Edward C. Tolman
Edward Chace Tolman | |
---|---|
Edwin Bissell Holt | |
Doctoral students | Murray Jarvik |
Edward Chace Tolman (April 14, 1886 – November 19, 1959) was an American psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.[1][2] Through Tolman's theories and works, he founded what is now a branch of psychology known as purposive behaviorism. Tolman also promoted the concept known as latent learning first coined by Blodgett (1929).[3] A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Tolman as the 45th most cited psychologist of the 20th century.[4]
Tolman was one of the leading figures in protecting academic freedom during the
Early life
Born in
In 1912, Tolman went to Giessen in Germany to study for his PhD examination. While there he was introduced to and later returned to study
Career
Tolman is best known for his studies of learning in rats using mazes, and he published many experimental articles, of which his paper with Ritchie and Kalish in 1946 was probably the most influential. His major theoretical contributions came in his 1932 book, Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men, and in a series of papers in the Psychological Review, "The determinants of behavior at a choice point" (1938), "Cognitive maps in rats and men" (1948), and "Principles of performance" (1955).[11][12][13][14][15][16]
Purposive behaviorism
Some of Tolman's early researches were early developments of what is now called
Although Tolman was firmly behaviorist in his methodology, he was not a radical behaviorist like B. F. Skinner. In his studies of learning in rats, Tolman sought to demonstrate that animals could learn facts about the world that they could subsequently use in a flexible manner, rather than simply learning automatic responses that were triggered off by environmental stimuli. In the language of the time, Tolman was an "S-S" (stimulus-stimulus), non-reinforcement theorist: he drew on Gestalt psychology to argue that animals could learn the connections between stimuli and did not need any explicit biologically significant event to make learning occur. This is known as latent learning. The rival theory, the much more mechanistic "S-R" (stimulus-response) reinforcement-driven view, was taken up by Clark L. Hull.
A key paper by Tolman, Ritchie, and Kalish in 1946 demonstrated that rats learned the layout of a maze, which they explored freely without reinforcement. After some trials, a food item was placed to a certain point of the maze, and the rats learned to navigate to that point very quickly.
Furthermore, psychologists began to renew the study of animal cognition in the last quarter of the 20th century. This renewed interested in animal research was prompted by experiments in cognitive psychology.
Other psychological work
Aside from the contributions Tolman made to learning theory such as purposive behaviorism and latent learning, he also wrote an article on his view of ways of learning and wrote some works involving psychology, sociology, and anthropology.[21] Tolman was very concerned that psychology should be applied to try to solve human problems, and in addition to his technical publications, he wrote a book called Drives Toward War. Moreover, in one of his papers, "A theoretical Analysis of the Relations between Psychology and Sociology", Tolman takes independent, dependent, and intervening variables under the context of psychology and sociology. Then he puts them together and show the interrelations between the two subjects in terms of variables and research.[22] In another publication, "Physiology, Psychology, and Sociology", Tolman takes the three subjects and explains how all three depend or interrelate with each other and must be looked at as a whole. Tolman creates a hypothetical situation and shows the conditions and interrelations between the three subjects in the situation.[23]
Tolman developed a two-level theory of instinct in response to the debate, at the time, of the relevance of instinct to psychology. Instinct was broken down into two parts: determining or driving adjustments and subordinate acts. Adjustments are motivations or purposes behind subordinate acts, while the subordinate acts fulfill that purpose. Adjustments are the response to a stimulus and can be arranged in a hierarchy with the lowest adjustment producing subordinate acts. Subordinate acts are randomized independent actions, excluding reflexes, that are part of larger groups of activity. While considered infinitely numerous, the amount found in a grouping is limited with identifiable boundaries. The cycle begins with a stimulus that produces a determining adjustment or a hierarchy of adjustments. The lowest adjustment then cues subordinate acts that persist until the purpose of the adjustment is fulfilled.[24]
Humans are unique in that we can think out our actions ahead of time. Tolman called this thoughts-of-acts or thinking-of-acts. This prevents us from acting completely random until something finally works. Thinking-of-acts triggers an inhibitory process that prevents the determining adjustment from cuing subordinate acts. Following the thinking, a prepotent stimulus turns those thoughts into acts. There are two ways a stimulus would be considered prepotent: (a) the original adjustment is favorable to the act produced by the foresee stimulus, or (b) the stimulus creates an alternative adjustment more favorable than the original.[24]
An example of this theory in action could be being trapped in a burning building. Without thinking, the lowest determining adjustment would be to escape, producing various acts where you may run around randomly trying to stumble upon an escape route. Or, you could stop and think, inhibiting that first process. You remember that the door in the corner leads to a hallway, to a stairwell, to a set of doors to the street. This would be an example of thinking-of-acts. The street would be the prepotent stimulus because it produces a favorable act to the original stimulus. Alternately, you could think that it might be dangerous to use the stairwell as smoke tends to pool in them and instead run to a window to call for help. This would be another version of a prepotent stimulus because it produces an alternative adjustment that is more favorable than the original. This might be because you learned that it may be safer to stay near a window and call for help than to go further into the burning building, creating a self-preservation adjustment.[24]
In 1948 Tolman wrote an article regarding the life of Kurt Lewin after Lewin's death in 1947. It contained some of Lewin's background, his contributions, and honest criticisms of his research. Overall Tolman wrote about him in a very positive light. Tolman regarded him along with Sigmund Freud as psychologists who would be well recognized in the future.[25]
Northwestern and Berkeley
Edward Tolman started his academic career in Northwestern University, where he was an instructor from 1915 to 1918.[1] Most of Tolman career, however, was spent at the University of California, Berkeley (from 1918 to 1954), where he was a professor of psychology.[1]
He was one of the senior professors whom the
In 1963, at the insistence of the then President of the University of California, Clark Kerr, the Berkeley campus' newly constructed Education and Psychology building was named "Tolman Hall" in honor of the late professor.[6] Tolman's portrait hung in the entrance hall of the building. Tolman Hall was demolished in 2019 due to seismic unsafety.[27]
Awards & honors
Tolman received many awards and honors. He was president of the
Personal life
Tolman was married to Kathleen Drew Tolman. They had three children, Deborah, Mary, and Edward James. Noted singer-songwriter, music producer Russ Tolman, is Tolman's grandson.
As mentioned previously, Tolman's father wished for his son to eventually take over the manufacturing company. Tolman was more interested in pursuing psychology than pursuing his father's career. Fortunately his family was very supportive of this decision.[32]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f "Edward C. Tolman" (PDF). National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
- ^ Bergman, Barry (2014-11-13). "Of rats and men: Tolman, behavior and academic freedom". Berkeley News. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
- PMID 18870876.
- S2CID 145668721.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8018-9585-2.
- ^ a b c d "Tolman, Edward (1886–195)" (PDF). University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
- ^ a b Douglass, John; Thomas, Sally. "Timeline: Summary of events of the Loyalty Oath Controversy 1949-54". www.lib.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 2019-03-18.
- ISBN 978-1-108-21060-7.
- ^ a b c d e History of Psychology 4ed, Hothersall. pp 487-489.
- ^ Lora Vander Zwaag, "Edward C. Tolman: 1886-1959" Psychology History. Muskingum University, December, 1998. 10 November 2014.
- PMID 1431737.
- PMID 13254969.
- PMID 13149127.
- PMID 15398592.
- PMID 15391108.
- PMID 18128182.
- PMID 1567088.
- ^ a b c History of Psychology 4ed, Hothersall. p. 494
- PMID 10495017.
- ^ a b History of Psychology 4ed, Hothersall. p. 493
- PMID 18128182.
- PMID 14937965.
- doi:10.1037/h0060722.
- ^ doi:10.1037/h0067277.
- doi:10.1037/h0058521.
- doi:10.1037/h0061920.
- ^ "Tolman Hall demolition". Retrieved 2019-03-18.
- ^ "Edward C. Tolman". www.nasonline.org. Retrieved 2023-03-14.
- ^ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 2023-03-14.
- ^ History of Psychology 4ed, Hothersall. p. 495
- ^ "Book of Members, 1780-2010: Chapter T" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 10 April 2011.
- ^ Ritchie, Benbow F. (1964). Edward Chace Tolman. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. pp. 294–295.
Further reading
- Skinner, BF (1950). "Are theories of learning necessary?". Psychological Review. 57 (4): 193–216. PMID 15440996.
- Tolman, EC (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.
- Tolman, EC (1938). "The determinants of behavior at a choice point". Psychological Review. 45: 1–41. doi:10.1037/h0062733.
- Tolman, EC (1942). Drives towards war. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Tolman, EC (1948). "Cognitive maps in rats and men". Psychological Review. 55 (4): 189–208. PMID 18870876.
- Tolman, EC (1951). Behavior and psychological man: essays in motivation and learning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
External links
- Works by or about Edward C. Tolman at Internet Archive
- Account of Tolman's "Sign Learning" theory from the Theory Into Practice database, compiled by Greg Kearsley
- History of Tolman Hall
- Guide to Papers Relating to Edward C. Tolman and the Loyalty Oath Controversy at The Bancroft Library
- Edward C. Tolman at Find a Grave