.
- ^ "Contra Luciferianos," xxiii.
- ^ Compare Clement of Rome, "Recognitiones," i. 54.
- ^ "De Hæresibus," §§ 4, 5.
- ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. .
- ^ Abu al-Fath," Annales," ed. Eduard Vilmar, 1865, p. 82.
- ^ Tan., Wayesheb, 2; Pirḳe R. El. xxxviii.
- ^ Compare Epiphanius, "Hæres." 11, 12, 13 [14].
- Migne, Patrologia Graeca, xcii. 441.
- ^ Grätz, "Gesch." 4th ed., iii. 45.
- Ecclesiastical History, iv. 22, § 5.
- ^ Clement of Rome, l.c. ii. 8; several passages in Origen; Epiphanius, l.c.
- ^ ἑστώς = "stans".
- ^ See "Contra Celsum," i. 57, vi. 11; in Matth. Comm. ser. xxxiii.; "Homil." xxv. in Lucam; "De Principiis," iv. 17.
- ^ "In Joann." xiii. 27.
- ^ "Hæres." 13.
- ^ Harnack, "Gesch. der Altchristlichen Litteratur bis Eusebius," i. 152, Leipsic, 1893.
- ^ "Contra Celsum," vi. 11.
- Midrash Mishlei 13:25, Yalkut Shimoni§ 950.
- Avot of Rabbi Natan, ed. Schechter, p. 37; compare "Shibbole ha-Leḳeṭ," ed. Buber, p. 266.
- ^ Clementine Homilies, ii. 23.
- ^ Clementine Recognitions, ii. 11.
- ^ ed. Cureton, i 170; Haarbrücker's transl., i. 258.
- ^ l.c.; compare p. 151, and "Chronique Samaritaine," ed. Neubauer, p. 21, Paris, 1873, "Dosthis".
- A. Geiger, "Urschrift und Uebersetzungen der Bibel," p. 149; see Judah Hadassi, "Eshkol ha-Kofer," § 97.
- ^ S. Lowy, The Principles of Samaritan Bible Exegesis (1977), pp. 260-1.
- ISBN 965-217-202-2.
Jewish Encyclopedia Bibliography
- D. Oppenheim, in Berliner's Magazin, i. 68;
- Goldberg, in Ha-Maggid, xii. 62;
- S. Krauss. Lehnwörter, ii. 192;
- Lagarde, Mittheilungen, iv. 135;
- John William Nutt. Fragments of a Samaritan Targum, pp. 47–52, London, 1874;
- A. Hilgenfeld. Ketzergesh des. Urchristenthums, p. 160. Leipzig, 1884;
- E. Renan, Les Origines du Christianisme, 2d ed., v. 452;
- Herzfeld, Gesch. des Volkes Israel, ii. 606;
- the Arabic sources in Silvester de Sacy, Chrestomathie Arabe, i. 333;
- Payne Smith, Thesarus Syriacus, col. 845;
- Hamburger, R. B. T. ii. 1069;
- S. Krauss, in Rev. Etudes Juives, xlii. 27–42;
- Büchler. ib. 220–231, who does not refer the Midrash passages to Dositheus.
- Compare also Hauck's Real-Encyc. pp. 157, 159-160
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Dositheus". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.